NATION

PASSWORD

Does God Exist?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Does God Exist

Yes
171
37%
No
213
46%
Maybe so
83
18%
 
Total votes : 467


User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:15 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Umikai wrote:Why is there a missing shade of blue if she knew everything?


TMSOB is another thought experiment.

It's also one of the most confusing things to wrap one's head around.
password scrambled

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57850
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:15 am

Umikai wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Now i'm thoroughly convinced you have no idea what you are talking about.

The problem is that you're assuming there are unknowns. If you could get off your high horse and realize you're not that clever, you could be able to realize that for God there are not two sets of information, known ad unknown, but one set- known.


But how does he know there isn't another set?
He cannot know that. It is impossible to know that there isn't an unknown unknown. What about this is so difficult for you to comprehend?
Since it's impossible to know whether or not an unknown unknown exists, that constitutes a KNOWN unknown. (Something I know I don't know.)
Which absolutely disqualifies you for Omniscience, whether or not there ever WAS an unknown unknown to begin with is irrelevant.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Umikai
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 148
Founded: May 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Umikai » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:15 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Umikai wrote:Why cant he overcome evil?


He cannot overcome his evil or ambivalent nature. because he isn't evil or ambivalent or nuanced.

This all started with an assumption that an entity must "overcome [it's] evil nature" to be good. What if that assumption is false?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57850
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:15 am

Condunum wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
TMSOB is another thought experiment.

It's also one of the most confusing things to wrap one's head around.


I really enjoyed it. I spent hours staring at the question mark trying desperately to conjure the missing shade of blue.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57850
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:16 am

Umikai wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
He cannot overcome his evil or ambivalent nature. because he isn't evil or ambivalent or nuanced.

This all started with an assumption that an entity must "overcome [it's] evil nature" to be good. What if that assumption is false?


Do you think it's false?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:17 am

Stovokor wrote:
Madredia wrote:
False.


Yeah i'ma go with this guy here, you're able to know of things without having experienced them, this is the very basis of education, and why jobs ask for personal experience along with your attained degree.

That applies to facts, it does not apply to emotion.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Umikai
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 148
Founded: May 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Umikai » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:19 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Umikai wrote:The problem is that you're assuming there are unknowns. If you could get off your high horse and realize you're not that clever, you could be able to realize that for God there are not two sets of information, known ad unknown, but one set- known.


But how does he know there isn't another set?
He cannot know that. It is impossible to know that there isn't an unknown unknown. What about this is so difficult for you to comprehend?
Since it's impossible to know whether or not an unknown unknown exists, that constitutes a KNOWN unknown. (Something I know I don't know.)
Which absolutely disqualifies you for Omniscience, whether or not there ever WAS an unknown unknown to begin with is irrelevant.

it's not "impossible to know whether or not an unknown unknown exists." If God is omniscient, wouldn't he know whether or not an unknown unknown exists, by the definition of omniscience?

User avatar
Madredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1435
Founded: Feb 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Madredia » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:19 am

God is the only One Who possesses limitless knowledge. The Illustrated Oxford Dictionary defines “omniscience” as “knowing everything,” and the Bible certainly ascribes omniscience to God (Psalm 139:1-4; cf. Woods, 1988, p. 34). Consider a sample of what the Bible reveals about God’s omniscience: “The eyes of the Lord are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good” (Proverbs 15:3). “Can anyone teach God knowledge, since He judges those on high?” (Job 21:22, emp. added).

God's omniscience means he possesses knowledge of all that is. He does not necessarily have to have felt something to know it. He created whales. He knows what its like to be a whale. He's never been a whale.e


User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57850
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:20 am

Umikai wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
But how does he know there isn't another set?
He cannot know that. It is impossible to know that there isn't an unknown unknown. What about this is so difficult for you to comprehend?
Since it's impossible to know whether or not an unknown unknown exists, that constitutes a KNOWN unknown. (Something I know I don't know.)
Which absolutely disqualifies you for Omniscience, whether or not there ever WAS an unknown unknown to begin with is irrelevant.

it's not "impossible to know whether or not an unknown unknown exists." If God is omniscient, wouldn't he know whether or not an unknown unknown exists, by the definition of omniscience?


If so, then it isn't an unknown unknown. If he knows whether or not it exists, it's a known.
The question is, how does god know that he is really omniscient.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57850
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:20 am

Umikai wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Do you think it's false?

Yup.


Based on what?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Umikai
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 148
Founded: May 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Umikai » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:20 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Umikai wrote:The problem is that you're assuming there are unknowns. If you could get off your high horse and realize you're not that clever, you could be able to realize that for God there are not two sets of information, known ad unknown, but one set- known.


But how does he know there isn't another set?
He cannot know that. It is impossible to know that there isn't an unknown unknown. What about this is so difficult for you to comprehend?
Since it's impossible to know whether or not an unknown unknown exists, that constitutes a KNOWN unknown. (Something I know I don't know.)
Which absolutely disqualifies you for Omniscience, whether or not there ever WAS an unknown unknown to begin with is irrelevant.

He knows there's not another set because he knows everything xD

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:20 am

Madredia wrote:God is the only One Who possesses limitless knowledge. The Illustrated Oxford Dictionary defines “omniscience” as “knowing everything,” and the Bible certainly ascribes omniscience to God (Psalm 139:1-4; cf. Woods, 1988, p. 34). Consider a sample of what the Bible reveals about God’s omniscience: “The eyes of the Lord are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good” (Proverbs 15:3). “Can anyone teach God knowledge, since He judges those on high?” (Job 21:22, emp. added).

God's omniscience means he possesses knowledge of all that is. He does not necessarily have to have felt something to know it. He created whales. He knows what its like to be a whale. He's never been a whale.e

This renders the "test" of earthly experience entirely meaningless.

It renders the sacrifice of Jesus a moot point.
Last edited by Anachronous Rex on Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...


User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57850
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:21 am

Umikai wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
But how does he know there isn't another set?
He cannot know that. It is impossible to know that there isn't an unknown unknown. What about this is so difficult for you to comprehend?
Since it's impossible to know whether or not an unknown unknown exists, that constitutes a KNOWN unknown. (Something I know I don't know.)
Which absolutely disqualifies you for Omniscience, whether or not there ever WAS an unknown unknown to begin with is irrelevant.

He knows there's not another set because he knows everything xD


Begging the question.
Sorry, try again. And do so without commiting logical fallacies.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:21 am

Madredia wrote:God is the only One Who possesses limitless knowledge. The Illustrated Oxford Dictionary defines “omniscience” as “knowing everything,” and the Bible certainly ascribes omniscience to God (Psalm 139:1-4; cf. Woods, 1988, p. 34). Consider a sample of what the Bible reveals about God’s omniscience: “The eyes of the Lord are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good” (Proverbs 15:3). “Can anyone teach God knowledge, since He judges those on high?” (Job 21:22, emp. added).

God's omniscience means he possesses knowledge of all that is. He does not necessarily have to have felt something to know it. He created whales. He knows what its like to be a whale. He's never been a whale.e

Yeah your still not making sense and quoting bible verses doesn't help you any.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Chinese Regions
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16326
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Regions » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:21 am

Madredia wrote:God is the only One Who possesses limitless knowledge. The Illustrated Oxford Dictionary defines “omniscience” as “knowing everything,” and the Bible certainly ascribes omniscience to God (Psalm 139:1-4; cf. Woods, 1988, p. 34). Consider a sample of what the Bible reveals about God’s omniscience: “The eyes of the Lord are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good” (Proverbs 15:3). “Can anyone teach God knowledge, since He judges those on high?” (Job 21:22, emp. added).

God's omniscience means he possesses knowledge of all that is. He does not necessarily have to have felt something to know it. He created whales. He knows what its like to be a whale. He's never been a whale.e

Does god know that he is a whale?
Fan of Transformers?|Fan of Star Trek?|你会说中文吗?
Geopolitics: Internationalist, Pan-Asian, Pan-African, Pan-Arab, Pan-Slavic, Eurofederalist,
  • For the promotion of closer ties between Europe and Russia but without Dugin's anti-intellectual quackery.
  • Against NATO, the Anglo-American "special relationship", Israel and Wahhabism.

Sociopolitics: Pro-Intellectual, Pro-Science, Secular, Strictly Anti-Theocractic, for the liberation of PoCs in Western Hemisphere without the hegemony of white liberals
Economics: Indifferent

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57850
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:22 am

Umikai wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Based on what?

How about you prove it?


Since morality is a value system it requires evaluators (subjective entities.)
Therefore, good is whatever we agree upon as being a valueable action. Given that we award medals for bravery (overcoming fear) and not simple "lack of fear", I consider the point proven.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Madredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1435
Founded: Feb 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Madredia » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:22 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Madredia wrote:God is the only One Who possesses limitless knowledge. The Illustrated Oxford Dictionary defines “omniscience” as “knowing everything,” and the Bible certainly ascribes omniscience to God (Psalm 139:1-4; cf. Woods, 1988, p. 34). Consider a sample of what the Bible reveals about God’s omniscience: “The eyes of the Lord are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good” (Proverbs 15:3). “Can anyone teach God knowledge, since He judges those on high?” (Job 21:22, emp. added).

God's omniscience means he possesses knowledge of all that is. He does not necessarily have to have felt something to know it. He created whales. He knows what its like to be a whale. He's never been a whale.e

This renders the "test" of earthly experience entirely meaningless.

It renders the sacrifice of Jesus a moot point.


No it doesn't as it was all necessary still for Jesus to be a perfect Lamb.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:23 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Condunum wrote:It's also one of the most confusing things to wrap one's head around.


I really enjoyed it. I spent hours staring at the question mark trying desperately to conjure the missing shade of blue.

I'd personally find it easier to close my eyes and picture it, as the question mark ruins the continuity.
password scrambled

User avatar
Umikai
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 148
Founded: May 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Umikai » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:23 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Umikai wrote:it's not "impossible to know whether or not an unknown unknown exists." If God is omniscient, wouldn't he know whether or not an unknown unknown exists, by the definition of omniscience?


If so, then it isn't an unknown unknown. If he knows whether or not it exists, it's a known.
The question is, how does god know that he is really omniscient.

God asks himself "am I omniscient?" Because he is omniscient, he knows the answer to this question (and every other question, by the definition of omniscience)- "yes."

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57850
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:24 am

Umikai wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
If so, then it isn't an unknown unknown. If he knows whether or not it exists, it's a known.
The question is, how does god know that he is really omniscient.

God asks himself "am I omniscient?" Because he is omniscient, he knows the answer to this question (and every other question, by the definition of omniscience)- "yes."


Again, begging the question.
I hope your not suggesting god is too ignorant to know how logical fallacies work.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Madredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1435
Founded: Feb 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Madredia » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:24 am

Let me just put this on context for everyone here. God does not have to know what it feels like to sin to be omniscient, any more than he has to be able to sin to be omnipotent.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:24 am

Umikai wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
If so, then it isn't an unknown unknown. If he knows whether or not it exists, it's a known.
The question is, how does god know that he is really omniscient.

God asks himself "am I omniscient?" Because he is omniscient, he knows the answer to this question (and every other question, by the definition of omniscience)- "yes."

Omniscience is a very annoying concept, especially for a world with free will.
password scrambled

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Bienenhalde, Cerespasia, Ethel mermania, Improper Classifications, Kreigsreich of Iron, Primitive Communism, Rary, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Valles Marineris Mining co, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads