NATION

PASSWORD

Are Disney Movies Bad for Children?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:22 pm

Khadgar wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Dude. Gay couple in the Bible. I have to find the image though.

I don't remember their names. One of them at least was a prince.

David and Jonathan IIRC.

EDIT: FOUND IT: Image.
Last edited by Individuality-ness on Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Unicario
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7474
Founded: Nov 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unicario » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm

I think Mulan was a pretty good message. (Mulan II doesn't count, since it was never in theatres.)
Last edited by Unicario on Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dai Ginkaigan Teikoku
Head of State: Ranko XIX Tentai
Ruling party is the Zenminjintō (Socialist Coalition)
Ginkaigan is currently at peace.

User avatar
Nailed to the Perch
Minister
 
Posts: 2137
Founded: Dec 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm

Tsuntion wrote:
Haktiva wrote:The best part of Disney movies are the villain songs. You could call that the biggest problem right there. I remember back when I watched the Lion King religiously when I was little, as much as I loved the super-happy schpiel from Timon and Pumba, I remember feeling much more excited when Scar sang Be Prepared. I can imagine a lot of kids who payed more attention to the villain songs will end up doing a lot of damage to those who modeled the Disney Princesses or the other happy BS.


Oh yes, the villain songs are often glorious.


LIKE FIIIIIRE!
HELLFIIIIIRE!
THIS FIRE IN MY SKIN!

(That movie is so completely bizarre and kind of terrible, since it can never make up its mind whether it's going to be the sort of movie in which a song like that fits or the sort of movie in which there are goofy dancing gargoyles, but that song is a friggin' masterpiece.)
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

User avatar
North America Inc
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7614
Founded: Mar 07, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby North America Inc » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm

Just to ask how should the Disney Corporation portray woman then. Should they be more plump?

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126498
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Charellia wrote:You may be right but the movie still has less harmful subtext than the others. Belle is by far the most intelligent and independent of the princesses, she succeeds in humanizing her captor and it is the Disney movie where beauty and goodness are the least closely related.

The fact that she earns a happy ending by loving him so much that she humanizes him is the problem.

And there's still the overt "beauty = goodness" trope in the movie. Belle means "beautiful" in French for God's sake.


no one names their kid "stupid ugly fuck"
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Unicario
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7474
Founded: Nov 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unicario » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm

North America Inc wrote:Just to ask how should the Disney Corporation portray woman then. Should they be more plump?


Good question.
Dai Ginkaigan Teikoku
Head of State: Ranko XIX Tentai
Ruling party is the Zenminjintō (Socialist Coalition)
Ginkaigan is currently at peace.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159048
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:25 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:The fact that she earns a happy ending by loving him so much that she humanizes him is the problem.

And there's still the overt "beauty = goodness" trope in the movie. Belle means "beautiful" in French for God's sake.


no one names their kid "stupid ugly fuck"

Don't tempt fate.

User avatar
Nailed to the Perch
Minister
 
Posts: 2137
Founded: Dec 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:26 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Neo Art wrote:It should be fairly obvious that disney movies are all profoundly sexist.


Lilo And Stitch, too?

Strong female characters, good family themes, men in supportive but not starring roles (except for a couple of semi-competent villains)....


Lilo and Stitch really is kind of a bizarre and wonderful exception within the Disney canon. Non-white characters with realistic body types doing a story about family in which romantic love is tangential at best? How did this ever happen?
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:26 pm

Haktiva wrote:The best part of Disney movies are the villain songs. You could call that the biggest problem right there. I remember back when I watched the Lion King religiously when I was little, as much as I loved the super-happy schpiel from Timon and Pumba, I remember feeling much more excited when Scar sang Be Prepared. I can imagine a lot of kids who payed more attention to the villain songs will end up doing a lot of damage to those who modeled the Disney Princesses or the other happy BS.

Not saying this is why, but I always liked the villains as a kid. I just love the bad guys - probably because they were always the underdogs as well.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159048
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:27 pm

Nailed to the Perch wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Lilo And Stitch, too?

Strong female characters, good family themes, men in supportive but not starring roles (except for a couple of semi-competent villains)....


Lilo and Stitch really is kind of a bizarre and wonderful exception within the Disney canon. Non-white characters with realistic body types doing a story about family in which romantic love is tangential at best? How did this ever happen?

Bad batch of cocaine.

User avatar
Charellia
Minister
 
Posts: 3172
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charellia » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:27 pm

North America Inc wrote:Just to ask how should the Disney Corporation portray woman then. Should they be more plump?

How about a healthy weight?

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:27 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:The fact that she earns a happy ending by loving him so much that she humanizes him is the problem.

And there's still the overt "beauty = goodness" trope in the movie. Belle means "beautiful" in French for God's sake.


no one names their kid "stupid ugly fuck"

Speak for yourself. "Truand" would be a pretty cool name.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:27 pm

Unicario wrote:I think Mulan was a pretty good message. (Mulan II doesn't count, since it was never in theatres.)

The ending though. She gave up everything and eventually marries her commander.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:28 pm

Nailed to the Perch wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Lilo And Stitch, too?

Strong female characters, good family themes, men in supportive but not starring roles (except for a couple of semi-competent villains)....


Lilo and Stitch really is kind of a bizarre and wonderful exception within the Disney canon. Non-white characters with realistic body types doing a story about family in which romantic love is tangential at best? How did this ever happen?

To be honest, the romance in every single kids' movie does annoy me. i didn't even like it when I was a kid. It just seemed stupid and repetitive to me. Like, "can we get back to the action?"
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Britcan
Senator
 
Posts: 3955
Founded: Jun 27, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Britcan » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:28 pm

Charellia wrote:The classic Disney princesses are all dangerously underweight.

That's because they are cartoon characters drawn in a certain style, of course they don't look realistic.

Many are passive and helpless and even those who do have some control over their own lives are still ultimately reliant on the prince to save them.

Mulan?

Most marry in their teens.

Which, in the time periods the movies are set in, isn't unusual.

On top of this there is a pattern in the appearances of the characters. Protagonists of both genders are beautiful, supporting characters are strange looking and villains are ugly or monstrous. This clearly sends the wrong message about appearance.

Quasimodo was a hero wasn't he?

Villains are always darker in colour than the heroes as well. Even on the rare occasion heroes are not white they are always lighter skinned than the villains.

I assume you are referring to skin tone?
Pocahontas was darker than Governor Ratcliffe, Esmeralda was darker than Frollo, Tarzan was darker than Clayton.

This nation should not be taken to be representative of my real-life views, nor should any of the nonsense I posted on here as a teenager.

User avatar
Unicario
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7474
Founded: Nov 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unicario » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:29 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Unicario wrote:I think Mulan was a pretty good message. (Mulan II doesn't count, since it was never in theatres.)

The ending though. She gave up everything and eventually marries her commander.


Closest thing I've seen to something half-decent, tbh.
Dai Ginkaigan Teikoku
Head of State: Ranko XIX Tentai
Ruling party is the Zenminjintō (Socialist Coalition)
Ginkaigan is currently at peace.

User avatar
Tsuntion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1939
Founded: Nov 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsuntion » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:29 pm

North America Inc wrote:Just to ask how should the Disney Corporation portray woman then. Should they be more plump?


They shouldn't be you-would-die-if-you-were-this-thin.

Realistic thin, sure. For some of them. But Disney should also include variation in body types and weights, which they don't currently do very much of, including plumper female protagonists (whose weights are not something they lose whilst getting their happy endings).
I'm not a roleplayer, but check these out: The United Defenders League and The Versutian Federation.

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!

CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!

User avatar
Unicario
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7474
Founded: Nov 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unicario » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:29 pm

Oh, I know the perfect Disney movie that has minimal lovey-dovey-ness.

EMPEROR'S NEW GROOVE.
Dai Ginkaigan Teikoku
Head of State: Ranko XIX Tentai
Ruling party is the Zenminjintō (Socialist Coalition)
Ginkaigan is currently at peace.

User avatar
North America Inc
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7614
Founded: Mar 07, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby North America Inc » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:30 pm

Charellia wrote:
North America Inc wrote:Just to ask how should the Disney Corporation portray woman then. Should they be more plump?

How about a healthy weight?

But don't Cartoons usually exaggerate people's bodies. For example I remember Jafaar in Aladin had a long head for example?

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:30 pm

Unicario wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:The ending though. She gave up everything and eventually marries her commander.

Closest thing I've seen to something half-decent, tbh.

But in order to gain her happy ending, she had to be more FEMININE. THAT'S THE LESSON.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Uieurnthlaal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6979
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Uieurnthlaal » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:31 pm

I've never been a big fan of disney. But what I've noticed is that while the US seems to be hanging desperately on to these sort of terrible conservative ideals, and continue to press them on out children in every possible way, more progressive nations like Japan don't do that. All you have to do is take a look at a Hayao Miyazaki film (if you haven't, I really recommend you google one and watch it. His films are amazing), and the difference is astonishing. While all these Disney films are about these one-dimensional girls being motivated only by love for the male character, and are often marginalized when it comes to plot, in the Miyazaki films, the main character are often girls, all independent, very three-dimensional, full of the complexity usually left for male characters in Disney stories. In the end, not only does this make a much more egalitarian storyline, it also makes a much more fascinating and enthralling story.
Official Name : Hanruskë Vangareksau Vjörnatlalos

Language : Vjörnissa

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:33 pm

We've got a black princess now, so next we should get a lesbian princess. *nods*
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
Alexander Sothis
Attaché
 
Posts: 81
Founded: Feb 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Alexander Sothis » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:33 pm

As a North Korean Anti-Western Culture Propaganda Film once put it "American Culture is nothing more than Corporate Pedophilia"

User avatar
Electroconvulsive Glee
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 496
Founded: Apr 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Electroconvulsive Glee » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:33 pm

I find it pleasing, but amusing, that the discussion has mostly turned from "there is not racism or sexism in Disney movies" to "here is an (alleged) example of a Disney movie/character that is not racist or sexist."
Some of the greatest satire ever, by my hero, Hammurab
  • Marcus Aurelius, The Meditations, Bk. XIII, No. LXIX: "They can all just fuck off. I'm sick of this shit and I'm going home."
  • Butthole Surfers: "I hate cough syrup, don't you?"
  • Socrates in Plato's Mentītus: "I can explain it to you, Dudious, but how can I understand it for you? Hmm?"

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:33 pm

Unicario wrote:Oh, I know the perfect Disney movie that has minimal lovey-dovey-ness.

EMPEROR'S NEW GROOVE.

This.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Aldygast, Ankoz, El Lazaro, Enormous Gentiles, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, ImperialRussia, Kenowa, Ostroeuropa, Picairn, Primitive Communism, Reloviskistan, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, Techocracy101010, The Black Forrest, The Sherpa Empire, The Two Jerseys, Xmara

Advertisement

Remove ads