NATION

PASSWORD

Is adultery wrong?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:56 am

The Tiger Kingdom wrote:
Zottistan wrote:I don't.

I really don't either.
I don't like sharing, or being shared.

It hurts. And in my experience it gets very messy.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:56 am

Zottistan wrote:
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:I really don't either.
I don't like sharing, or being shared.

It hurts. And in my experience it gets very messy.

Oh yeah, I totally forgot about the MASSIVE POTENTIAL for complications.
It's more trouble than its worth, really.
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

User avatar
Terrordome
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 419
Founded: Jan 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terrordome » Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:57 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Terrordome wrote:Government and the law should stay out of it it should be completely legal. The only legal effect adultery should have is as a grounds for divorce.

But if you commit adultery without the knowledge/consent of your spouse then you show yourself to be untrustworthy and capable of breaking a solemn oath to a loved one. So even if you should not be prosecuted, I can still think you are a shitty human being.

you shouldnt need grounds for divorce. and you don't in most states of the united states. not wanting to be married any more is enough.


You are right, but in the case of divorce, I believe it should negatively effect the settlement for you if you cheated.
My nation does not reflect my real political views!
Economic Left/Right: -5.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.08

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:58 am

The Tiger Kingdom wrote:
Zottistan wrote:It hurts. And in my experience it gets very messy.

Oh yeah, I totally forgot about the MASSIVE POTENTIAL for complications.
It's more trouble than its worth, really.

Still, each to their own. Far be it from me to force my romantic preferences on others.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Auremena
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26352
Founded: Mar 04, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Auremena » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:00 am

I think with me it's the same with abortion; I'm OK with it, I just wouldn't want it happening to me. I didn't used to think that way, until it hit close to home.
NS's aviation and train sabelotodo.
Post-left anarchist and sad about it.
Killdash, Firsthome, Coffee Cakes, SSC, GCoCS, Snowy, Val, Aeqy, and Replevion are my bitches.
Foot worshipper: Lutvikkia. Dakky's mom, I had her with Nana.
The female Jim Morrison; not as talented, but just as attractive and self destructive. The one true heir to the throne of the Lizard King.
Some poetry I write sometimes
Tearing the MBTA a new one since 2014. The MTA too since 2016. Cover the world in trains 2030
COYS!

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55260
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:09 am

Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:I've heard quite a lot of debate over what should be done about adultery.

Nothing.

Some say it should be a crime punishable by imprisonment,

Yeah, but it's not like the ramblings of fundies should be of any consequence.

others say it's equivalent to breaking a legal contract.

Well, it's not like matrimony is a business contract. Not in all jurisdictions anyway.

Here are two questions for you: is adultery fundamentally immoral

Yes.

and what consequences should there be for it, if any?

None, except if the other spouse raises a divorce case.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. Egli/Lui.
"Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee. Should I restart the bugger?
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Czechanada
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14851
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Czechanada » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:36 am

Only if the individual affected by the adultery considers it to be wrong.
"You know what I was. You see what I am. Change me, change me!" - Randall Jarrell.

User avatar
Terravoss
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 167
Founded: Mar 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terravoss » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:50 am

Meh. Having been the victim of a cheating spouse, it really ain't that bad. Just gives you pretty much free rein to get your cheat on and not feel bad about it.

This smells very heavily of a research thread, which would be a no-no.
WARNING, WARNING, WARNING

This is an out of character nation that represents my true views on Nation States. I make no apologies for any comment that I may make. You have been warned.

User avatar
Surfistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1700
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Surfistan » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:57 am

Always ask your partner permission, if it's no, and you do it anyway it's adultery.
It's not inherently wrong, as long as it's consesual.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:50 am

It's wrong, but there should be no punishment.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:55 am

If you are in a polyamorous relationship or are permitted to in that particular incident, then no, there is nothing wrong with it at all.If you are expected to remain monogamous, then yes, it is wrong. However, it would be a greater moral travesty to outlaw it.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Astholm
Senator
 
Posts: 4775
Founded: Jan 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Astholm » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:59 am

Adultery is wrong, as it feels disloyal to your partner, and if there was a problem which made them turn to adultery, I would ask them to go to counselling but not force them, and if it still didn't work, leave the relationship entirely.

It's not a grey area - either a relationship works or doesn't, so I was taught [at least by the people I know].

This is not discussing the issue from a government perspective, only social mores and etiquettes perspective.
Last edited by Astholm on Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
[spoiler=About Me]Based on the United Kingdom, but enlarged version with alternate history.
On IIWiki
I have multiple puppets here; only a select few are used to represent the continent of Astholm; others used represent Westholme, and do not artificially boost my nation's statistics.Previously i used puppets with nation names that did not identify as Astholm (e.g. Australis Australia; now all new puppets use ASTHLM, NORTHLM, SOUTHLM, WESTHLM (HLM denoting The Holmes.
NOTE: Other uses of Astholm here have a different continuity and refer to work created by the user Astholm, not the nation

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163846
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:59 am

Outside of divorce proceedings, I can't see it being the government's business if people are cheating or not.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:02 am

Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:I've heard quite a lot of debate over what should be done about adultery. Some say it should be a crime punishable by imprisonment, others say it's equivalent to breaking a legal contract. Some say the government should just keep out of it.

Here are two questions for you: is adultery fundamentally immoral and what consequences should there be for it, if any? In my opinion, adultery is wrong in most cases but it should not be a criminal offense. Instead, judges should consider the background behind the extramarital affair being dealt with. For example, did the other spouse have one as well? Did they do it because they were being abused? Was it an open marriage? The result should be more favorable to the victim of the marriage rather than the judge arbiting based on logistical factors.

What say you, NSG?

What about adultery with your dog or cat?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
The God-Realm
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8759
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The God-Realm » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:03 am

No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves
Add me on Steam: Hatekindler

Member of: IWW, EF!, La Raza, the KFA, and NSG Senate and Red Army
Esternial wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Before they wreck themselves?

Or their ex' car.

User avatar
Thama
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1424
Founded: Jun 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Thama » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:06 am

Yes it's wrong. But as long as something is consensual and between people who are mature enough to be able to understand the meaning of consent, then no law should forbid it.
Politics? In my NS? It's more likely than you think.
Economic Left/Right: -5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.50
Factbook, not stats. Not a guy, not a gal.
- The Nikopolian Empire and Archoncy of Thama -
- Des Nikopolsraik ed Arkoncy of Thama -
Capital city: Capital District Territory
Official languages: Ostspeak, Llynduneg
Government: Federated Parliamentary Monarchy
Population: 234,240,000
Head of State: Cedric Stargard
National Anthem: First March
Technology Level: Class V11 (Late PMT)
Area: 6,103,670 Sq km (mainland)
Old Map


Insert Cliche Here

User avatar
Esternial
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54391
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:10 am

The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Before they wreck themselves?

Or their ex' car.

User avatar
Estovakiva
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1327
Founded: Mar 25, 2011
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Estovakiva » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:11 am

Ryccia wrote:Its wrong, and its a crime in Ryccia. If you want to have another woman, then divorvce and that would do it.

You implying only males do adultery?

User avatar
Agritum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22161
Founded: May 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Agritum » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:13 am

I wouldn't make it punishable by law (but permit it to be an argument for divorce), but I can say that adultery is surely a quite ugly break of trust.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163846
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:13 am

The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Why are you trying to make my brain cry with this nonsense?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Esternial
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54391
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:14 am

Ifreann wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Why are you trying to make my brain cry with this nonsense?

It only makes him stronger.

User avatar
Samozaryadnyastan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19987
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samozaryadnyastan » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:15 am

On some level.

Since marriage is indeed a contract under law, then adultery would logically be a breach of contract issue and should be legislated against.
But I view marriage as an antiquated ceremony of dubious relevance, so I'm actually opposed to legislation against it.

It's something three people should be able to work out as adults.
I put that in italics because of the absolute irony that many people really can't be adult about such an issue.
Sapphire's WA Regional Delegate.
Call me Para.
In IC, I am to be referred to as The People's Republic of Samozniy Russia
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.
^ trufax
Samozniy foreign industry will one day return...
I unfortunately don't RP.
Puppets: The Federal Republic of the Samozniy Space Corps (PMT) and The Indomitable Orthodox Empire of Imperializt Russia (PT).
Take the Furry Test today!

User avatar
The God-Realm
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8759
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The God-Realm » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:23 am

Ifreann wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Why are you trying to make my brain cry with this nonsense?

Your brain has tear ducts? COOL.
Esternial wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Before they wreck themselves?

Or their ex' car.

Sigged
Add me on Steam: Hatekindler

Member of: IWW, EF!, La Raza, the KFA, and NSG Senate and Red Army
Esternial wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Before they wreck themselves?

Or their ex' car.

User avatar
The God-Realm
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8759
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The God-Realm » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:28 am

Sorry for my post on this thread.

A simple "No, I don't think it's wrong." Should have sufficed.
Add me on Steam: Hatekindler

Member of: IWW, EF!, La Raza, the KFA, and NSG Senate and Red Army
Esternial wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Before they wreck themselves?

Or their ex' car.

User avatar
Phocidaea
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5316
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phocidaea » Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:09 am

It is not "fundamentally immoral".

However, if one does decide to pledge their sexual/romantic loyalty to one person, then yes, it is at the very least jerkish to break that promise.
Call me Phoca.
Senator [Unknown] of the Liberal Democrats in NSG Senate.
Je suis Charlie: Because your feels don't justify murder.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beliras, DutchFormosa, Mergold-Aurlia, Tiami, Tillania, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads