NATION

PASSWORD

Should men have a choice in abortion?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Khanastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1989
Founded: May 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Khanastan » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:14 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Khanastan wrote:I'll get the Swiss the money, and you get the storks... whatever it is storks eat.

Babies, I assume.

Well... this is problematic. Unless we can find a new carrier bird it is back to square one.
“The ancient Oracle said that I was the wisest of all the Greeks. It is because I alone, of all the Greeks, know that I know nothing.” - Socrates
Khanastan is an entirely fictional PMT nation somewhat similar to a larger, more free version of China. We are a massive federal representative republic of half a billion people with a self-sufficient, world-dominating economy. NS stats are not used. Use our Factbook instead.
Call me Khan. I've been here a while. I'm from Glasgow, Scotland. I think people should treat people like they want to be treated themselves. If you want to know more you're going have to buy me a drink or get to know me better, otherwise i'll stop being such a mystery.
Merry crisis one and all.

User avatar
Czechanada
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14851
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Czechanada » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:15 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Khanastan wrote:I'll get the Swiss the money, and you get the storks... whatever it is storks eat.

Babies, I assume.


Reminds me of that one scene from a movie/ that one Simpsons episode where a courier accepts a flask of whisky as payment for delivering a letter.
"You know what I was. You see what I am. Change me, change me!" - Randall Jarrell.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159069
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:16 pm

Khanastan wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Babies, I assume.

Well... this is problematic. Unless we can find a new carrier bird it is back to square one.

They just eat the spares.

User avatar
Czechanada
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14851
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Czechanada » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:17 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Khanastan wrote:Well... this is problematic. Unless we can find a new carrier bird it is back to square one.

They just eat the spares.


Just feed the stork before it leaves.
"You know what I was. You see what I am. Change me, change me!" - Randall Jarrell.

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:17 pm

Now that I've thought about it I think that men should have a hand in the decision of whether or not to have an abortion, but the woman should be the one to 'pull the trigger' so to speak.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:17 pm

Czechanada wrote:
Condunum wrote:So long as we all get both sets of reproductive systems, I'm good.


Hermaphrodites would be difficult to implement. I was just advocating that every woman should get pregnant with twins (or any even set, for that matter.) *nods*

That... that doesn't work at all... He'd still be forcing her to do something with her body that she would not want to do.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:19 pm

Mkuki wrote:Now that I've thought about it I think that men should have a hand in the decision of whether or not to have an abortion, but the woman should be the one to 'pull the trigger' so to speak.

He should have an opinion to place forth - whether or not she listens to it or not is her decision.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Czechanada
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14851
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Czechanada » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:19 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Czechanada wrote:
Hermaphrodites would be difficult to implement. I was just advocating that every woman should get pregnant with twins (or any even set, for that matter.) *nods*

That... that doesn't work at all... He'd still be forcing her to do something with her body that she would not want to do.


Which is why I am kidding, madam.
"You know what I was. You see what I am. Change me, change me!" - Randall Jarrell.

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:19 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Now that I've thought about it I think that men should have a hand in the decision of whether or not to have an abortion, but the woman should be the one to 'pull the trigger' so to speak.

He should have an opinion to place forth - whether or not she listens to it or not is her decision.

Yes, that was what I said.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Evil Siamese Cats
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 145
Founded: Mar 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Evil Siamese Cats » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:27 pm

In terms of the biological father's rights, I'm torn. On one hand, if he really, really wants to be a father, the mother of the child can pretty much go out and abort the child for no other reason than to spite him, and he can't legally do shit, so for nine months, he's potentially at the mercy of the mother. On the other hand, he's not the one giving birth, carrying extra baby weight, or giving up sushi and bourbon, so the bulk of the rights should go to the mother.

The only time the father should ever have a right, if he has one at all, to control an abortion is to prevent one, unless the mother is incompetent.

