Advertisement

by Benomia » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:11 pm
The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:You've obviously never seen the Benomian M16A3s.
Carathon wrote:*Logs in with the name of Troll Alliance and writes a short app with poor grammar and logic.*Somehow genuinely surprised when denied*
Ragnarum wrote:Ragnarum transforms into a giant godzilla like creature, then walks into the sunset while emotional music plays and Morgan Freeman narrates.
Kouralia wrote:Everyone hates us: we're MMW. We're like the poster children of Realismfggtry.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:11 pm
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Electroconvulsive Glee » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:11 pm
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:Can't we all just enjoy a good cartoon without searching for racial undertones?
Bullyland wrote:^This

by Ifreann » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:12 pm
Soviet Central wrote:Ifreann wrote:We're just talking about it on the internet, we're not storming the seat of government or Disney headquarters.
Which is why your actions are pointless. You wont gonna change anything here on this forum.Ifreann wrote:And for the record, it is totally okay for us to bitch about Disney movies. DWI.
Totally ok and pointless.Ifreann wrote:Is what you're doing important? Bitching at us?
Pointing out pointlessness of other people actions is by no means pointless.
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
the implication was that she was nude, and the issue is sexualizing a minor. i get that 16 year olds are sex objects to other 16 year olds, and that is fine. vanity fair is not targeted at 16 year olds.
I wouldn't have objected if people had said, "Hmm, this photo seems to me to have some sexual overtones. I don't think that was a good choice for a photo of a minor." That's a totally reasonable position. (I don't entirely agree with it - I'll accept that it has sexual overtones within the larger context of a culture, like ours, in which the female body is treated as being inherently sexual, and that Vanity Fair probably should have expected backlash, but I don't actually see anything intrinsically sexual in that photo - but it's reasonable.) What I objected to were the over-the-top accusations that taking a photo of a teenage girl wearing a halter top was disgusting, overtly sexual, abusive, and so on and so forth. I mean, for heaven's sake, I remember people seriously accusing Annie Leibowitz of being a child molester solely because she took a photo of a fully-clothed teenage girl while her parents were in the room watching and okaying everything. That's kinda nuts.

by Charellia » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:12 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Charellia wrote:I would argue that when the beast was abusive she hated him. It was only when he became a better person that she began to fall in love.
As the father-to-be of a daughter, I'd prefer that she watch a movie with the message "If the guy starts ripping apart the furniture and yelling at you over perceived or imagined slights, then get the fuck out of there."

by Nidaria » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:13 pm

by Crystal Spires » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:13 pm

1 2 3 4 5
Tech Level: FanT

by Individuality-ness » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:13 pm

by Khadgar » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:14 pm
Nidaria wrote:All modern movies, and even some older ones, need to be carefully scrutinized before exposed to children. Today's society is corrupt and highly sexualized. I read an article a while ago that movies like Madagascar promote homosexuality.

by Ifreann » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:15 pm
Nidaria wrote:All modern movies, and even some older ones, need to be carefully scrutinized before exposed to children. Today's society is corrupt and highly sexualized. I read an article a while ago that movies like Madagascar promote homosexuality.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:15 pm

by Khadgar » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:16 pm

by Nailed to the Perch » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:16 pm

Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:18 pm
Benomia wrote:WALL-E was about a dystopian future about what would happen if the anti-secular right-wing exclusivism in the US government is allowed to continue for a couple centuries.
Bad for kids? Not really.

by Neo Art » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:18 pm

by Johto and Kanto » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:18 pm
Electroconvulsive Glee wrote:[*]Tarzan, which was released in 1999, is set in Africa but does not feature any black people.

by Al Meajilia » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:19 pm

by Tsuntion » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:19 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Oh, most Disney movies are fucking awful when you actually think about them. The Little Mermaid suggests that true love means abandoning your family and home and giving up everything that makes you yourself in order to impress a dude. Beauty and the Beast is the story of how a woman fell in love with a dude who literally kidnapped her and held her captive. I still love them both - I just love them in an adult, nuanced way that involves recognizing that they're deeply flawed.
Giovenith wrote:In some ways arguably, but think the whole underweight thing is a little silly considering they're cartoon drawings, and are bound to have some radical differences from an actual body. This isn't to say it's not totally harmless (I'm sure there's at least someone crazy enough to try to turn themselves into a cartoon), but I think it's fair to point out that cartoons aren't exactly the finest place to be looking for messages on body shape.
Haktiva wrote:The best part of Disney movies are the villain songs. You could call that the biggest problem right there. I remember back when I watched the Lion King religiously when I was little, as much as I loved the super-happy schpiel from Timon and Pumba, I remember feeling much more excited when Scar sang Be Prepared. I can imagine a lot of kids who payed more attention to the villain songs will end up doing a lot of damage to those who modeled the Disney Princesses or the other happy BS.
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:And anyway, most of that is stereotyping, not racism.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!
CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!

by Individuality-ness » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:19 pm
Khadgar wrote:Nidaria wrote:All modern movies, and even some older ones, need to be carefully scrutinized before exposed to children. Today's society is corrupt and highly sexualized. I read an article a while ago that movies like Madagascar promote homosexuality.
That is completely unsurprising. You can find articles that say Genesis promotes homosexuality.

by Electroconvulsive Glee » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:19 pm
Neo Art wrote:It should be fairly obvious that disney movies are all profoundly sexist.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:20 pm
Khadgar wrote:Nidaria wrote:All modern movies, and even some older ones, need to be carefully scrutinized before exposed to children. Today's society is corrupt and highly sexualized. I read an article a while ago that movies like Madagascar promote homosexuality.
That is completely unsurprising. You can find articles that say Genesis promotes homosexuality.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:20 pm
Neo Art wrote:It should be fairly obvious that disney movies are all profoundly sexist.

by Electroconvulsive Glee » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:22 pm
Johto and Kanto wrote:Electroconvulsive Glee wrote:[*]Tarzan, which was released in 1999, is set in Africa but does not feature any black people.
I think that's because the cast is comprised of an English group on an expedition to Africa, and Tarzan, who I believe was raised by gorillas due to his birth parents (from Europe) being killed.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Aldygast, Ankoz, El Lazaro, Enormous Gentiles, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, ImperialRussia, Kenowa, Ostroeuropa, Picairn, Primitive Communism, Reloviskistan, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, Techocracy101010, The Sherpa Empire, The Two Jerseys, Xmara
Advertisement