NATION

PASSWORD

Discussion Thread for Nelson Mandela's Health

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:24 am

Hippostania wrote:And yeah, if you're in South Africa you speak Afrikaans. If you can't handle it then move to Zimbabwe or somet other country. Protesters in Soweto were whiny bastards who couldn't deal with the fact that Afrikaans was the lingua franca.


"If you're in the Grand Duchy of Finland of the Russian Empire you speak Russian. If you can't handle it move to Sweden or some other country. Pro-independence individuals in Finland were whiny bastards who couldn't deal with the fact that Russian was the administrative language and lingua franca of the Russian Empire."

What's wrong with having the right to speak and be taught in your own language, again, when that language is a native tongue of the country you live in?
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Surfistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1700
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Surfistan » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:25 am

Hey he's 94, I mean, we could build him a cryogenic tank but I think that's a beatiful age to kick the bucket.

He'll probably end up havin a city on Venus named after him.

User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:26 am

Surfistan wrote:Hey he's 94, I mean, we could build him a cryogenic tank but I think that's a beatiful age to kick the bucket.

He'll probably end up havin a city on Venus named after him.

We couldn't get him back if we did that.
by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
Heavenly Peace
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1048
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heavenly Peace » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:26 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Heavenly Peace wrote:
Both.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2006 ... ervatives1

David Cameron dramatically denounced one of Margaret Thatcher's flagship foreign policies last night, saying that she was wrong to have branded Nelson Mandela's African National Congress as 'terrorists' and to have opposed sanctions against the apartheid regime in South Africa.

is this good enough to satisfy the first part then? because if i'm not sure if "did thatcher call mandela a grubby little terrorist, or just call the ANC and mandela terrorists" is relevant and i'm worried we're going to have another thatcther-derail. i mean, i suppose it IS mandela related, i guess.


I am still waiting for the evidence I originally asked for which proves that Thatcher did indeed call Mandela a 'terrorist'.
Freeborn Englishman classical liberal & individualist
Michael Gove: Saviour of the British education system, Scourge of the Trade Unions, Prime Minister-In-Waiting
Economic Left/Right: 8.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.90

"Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." - Frédéric Bastiat
Stop the War on Drugs End the Debt Open the Borders
The American War of Independence was an English Civil War

User avatar
Surfistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1700
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Surfistan » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:30 am

New Libertarian States wrote:
Surfistan wrote:Hey he's 94, I mean, we could build him a cryogenic tank but I think that's a beatiful age to kick the bucket.

He'll probably end up havin a city on Venus named after him.

We couldn't get him back if we did that.


But we could put him frozen in a lollypop museum.

God, that was inappropriate.

Anyways, hope he gets better if not, well, he had a great ride the last 20 years.

User avatar
Trezchoix
Diplomat
 
Posts: 701
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Trezchoix » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:32 am

Mandela was a decent man BUT he was a terrorist that killed innocent people!
http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.c ... 3-dec.html
http://youhavetoaskwhy.blogspot.com/201 ... delas.html
http://www.netcomuk.co.uk/~springbk/enemy.html
http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/0 ... rist/?_r=0

I still respect the man and for some one to just forgive something like being put in jail for that length of time is amazing. But in reality ANY treasons activity that killed innocent people he should have been killed and you may argue but that's the common in the world. As for the ANC they're terrible and have nearly brought SA down to shambles and IF they continue it will be another Rhodesia or Zimbabwe for you non-Africans. I hope that he will RIP.
A attempt a communism is like trying cyanide, It'll only happen once.
Nation States the only place where communism and socialism work.

ACHTUNG! GRAMER NAZI

UBER CAPITALIST

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:37 am

Heavenly Peace wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2006 ... ervatives1

David Cameron dramatically denounced one of Margaret Thatcher's flagship foreign policies last night, saying that she was wrong to have branded Nelson Mandela's African National Congress as 'terrorists' and to have opposed sanctions against the apartheid regime in South Africa.

is this good enough to satisfy the first part then? because if i'm not sure if "did thatcher call mandela a grubby little terrorist, or just call the ANC and mandela terrorists" is relevant and i'm worried we're going to have another thatcther-derail. i mean, i suppose it IS mandela related, i guess.


I am still waiting for the evidence I originally asked for which proves that Thatcher did indeed call Mandela a 'terrorist'.


are you telling me that the leader of the conservative party coming out and saying "oh, we're sorry that thatcher called mandelas ANC terrorists" isn't enough to prove that, hey, maybe thatcher called mandela and the ANC terrorists? i mean, it's theoretically possible you at this point to split hairs and hope no one else can find another source and say "well, she believed he belonged to a terrorist organization, but that doesn't mean she called him a terrorist, hmm???" but i'm not sure if i wouldn't just get bored and respond with a venn diagram. or perhaps it would be a euler diagram? again, we verge into that murky territory.
Last edited by Souseiseki on Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:38 am, edited 2 times in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Rhodesi
Diplomat
 
Posts: 624
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesi » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:39 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Heavenly Peace wrote:
I am still waiting for the evidence I originally asked for which proves that Thatcher did indeed call Mandela a 'terrorist'.


are you telling me that the leader of the conservative party coming out and saying "oh, we're sorry that thatcher called mandelas ANC terrorists" isn't enough to prove that, hey, maybe thatcher called mandela and the ANC terrorists? i mean, it's theoretically possible you at this point to split hairs and hope no one else can find another source and say "well, she believed he belonged to a terrorist organization, but that doesn't mean she called him a terrorist, hmm???" but i'm not sure if i wouldn't just get bored and respond with a venn diagram. or perhaps it would be a euler diagram? again, we verge into that murky territory.


You seem to be labouring under the delusion that Cameron is a conservative. My sympathies...
NSG Senate: Classical Monarchist Party
"Wherever an altar is found, there civilization exists" - Joseph De Maistre

"It is one of man's curious idiosyncrasies to create difficulties for the pleasure of resolving them" - Joseph De Maistre

"The United Nations is useless...and also harmful. It is a land that flowers demagoguery with a bunch of newborn countries, devoid of any tradition." - Antonio de Oliveira Salazar

"If a nation does not want a monarchy, change the nation’s mind. If a nation does not need a monarchy, change the nation’s needs" - Jan Christiaan Smuts

"So, it's possible to be a democracy without gay-pride parades, hmm?" - Lyttenburgh - July 2013

Political Compass: Economic Right: 7.12, Social Authoritarian: 5.54

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:41 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
are you telling me that the leader of the conservative party coming out and saying "oh, we're sorry that thatcher called mandelas ANC terrorists" isn't enough to prove that, hey, maybe thatcher called mandela and the ANC terrorists? i mean, it's theoretically possible you at this point to split hairs and hope no one else can find another source and say "well, she believed he belonged to a terrorist organization, but that doesn't mean she called him a terrorist, hmm???" but i'm not sure if i wouldn't just get bored and respond with a venn diagram. or perhaps it would be a euler diagram? again, we verge into that murky territory.


You seem to be labouring under the delusion that Cameron is a conservative. My sympathies...

i said he is the leader of the conservative party. which he is. if you think he's a secret left-winger or something you could say that, but it won't make him not the leader of the conservative party.
Last edited by Souseiseki on Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Heavenly Peace
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1048
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heavenly Peace » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:41 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Heavenly Peace wrote:
I am still waiting for the evidence I originally asked for which proves that Thatcher did indeed call Mandela a 'terrorist'.


are you telling me that the leader of the conservative party coming out and saying "oh, we're sorry that thatcher called mandelas ANC terrorists" isn't enough to prove that, hey, maybe thatcher called mandela and the ANC terrorists? i mean, it's theoretically possible you at this point to split hairs and hope no one else can find another source and say "well, she believed he belonged to a terrorist organization, but that doesn't mean she called him a terrorist, hmm???" but i'm not sure if i wouldn't just get bored and respond with a venn diagram. or perhaps it would be a euler diagram? again, we verge into that murky territory.


You made the claim that Thatcher specifically called Mandela a terrorist so the burden of proof lies on you to prove that she did. Unless you find empirical evidence that she did then there isn't much basis for you to make that claim.
Freeborn Englishman classical liberal & individualist
Michael Gove: Saviour of the British education system, Scourge of the Trade Unions, Prime Minister-In-Waiting
Economic Left/Right: 8.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.90

"Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." - Frédéric Bastiat
Stop the War on Drugs End the Debt Open the Borders
The American War of Independence was an English Civil War

User avatar
TBA Field Marshal
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 171
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby TBA Field Marshal » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:43 am

He was a horrible man. He deserves it.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:43 am

TBA Field Marshal wrote:He was a horrible man. He deserves it.


Yes, all that helping to end apartheid.

How terrible.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Stolen Droplets
Envoy
 
Posts: 238
Founded: Mar 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Stolen Droplets » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:45 am

Hope we can see the man again...I swear he was good, but we don't indeed live forever. And in the next life...there's gonna be a heck of a lot of people im gonna wanna chat with, he's one of em.

:( Thanks for doing what you've done, see yah on the other side.
Economic Left/Right: -3.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51

Click for, "The Bunnies of South-Central" -------> https://sites.google.com/site/gtasanand ... houreisen/

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:46 am

Heavenly Peace wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
are you telling me that the leader of the conservative party coming out and saying "oh, we're sorry that thatcher called mandelas ANC terrorists" isn't enough to prove that, hey, maybe thatcher called mandela and the ANC terrorists? i mean, it's theoretically possible you at this point to split hairs and hope no one else can find another source and say "well, she believed he belonged to a terrorist organization, but that doesn't mean she called him a terrorist, hmm???" but i'm not sure if i wouldn't just get bored and respond with a venn diagram. or perhaps it would be a euler diagram? again, we verge into that murky territory.


You made the claim that Thatcher specifically called Mandela a terrorist so the burden of proof lies on you to prove that she did. Unless you find empirical evidence that she did then there isn't much basis for you to make that claim.

"she didn't call him a terrorist. she said she believed the group he belonged to was a terrorist group, making him a terrorist. that's, like, totally different. so you're totes wrong."

i just want to check. this is seriously what you're trying to argue?
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:48 am

Divair wrote:The second he dies, the country goes to shit. Mark my words.

I hope not, but South Africa is seriously messed up right now.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Heavenly Peace
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1048
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heavenly Peace » Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:58 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Heavenly Peace wrote:
You made the claim that Thatcher specifically called Mandela a terrorist so the burden of proof lies on you to prove that she did. Unless you find empirical evidence that she did then there isn't much basis for you to make that claim.

"she didn't call him a terrorist. she said she believed the group he belonged to was a terrorist group, making him a terrorist. that's, like, totally different. so you're totes wrong."

i just want to check. this is seriously what you're trying to argue?


I am not arguing whether she did or she didn't, I merely want you to provide empirical evidence for your claim that she called Mandela a terrorist.
Freeborn Englishman classical liberal & individualist
Michael Gove: Saviour of the British education system, Scourge of the Trade Unions, Prime Minister-In-Waiting
Economic Left/Right: 8.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.90

"Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." - Frédéric Bastiat
Stop the War on Drugs End the Debt Open the Borders
The American War of Independence was an English Civil War

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:14 am

Heavenly Peace wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:"she didn't call him a terrorist. she said she believed the group he belonged to was a terrorist group, making him a terrorist. that's, like, totally different. so you're totes wrong."

i just want to check. this is seriously what you're trying to argue?


I am not arguing whether she did or she didn't, I merely want you to provide empirical evidence for your claim that she called Mandela a terrorist.

Image
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Zokorias personal views
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 179
Founded: Jun 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Zokorias personal views » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:16 am

I hope he doesn't pass away, because Mandela is such a good man with a good heart, since he fought nail and tooth against the cruel Apartheid laws of old, despite his age.

#PrayForMandela
Fr*ck NO!: Homophobia, "bad" capitalism, fascism, Nazism, conservatism, communism, misogyny, GOP, Tea Party, Justin Bieber, internet censorship, cyberbullies, Russia
Meh: Socialism, anarchism, libertarianism, racism
Fr*ck YEAH!: LGBT rights, marriage equality, democracy, liberalism, social democracy, "good" capitalism, women's rights, ponies, Homestuck, Democrats, internet freedom, animes
Economic Left: -2.59 Social Libertarian: -4.14
Foreign Policy: 0.23 Cultural Liberal: -5.1

Libertarian Purity Score: 21/160
OOC puppet of Zokoria, add NSG (except Forum 7/NSG Senate) posts here.

User avatar
Eylandia
Envoy
 
Posts: 306
Founded: May 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Eylandia » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:23 am

Mandela's an old guy now, I guess we have to consider the reality that he is one day going to pass on, and that that day seems unfortunately close.

Mandela has achieved a great deal in his life. Sure he was involved with basically terrorist activities, but in the situation where you have an oppressive and racist regime that allows you no voice, I'm sure most can understand why so many turned to violent means of expression. I wished apartheid could have ended peacefully through politics, but it was never going to happen. What really counts though is the post Apartheid work that Mandela did, fantastic work that provided a despondent Africa with some hope.

I really hope that whenever Mandela does pass away that Africa doesn't lose hope. He was one of the very few beacons of hope for Africa, a symbol that the future will get brighter. With Mandela gone I fear hope will be lost, and the brighter future awaiting Africa will become further out of reach.

EDIT: I certainly hope that Mandela's death doesn't become a band-wagon for Western leaders to latch on to for their own political means. Most Western governments either outright branded Mandela an evil terrorist or else purposefully turned a blind eye to the regime of Apartheid SA. Western leaders have no right to use Mandela's passing like that, quiet respect and acknowledgement of the good he has done is what will be in order.
Last edited by Eylandia on Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Rhodesi
Diplomat
 
Posts: 624
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodesi » Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:44 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Heavenly Peace wrote:
I am not arguing whether she did or she didn't, I merely want you to provide empirical evidence for your claim that she called Mandela a terrorist.

Image


But she never mentioned him by name as a terrorist. If she did think he was one, then it would have been a rather reasonable conclusion to draw considering that he helped found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umkhonto_we_Sizwe, which was indubitably a terrorist organization. Since it was closely linked to the ANC, it was also a reasonable judgement of hers that the ANC was a terrorist organization.
NSG Senate: Classical Monarchist Party
"Wherever an altar is found, there civilization exists" - Joseph De Maistre

"It is one of man's curious idiosyncrasies to create difficulties for the pleasure of resolving them" - Joseph De Maistre

"The United Nations is useless...and also harmful. It is a land that flowers demagoguery with a bunch of newborn countries, devoid of any tradition." - Antonio de Oliveira Salazar

"If a nation does not want a monarchy, change the nation’s mind. If a nation does not need a monarchy, change the nation’s needs" - Jan Christiaan Smuts

"So, it's possible to be a democracy without gay-pride parades, hmm?" - Lyttenburgh - July 2013

Political Compass: Economic Right: 7.12, Social Authoritarian: 5.54

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:03 am

Rhodesi wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:(Image)


But she never mentioned him by name as a terrorist. If she did think he was one, then it would have been a rather reasonable conclusion to draw considering that he helped found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umkhonto_we_Sizwe, which was indubitably a terrorist organization. Since it was closely linked to the ANC, it was also a reasonable judgement of hers that the ANC was a terrorist organization.

this is like having person X call the IRA a terrorist organization, then have someone say person X called bobby sands a terrorist, but then have someone butt in and say "um no source???"?

it's a fairly reasonable to conclude that someone believes that active members of a terrorist organization are terrorists. even if you somehow argue down to "well they only called them a terrorist by virtue of being in a a terrorist organization!" i don't see how it matters. they are still in effect labeling that person as a terrorist. it is paper thin and leads to a hollow technical "victory" that in essence means you're still either conceding or doing some rather impressive mental gymnastics, because they didn't get a list of members and go through them one by one and clarify that yes they believe this member of a terrorist organization is also a terrorist.
Last edited by Souseiseki on Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Potenco
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 492
Founded: Apr 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Potenco » Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:07 pm

Hippostania wrote:
Divair wrote:You think we don't? It makes no difference because we're an absurdly tiny minority. The ANC has a super majority, and it will continue to have one for the rest of our lives.

If only the people of South Africa would've known what South Africa would become in 20 years, maybe they would've voted differently in 1992.

Because im sure VF= has the best interests of blacks in South Africa at heart :D

Seriously, Hippo you are pretty much the biggest elitist on Nationstates and a borderline rascist. You think Aborigines and American Indians have contributed nothing to their respective nations cultures (which is very ignorant) and you took aparthed era South Africas flag and put your own coat of arms on it
Social Democrat/Democratic Socialist depending on the weather.
Very Bisexual-Probably a 4 on the Kinsey Scale
Pro:US Democratic Party, Social Democracy, Bayard Rustin's ideals, Hopefully a Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren for President in 2020. Recent convert to the episcopal church from atheism and a fan of distributist thinking and christian democracy.
Anti: Paleoconservative bullshit, dicksuck Austrian economics

User avatar
Cameroi
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15788
Founded: Dec 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Cameroi » Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:09 pm

none of us live forever. he's a hero. he's also 94. (and i thought my mom was doing pretty good to make it to 91).
truth isn't what i say. isn't what you say. isn't what anybody says. truth is what is there, when no one is saying anything.

"economic freedom" is "the cake"
=^^=
.../\...

User avatar
Valigaria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Jun 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valigaria » Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:20 pm

He had one good idea and that was ending Apartheid. Other than that, he was a horrible politician that set the stage for running South Africa into the ground.
Last edited by Valigaria on Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hippostania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8826
Founded: Nov 23, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hippostania » Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:36 pm

I can't be assed to answer anything else right now, but..

Potenco wrote:you took aparthed era South Africas flag and put your own coat of arms on it

HOLY FUCK, SO WHAT? The color scheme of the South African flag symbolized the Dutch, the first inhabitants of South Africa and the three nations that united to form the Union of South Africa in 1910; Oranje Free State, Transvaal and Cape Colony.

Only the ignorant liberals could see that, a flag symbolizing the history of South Africa that was adopted two decades before apartheid as "racist". That flag is the true flag of South Africa, the current flag with the ANC colors conviniently added in is nothing but a symbol of Afrikaner cultural genocide and general failure.

Besides, the blue-white-orange color scheme is asthetically beautiful.
Factbook - New Embassy Program
Economic Right: 10.00 - Social Authoritarian: 2.87 - Foreign Policy Neoconservative: 9.54 - Cultural Liberal: -1.14
For: market liberalism, capitalism, eurofederalism, neoconservatism, British unionism, atlanticism, LGB rights, abortion rights, Greater Israel, Pan-Western federalism, NATO, USA, EU
Against: communism, socialism, anarchism, eurosceptism, agrarianism, Swiss/Irish/Scottish/Welsh independence, cultural relativism, all things Russian, aboriginal/native American special rights

Hippo's Political Party Rankings (updated 21/7/2013)

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alternate Garza, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bradfordville, Galloism, Great Britain eke Northern Ireland, Grinning Dragon, La Xinga, Port Caverton, Rary, The Sherpa Empire, Urkennalaid, Z-Zone 3

Advertisement

Remove ads