What's the problem with straight? Doesn't that mean they'll be into you?

Advertisement

by Olthar » Mon May 20, 2013 11:17 am


by Neutraligon » Mon May 20, 2013 11:18 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Gon is fine. Not sure about any formal word for someone who is genderless, but most of us like the singular they as a pronoun.
I've been wanting to ask people to use that as my pronoun for a while - I just always worry about people thinking I'm a pretentious dickwad.
. If you want I can use they for you. Is there a formal English gender neutral word like Sir or Madam. If not we need to come up with one.

by Obrenovacia » Mon May 20, 2013 11:20 am


by Corrian » Mon May 20, 2013 11:24 am


by Immoren » Mon May 20, 2013 11:24 am

Neutraligon wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:
I've been wanting to ask people to use that as my pronoun for a while - I just always worry about people thinking I'm a pretentious dickwad.
People can think that anyway. If you want I can use they for you. Is there a formal English gender neutral word like Sir or Madam. If not we need to come up with one.
Immoren wrote:My luck=All the interesting ones are taken, straight or lesbians.
Now i feel sad, apparently I'm not interesting

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Olthar » Mon May 20, 2013 11:25 am


by Neutraligon » Mon May 20, 2013 11:26 am

by The Legion of War » Mon May 20, 2013 11:27 am
Slembana wrote:I'm a straight male.

by Immoren » Mon May 20, 2013 11:27 am

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Olthar » Mon May 20, 2013 11:28 am

by Grenartia » Mon May 20, 2013 11:28 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Gon is fine. Not sure about any formal word for someone who is genderless, but most of us like the singular they as a pronoun.
I've been wanting to ask people to use that as my pronoun for a while - I just always worry about people thinking I'm a pretentious dickwad.
Neutraligon wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:
I've been wanting to ask people to use that as my pronoun for a while - I just always worry about people thinking I'm a pretentious dickwad.
People can think that anyway. If you want I can use they for you. Is there a formal English gender neutral word like Sir or Madam. If not we need to come up with one.

by Empires Empire » Mon May 20, 2013 11:29 am

by Sommorragh » Mon May 20, 2013 11:29 am

by Neutraligon » Mon May 20, 2013 11:30 am
Empires Empire wrote:I fail to see why in society these days people think you should get a pat on the back and a parade for having sex with... something... or whatever. Who cares. Just because you have obscure or standard sexual practices doesn't make you special at all. I'm all for equality for whatever the hell people want to do, but that's just it, equality means who cares shut up. I say let people marry their toaster oven if they want, but don't attach social benefits like tax breaks and cheaper insurance to marriage. Then let's cancel all stupid parades and such events which act like people are special just because they stuck it in something somewhere. If you want a parade go be an astronaut or something cool like that.

by Sommorragh » Mon May 20, 2013 11:30 am
Empires Empire wrote:I fail to see why in society these days people think you should get a pat on the back and a parade for having sex with... something... or whatever. Who cares. Just because you have obscure or standard sexual practices doesn't make you special at all. I'm all for equality for whatever the hell people want to do, but that's just it, equality means who cares shut up. I say let people marry their toaster oven if they want, but don't attach social benefits like tax breaks and cheaper insurance to marriage. Then let's cancel all stupid parades and such events which act like people are special just because they stuck it in something somewhere. If you want a parade go be an astronaut or something cool like that.

by Empires Empire » Mon May 20, 2013 11:38 am
Sommorragh wrote:Edit: Okay, first, yes people over blow the whole thing. But, there are still countries like Ukraine where harboring different sexual practices can get you killed.

by Immoren » Mon May 20, 2013 11:39 am
*Sommorragh wrote:I can already see the it!
"Brothers! Join with me in defiance against these tiranical harlots! Let us break the shackles of oppression and take back our rights! For too long have they had their slumber parties and horrible fashion sense! Rise my brothers, let us leave these areanas and make exodus. For Russ, Beer, Sports, Guns, other Guy Stuff and the All-Father!!!"
*Weeps manly tears*
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Ifreann » Mon May 20, 2013 11:39 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Gon is fine. Not sure about any formal word for someone who is genderless, but most of us like the singular they as a pronoun.
I've been wanting to ask people to use that as my pronoun for a while - I just always worry about people thinking I'm a pretentious dickwad.

by Olthar » Mon May 20, 2013 11:41 am
Empires Empire wrote:However, in a free country?

by Neutraligon » Mon May 20, 2013 11:42 am
Ifreann wrote:Olthar wrote:Does that include bloody fights to the death?
If you're into that kind of thing.Dumb Ideologies wrote:
I've been wanting to ask people to use that as my pronoun for a while - I just always worry about people thinking I'm a pretentious dickwad.
If you'd like, I could think you're a pretentious dickwad without you asking me anything.


by Immoren » Mon May 20, 2013 11:42 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Ifreann » Mon May 20, 2013 11:42 am
Empires Empire wrote:Sommorragh wrote:Edit: Okay, first, yes people over blow the whole thing. But, there are still countries like Ukraine where harboring different sexual practices can get you killed.
Yep, and that's bad. Same kinda bad as killing people for their religious practices, or their love of quiche. Openly defying oppression is courageous, I'll give them that one. They're not courageous for liking to have a different kind of sex, they're being courageous by defying unjust oppression, and the reason for said oppression doesn't matter. However, in a free country? Nobody cares. Unless they're somehow having different kinda weird sex while saving 40 schoolkids from a burning building, now THAT I could see them getting a pat on the back and a medal for.
People should just be themselves and shut up about it already. I'm just sick of the LOOK AT ME! generation thinking anything not within the status quo they do makes them a special snowflake. I don't care if someone is having sex with a tree or whatever. Why does that define them and their personality anyhow? How would I look if I constantly ran around shouting "OMG EVERYONE I LIKE TO HAVE SEX WITH GIRLS, LOOK AT ME, SOMEONE GIVE ME A MEDAL AND TALK ABOUT HOW COURAGEOUS I COME TO SAY SO ON TV." and wore some stupid t-shirt that says I ♥ PUSSY. I'd look like an attention whore, wouldn't I. Yes, I would.

by Neutraligon » Mon May 20, 2013 11:43 am
Empires Empire wrote:Sommorragh wrote:Edit: Okay, first, yes people over blow the whole thing. But, there are still countries like Ukraine where harboring different sexual practices can get you killed.
Yep, and that's bad. Same kinda bad as killing people for their religious practices, or their love of quiche. Openly defying oppression is courageous, I'll give them that one. They're not courageous for liking to have a different kind of sex, they're being courageous by defying unjust oppression, and the reason for said oppression doesn't matter. However, in a free country? Nobody cares. Unless they're somehow having different kinda weird sex while saving 40 schoolkids from a burning building, now THAT I could see them getting a pat on the back and a medal for.
People should just be themselves and shut up about it already. I'm just sick of the LOOK AT ME! generation thinking anything not within the status quo they do makes them a special snowflake. I don't care if someone is having sex with a tree or whatever. Why does that define them and their personality anyhow? How would I look if I constantly ran around shouting "OMG EVERYONE I LIKE TO HAVE SEX WITH GIRLS, LOOK AT ME, SOMEONE GIVE ME A MEDAL AND TALK ABOUT HOW COURAGEOUS I COME TO SAY SO ON TV." and wore some stupid t-shirt that says I ♥ PUSSY. I'd look like an attention whore, wouldn't I. Yes, I would.

by Olthar » Mon May 20, 2013 11:46 am
Ifreann wrote:Empires Empire wrote:
Yep, and that's bad. Same kinda bad as killing people for their religious practices, or their love of quiche. Openly defying oppression is courageous, I'll give them that one. They're not courageous for liking to have a different kind of sex, they're being courageous by defying unjust oppression, and the reason for said oppression doesn't matter. However, in a free country? Nobody cares. Unless they're somehow having different kinda weird sex while saving 40 schoolkids from a burning building, now THAT I could see them getting a pat on the back and a medal for.
People should just be themselves and shut up about it already. I'm just sick of the LOOK AT ME! generation thinking anything not within the status quo they do makes them a special snowflake. I don't care if someone is having sex with a tree or whatever. Why does that define them and their personality anyhow? How would I look if I constantly ran around shouting "OMG EVERYONE I LIKE TO HAVE SEX WITH GIRLS, LOOK AT ME, SOMEONE GIVE ME A MEDAL AND TALK ABOUT HOW COURAGEOUS I COME TO SAY SO ON TV." and wore some stupid t-shirt that says I ♥ PUSSY. I'd look like an attention whore, wouldn't I. Yes, I would.
I wonder how you might look if you were to show up in a thread that has nothing to do with gay pride parades, start complaining about gay pride parades, and then attribute them to attention seeking. You might just look like a gigantic hypocrite.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Aggicificicerous, Alcala-Cordel, American Legionaries, Andsed, Floofybit, Ryemarch, Umeria
Advertisement