NATION

PASSWORD

Regarding Rape Culture: Its Presence and Method of Attack

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:58 pm

Brocwika wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
You realize that if there's consent, there's no problem, right?


But if rape is bad, am I supposed to feel bad I have fetish for it?

Put it this way, when I hear a movie has a rape scene in it, I want to watch it. Is this some reinforcement from society?


Probably. But why does that mean your fetish is harmful?

Unless, y'know, you're actually raping people. Then it's harmful.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62662
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:59 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Well that was revolting to read.

I feel sorry for your daughters.


No. The way he talks about the girl is revolting.


Are you talking to yourself? :blink:
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sat Jun 15, 2013 5:00 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
No. The way he talks about the girl is revolting.


Are you talking to yourself? :blink:


I fucking hate quote tags.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32088
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Jun 15, 2013 5:03 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:

No. The way he talks about the girl is revolting.


Really because you've stated in the past that there's nothing wrong with calling someone a slut.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Nailed to the Perch
Minister
 
Posts: 2137
Founded: Dec 07, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nailed to the Perch » Sat Jun 15, 2013 5:08 pm

Brocwika wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:
You realize that if there's consent, there's no problem, right?


But if rape is bad, am I supposed to feel bad I have fetish for it?

Put it this way, when I hear a movie has a rape scene in it, I want to watch it. Is this some reinforcement from society?


Question: if you had the opportunity to watch a video of someone actually being raped, would you want to see it, or would that repulse you?
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:22 am

Des-Bal wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:

No. The way he talks about the girl is revolting.


Really because you've stated in the past that there's nothing wrong with calling someone a slut.


It was really just the utter hatred of women that cinched it.

(also slut shaming's bad, m'kay?)

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:52 am

Brocwika wrote:Serious question, I'm I supposed to be guilty for having a Rape niche?

I mean, I can't help it, am I supposed to feel wrong about it? Am I part of rape culture? Does fantasy with a partner make me immoral? Did rape culture do this to me? Or is it natural for a person to be dominant and aroused by submission?

I'm just wondering. Seeing all this rape culture stuff got me thinking.

Girls's identity is indoctrinated to care (dolls).

Boys get toy guns.

Society does teach men that violent domination is cool from boyhood, and sexy soon after. Rape is a natural extension of that.

If you get off on rape (I'm not talking BDSM), that is bad, in my opionion (because we're taught to see "shades of grey" as far as rape goes, it can negatively impact women you're with). You want an easy cure? Find a woman who's been raped and talk to her. I'm sure you know a couple, even if you don't know it. When you find it's hurt someone you know, it will cease to excite you.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Kalarin
Envoy
 
Posts: 285
Founded: Jan 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kalarin » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:02 am

I think the real problem is that often the situation is not clear cut. Having had a relative of mine raped and seeing the psychological impact it can have on someone (She was afraid to leave the house until the guy was arrested) I understand how many people call for such harsh punishment. However her case was very clear cut, she was walking home from work along he comes and well I think the rest is pretty obvious.

But in some cases its not clear cut, take for instance at a party. When someone is intoxicated and has sex but later regrets it is it rape? The obvious problem here is whether actual consent to sex can be given when intoxicated. This is just for one person to another but it goes both ways man-woman, man-man ect. This can lead to some people being wrongfully prosecuted and sentenced for something which may not have been rape.

I think it shouldn't be called "rape culture" but rather the "rape question": What is rape and how is the definition applied to all circumstances?
How do we deal with it? and How do we undo the failings of the justice system in regards to this: people wrongfully prosecuted, people wrongfully acquitted.
Economic Left/Right: 2.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.90
"There seem to me to be very few facts, at least ascertainable facts, in politics." - Robert Peel
"As a rule, men worry more about what they can't see than about what they can." - Caesar
"Those who know how to win are much more numerous than those who know how to make proper use of their victories." - Polybius

BRITISH

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32088
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 2:10 pm

Kalarin wrote:I think the real problem is that often the situation is not clear cut. Having had a relative of mine raped and seeing the psychological impact it can have on someone (She was afraid to leave the house until the guy was arrested) I understand how many people call for such harsh punishment. However her case was very clear cut, she was walking home from work along he comes and well I think the rest is pretty obvious.

But in some cases its not clear cut, take for instance at a party. When someone is intoxicated and has sex but later regrets it is it rape? The obvious problem here is whether actual consent to sex can be given when intoxicated. This is just for one person to another but it goes both ways man-woman, man-man ect. This can lead to some people being wrongfully prosecuted and sentenced for something which may not have been rape.

I think it shouldn't be called "rape culture" but rather the "rape question": What is rape and how is the definition applied to all circumstances?
How do we deal with it? and How do we undo the failings of the justice system in regards to this: people wrongfully prosecuted, people wrongfully acquitted.


Intoxication is complicated, there doesn't seem to be a consensus on how drunk you have to be to be incapable of consent. Getting shitfaced and then trying to get laid is a fairly common pastime and I can't imagine the people who routinely do it believe they're enjoying consensual sex despite the fact that they are actively pursuing legal rape. Since the wheels of justice won't start spinning unless one party takes umbrage for all practical purposes it's only rape if one party says it was.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Temujinn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1545
Founded: Jan 06, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Temujinn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:28 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Really because you've stated in the past that there's nothing wrong with calling someone a slut.


It was really just the utter hatred of women that cinched it.

(also slut shaming's bad, m'kay?)

If you could cite my utter hatred of women, that would be great.
Hating Feminism, isnt hating women, no matter how bad you want it to be so.
I hate you.
Yes, I do mean you.
Conserative Morality wrote:Is accusing someone of being a WASP likely to damage their reputation?.... I openly admit that I use it disparagingly. Something about the mentality of the group referred to being rather contrary to American values.
Do you know someone who might be a White Protestant of English ancestry, report them to your block Sargeant CM, and he will drag them before the New House Committee on Un-American Activities. Report your neighbors.

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:30 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Kalarin wrote:I think the real problem is that often the situation is not clear cut. Having had a relative of mine raped and seeing the psychological impact it can have on someone (She was afraid to leave the house until the guy was arrested) I understand how many people call for such harsh punishment. However her case was very clear cut, she was walking home from work along he comes and well I think the rest is pretty obvious.

But in some cases its not clear cut, take for instance at a party. When someone is intoxicated and has sex but later regrets it is it rape? The obvious problem here is whether actual consent to sex can be given when intoxicated. This is just for one person to another but it goes both ways man-woman, man-man ect. This can lead to some people being wrongfully prosecuted and sentenced for something which may not have been rape.

I think it shouldn't be called "rape culture" but rather the "rape question": What is rape and how is the definition applied to all circumstances?
How do we deal with it? and How do we undo the failings of the justice system in regards to this: people wrongfully prosecuted, people wrongfully acquitted.


Intoxication is complicated, there doesn't seem to be a consensus on how drunk you have to be to be incapable of consent. Getting shitfaced and then trying to get laid is a fairly common pastime and I can't imagine the people who routinely do it believe they're enjoying consensual sex despite the fact that they are actively pursuing legal rape. Since the wheels of justice won't start spinning unless one party takes umbrage for all practical purposes it's only rape if one party says it was.

I guess the answer is to never ever have sex with the intoxicated as it can comeback to haunt someone.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
Temujinn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1545
Founded: Jan 06, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Temujinn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:35 pm

The Serbian Empire wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Intoxication is complicated, there doesn't seem to be a consensus on how drunk you have to be to be incapable of consent. Getting shitfaced and then trying to get laid is a fairly common pastime and I can't imagine the people who routinely do it believe they're enjoying consensual sex despite the fact that they are actively pursuing legal rape. Since the wheels of justice won't start spinning unless one party takes umbrage for all practical purposes it's only rape if one party says it was.

I guess the answer is to never ever have sex with the intoxicated as it can comeback to haunt someone.

If they are intoxicated and you are not, then you are clearly in a more present state of mind.
If you are both shitfaced, then I think that is where ambiguity comes into play, solution- always be way more fucked up than the other person.
I hate you.
Yes, I do mean you.
Conserative Morality wrote:Is accusing someone of being a WASP likely to damage their reputation?.... I openly admit that I use it disparagingly. Something about the mentality of the group referred to being rather contrary to American values.
Do you know someone who might be a White Protestant of English ancestry, report them to your block Sargeant CM, and he will drag them before the New House Committee on Un-American Activities. Report your neighbors.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:50 pm

People who like to roleplay rape scenario's are probably the least threatening people in terms of, you know, actually going out to commit rape.
If they didn't care about consent, they'd have already done it. Does it contribute to the culture?
I dunno. Probably not. If anything it's demonstrating to people how to act if you actually do have these urges.
(In a controlled roleplay manner, between consenting adults.)
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32088
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:55 pm

Temujinn wrote:If you could cite my utter hatred of women, that would be great.
Hating Feminism, isnt hating women, no matter how bad you want it to be so.


Hating feminism is hating women, supporting with feminism but disagreeing with feminist policies is hating women, disagreeing with feminists in any capacity is hating women, supporting defense of property is hating women, disagreeing with the legal definitions is hating women. One thing I've learned from NSG is that it is very easy to accidentally hate women.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32088
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:57 pm

Temujinn wrote:If they are intoxicated and you are not, then you are clearly in a more present state of mind.
If you are both shitfaced, then I think that is where ambiguity comes into play, solution- always be way more fucked up than the other person.


The issue isn't that your state of mind is better than theirs it's that they are so intoxicated that they are incapable of consent. There's no real line for when that is. The opinion of NSG is that even if person A can't stand straight if person B is drunk enough to be incapable of consent then person B has a legitimate case for rape.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Saint Jade IV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6441
Founded: Jul 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Jade IV » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:09 pm

The Serbian Empire wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Intoxication is complicated, there doesn't seem to be a consensus on how drunk you have to be to be incapable of consent. Getting shitfaced and then trying to get laid is a fairly common pastime and I can't imagine the people who routinely do it believe they're enjoying consensual sex despite the fact that they are actively pursuing legal rape. Since the wheels of justice won't start spinning unless one party takes umbrage for all practical purposes it's only rape if one party says it was.

I guess the answer is to never ever have sex with the intoxicated as it can comeback to haunt someone.


Well, the answer is to never, ever have sex with an intoxicated person, since you might be guilty of rape.

Seriously, I have never understood this obsession with "the line". Like, we have to know exactly where it is, because our need for sex is so great, it's better to possibly rape someone than miss out on getting laid.

I mean, I personally would rather go home and masturbate, than potentially cause someone irreparable, horrific mental and emotional (and potentially physical) harm.
When you grow up, your heart dies.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of son of a b*tch or another.
RIP Dyakovo...we are all poorer for your loss.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32088
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:18 pm

Saint Jade IV wrote:
Well, the answer is to never, ever have sex with an intoxicated person, since you might be guilty of rape.

Seriously, I have never understood this obsession with "the line". Like, we have to know exactly where it is, because our need for sex is so great, it's better to possibly rape someone than miss out on getting laid.

I mean, I personally would rather go home and masturbate, than potentially cause someone irreparable, horrific mental and emotional (and potentially physical) harm.



People go to bars and parties to drink and meet people. Alcohol is a major part of social interaction.

How can we talk about educating people about consent when you need to be twelve jurors to determine whether or not it exists?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Saint Jade IV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6441
Founded: Jul 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Jade IV » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:25 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Saint Jade IV wrote:
Well, the answer is to never, ever have sex with an intoxicated person, since you might be guilty of rape.

Seriously, I have never understood this obsession with "the line". Like, we have to know exactly where it is, because our need for sex is so great, it's better to possibly rape someone than miss out on getting laid.

I mean, I personally would rather go home and masturbate, than potentially cause someone irreparable, horrific mental and emotional (and potentially physical) harm.



People go to bars and parties to drink and meet people. Alcohol is a major part of social interaction.

How can we talk about educating people about consent when you need to be twelve jurors to determine whether or not it exists?


People need to understand that behaviour like going to a bar, and taking a wasted person home for the purposes of sex can be rape. That if a person is drunk, they may be unable to consent. They need to decide whether the risk of raping someone is worth getting their rocks off.

I think people also need to have a much better understanding of drunkenness, and the effects of alcohol and drug consumption.
Last edited by Saint Jade IV on Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
When you grow up, your heart dies.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of son of a b*tch or another.
RIP Dyakovo...we are all poorer for your loss.

User avatar
Lyrne
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Jun 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lyrne » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:30 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:People who like to roleplay rape scenario's are probably the least threatening people in terms of, you know, actually going out to commit rape.
If they didn't care about consent, they'd have already done it. Does it contribute to the culture?
I dunno. Probably not. If anything it's demonstrating to people how to act if you actually do have these urges.
(In a controlled roleplay manner, between consenting adults.)


