Advertisement

by Asuiop » Fri May 31, 2013 9:54 pm

by Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:54 pm
Dakini wrote:Vazdania wrote:at conception, that cell is a human. If you prevent those gametes from forming a complete diploid cell then go ahead.
You know that more than half of all fertilized ova spontaneously abort, right?
Half of them don't even implant and more of them result in a miscarriage before a woman even knows she was pregnant. I'd only be getting an abortion slightly later than that so really, it's no biggie as far as development goes.

by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:55 pm
Vazdania wrote:Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:If your intent to do so and use of contraceptives is 100% effective, yes, I'd accept that argument. But often contraceptives are not 100% effective, and often women are not given a choice of contraceptive.
well then they become pregnant....then they should go along with the pregnancy until the child is birthed.

by Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:55 pm


by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:56 pm
Vazdania wrote:Dakini wrote:You know that more than half of all fertilized ova spontaneously abort, right?
Half of them don't even implant and more of them result in a miscarriage before a woman even knows she was pregnant. I'd only be getting an abortion slightly later than that so really, it's no biggie as far as development goes.
that is correct, we can only blame nature on that, the women didn't intentionally do that, now did she??? Nature naturally aborts some embryo's.
Your default thinking is blaming something for everything, isn't it?
by Individuality-ness » Fri May 31, 2013 9:56 pm
Asuiop wrote:Look, the human being ended up inside of you through your actions. The human being had no say in the matter. Now you want to kill the human instead of giving birth to him/her. Sounds a bit selfish doesn't it?

by Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:56 pm
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:Vazdania wrote:well then they become pregnant....then they should go along with the pregnancy until the child is birthed.
What a casual understanding of points I have made, without any regard to realities. You really are not very mature in your understanding of the world.

by Asuiop » Fri May 31, 2013 9:56 pm

by Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:56 pm



by Dakini » Fri May 31, 2013 9:57 pm
Individuality-ness wrote:Dakini wrote:"The bear didn't want to maul you, you unknowingly put yourself between her and her cub so you forced her to maul you."
"The troll didn't want to troll you, you unknowingly put your picture up so that said troll was forced to badly Photoshop it to make it look like you were eating cum and spam it all over the forums to harass you."

by Individuality-ness » Fri May 31, 2013 9:57 pm

by Mavorpen » Fri May 31, 2013 9:57 pm
Auralia wrote:
Laws, including the legal definition of "person", are rooted in reason, empirical evidence, and ethics. So please give me a reason why not all human beings should receive the fundamental human right (i.e. right to life) associated with human personhood.

by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:58 pm

by Individuality-ness » Fri May 31, 2013 9:58 pm
Dakini wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:"The troll didn't want to troll you, you unknowingly put your picture up so that said troll was forced to badly Photoshop it to make it look like you were eating cum and spam it all over the forums to harass you."
"You didn't want to start a trend, you unknowingly made a terrible argument and everyone else was forced to find it hilarious."

by Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:58 pm

by Asuiop » Fri May 31, 2013 9:58 pm

by Individuality-ness » Fri May 31, 2013 9:59 pm

by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:59 pm


by Dakini » Fri May 31, 2013 10:00 pm
Vazdania wrote:Dakini wrote:You know that more than half of all fertilized ova spontaneously abort, right?
Half of them don't even implant and more of them result in a miscarriage before a woman even knows she was pregnant. I'd only be getting an abortion slightly later than that so really, it's no biggie as far as development goes.
that is correct, we can only blame nature on that, the women didn't intentionally do that, now did she??? Nature naturally aborts some embryo's.

by Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 10:00 pm

by Asuiop » Fri May 31, 2013 10:00 pm

by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 10:01 pm
Vazdania wrote:Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:On their own. Right.
fucking no. The women consented to sex which may or may not result in a fetus depending on if nature allows the child to remain in the womb. Now the women knowingly had sex and know the consequences thereof. ALL people start out life in such a (albeit parasitic) manner, but even parasites are organisms.

by Dakini » Fri May 31, 2013 10:02 pm
Asuiop wrote:Look, the human being ended up inside of you through your actions. The human being had no say in the matter. Now you want to kill the human instead of giving birth to him/her. Sounds a bit selfish doesn't it?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bruhssians, Calption, Dantek, Duvniask, El Lazaro, Elwher, Fartsniffage, Floofybit, Free Papua Republic, Guxturnia, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Hurtful Thoughts, Juansonia, Katangese Republic, Kernen, Major-Tom, Mittle Europa Reich, Stalvervild, The Sherpa Empire, The Two Jerseys, Washington Resistance Army, Weenus
Advertisement