One possibility, and this may or may not work - an unmarried pair hooks up, and all of a sudden, bam, she's pregnant, and it's plainly obvious to both parties who the father is. She wants an abortion because she doesn't want a damn kid and doesn't want to go through all the hell of carrying a kid to term because she, let's just say, needs to avoid pregnancy for professional or school reasons. However, the father really wants the baby, to the point where he'll raise it on his own or find another mother to help. At this point, the situation turns into an awkward form of surrogacy, at which point we have to determine what is fair to compensate the mother for her troubles. Certainly the right to sign away her parental rights free and clear is in order. Also, the father should probably be on the hook for the bulk of her medical bills. Beyond that, I don't know.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159069
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:28 pm

Evil Siamese Cats wrote:In terms of the biological father's rights, I'm torn. On one hand, if he really, really wants to be a father, the mother of the child can pretty much go out and abort the child for no other reason than to spite him, and he can't legally do shit, so for nine months, he's potentially at the mercy of the mother. On the other hand, he's not the one giving birth, carrying extra baby weight, or giving up sushi and bourbon, so the bulk of the rights should go to the mother.

The only time the father should ever have a right, if he has one at all, to control an abortion is to prevent one, unless the mother is incompetent.

He doesn't have one at all. So that's that, then.

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:30 pm

Evil Siamese Cats wrote:In terms of the biological father's rights, I'm torn. On one hand, if he really, really wants to be a father, the mother of the child can pretty much go out and abort the child for no other reason than to spite him, and he can't legally do shit, so for nine months, he's potentially at the mercy of the mother. On the other hand, he's not the one giving birth, carrying extra baby weight, or giving up sushi and bourbon, so the bulk of the rights should go to the mother.

The only time the father should ever have a right, if he has one at all, to control an abortion is to prevent one, unless the mother is incompetent.

One possibility, and this may or may not work - an unmarried pair hooks up, and all of a sudden, bam, she's pregnant, and it's plainly obvious to both parties who the father is. She wants an abortion because she doesn't want a damn kid and doesn't want to go through all the hell of carrying a kid to term because she, let's just say, needs to avoid pregnancy for professional or school reasons. However, the father really wants the baby, to the point where he'll raise it on his own or find another mother to help. At this point, the situation turns into an awkward form of surrogacy, at which point we have to determine what is fair to compensate the mother for her troubles. Certainly the right to sign away her parental rights free and clear is in order. Also, the father should probably be on the hook for the bulk of her medical bills. Beyond that, I don't know.

If she doesn't want to be pregnant she doesn't have to be, end of story. There is no situation fathomable in which case a woman should be prevented from having an abortion. Or having a baby, if that's what she wants.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:34 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Czechanada wrote:
Hermaphrodites would be difficult to implement. I was just advocating that every woman should get pregnant with twins (or any even set, for that matter.) *nods*

That... that doesn't work at all... He'd still be forcing her to do something with her body that she would not want to do.

You'll have to pardon our friend here. Canadians are still a bit too british and therefore their humor is hard to understand.
password scrambled

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:35 pm

Mkuki wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:He should have an opinion to place forth - whether or not she listens to it or not is her decision.

Yes, that was what I said.

should she be forced to hear him out?
whatever

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:41 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Yes, that was what I said.

should she be forced to hear him out?


Considering it's his kid as well, and she doesn't have to accept his advice, yeah, she should.

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:43 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Yes, that was what I said.

should she be forced to hear him out?

Not physically forced. Legally, though, it depends on the case. If the husband is abusive to either her or, if there are any, the existing children then no she shouldn't. However, if the male has no record off being abusive in any way then she should, legally, be forced to hear his grievances. Of course that applies only if the two are married or have some form of domestic partnership contract.
Last edited by Mkuki on Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:46 pm

Mkuki wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:should she be forced to hear him out?

Not physically forced. Legally, though, it depends on the case. If the husband is abusive to either her or, if there are any, the existing children then no she shouldn't. However, if the male has no record off being abusive in any way then she should, legally, be forced to hear his grievances. Of course that applies only if the two are married or have some form of domestic partnership contract.

Sorry but she doesn't even have to listen to him if nothing is going to change her mind either way.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159069
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:46 pm

The Grey Wolf wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:should she be forced to hear him out?


Considering it's his kid as well, and she doesn't have to accept his advice, yeah, she should.

What are you going to do, arrest her and cuff her to a chair while he makes a speech?

User avatar
The Rising Sun Katana
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 196
Founded: Jun 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rising Sun Katana » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:49 pm

Khanastan wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Babies, I assume.

Well... this is problematic. Unless we can find a new carrier bird it is back to square one.

Mallards are cool!! There's a park by my house that has a small lake and lots of ducks, turtles, and fish and we go there to feed'em sometimes. Mallards can bust a move for a nummy so they'd bee the bomb!! :clap:

User avatar
The Grey Wolf
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32675
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grey Wolf » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:50 pm

Ifreann wrote:
The Grey Wolf wrote:
Considering it's his kid as well, and she doesn't have to accept his advice, yeah, she should.

What are you going to do, arrest her and cuff her to a chair while he makes a speech?


Don't put words in my mouth.
If she doesn't want to hear him, she can decide not to. I just said she should, morally.

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:50 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Not physically forced. Legally, though, it depends on the case. If the husband is abusive to either her or, if there are any, the existing children then no she shouldn't. However, if the male has no record off being abusive in any way then she should, legally, be forced to hear his grievances. Of course that applies only if the two are married or have some form of domestic partnership contract.

Sorry but she doesn't even have to listen to him if nothing is going to change her mind either way.

If nothing will change her mind then it shouldn't matter if she hears his opinion. Nobody should be able to make such a life changing decision without hearing arguments for or against that decision from all directly interested parties.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159069
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:52 pm

The Rising Sun Katana wrote:
Khanastan wrote:Well... this is problematic. Unless we can find a new carrier bird it is back to square one.

Mallards are cool!! There's a park by my house that has a small lake and lots of ducks, turtles, and fish and we go there to feed'em sometimes. Mallards can bust a move for a nummy so they'd bee the bomb!! :clap:

Nah, ducks are busy fighting their rape war against each other.

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:54 pm

Ifreann wrote:
The Rising Sun Katana wrote:Mallards are cool!! There's a park by my house that has a small lake and lots of ducks, turtles, and fish and we go there to feed'em sometimes. Mallards can bust a move for a nummy so they'd bee the bomb!! :clap:

Nah, ducks are busy fighting their rape war against each other.

Talk about a war on women...
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159069
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:55 pm

Mkuki wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Nah, ducks are busy fighting their rape war against each other.

Talk about a war on women...

Not women. Ducks.

User avatar
The Rising Sun Katana
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 196
Founded: Jun 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rising Sun Katana » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:57 pm

Ifreann wrote:
The Grey Wolf wrote:
Considering it's his kid as well, and she doesn't have to accept his advice, yeah, she should.

What are you going to do, arrest her and cuff her to a chair while he makes a speech?

No way man. Saying anything to a woman other than what she wants to hear is a total waste of time dude. Just spoon feed'em what they wanna hear and get what you want out of it while you're at it. By the time she figures out that's what you're doing you can just trade her in for a newer model with less miles on her. Don't hate the Playa!! Hate the Game....

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Crankblitz, Des-Bal, Elejamie, Eragon Island, Fractalnavel, Galloism, Habsburg Mexico, Haganham, Kerwa, Kractero, Lysset, M-101, New Bradfordsburg, Primitive Communism, Qwuazaria, Rary, San Lumen, Stellar Colonies, Stone Age Electricians, Tarsonis, The Astral Mandate, The Two Jerseys, Unitria, Warvick, Z-Zone 3

Advertisement

Remove ads

cron