This reminds me of an entry in a CRACKED article I read a while back. When you imagine something, your brain releases the same chemicals it would if you actually experinced the situation being imagined. This makes you less likely to actually to act out on your fantasies. I'm not sure if it's because I was conditioned but with my old crush I'd act out scenarios involving the two of us getting together in my head and got absolutley nowhere IRL while I reused to do the same with my current one and have got much farther with her :lol: .

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32088
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:37 pm

Saint Jade IV wrote:People need to understand that behaviour like going to a bar, and taking a wasted person home for the purposes of sex can be rape. That if a person is drunk, they may be unable to consent. They need to decide whether the risk of raping someone is worth getting their rocks off.

I think people also need to have a much better understanding of drunkenness, and the effects of alcohol and drug consumption.


Given that many people go to bars and get wasted intending on having sex with someone I don't think that it makes sense to just say bone at your own peril. Turning rape into a game of duck duck goose helps nobody.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Saint Jade IV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6441
Founded: Jul 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Jade IV » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:40 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Saint Jade IV wrote:People need to understand that behaviour like going to a bar, and taking a wasted person home for the purposes of sex can be rape. That if a person is drunk, they may be unable to consent. They need to decide whether the risk of raping someone is worth getting their rocks off.

I think people also need to have a much better understanding of drunkenness, and the effects of alcohol and drug consumption.


Given that many people go to bars and get wasted intending on having sex with someone I don't think that it makes sense to just say bone at your own peril. Turning rape into a game of duck duck goose helps nobody.


I think educating people about the effects of alcohol and drug consumption on a person's ability to consent may assist in helping people determine whether they want to take the risk. Again, I don't understand why people would rather risk irreparably harming someone to get their rocks off?
When you grow up, your heart dies.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of son of a b*tch or another.
RIP Dyakovo...we are all poorer for your loss.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32088
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:44 pm

Saint Jade IV wrote:I think educating people about the effects of alcohol and drug consumption on a person's ability to consent may assist in helping people determine whether they want to take the risk. Again, I don't understand why people would rather risk irreparably harming someone to get their rocks off?


Turning rape into a landmine that people randomly step on during the course of normal interaction rather than a heinous crime one person perpetrates against another robs the crime of all it's legitimacy.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Saint Jade IV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6441
Founded: Jul 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Jade IV » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:50 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Saint Jade IV wrote:I think educating people about the effects of alcohol and drug consumption on a person's ability to consent may assist in helping people determine whether they want to take the risk. Again, I don't understand why people would rather risk irreparably harming someone to get their rocks off?


Turning rape into a landmine that people randomly step on during the course of normal interaction rather than a heinous crime one person perpetrates against another robs the crime of all it's legitimacy.


Except that it's not normal interaction. It's rape. The problem is that people don't understand that. They have normalised something which should not be normalised. It's kind of the definition of rape culture.
When you grow up, your heart dies.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of son of a b*tch or another.
RIP Dyakovo...we are all poorer for your loss.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32088
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:54 pm

Saint Jade IV wrote:
Except that it's not normal interaction. It's rape. The problem is that people don't understand that. They have normalised something which should not be normalised. It's kind of the definition of rape culture.


Drinking is completely normal interaction, so is having sex. It is completely normal to drink and have sex. The problem is that no clear definition exists for how drunk someone has to be to be rendered incapable of consent.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Saint Jade IV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6441
Founded: Jul 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Jade IV » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:07 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Saint Jade IV wrote:
Except that it's not normal interaction. It's rape. The problem is that people don't understand that. They have normalised something which should not be normalised. It's kind of the definition of rape culture.


Drinking is completely normal interaction, so is having sex. It is completely normal to drink and have sex. The problem is that no clear definition exists for how drunk someone has to be to be rendered incapable of consent.


So why can't people err on the side of caution? If s/he seems to drunk, looks too drunk, or has drunk a lot, maybe just don't go there? Go home and jack off or flick the bean, or do whatever.
When you grow up, your heart dies.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of son of a b*tch or another.
RIP Dyakovo...we are all poorer for your loss.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abaro, Austergard, Calption, Galloism, Gran Cordoba, Incelastan, Nilokeras, North American Imperial State, Orcuo, Port Caverton, Rary, Shrillland, Southland, Spirit of Hope, Stasts, Uiiop, United kigndoms of goumef, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads