Probably. But why does that mean your fetish is harmful?
Unless, y'know, you're actually raping people. Then it's harmful.
Advertisement

by The Steel Magnolia » Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:58 pm

by The Blaatschapen » Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:59 pm



by Des-Bal » Sat Jun 15, 2013 5:03 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Nailed to the Perch » Sat Jun 15, 2013 5:08 pm
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by The Steel Magnolia » Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:22 am

by The Parkus Empire » Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:52 am
Brocwika wrote:Serious question, I'm I supposed to be guilty for having a Rape niche?
I mean, I can't help it, am I supposed to feel wrong about it? Am I part of rape culture? Does fantasy with a partner make me immoral? Did rape culture do this to me? Or is it natural for a person to be dominant and aroused by submission?
I'm just wondering. Seeing all this rape culture stuff got me thinking.

by Kalarin » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:02 am

by Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 2:10 pm
Kalarin wrote:I think the real problem is that often the situation is not clear cut. Having had a relative of mine raped and seeing the psychological impact it can have on someone (She was afraid to leave the house until the guy was arrested) I understand how many people call for such harsh punishment. However her case was very clear cut, she was walking home from work along he comes and well I think the rest is pretty obvious.
But in some cases its not clear cut, take for instance at a party. When someone is intoxicated and has sex but later regrets it is it rape? The obvious problem here is whether actual consent to sex can be given when intoxicated. This is just for one person to another but it goes both ways man-woman, man-man ect. This can lead to some people being wrongfully prosecuted and sentenced for something which may not have been rape.
I think it shouldn't be called "rape culture" but rather the "rape question": What is rape and how is the definition applied to all circumstances?
How do we deal with it? and How do we undo the failings of the justice system in regards to this: people wrongfully prosecuted, people wrongfully acquitted.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Temujinn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:28 pm
Do you know someone who might be a White Protestant of English ancestry, report them to your block Sargeant CM, and he will drag them before the New House Committee on Un-American Activities. Report your neighbors.Conserative Morality wrote:Is accusing someone of being a WASP likely to damage their reputation?.... I openly admit that I use it disparagingly. Something about the mentality of the group referred to being rather contrary to American values.

by The Serbian Empire » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:30 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Kalarin wrote:I think the real problem is that often the situation is not clear cut. Having had a relative of mine raped and seeing the psychological impact it can have on someone (She was afraid to leave the house until the guy was arrested) I understand how many people call for such harsh punishment. However her case was very clear cut, she was walking home from work along he comes and well I think the rest is pretty obvious.
But in some cases its not clear cut, take for instance at a party. When someone is intoxicated and has sex but later regrets it is it rape? The obvious problem here is whether actual consent to sex can be given when intoxicated. This is just for one person to another but it goes both ways man-woman, man-man ect. This can lead to some people being wrongfully prosecuted and sentenced for something which may not have been rape.
I think it shouldn't be called "rape culture" but rather the "rape question": What is rape and how is the definition applied to all circumstances?
How do we deal with it? and How do we undo the failings of the justice system in regards to this: people wrongfully prosecuted, people wrongfully acquitted.
Intoxication is complicated, there doesn't seem to be a consensus on how drunk you have to be to be incapable of consent. Getting shitfaced and then trying to get laid is a fairly common pastime and I can't imagine the people who routinely do it believe they're enjoying consensual sex despite the fact that they are actively pursuing legal rape. Since the wheels of justice won't start spinning unless one party takes umbrage for all practical purposes it's only rape if one party says it was.

by Temujinn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:35 pm
The Serbian Empire wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
Intoxication is complicated, there doesn't seem to be a consensus on how drunk you have to be to be incapable of consent. Getting shitfaced and then trying to get laid is a fairly common pastime and I can't imagine the people who routinely do it believe they're enjoying consensual sex despite the fact that they are actively pursuing legal rape. Since the wheels of justice won't start spinning unless one party takes umbrage for all practical purposes it's only rape if one party says it was.
I guess the answer is to never ever have sex with the intoxicated as it can comeback to haunt someone.
Do you know someone who might be a White Protestant of English ancestry, report them to your block Sargeant CM, and he will drag them before the New House Committee on Un-American Activities. Report your neighbors.Conserative Morality wrote:Is accusing someone of being a WASP likely to damage their reputation?.... I openly admit that I use it disparagingly. Something about the mentality of the group referred to being rather contrary to American values.

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:50 pm

by Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:55 pm
Temujinn wrote:If you could cite my utter hatred of women, that would be great.
Hating Feminism, isnt hating women, no matter how bad you want it to be so.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:57 pm
Temujinn wrote:If they are intoxicated and you are not, then you are clearly in a more present state of mind.
If you are both shitfaced, then I think that is where ambiguity comes into play, solution- always be way more fucked up than the other person.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Saint Jade IV » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:09 pm
The Serbian Empire wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
Intoxication is complicated, there doesn't seem to be a consensus on how drunk you have to be to be incapable of consent. Getting shitfaced and then trying to get laid is a fairly common pastime and I can't imagine the people who routinely do it believe they're enjoying consensual sex despite the fact that they are actively pursuing legal rape. Since the wheels of justice won't start spinning unless one party takes umbrage for all practical purposes it's only rape if one party says it was.
I guess the answer is to never ever have sex with the intoxicated as it can comeback to haunt someone.

by Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:18 pm
Saint Jade IV wrote:
Well, the answer is to never, ever have sex with an intoxicated person, since you might be guilty of rape.
Seriously, I have never understood this obsession with "the line". Like, we have to know exactly where it is, because our need for sex is so great, it's better to possibly rape someone than miss out on getting laid.
I mean, I personally would rather go home and masturbate, than potentially cause someone irreparable, horrific mental and emotional (and potentially physical) harm.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Saint Jade IV » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:25 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Saint Jade IV wrote:
Well, the answer is to never, ever have sex with an intoxicated person, since you might be guilty of rape.
Seriously, I have never understood this obsession with "the line". Like, we have to know exactly where it is, because our need for sex is so great, it's better to possibly rape someone than miss out on getting laid.
I mean, I personally would rather go home and masturbate, than potentially cause someone irreparable, horrific mental and emotional (and potentially physical) harm.
People go to bars and parties to drink and meet people. Alcohol is a major part of social interaction.
How can we talk about educating people about consent when you need to be twelve jurors to determine whether or not it exists?

by Lyrne » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:30 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:People who like to roleplay rape scenario's are probably the least threatening people in terms of, you know, actually going out to commit rape.
If they didn't care about consent, they'd have already done it. Does it contribute to the culture?
I dunno. Probably not. If anything it's demonstrating to people how to act if you actually do have these urges.
(In a controlled roleplay manner, between consenting adults.)
.
by Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:37 pm
Saint Jade IV wrote:People need to understand that behaviour like going to a bar, and taking a wasted person home for the purposes of sex can be rape. That if a person is drunk, they may be unable to consent. They need to decide whether the risk of raping someone is worth getting their rocks off.
I think people also need to have a much better understanding of drunkenness, and the effects of alcohol and drug consumption.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Saint Jade IV » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:40 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Saint Jade IV wrote:People need to understand that behaviour like going to a bar, and taking a wasted person home for the purposes of sex can be rape. That if a person is drunk, they may be unable to consent. They need to decide whether the risk of raping someone is worth getting their rocks off.
I think people also need to have a much better understanding of drunkenness, and the effects of alcohol and drug consumption.
Given that many people go to bars and get wasted intending on having sex with someone I don't think that it makes sense to just say bone at your own peril. Turning rape into a game of duck duck goose helps nobody.

by Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:44 pm
Saint Jade IV wrote:I think educating people about the effects of alcohol and drug consumption on a person's ability to consent may assist in helping people determine whether they want to take the risk. Again, I don't understand why people would rather risk irreparably harming someone to get their rocks off?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Saint Jade IV » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:50 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Saint Jade IV wrote:I think educating people about the effects of alcohol and drug consumption on a person's ability to consent may assist in helping people determine whether they want to take the risk. Again, I don't understand why people would rather risk irreparably harming someone to get their rocks off?
Turning rape into a landmine that people randomly step on during the course of normal interaction rather than a heinous crime one person perpetrates against another robs the crime of all it's legitimacy.

by Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:54 pm
Saint Jade IV wrote:
Except that it's not normal interaction. It's rape. The problem is that people don't understand that. They have normalised something which should not be normalised. It's kind of the definition of rape culture.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Saint Jade IV » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:07 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Saint Jade IV wrote:
Except that it's not normal interaction. It's rape. The problem is that people don't understand that. They have normalised something which should not be normalised. It's kind of the definition of rape culture.
Drinking is completely normal interaction, so is having sex. It is completely normal to drink and have sex. The problem is that no clear definition exists for how drunk someone has to be to be rendered incapable of consent.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abaro, Austergard, Calption, Galloism, Gran Cordoba, Incelastan, Nilokeras, North American Imperial State, Orcuo, Port Caverton, Rary, Shrillland, Southland, Spirit of Hope, Stasts, Uiiop, United kigndoms of goumef, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement