What, insinuating (blatantly stating) that someone can't read isn't flaming? Come on, what's a pile of dead skinks among slightly obtuse, diametrically opposed, uh ... Pals.
Advertisement

by Harkonna » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:24 am

by Dakini » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:25 am

by Luveria » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:25 am
Mkuki wrote:Luveria wrote:
Do you expect them to prove it to you by showing you their little bits? Sex and gender are different things so even if you had photographic visual evidence it wouldn't indicate anything.
No need to get all weird and defensive. It's a simple process, really. When a user says whether they are male or female or whatever else then I'll address them as such with the appropriate pronoun.
Araraukar wrote:The Scandinavian AlThing wrote:Ps dont tell me you ARE a "Nice dirty Girl/Tomboy" because if you do THEN I WILL KNOW that you are a 55yr old trucker pedophile, or some other Emo-Hipster-Tranny!
And if someone said they were "a 55yr old trucker pedophile"? Would you then believe they're a "Nice dirty Girl/Tomboy"?
The Scandinavian AlThing wrote:Ps dont tell me you ARE a "Nice dirty Girl/Tomboy" because if you do THEN I WILL KNOW that you are a 55yr old trucker pedophile, or some other Emo-Hipster-Tranny!
Nua Corda wrote:I really couldn't care less about gender in general. People turn it into a bloody standard to wave everywhere, like it makes them ultra-special kawaii desu, when it's really pretty low on the list of relevant issues today. You got nuts? You got tits? Good for you. I don't give a shit, as long as you're a decent person.

by Immoren » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:27 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Harkonna » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:27 am
Dakini wrote:Ah, see, there's some snark. At your own expense, even.

by Dakini » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:28 am
Harkonna wrote:Nua Corda wrote:
That's probably flaming, but I'm too lazy to report it. Might want to take that back b4 someone else does.
What, insinuating (blatantly stating) that someone can't read isn't flaming? Come on, what's a pile of dead skinks among slightly obtuse, diametrically opposed, uh ... Pals.

by Olthar » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:28 am

by Araraukar » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:28 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

by Mediobogdum » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:29 am


by Harkonna » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:31 am
Dakini wrote:Technically I said that you needed to work on your snark because the utter failure of your snark to come across as snark meant that you looked like you didn't understand the words that were on the page.
I mean, if it was a failure to snark and a success at reading then that's totally different from a failure to do either.

by Olthar » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:31 am

by Araraukar » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:32 am
Mediobogdum wrote:Common all you marketing guys and gals out there!
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

by The Blaatschapen » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:32 am

by Harkonna » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:34 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:
I would like to introduce a new word: "snarcasm". Can I?

by Araraukar » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:34 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

by Harkonna » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:36 am

by Olthar » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:36 am

by The Blaatschapen » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:38 am

by Harkonna » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:39 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:
My shareholders are the non-male population of NS.
(I had to keep on topic here).

by Araraukar » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:41 am
Olthar wrote:Araraukar wrote:Mmh, if you openly belong into a "curious minority" and have not encountered any harassment in NationStates yet, what can I say, "Congratulations for being incredibly lucky"?
You know, the mods kind of punish people for that sort of thing, so it has nothing to do with luck.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

by Olthar » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:43 am

by Araraukar » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:44 am
Olthar wrote:And most people aren't stupid enough to intentionally get themselves banned.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

by TaQud » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:44 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Corporate Collective Salvation, Dimetrodon Empire, Equai, Rusozak, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement