NATION

PASSWORD

What is the gender of nationstates

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

NS, what is your gender

Male
508
82%
Female
59
10%
Genderqueer/fluid
33
5%
MtF transgender
15
2%
FtM Transgender
5
1%
 
Total votes : 620

User avatar
Sommorragh
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1073
Founded: Aug 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sommorragh » Mon May 20, 2013 11:46 am

Ifreann wrote:
Empires Empire wrote:
Yep, and that's bad. Same kinda bad as killing people for their religious practices, or their love of quiche. Openly defying oppression is courageous, I'll give them that one. They're not courageous for liking to have a different kind of sex, they're being courageous by defying unjust oppression, and the reason for said oppression doesn't matter. However, in a free country? Nobody cares. Unless they're somehow having different kinda weird sex while saving 40 schoolkids from a burning building, now THAT I could see them getting a pat on the back and a medal for.

People should just be themselves and shut up about it already. I'm just sick of the LOOK AT ME! generation thinking anything not within the status quo they do makes them a special snowflake. I don't care if someone is having sex with a tree or whatever. Why does that define them and their personality anyhow? How would I look if I constantly ran around shouting "OMG EVERYONE I LIKE TO HAVE SEX WITH GIRLS, LOOK AT ME, SOMEONE GIVE ME A MEDAL AND TALK ABOUT HOW COURAGEOUS I COME TO SAY SO ON TV." and wore some stupid t-shirt that says I ♥ PUSSY. I'd look like an attention whore, wouldn't I. Yes, I would.

I wonder how you might look if you were to show up in a thread that has nothing to do with gay pride parades, start complaining about gay pride parades, and then attribute them to attention seeking. You might just look like a gigantic hypocrite.


Let him/her be, Empire voiced his opinion that he simply thought that nobody should care who is shagging who. He came to the wrong thread and made a valid argument.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42382
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon May 20, 2013 11:47 am

Sommorragh wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I wonder how you might look if you were to show up in a thread that has nothing to do with gay pride parades, start complaining about gay pride parades, and then attribute them to attention seeking. You might just look like a gigantic hypocrite.


Let him/her be, Empire voiced his opinion that he simply thought that nobody should care who is shagging who. He came to the wrong thread and made a valid argument.


How is it a valid argument if it has nothing to do with the discussion?
Last edited by Neutraligon on Mon May 20, 2013 11:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Empires Empire
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 173
Founded: Dec 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Empires Empire » Mon May 20, 2013 11:47 am

Olthar wrote:
Empires Empire wrote:However, in a free country?

Except that America is not a free country, and we are still very much oppressed. We do not have equal rights. That's why we continue to fight.


I don't see the US government rounding up gays for extermination or putting them in prison. Besides the point is the issue of civil marriage, it shouldn't even exist at all. People only do that for tax purposes and such. A piece of paper from a courthouse does not make a couple, they make that themselves. Marriage was a religious concept that's just been taken as a requisite because even non-religious people still have their mindsets totally influenced by the religious establishment, that something like a marriage would be necessary. Leave it to the churches. Oh wait, you just want a tax break you say? Thought so. Nobody should be getting free stuff just for forming some monogamous coupling. What about equal rights for people who just don't want to get married and find it offensive that I have to pay more than a couple who does so just because I don't believe it should be required of me? Marriage itself is a coercive and offensive form of oppression, that it's required to advance in many business and political and social circles as a sign of "Stability" and that it's a way to cheapen expenses because its somehow required to not have to pay extra prices on many services.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42382
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon May 20, 2013 11:48 am

Empires Empire wrote:
Olthar wrote:Except that America is not a free country, and we are still very much oppressed. We do not have equal rights. That's why we continue to fight.


I don't see the US government rounding up gays for extermination or putting them in prison. Besides the point is the issue of civil marriage, it shouldn't even exist at all. People only do that for tax purposes and such. A piece of paper from a courthouse does not make a couple, they make that themselves. Marriage was a religious concept that's just been taken as a requisite because even non-religious people still have their mindsets totally influenced by the religious establishment, that something like a marriage would be necessary. Leave it to the churches. Oh wait, you just want a tax break you say? Thought so. Nobody should be getting free stuff just for forming some monogamous coupling. What about equal rights for people who just don't want to get married and find it offensive that I have to pay more than a couple who does so just because I don't believe it should be required of me? Marriage itself is a coercive and offensive form of oppression, that it's required to advance in many business and political and social circles as a sign of "Stability" and that it's a way to cheapen expenses because its somehow required to not have to pay extra prices on many services.


Marriage is not the discussion here. Don't threadjack.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Mon May 20, 2013 11:50 am

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Immoren wrote:Why homosexuals? Why not heterosexuals?


Why ? I don´t know why, but I know the why NOT : because no real hetero male would ever dream of becoming a girl, that´s why. We love them too much for that.


