They weren't :/ My sister has been watching them for a while, and they've gotten worse every year.
But Disney movies? Nah. Nothing wrong there.
Advertisement

by Tano » Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:04 pm
Govindia: Do you consider me a friend, or just an acquaintance or what?
hobbes: I don't particularly consider anyone a true 'friend'
hobbes: at least,not on NS
Govindia: why is that?
hobbes: because
hobbes: everyone here is a jackass
hobbes: myself included
Pixie: *heart sploosh*
Tano: if your heart is splooshing you should contact a doctor
Tano: hearts are supposed to thump not sploosh
Pixie: No this is normal
Pixie: intense emotion causes me to hemorrage internally
Pixie: my life is like a really depressing comedic episode of The X-Files
Khron: we need an achievment of rem's face just for Tano
Pixie: haha
Pixie: "be Tano"
Brunhilde: My quotes should be in more signatures.

by Mushet » Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:05 pm

by Diopolis » Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:07 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Like, do they rot your teeth or give you lung cancer? No, I don't think so.
In all seriousness, I can see what people are saying about them and Nickelodeon promoting the sexualisation of young girls. But I have to say: Is it only them? Look at our society in general. It's everywhere. Clothing brands, various television channels - it's everywhere. Don't want your little girl to be exposed to it? Keep her away from it. Homeschool her, don't own a TV, and sew your own clothes.
You can either get out there and make a difference - protest, write letters, preach, whatever - or just deal with it, and let your daughter wear clothes more appropriate for someone that has already hit puberty and start wanting a boyfriend at six years old. Don't sit around and bitch about it while your kids listen to Miley Cyrus and go out on a date in fifth grade.

by The Sector Union » Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:10 pm

by Ifreann » Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:12 pm
The Sector Union wrote:Tano wrote:They weren't :/ My sister has been watching them for a while, and they've gotten worse every year.
But Disney movies? Nah. Nothing wrong there.
Although iCarly is Nickelodean, I remember this one episode where a gay couple owned this pet photo shoot shop and Carly and her friends decided to vandalize the store to get revenge because the couple closed down their photoshoot.
Basically promoted vandalism and glamorized it to the child audience.

by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:14 pm
Ifreann wrote:The Sector Union wrote:Although iCarly is Nickelodean, I remember this one episode where a gay couple owned this pet photo shoot shop and Carly and her friends decided to vandalize the store to get revenge because the couple closed down their photoshoot.
Basically promoted vandalism and glamorized it to the child audience.
And I'm sure this was the entire episode. Definitely no later part where they learned the error of their ways or anything like that.

by The Sector Union » Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:14 pm
Ifreann wrote:The Sector Union wrote:Although iCarly is Nickelodean, I remember this one episode where a gay couple owned this pet photo shoot shop and Carly and her friends decided to vandalize the store to get revenge because the couple closed down their photoshoot.
Basically promoted vandalism and glamorized it to the child audience.
And I'm sure this was the entire episode. Definitely no later part where they learned the error of their ways or anything like that.

by Ifreann » Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:16 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ifreann wrote:And I'm sure this was the entire episode. Definitely no later part where they learned the error of their ways or anything like that.
I'm not sure.
We're pony fans.
You're telling me that even our show, with generally good writers, hasn't completely dropped the ball incredibly hard on some of the moral implications?
I'm betting that at least one show on nickelodean (Fuck, a LOT of shows and movies) glamorize vandalism and criminal activity as long as the victim is an asshole and the nominal "villain"

by SaorAlba » Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:23 pm


by United Kingdom of Poland » Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:59 pm
The Sector Union wrote:Yes they are.
The Disney Cult is re-establishing films with stories that weren't really meant for kids in the first place. Many of the movies contain these subliminal messages about sex.
I know Walt Disney was a social conservative but his legacy has been hijacked by some fat corporate slob. and don't get me started on the garbage Disney Channel puts, those are worst than the movies.

by Matta » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:05 pm
The Sector Union wrote:Ifreann wrote:And I'm sure this was the entire episode. Definitely no later part where they learned the error of their ways or anything like that.
At least Spongebob has characters doing bad things and suffer the consequences later. The only cartoon years ahead we should be proud of.

by Matta » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:07 pm
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:The Sector Union wrote:Yes they are.
The Disney Cult is re-establishing films with stories that weren't really meant for kids in the first place. Many of the movies contain these subliminal messages about sex.
I know Walt Disney was a social conservative but his legacy has been hijacked by some fat corporate slob. and don't get me started on the garbage Disney Channel puts, those are worst than the movies.
you honestly believe that conspiricy garbage, there are no messages sexual or otherwise. all it is is that you heard it from someone else then noticed it in the movie

by United Kingdom of Poland » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:20 pm
Matta wrote:United Kingdom of Poland wrote:you honestly believe that conspiricy garbage, there are no messages sexual or otherwise. all it is is that you heard it from someone else then noticed it in the movie
*You, *Conspiracy *all *. People will actually listen to that when you use proper grammar.
Also how can the be no sexual messages if you hear its in the movie and then notice it therefore you just stated it is there.

by The Marxist State » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:45 pm
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Alladin isn't telling kids to take their garments,
The Rich Port wrote:Again, that happened when he was being a dick.
Belle didn't have any of that shit. She locked herself in a room.

by Pine Mountain » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:59 pm

by Marcurix » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:08 pm

by Charellia » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:18 pm
Pine Mountain wrote:Wow. Talk about jealous dysgenic tyranny.
I never realized how some of the Disney films venerate excellent genes (beauty; the shapeliness which Charellia calls 'dangerously underweight'; women who take advantage of their shapely child-bearing bodies by marrying at prime reproductive age, and who desire a handsome and otherwise excellent mate more than anything) until now, when the jealous tyrannical media-censoring dysgenicist Charellia pointed it out, and was also angry enough to make libellous accusations of racism and sexism.
...The coming accusation of 'stupid' by tyrannical dysgenicists who habitually call enlightening information which they desire to suppress 'stupid' is almost hilariously predictable.

by Charellia » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:19 pm
Marcurix wrote:I wouldn't say so, usually they do have good messages, in the end at least. Though the older ones tend to reflect a different time, they aren't inherently bad for children.
All the apparent undertones are more likely to go way over any kids head and stick to the parents, as they tend to do.

by Orcoa » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:55 pm

by Marcurix » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:55 pm
Charellia wrote:Marcurix wrote:I wouldn't say so, usually they do have good messages, in the end at least. Though the older ones tend to reflect a different time, they aren't inherently bad for children.
All the apparent undertones are more likely to go way over any kids head and stick to the parents, as they tend to do.
Just because a kid doesn't understand the undertones doesn't mean they don't effect them.

by Temujinn » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:58 pm
Charellia wrote:I am not 100% sure this belongs in General rather than Arts and Fiction but as the intent here is to focus the discussion on the influence of the films on society rather than the films themselves I'm putting it here.
I was watching a bunch of Disney movies with my sister yesterday and I do not think they are a good influence on children, especially girls. The movies are full of racist and sexist messages.
The classic Disney princesses are all dangerously underweight. Many are passive and helpless and even those who do have some control over their own lives are still ultimately reliant on the prince to save them. Most marry in their teens.
On top of this there is a pattern in the appearances of the characters. Protagonists of both genders are beautiful, supporting characters are strange looking and villains are ugly or monstrous. This clearly sends the wrong message about appearance. Villains are always darker in colour than the heroes as well. Even on the rare occasion heroes are not white they are always lighter skinned than the villains.One exception I noted was Beauty and the Beast which had only the problem of the underweight princess.I also am overlooking the 21st century films as they do not have the same influence as the older ones in popular culture.
I would not take issue with any of this if these were movies for adults, but as Disney movies are not only aimed at young children but are usually the first movies children see it is important to be aware of the lessons they are teaching.
What does everybody else think? Are Disney movies a bad influence on children? Do the characters make good role models?
EDIT: I would like to retract my claim about Beauty and the Beast not being harmful in light of some well reasoned responses. I still think it is better than most but clearly there are problems I missed.
Do you know someone who might be a White Protestant of English ancestry, report them to your block Sargeant CM, and he will drag them before the New House Committee on Un-American Activities. Report your neighbors.Conserative Morality wrote:Is accusing someone of being a WASP likely to damage their reputation?.... I openly admit that I use it disparagingly. Something about the mentality of the group referred to being rather contrary to American values.

by Meryuma » Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:05 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Twerking is basically when a girl shakes her ass. Up and down. Usually to a beat. Making the ass, you know, shake. And jiggle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twerking
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

by Orcoa » Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:05 pm

by Orcoa » Wed Jun 19, 2013 9:06 pm
Meryuma wrote:Eh, it depends. Aladdin definitely has some racism going on. Atlantis? Not so much. The Lion King? Eh, the jury's out.
They kinda ruined Pinocchio though.Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Twerking is basically when a girl shakes her ass. Up and down. Usually to a beat. Making the ass, you know, shake. And jiggle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twerking
Pretty sure it doesn't have to be a girl.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Balaresia, Bear Stearns, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Emotional Support Crocodile, Eternal Algerstonia, Galloism, Heavenly Assault, Hidrandia, Hurtful Thoughts, Libertarian Right, Phage, Shrillland, Sorcery, Sules Kin, USS Monitor, Valyxias, Vassenor
Advertisement