Whites now the minority in US under-5 population

[Condunum]

Murdering and raping the natives doesn't make you the new natives, no matter how much time has passed.

It's not a championship belt.

My ancestors settled here. Celts, Germanics, Nordics, Romans. They merged through a millenia of strife and war. Then came the Normans.

I am Native.

A millenia ago, the same thing you're saying could be said about the Romans, or the Normans.

Nothing you are saying is based in reality.

[Theonureos]

I must steal the brains of a GOP candidate to figure out how they think!

Just as military analysts must analyze the enemy, you must analyze the Republicans.

Republicans, Democrats...Seriously, what's the difference anymore?

[Napkiraly]

tell me about it. I'm in a border town near San Diego and Mexicans outnumber whites by so very much!

So?

[Divair]

Just as military analysts must analyze the enemy, you must analyze the Republicans.

Republicans, Democrats...Seriously, what's the difference anymore?

There are plenty of differences. Or maybe you haven't paid attention to the obstructionism in Congress over the past five years.

[Condunum]

Just as military analysts must analyze the enemy, you must analyze the Republicans.

Republicans, Democrats...Seriously, what's the difference anymore?

Don't start that.

[Divair]

tell me about it. I'm in a border town near San Diego and Mexicans outnumber whites by so very much!

Who cares?

[Arrakis Dune]

Multiculturlaism is a bastardization of cultures. It becomes a hodge podge mongrel of consumerism. A CHinese area in Scotland or ENgland is not the same as CHina. Only stupid whites think this.

The UK is multicultural, and has been for millennia. The UK is 'a hodge podge mongrel'.

That's the best thing about it.

I'm amused by your idea that you can somehow dilute what it means to be English, by embracing new cultures. It's like arguing that it dilutes water to pour water in it.

The population and ethnic groups of the UK have been similar since the Normans invaded. And as I said, London was Nativist, it did not tolerate any foreigners of any kind. It maintained much of its culture and heritage right up until the 1950s. Any changes were organic.

Your argument is a fallacy, I have already porven you wrong twice on your supposed knowledge of History. NATION OF IMMIGRANTS!!! Is a progressive argument with no historicla backing. And as I said, multiple times, the immigration of a few centuries back is RADICALYL different from the policies of todayy.

As I said, look up the immigration act of 1905.

[Grave_n_idle]

Murdering and raping the natives doesn't make you the new natives, no matter how much time has passed.

It's not a championship belt.

My ancestors settled here. Celts, Germanics, Nordics, Romans. They merged through a millenia of strife and war. Then came the Normans.

I am Native.

So you're definition of 'native' is 'foreign, but a while back'?

[The German Federal-Republic]

I don't see a problem

Race traitor! You're obviously in league with the Commu-Nazi-Chinese-Terrorist-Jew Empire.

[Edlichbury]

Murdering and raping the natives doesn't make you the new natives, no matter how much time has passed.

It's not a championship belt.

My ancestors settled here. Celts, Germanics, Nordics, Romans. They merged through a millenia of strife and war. Then came the Normans.

I am Native.

HISTORY LESSON TIME!

Can anyone tell me what William the Conqueror's claim to the throne of England was? That's right, he was related to the old king! Which means the Norman invasion was actually the invasion by one of the four well-known rulers that had a legitimate "native" claim, of which another ruler acted on as well!

Which means the best argument against him would be "invasion by foreign force on behalf of native ruler."

[Death Metal]

Murdering and raping the natives doesn't make you the new natives, no matter how much time has passed.

It's not a championship belt.

My ancestors settled here. Celts, Germanics, Nordics, Romans. They merged through a millenia of strife and war. Then came the Normans.

I am Native.

You're a UK Native in that you were born in the UK, but you're not an ethnic Native in that your ancestors were mostly native.

In fact, the Celts, Germanics, Nordics, and Romans were all immigrants who culturally merged with the original Pritani.

[Arglorand]

I must steal the brains of a GOP candidate to figure out how they think!

Just as military analysts must analyze the enemy, you must analyze the Republicans.

I'd prefer to compare analyzing them to analyzing the behavior of certain animals in certain situations. e.g. "Here we can now observe the wild Republican in its natural habitat, a Fox News talkshow, where it interacts with others of its kind and with related species."

[Antares XII]

So white people just aren't pumping out enough babies? PANIC!

they should all become LDS

I find this relevant. To everything.

[Mushet]

This requires destroying New York City? Talk about hyperbole

Well in order to give the land back to the Natives, you'd need to evict the non-Native population, and that's like 8 million people. So yeah, destroying the city.

Not necessarily, how will the Lenape nation benefit from evicting all the non-Indians from NYC, seems to me it'll work better for all parties involved if they let them stay there.

I doubt any sensible activists advocate getting all the land back and evicting all non-native people from the area, sovereignty is good, real sovereignty, recognition of treaty rights, cessation of destroying the natural resources of the community and insistence on keeping toxic facilities disproportionately close to native american communities is good. IIRC they have a reservation in Downtown Las Vegas, they can't do that in more cities?

[Arrakis Dune]

My ancestors settled here. Celts, Germanics, Nordics, Romans. They merged through a millenia of strife and war. Then came the Normans.

I am Native.

A millenia ago, the same thing you're saying could be said about the Romans, or the Normans.

Nothing you are saying is based in reality.

It could be and they would be right. I dont doubt my ancestors didnt want to be invaded by Frankish Viking settlers but they were and they fought and were overcome. Does that mena we should accept an even more foreign and brutal culture and ethnic group to destroy us? The Normans did not replace us, they were small in number but a grand military. They had similar ethnic backgrounds as the people there.

Immigration from back then is different to immigration now. Wordls apart.

[Theonureos]

Republicans, Democrats...Seriously, what's the difference anymore?

There are plenty of differences. Or maybe you haven't paid attention to the obstructionism in Congress over the past five years.

The ones who cause the obstructionism in Congress really depends on who happens to be in power. In this case, since Barack Obama is president, and most of the bills being pushed are of Democratic origin, then obviously it's the Republicans doing the obstructing. Democrats, however, do this as well.

Again, congress has basically turned into a power-struggle.

[Divair]

Just as military analysts must analyze the enemy, you must analyze the Republicans.

I'd prefer to compare analyzing them to analyzing the behavior of certain animals in certain situations. e.g. "Here we can now observe the wild Republican in its natural habitat, a Fox News talkshow, where it interacts with others of its kind and with related species."

That'd be an amazing show to watch.

[Edlichbury]

The UK is multicultural, and has been for millennia. The UK is 'a hodge podge mongrel'.

That's the best thing about it.

I'm amused by your idea that you can somehow dilute what it means to be English, by embracing new cultures. It's like arguing that it dilutes water to pour water in it.

The population and ethnic groups of the UK have been similar since the Normans invaded. And as I said, London was Nativist, it did not tolerate any foreigners of any kind. It maintained much of its culture and heritage right up until the 1950s. Any changes were organic.

Your argument is a fallacy, I have already porven you wrong twice on your supposed knowledge of History. NATION OF IMMIGRANTS!!! Is a progressive argument with no historicla backing. And as I said, multiple times, the immigration of a few centuries back is RADICALYL different from the policies of todayy.

As I said, look up the immigration act of 1905.

1905 is today? Someone warn Obama he can't be President, but he can be the black-only President. But us whites need a separate but equal white-only President.

[Fruition (Ancient)]

I have this feeling that after today, this word will become excruciatingly popular.

Probs.

Whats that?

Upper middle to middle class urban professional was what it originally meant. Apparently it means race betraying working class hating suburban white folk.

I'm a yuppie too but .... oh can't hold it!

Why do you hate your heritage?

I don't hate my heritage. The humor itself is funny but it's also kind of sad.

[Libertarian California]

My ancestors settled here. Celts, Germanics, Nordics, Romans. They merged through a millenia of strife and war. Then came the Normans.

I am Native.

You're a UK Native in that you were born in the UK, but you're not an ethnic Native in that your ancestors were mostly native.

In fact, the Celts, Germanics, Nordics, and Romans were all immigrants who culturally merged with the original Pritani.

This is where ethnic nationalism falls apart. He should instead be supporting a pan-Britannic civic nationalism in the sense that "It does not matter your ethnicity, we're all limeys, and we're all in it together".

[Arrakis Dune]

My ancestors settled here. Celts, Germanics, Nordics, Romans. They merged through a millenia of strife and war. Then came the Normans.

I am Native.

HISTORY LESSON TIME!

Can anyone tell me what William the Conqueror's claim to the throne of England was? That's right, he was related to the old king! Which means the Norman invasion was actually the invasion by one of the four well-known rulers that had a legitimate "native" claim, of which another ruler acted on as well!

Which means the best argument against him would be "invasion by foreign force on behalf of native ruler."

So you admit that modern immigration is an invasion that is detrimental to the people of the UK? Glad we're getting somewhere.

Did the Normans replace the ethnic group of ENgland? No. Funny how we cna dicuss History a thousand years ago which is being used to justify your modern progressive ethnic replacement.

[Confederate Germany]

We should make more Caucasians. BAM! Our problems are solved.

[Death Metal]

Immigration from back then is different to immigration now. Wordls apart.

Lots more rape and murder back then, yes.

[Choronzon]

On another thought, does this mean that Whites will receive benefits in school more?

Is this some attempt at a subtle dig at affirmative action?

Cause currently benefit from affirmative action.

[Divair]

We should make more Caucasians. BAM! Our problems are solved.

What problems?