Snorts.

All the gay trans folk are sitting back and laughing, I assure you.

User avatar
Empires Empire
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 173
Founded: Dec 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Empires Empire » Mon May 20, 2013 11:50 am

Ifreann wrote:I wonder how you might look if you were to show up in a thread that has nothing to do with gay pride parades, start complaining about gay pride parades, and then attribute them to attention seeking. You might just look like a gigantic hypocrite.


Actually my point is that people are always discussing their sexual orientation like its a culture and like it defines them, which only puts them all further apart from each other, and that these things are individual and private matters on the same level as what you had for breakfast this morning. Except the obsession over typecasting yourselves in this category is what is adding fuel to the fire for the continued social backlash you'll see out of busybodies who cant keep their nose in their own business, as well as just being innane.

I believe my point is now made, return to your regularly scheduled programming.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Mon May 20, 2013 11:52 am

Nadkor wrote:
Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Well, it´s all a bit confusing, I must admit.
Maybe there should be a way of getting people to wear armbands, identifying them by what they are.
Just to keep things simple.


Maybe some kind of badge on their clothing?


How about a tattoo on their foreheads?

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Mon May 20, 2013 11:53 am

Empires Empire wrote:
Olthar wrote:Except that America is not a free country, and we are still very much oppressed. We do not have equal rights. That's why we continue to fight.


I don't see the US government rounding up gays for extermination or putting them in prison. Besides the point is the issue of civil marriage, it shouldn't even exist at all. People only do that for tax purposes and such. A piece of paper from a courthouse does not make a couple, they make that themselves. Marriage was a religious concept that's just been taken as a requisite because even non-religious people still have their mindsets totally influenced by the religious establishment, that something like a marriage would be necessary. Leave it to the churches. Oh wait, you just want a tax break you say? Thought so. Nobody should be getting free stuff just for forming some monogamous coupling. What about equal rights for people who just don't want to get married and find it offensive that I have to pay more than a couple who does so just because I don't believe it should be required of me? Marriage itself is a coercive and offensive form of oppression, that it's required to advance in many business and political and social circles as a sign of "Stability" and that it's a way to cheapen expenses because its somehow required to not have to pay extra prices on many services.

Oooookay. I'm just going to go over here and talk to someone else now. You have fun in your little...whatever this is.... :?
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42382
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon May 20, 2013 11:53 am

Empires Empire wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I wonder how you might look if you were to show up in a thread that has nothing to do with gay pride parades, start complaining about gay pride parades, and then attribute them to attention seeking. You might just look like a gigantic hypocrite.


Actually my point is that people are always discussing their sexual orientation like its a culture and like it defines them, which only puts them all further apart from each other, and that these things are individual and private matters on the same level as what you had for breakfast this morning. Except the obsession over typecasting yourselves in this category is what is adding fuel to the fire for the continued social backlash you'll see out of busybodies who cant keep their nose in their own business, as well as just being innane.

I believe my point is now made, return to your regularly scheduled programming.


The question was about sex and sexual orientation, so we are discussing it. Discussing it means people will be more likely to understand those who have a sexual orientation different from their own which in turn can lead to acceptance and in turn to equality. Sexual orientation is one of the things that defines a person. Oh a runner. Never did answer my question.
Last edited by Neutraligon on Mon May 20, 2013 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Mon May 20, 2013 11:54 am

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Nadkor wrote:
Maybe some kind of badge on their clothing?


How about a tattoo on their foreheads?


Nah, that's way too oppressive. Just publicly humiliate them and/or force people to wear markers showing their 23rd pair (or otherwise) of chromosomes.

Because we care, and it's about being caring and compassionate.

EDIT: Oh, and privately-funded propaganda campaigns to indoctrinate the children.
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Mon May 20, 2013 11:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Mon May 20, 2013 11:54 am

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Why ? I don´t know why, but I know the why NOT : because no real hetero male would ever dream of becoming a girl, that´s why. We love them too much for that.


Snorts.

All the gay trans folk are sitting back and laughing, I assure you.

I'm not. I'm more sighing, really.
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Mon May 20, 2013 11:55 am

Obrenovacia wrote:Male to Female transsexual. Post-op to boot.

I'm now straight ;)


Yeah, screw the rest of us who can't/don't want surgery! Sexuality is about genitals, nothing more!

Good lord.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon May 20, 2013 11:55 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Empires Empire wrote:
Actually my point is that people are always discussing their sexual orientation like its a culture and like it defines them, which only puts them all further apart from each other, and that these things are individual and private matters on the same level as what you had for breakfast this morning. Except the obsession over typecasting yourselves in this category is what is adding fuel to the fire for the continued social backlash you'll see out of busybodies who cant keep their nose in their own business, as well as just being innane.

