David and Jonathan IIRC.
EDIT: FOUND IT: Image.
Advertisement

by Individuality-ness » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:22 pm

by Unicario » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm
Tsuntion wrote:Haktiva wrote:The best part of Disney movies are the villain songs. You could call that the biggest problem right there. I remember back when I watched the Lion King religiously when I was little, as much as I loved the super-happy schpiel from Timon and Pumba, I remember feeling much more excited when Scar sang Be Prepared. I can imagine a lot of kids who payed more attention to the villain songs will end up doing a lot of damage to those who modeled the Disney Princesses or the other happy BS.
Oh yes, the villain songs are often glorious.
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by North America Inc » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm

by Ethel mermania » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm
Individuality-ness wrote:Charellia wrote:You may be right but the movie still has less harmful subtext than the others. Belle is by far the most intelligent and independent of the princesses, she succeeds in humanizing her captor and it is the Disney movie where beauty and goodness are the least closely related.
The fact that she earns a happy ending by loving him so much that she humanizes him is the problem.
And there's still the overt "beauty = goodness" trope in the movie. Belle means "beautiful" in French for God's sake.

by Unicario » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:24 pm
North America Inc wrote:Just to ask how should the Disney Corporation portray woman then. Should they be more plump?

by Ifreann » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:25 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:The fact that she earns a happy ending by loving him so much that she humanizes him is the problem.
And there's still the overt "beauty = goodness" trope in the movie. Belle means "beautiful" in French for God's sake.
no one names their kid "stupid ugly fuck"

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:26 pm
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:26 pm
Haktiva wrote:The best part of Disney movies are the villain songs. You could call that the biggest problem right there. I remember back when I watched the Lion King religiously when I was little, as much as I loved the super-happy schpiel from Timon and Pumba, I remember feeling much more excited when Scar sang Be Prepared. I can imagine a lot of kids who payed more attention to the villain songs will end up doing a lot of damage to those who modeled the Disney Princesses or the other happy BS.

by Ifreann » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:27 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Lilo And Stitch, too?
Strong female characters, good family themes, men in supportive but not starring roles (except for a couple of semi-competent villains)....
Lilo and Stitch really is kind of a bizarre and wonderful exception within the Disney canon. Non-white characters with realistic body types doing a story about family in which romantic love is tangential at best? How did this ever happen?

by Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:27 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:The fact that she earns a happy ending by loving him so much that she humanizes him is the problem.
And there's still the overt "beauty = goodness" trope in the movie. Belle means "beautiful" in French for God's sake.
no one names their kid "stupid ugly fuck"

by Individuality-ness » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:27 pm
Unicario wrote:I think Mulan was a pretty good message. (Mulan II doesn't count, since it was never in theatres.)

by Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:28 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Lilo And Stitch, too?
Strong female characters, good family themes, men in supportive but not starring roles (except for a couple of semi-competent villains)....
Lilo and Stitch really is kind of a bizarre and wonderful exception within the Disney canon. Non-white characters with realistic body types doing a story about family in which romantic love is tangential at best? How did this ever happen?

by Britcan » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:28 pm
Charellia wrote:The classic Disney princesses are all dangerously underweight.
Many are passive and helpless and even those who do have some control over their own lives are still ultimately reliant on the prince to save them.
Most marry in their teens.
On top of this there is a pattern in the appearances of the characters. Protagonists of both genders are beautiful, supporting characters are strange looking and villains are ugly or monstrous. This clearly sends the wrong message about appearance.
Villains are always darker in colour than the heroes as well. Even on the rare occasion heroes are not white they are always lighter skinned than the villains.

by Tsuntion » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:29 pm
North America Inc wrote:Just to ask how should the Disney Corporation portray woman then. Should they be more plump?
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!
CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!

by Unicario » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:29 pm

by North America Inc » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:30 pm

by Individuality-ness » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:30 pm

by Uieurnthlaal » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:31 pm

by Olthar » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:33 pm

by Alexander Sothis » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:33 pm

by Electroconvulsive Glee » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:33 pm

by Geilinor » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:33 pm
Unicario wrote:Oh, I know the perfect Disney movie that has minimal lovey-dovey-ness.
EMPEROR'S NEW GROOVE.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Aldygast, Ankoz, El Lazaro, Enormous Gentiles, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, ImperialRussia, Kenowa, Ostroeuropa, Picairn, Primitive Communism, Reloviskistan, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, Techocracy101010, The Black Forrest, The Sherpa Empire, The Two Jerseys, Xmara
Advertisement