Rape: 1 years, 2 years. Bringing rapists to justice: 10.

[Ifreann]

Because it's an electronic device, which is where evidence of cybercrimes would be.

---

Just about everything you've just said is a lie.

which bit is the lie?

Ohio has not abolished due process, nor decreed that criticising rape is vigilantism and blasphemy.

[Brocwika]

Lets review the viewpoints:

-The hacker is a vigilante, and vigilantism is not the answer.

-The hacker didn't really do jack shit saving the day, so why treat him like a hero?

-But it's not like he's any guiltier than the rapists, so there's that.

-Different legal parameters: federal vs state laws, adult vs minor.

[AiliailiA]

Evidence obtained illegally isn't permissible in court. By illegally obtaining the evidence before police can legally obtain it, a vigilante could actually make it harder not easier to convict.

It's probably better not to even try, but assuming you did and came across evidence, why would you do anything but deliver it to police?

Because we already know that Ohio police are pro rape and the police had no intention of prosecuting the preverts.

Nevertheless, the police should be the first call for someone holding evidence illegally obtained. Because ... well, read my first paragraph.

In the old days, vigilantes killed rapists, but the problem was that without due process, sometimes vigilantes might kill innocents. Now, the entire state of Ohio has abolished due process and decreed that criticizing rape is vigilantism and blasphemy.

Vigilantes still sometimes kill rapists. Or alleged rapists.

If you break the law, and don't intend to go to jail, you have to hide. You don't tell anyone and you don't do a CNN interview. If you break the law to make a point or in the expectation that people will applaud your actions, you must be prepared to go to jail. It's meaningless and no kind of heroism if you're not prepared to make that personal sacrifice.

This guys intentions were probably good, but what he did was just dumb.

[Greed and Death]

Evidence obtained illegally isn't permissible in court. By illegally obtaining the evidence before police can legally obtain it, a vigilante could actually make it harder not easier to convict.

It's probably better not to even try, but assuming you did and came across evidence, why would you do anything but deliver it to police?

Because we already know that Ohio police are pro rape and the police had no intention of prosecuting the preverts.

In the old days, vigilantes killed rapists, but the problem was that without due process, sometimes vigilantes might kill innocents. Now, the entire state of Ohio has abolished due process and decreed that criticizing rape is vigilantism and blasphemy.

You know this is the federal government. Talk to the President if you think the executive branch is being over zealous in this case.

[Kaylea]

It bothers me that Anonymous is now known primarily as an 'activist group'. I'm not usually one for nostalgia, but back in the day people like him would have been laughed at and ostracized rather than praised in those circles. He sounds like a classic white knight, involving himself in stuff he has nothing to do with just for the sake of looking heroic and getting the - apparently much-needed for him - praise of young women on the internet.

But that's Anonymous now - and it has been like that for a few years now. It's been hijacked by the young progressive left - bleeding heart script kiddies with an overdeveloped sense of 'justice' and an underdeveloped sense of humour. Instead of closing pools due to AIDS, today's young whippersnappers are attacking Israel's websites to defend the rights of 'the poor Palestinians'. Instead of being the Internet Hate Machine, they're a bunch of misguided and disorganized socialist knights in shining armour.

They should ditch the partisan crap and get back to being an instrument of chaos.

So these people should stop trying to do socially respectable things and aspire to be losers. Yeah.

Jelly.

[Ifreann]

It bothers me that Anonymous is now known primarily as an 'activist group'. I'm not usually one for nostalgia, but back in the day people like him would have been laughed at and ostracized rather than praised in those circles. He sounds like a classic white knight, involving himself in stuff he has nothing to do with just for the sake of looking heroic and getting the - apparently much-needed for him - praise of young women on the internet.

But that's Anonymous now - and it has been like that for a few years now. It's been hijacked by the young progressive left - bleeding heart script kiddies with an overdeveloped sense of 'justice' and an underdeveloped sense of humour. Instead of closing pools due to AIDS, today's young whippersnappers are attacking Israel's websites to defend the rights of 'the poor Palestinians'. Instead of being the Internet Hate Machine, they're a bunch of misguided and disorganized socialist knights in shining armour.

They should ditch the partisan crap and get back to being an instrument of chaos.

So these people should stop trying to do socially respectable things and aspire to be losers. Yeah.

Jelly.

>federal crimes
>socially respectable
u wot m8

[Kaylea]

^ It's not like all criminals or criminal acts are unpopular. Look at Assange/Wikileaks

[Ifreann]

^ It's not like all criminals or criminal acts are unpopular. Look at Assange

Assange is undeniably a criminal and most likely a rapist. Society doesn't respect him.

[United Kingdom of Muffins]

^ It's not like all criminals or criminal acts are unpopular. Look at Assange

Assange is undeniably a criminal and most likely a rapist. Society doesn't respect him.

*my opinion
*stated as worlds opinion

[Kaylea]

^ It's not like all criminals or criminal acts are unpopular. Look at Assange

Assange is undeniably a criminal and most likely a rapist. Society doesn't respect him.

I agree wholeheartedly, but in my experience I don't think most people believe the case against him. In the UK I think a lot of the public at the very least support what he did in regards to publishing classified documents because of the current state of mistrust towards politicians.

[Grad Duchy of Luxembourg]

^ It's not like all criminals or criminal acts are unpopular. Look at Assange

Assange is undeniably a criminal and most likely a rapist. Society doesn't respect him.

Agreed. And an insufferable egotist to boot.

[Miss Defied]

It bothers me that Anonymous is now known primarily as an 'activist group'. I'm not usually one for nostalgia, but back in the day people like him would have been laughed at and ostracized rather than praised in those circles. He sounds like a classic white knight, involving himself in stuff he has nothing to do with just for the sake of looking heroic and getting the - apparently much-needed for him - praise of young women on the internet.

But that's Anonymous now - and it has been like that for a few years now. It's been hijacked by the young progressive left - bleeding heart script kiddies with an overdeveloped sense of 'justice' and an underdeveloped sense of humour. Instead of closing pools due to AIDS, today's young whippersnappers are attacking Israel's websites to defend the rights of 'the poor Palestinians'. Instead of being the Internet Hate Machine, they're a bunch of misguided and disorganized socialist knights in shining armour.

They should ditch the partisan crap and get back to being an instrument of chaos.

So these people should stop trying to do socially respectable things and aspire to be losers. Yeah.

Jelly.

No they can go right ahead and do socially respectable things, but they should drop the Anonymous schtick. It's not them. Besides, if one is doing something socially respectable, there is hardly a need to hide behind a mask.

[Nightkill the Emperor]

What the fuck.

[St George]

Perhaps a Rapist, should experience 10 years of rape. Just sayin'

And robbers robbed from!

And assaulters assaulted!

Murderers murdered!

Defrauders defrauded!

Muggers mugged!

Molesters molested!

Oh wait, the justice system isn't about revenge?

[United Kingdom of Muffins]

Perhaps a Rapist, should experience 10 years of rape. Just sayin'

And robbers robbed from!

And assaulters assaulted!

Murderers murdered!

Defrauders defrauded!

Muggers mugged!

Molesters molested!

Oh wait, the justice system isn't about revenge?

Pretty sure we moved past that point in time.

[St George]

Twitter is public domain. How is that hacking anything?

Because he didn't hack twitter. He hacked RollRedRoll.com, some site affiliated with the footballers I think?

[Nazi Flower Power]

It's unlikely that he'd actually get the 10 year sentence. They're saying that's the maximum he COULD get if he gets convicted (not a sure thing) and they throw the book at him.

[Brocwika]

It bothers me that Anonymous is now known primarily as an 'activist group'. I'm not usually one for nostalgia, but back in the day people like him would have been laughed at and ostracized rather than praised in those circles. He sounds like a classic white knight, involving himself in stuff he has nothing to do with just for the sake of looking heroic and getting the - apparently much-needed for him - praise of young women on the internet.

But that's Anonymous now - and it has been like that for a few years now. It's been hijacked by the young progressive left - bleeding heart script kiddies with an overdeveloped sense of 'justice' and an underdeveloped sense of humour. Instead of closing pools due to AIDS, today's young whippersnappers are attacking Israel's websites to defend the rights of 'the poor Palestinians'. Instead of being the Internet Hate Machine, they're a bunch of misguided and disorganized socialist knights in shining armour.

They should ditch the partisan crap and get back to being an instrument of chaos.

Oldfag detected.

Can you triforce?

[Brocwika]

Evidence obtained illegally isn't permissible in court. By illegally obtaining the evidence before police can legally obtain it, a vigilante could actually make it harder not easier to convict.

It's probably better not to even try, but assuming you did and came across evidence, why would you do anything but deliver it to police?

Because we already know that Ohio police are pro rape and the police had no intention of prosecuting the preverts.

In the old days, vigilantes killed rapists, but the problem was that without due process, sometimes vigilantes might kill innocents. Now, the entire state of Ohio has abolished due process and decreed that criticizing rape is vigilantism and blasphemy.

Because we know

Thats some mighty big accusations. CITATION NEEDED

[OMGeverynameistaken]

Twitter is public domain. How is that hacking anything?

Because he didn't hack twitter. He hacked RollRedRoll.com, some site affiliated with the footballers I think?

He's accused of hacking rollredroll.com. Somebody else has, however, already publicly claimed responsibility. Before the charges were brought.

[Meryuma]

Why doesn't it? It's a guy using his wits and technical expertise to solve traumatic crimes. That's pretty close to the goddamn Batman in a way.

Keep in mind that Batman also was wanted by the police/feds/etc.

Exactly.

It bothers me that Anonymous is now known primarily as an 'activist group'. I'm not usually one for nostalgia, but back in the day people like him would have been laughed at and ostracized rather than praised in those circles. He sounds like a classic white knight, involving himself in stuff he has nothing to do with just for the sake of looking heroic and getting the - apparently much-needed for him - praise of young women on the internet.

But that's Anonymous now - and it has been like that for a few years now. It's been hijacked by the young progressive left - bleeding heart script kiddies with an overdeveloped sense of 'justice' and an underdeveloped sense of humour. Instead of closing pools due to AIDS, today's young whippersnappers are attacking Israel's websites to defend the rights of 'the poor Palestinians'. Instead of being the Internet Hate Machine, they're a bunch of misguided and disorganized socialist knights in shining armour.

They should ditch the partisan crap and get back to being an instrument of chaos.

I used to find it kinda annoying but /b/ was always mostly dumb loledgy shit and the new Anon is better.

That makes me sick that you think there is one.

Not as sick as you would feel if you were raped, denied help afterward and told you deserved it.

Perhaps a Rapist, should experience 10 years of rape. Just sayin'

why

[Gravlen]

Because he didn't hack twitter. He hacked RollRedRoll.com, some site affiliated with the footballers I think?

He's accused of hacking rollredroll.com. Somebody else has, however, already publicly claimed responsibility. Before the charges were brought.

That said, there's no guarantee that the other person claiming responsibility is being truthful about it. I expect the investigation to uncover more about who did what when.

[The Grey Wolf]

Really? I guess hacking is more of a crime than, I don't know, forcing somebody into sex and traumatizing them for life.
I still think the guy should get sentenced. He broke the law, but his "crimes" are nowhere near as bad as the hooligans. It's not even on the same level.

This fucking country man.

Have you seen how rape is dealt with in the Middle East?

[Tsmida Eri]

The man is a hero, bringing criminals to justice in ways that the law enforcement can't.

[Ifreann]

Assange is undeniably a criminal and most likely a rapist. Society doesn't respect him.

I agree wholeheartedly, but in my experience I don't think most people believe the case against him. In the UK I think a lot of the public at the very least support what he did in regards to publishing classified documents because of the current state of mistrust towards politicians.

I'm willing to call him "probably a rapists" until the Swedes get their hands on him. The fact that he jumped bail, however, could not possibly be more obvious. There's literally no scope to doubt it.

---

Perhaps a Rapist, should experience 10 years of rape. Just sayin'

And robbers robbed from!

And assaulters assaulted!

Murderers murdered!

Defrauders defrauded!

Muggers mugged!

Molesters molested!

Oh wait, the justice system isn't about revenge?

And jaywalkers...um...walked on?

---

He's accused of hacking rollredroll.com. Somebody else has, however, already publicly claimed responsibility. Before the charges were brought.

That said, there's no guarantee that the other person claiming responsibility is being truthful about it. I expect the investigation to uncover more about who did what when.

Surely someone wouldn't lie on the internet!

---

The man is a hero, bringing criminals to justice in ways that the law enforcement can't.

Not at all?