I believe my point is now made, return to your regularly scheduled programming.


The question was about sex and sexual orientation, so we are discussing it. Discussing it means people will be more likely to understand those who have a sexual orientation different from their own which in turn can lead to acceptance and in turn to equality. Sexual orientation is one of the things that defines a person. Oh a runner. Never did answer my question.

Shocking concept, ain't it?
password scrambled

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Mon May 20, 2013 11:56 am

Empires Empire wrote:
Sommorragh wrote:Edit: Okay, first, yes people over blow the whole thing. But, there are still countries like Ukraine where harboring different sexual practices can get you killed.


Yep, and that's bad. Same kinda bad as killing people for their religious practices, or their love of quiche. Openly defying oppression is courageous, I'll give them that one. They're not courageous for liking to have a different kind of sex, they're being courageous by defying unjust oppression, and the reason for said oppression doesn't matter.

Congratulations! You just answered why pride parades exist.

User avatar
Empires Empire
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 173
Founded: Dec 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Empires Empire » Mon May 20, 2013 11:57 am

Neutraligon wrote: Sexual orientation is one of the things that defines a person. Oh a runner. Never did answer my question.


Nope just was going to let things return to their original path, chimed in with my 2 cents. I'll say this though, sexual orientation doesn't define a person at all. I can't for the life of me think I'm in any way defined by who I want to sleep with. I find myself to be defined by my character, my ideals, my goals, my achievements, and my failures. Not by the fact that I have some base primal urge in the back of my skull to stick part of myself inside of women. To me, that's like saying I'm defined by my urge to stick air inside my lungs, or to stick water inside of my stomach.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon May 20, 2013 11:58 am

Empires Empire wrote:
Neutraligon wrote: Sexual orientation is one of the things that defines a person. Oh a runner. Never did answer my question.


Nope just was going to let things return to their original path, chimed in with my 2 cents. I'll say this though, sexual orientation doesn't define a person at all. I can't for the life of me think I'm in any way defined by who I want to sleep with. I find myself to be defined by my character, my ideals, my goals, my achievements, and my failures. Not by the fact that I have some base primal urge in the back of my skull to stick part of myself inside of women. To me, that's like saying I'm defined by my urge to stick air inside my lungs, or to stick water inside of my stomach.

You are defined by those. Derp.
password scrambled

User avatar
Empires Empire
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 173
Founded: Dec 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Empires Empire » Mon May 20, 2013 11:58 am

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Empires Empire wrote:
Yep, and that's bad. Same kinda bad as killing people for their religious practices, or their love of quiche. Openly defying oppression is courageous, I'll give them that one. They're not courageous for liking to have a different kind of sex, they're being courageous by defying unjust oppression, and the reason for said oppression doesn't matter.

Congratulations! You just answered why pride parades exist.


Go have a pride parade in Saudi Arabia then. You'll want to be bringing tanks and jet fighters to that one. THAT I'll call courageous as hell and probably even show up to and help.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42382
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon May 20, 2013 11:59 am

Empires Empire wrote:
Neutraligon wrote: Sexual orientation is one of the things that defines a person. Oh a runner. Never did answer my question.


Nope just was going to let things return to their original path, chimed in with my 2 cents. I'll say this though, sexual orientation doesn't define a person at all. I can't for the life of me think I'm in any way defined by who I want to sleep with. I find myself to be defined by my character, my ideals, my goals, my achievements, and my failures. Not by the fact that I have some base primal urge in the back of my skull to stick part of myself inside of women. To me, that's like saying I'm defined by my urge to stick air inside my lungs, or to stick water inside of my stomach.


I said part of what defines a person. A person is the some of their parts, and part of a person is who they are sexually attracted to. Also please answer my question about whether you know why the pride parades came into existence.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon May 20, 2013 12:00 pm

Empires Empire wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Congratulations! You just answered why pride parades exist.


Go have a pride parade in Saudi Arabia then. You'll want to be bringing tanks and jet fighters to that one. THAT I'll call courageous as hell and probably even show up to and help.

So it doesn't mean anything unless you're going out of your way to risk being executed. Yeah, okay.
password scrambled

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58543
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 20, 2013 12:02 pm

The Steel Magnolia wrote:
Empires Empire wrote:
Yep, and that's bad. Same kinda bad as killing people for their religious practices, or their love of quiche. Openly defying oppression is courageous, I'll give them that one. They're not courageous for liking to have a different kind of sex, they're being courageous by defying unjust oppression, and the reason for said oppression doesn't matter.

Congratulations! You just answered why pride parades exist.


And yet, when asked explicitly if you'd support a straight pride parade you said no.
Despite the fact straight people also suffer oppression at the hands of prudes.


As for the poll, I recognize including all options is not feasible so i'm not mad.

I'm bisexual and do not have a gender identity.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon May 20, 2013 12:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Empires Empire
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 173
Founded: Dec 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Empires Empire » Mon May 20, 2013 12:02 pm

Condunum wrote:You are defined by those. Derp.


Only in the most base and uninteresting sense. When will society move past such basics and concern itself with people's real essence? I'd rather see people with a tag under their posts saying "I'm a great piano player!" or "Writing a great book!" than "I like to have sex with ______". Suppose I'm just musing on the fact that even when someone believes they're liberating themselves from society's oppressive trappings, they're still being defined and typecast by them as though they're some sort of counter-culture or other such subclass.

Now really, I'm hungry and I had no intention on turning this into a full page of me contemplating such issues. I'm gonna go get some dinner and beer.

User avatar
Kvatchdom
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8823
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Kvatchdom » Mon May 20, 2013 12:03 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Congratulations! You just answered why pride parades exist.


And yet, when asked explicitly if you'd support a straight pride parade you said no.
Despite the fact straight people also suffer oppression at the hands of prudes.

The Gay Pride parade is mainly for the cause of promoting needed equality, not to promote actual pride of being gay.

The genius in this thread is overwhelming me.
boo
Left-wing nationalist, socialist, souverainist and anti-American. From the River to the Sea.
Equality, Fatherland, Socialism
I am not available on the weekends

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon May 20, 2013 12:04 pm

Empires Empire wrote:
Condunum wrote:You are defined by those. Derp.


Only in the most base and uninteresting sense. When will society move past such basics and concern itself with people's real essence? I'd rather see people with a tag under their posts saying "I'm a great piano player!" or "Writing a great book!" than "I like to have sex with ______". Suppose I'm just musing on the fact that even when someone believes they're liberating themselves from society's oppressive trappings, they're still being defined and typecast by them as though they're some sort of counter-culture or other such subclass.

Now really, I'm hungry and I had no intention on turning this into a full page of me contemplating such issues. I'm gonna go get some dinner and beer.

Good for you. Come back when you actually grasp the concept of why pride parades exist, and all this is happening.
password scrambled

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58543
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 20, 2013 12:07 pm

Kvatchdom wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
And yet, when asked explicitly if you'd support a straight pride parade you said no.
Despite the fact straight people also suffer oppression at the hands of prudes.

The Gay Pride parade is mainly for the cause of promoting needed equality, not to promote actual pride of being gay.

The genius in this thread is overwhelming me.


Gay people are told they aren't allowed to fulfill their sexual urges.
Straight people are also told this. (They just have a loophole that is grudgingly given to them. But first we gotta cut off a bit of your foreskin to make it as shit as possible, and also we might hack off the clitoris too.)
If the gay pride parade means anything at all, it's a parade about being open with your sexuality and in celebration of exploration and experimentation followed by self-discovery, as well as an endorsement of tolerance of other sexualities.

Suppose a straight person underwent a self-explorative process and experimented with their sexuality, knowing full well that doing so went against societal bigotry and such, and did it anyway to discover themselves.
Then they find out they are straight.

What about that process and the discovery at the end alters if you discover you are gay? (Other than the, you know, being gay or straight.)
I'd prefer the gay pride parades be labeled sexuality pride parades.
Would the gay pride parade welcome straight furries?
If not, why not.
How about BDSM people?
It's these kinds of questions that make the concept of an explicitly "Gays, lesbians and bisexuals only" parade a complete farce.
Hence why I prefer to see them as sexuality parades.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon May 20, 2013 12:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Kvatchdom
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8823
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Kvatchdom » Mon May 20, 2013 12:09 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Kvatchdom wrote:The Gay Pride parade is mainly for the cause of promoting needed equality, not to promote actual pride of being gay.

The genius in this thread is overwhelming me.


Gay people are told they aren't allowed to fulfill their sexual urges.
Straight people are also told this.
If the gay pride parade means anything at all, it's a parade about being open with your sexuality and in celebration of exploration and experimentation followed by self-discovery, as well as an endorsement of tolerance of other sexualities.

Suppose a straight person underwent a self-explorative process and experimented with their sexuality, knowing full well that doing so went against societal bigotry and such, and did it anyway to discover themselves.
Then they find out they are straight.

What about that process and the discovery at the end alters if you discover you are gay? (Other than the, you know, being gay or straight.)
I'd prefer the gay pride parades be labeled sexuality pride parades.


Actually, in modern countries everyone is told to fulfill sexual urges. Especially straight people.

well, they aren't even called Gay Pride parades, just Pride parades. ;)
boo
Left-wing nationalist, socialist, souverainist and anti-American. From the River to the Sea.
Equality, Fatherland, Socialism
I am not available on the weekends

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Fartsniffage, Gun Manufacturers, Ifreann, Minoa, Philjia, Picairn, Port Carverton, San Lumen, Shidei, Tungstan, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads