Quintium wrote:It bothers me that Anonymous is now known primarily as an 'activist group'. I'm not usually one for nostalgia, but back in the day people like him would have been laughed at and ostracized rather than praised in those circles. He sounds like a classic white knight, involving himself in stuff he has nothing to do with just for the sake of looking heroic and getting the - apparently much-needed for him - praise of young women on the internet.
But that's Anonymous now - and it has been like that for a few years now. It's been hijacked by the young progressive left - bleeding heart script kiddies with an overdeveloped sense of 'justice' and an underdeveloped sense of humour. Instead of closing pools due to AIDS, today's young whippersnappers are attacking Israel's websites to defend the rights of 'the poor Palestinians'. Instead of being the Internet Hate Machine, they're a bunch of misguided and disorganized socialist knights in shining armour.
They should ditch the partisan crap and get back to being an instrument of chaos.
This is what happens when /b/ got flooded with regular people who thought Anonymous was cool back in the Eternal Summer of 2007.







