I don't think we'll need any...
Thanks anyway...
Advertisement

by Algonquin Ascendancy » Mon May 20, 2013 9:52 pm

by Rhodesiah » Mon May 20, 2013 9:54 pm
Esternial wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
It's NSG, that's what we do. It's not a big point, it's not a big problem. It's just that Obrenovacia said something stupid, which is that a) genitalia is determinant to sexuality, and b) that a vagina is at all necessarily connected to womanhood.
I'm sure I'd feel more womanly too, with a vagina. That doesn't mean I'm not a woman and it doesn't mean anyone with a vagina is more of a woman than I am.
Where did Obrenovacia say that?
Esternial wrote:b) that a vagina is at all necessarily connected to womanhood

by Aalnordhavn » Mon May 20, 2013 10:09 pm
Esternial wrote:
It's NSG, that's what we do. It's not a big point, it's not a big problem. It's just that Obrenovacia said something stupid, which is that a) genitalia is determinant to sexuality, and b) that a vagina is at all necessarily connected to womanhood.
I'm sure I'd feel more womanly too, with a vagina. That doesn't mean I'm not a woman and it doesn't mean anyone with a vagina is more of a woman than I am.

by The Steel Magnolia » Mon May 20, 2013 10:10 pm
Rhodesiah wrote:Esternial wrote:Where did Obrenovacia say that?
She never said not hinted that genitalia is determinant to sexuality, merely felt more comfortably admitting one's own sexuality. How it related to dominance over someone else is completely stupid...Esternial wrote:b) that a vagina is at all necessarily connected to womanhood
It isn't, though it allows someone to be more comfortable in identifying with a gender group. There was no superiority complex, merely a statement of fact.
Self-righteous much?

by Rhodesiah » Mon May 20, 2013 10:13 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Rhodesiah wrote:
She never said not hinted that genitalia is determinant to sexuality, merely felt more comfortably admitting one's own sexuality. How it related to dominance over someone else is completely stupid...
It isn't, though it allows someone to be more comfortable in identifying with a gender group. There was no superiority complex, merely a statement of fact.
Self-righteous much?
Did you miss me quoting her?
She said something stupid. It's not really idiotic, it's not all that bad, all things considered. Hell, it's a common opinion.
It's still stupid.


by Aalnordhavn » Mon May 20, 2013 10:19 pm
Rhodesiah wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Did you miss me quoting her?
She said something stupid. It's not really idiotic, it's not all that bad, all things considered. Hell, it's a common opinion.
It's still stupid.
Dismissing a legitimate post as stupid... regardless of overwhelming opinion against you...

by New haven america » Mon May 20, 2013 10:19 pm

by Great Empire of Gamilus » Mon May 20, 2013 10:20 pm

by Yaie » Mon May 20, 2013 10:22 pm

by The Steel Magnolia » Mon May 20, 2013 10:26 pm
Rhodesiah wrote:Dismissing a legitimate post as stupid... regardless of overwhelming opinion against you...

by Mike the Progressive » Mon May 20, 2013 10:27 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Rhodesiah wrote:Dismissing a legitimate post as stupid... regardless of overwhelming opinion against you...
What?
Seriously, I don't think you people read at all.
The notion that genitalia is connected to sexuality is stupid. Her post said this, and I objected. The notion that there are "stages to womanhood", and one is more or less of a woman depending on how far along you are is also stupid, and I objected.
Neither of those two objections are overly controversial. Or rather, they are, but not in civilized society.

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon May 20, 2013 10:29 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Anachronous Rex » Mon May 20, 2013 10:30 pm

by Rhodesiah » Mon May 20, 2013 10:31 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Rhodesiah wrote:Dismissing a legitimate post as stupid... regardless of overwhelming opinion against you...
The notion that genitalia is connected to sexuality is stupid. Her post said this, and I objected. The notion that there are "stages to womanhood", and one is more or less of a woman depending on how far along you are is also stupid, and I objected.

by Anachronous Rex » Mon May 20, 2013 10:31 pm

by Yaie » Mon May 20, 2013 10:31 pm


by Algonquin Ascendancy » Mon May 20, 2013 10:32 pm

by Nadkor » Mon May 20, 2013 10:33 pm
Rhodesiah wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:The notion that genitalia is connected to sexuality is stupid. Her post said this, and I objected. The notion that there are "stages to womanhood", and one is more or less of a woman depending on how far along you are is also stupid, and I objected.
There's different stages to identification, progress and acceptance. For a man to put on a skirt and hop into a woman's changeroom is a little different from therapy, identification, mental transformation, physical transformation, and acceptance....
But hey... you're clearly an expert on this

by Immoren » Mon May 20, 2013 10:34 pm
Kvatchdom wrote: Hell, our Sex Ed teaches us how to attract people...
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Kharsus » Mon May 20, 2013 10:41 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:I have a penis, though I'm doing my best to distance myself from thinking in binary terms and demolish the role I've helped others force my thoughts into. I find myself only sexually attracted to people I assume have vaginas, and while I'm not sure why I don't see a need to challenge that right now.

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon May 20, 2013 10:46 pm
Kharsus wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:I have a penis, though I'm doing my best to distance myself from thinking in binary terms and demolish the role I've helped others force my thoughts into. I find myself only sexually attracted to people I assume have vaginas, and while I'm not sure why I don't see a need to challenge that right now.
Congratulations, you're perfectly natural. There's nothing wrong with that, and if other people tell you otherwise they're just trying to push their own beliefs/ideals/orientation(s) on you.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by The Steel Magnolia » Mon May 20, 2013 10:47 pm
Rhodesiah wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:The notion that genitalia is connected to sexuality is stupid. Her post said this, and I objected. The notion that there are "stages to womanhood", and one is more or less of a woman depending on how far along you are is also stupid, and I objected.
There's different stages to identification, progress and acceptance. For a man to put on a skirt and hop into a woman's changeroom is a little different from therapy, identification, mental transformation, physical transformation, and acceptance....
But hey... you're clearly an expert on this

by Nadkor » Mon May 20, 2013 10:51 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Rhodesiah wrote:
There's different stages to identification, progress and acceptance. For a man to put on a skirt and hop into a woman's changeroom is a little different from therapy, identification, mental transformation, physical transformation, and acceptance....
But hey... you're clearly an expert on this
Certainly more than you.
You're seriously arguing with a trans woman about how to identify as a woman.
E: Dammit, Nadkor! I wanted to say it this time!

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Enormous Gentiles, Galloism, Grinning Dragon, Ima, ImperialRussia, Kenowa, Kernen, Kerwa, Nantoraka, Ostroeuropa, Patoka, Picairn, Reloviskistan, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, Techocracy101010, The Black Forrest, The Sherpa Empire, The Two Jerseys, Tinhampton, Xmara
Advertisement