NATION

PASSWORD

So, Abortion.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What should the legal conditions for abortion be?

Always legal.
142
27%
Legal until the date of expected birth.
24
4%
Legal until the start of the third trimester.
62
12%
Legal until the start of the second trimester.
48
9%
Legal until the fetus can feel pain.
37
7%
Legal until the fetus has brain activity.
51
10%
Legal until the fetus has a heartbeat.
35
7%
Completely illegal, but allow the morning-after pill.
58
11%
Completely illegal and do not allow the morning-after pill.
78
15%
 
Total votes : 535

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 31, 2013 9:28 pm

Auralia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:This is a nonsensical question. Becoming a person doesn't preclude gaining rights, gaining rights precludes becoming a person. Being a person depends upon having rights.

OK, then, let's examine another question: do you believe that human beings have a right to life? If so, doesn't abortion violate this right?

No. What the fuck is with this 20 Questions shit?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Asuiop
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1568
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Asuiop » Fri May 31, 2013 9:28 pm

Individuality-ness wrote:
Asuiop wrote:Sorry messing up with the Amendments today
And I have already debated with you on this, I'm not going back to that

Too bad, legally they are not persons under the law, as per Roe v. Wade.

Not re-debating this...
"Unless hes ready to put some serious boot to ass, Hungry is fucked. Blobhemia, Austria, Switzerland, Britanny and whoever else gets cascaded. Thats a hell of an alliance to go against, especially because you know France will worm their way in too. They always do."
- Some random EU3 player


Join the UU(Unitarian Union) today! We are completely open region with our own centralized currency, the Unitaria! The only requirement is that you change your currency to the Unitaria.

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:28 pm

Auralia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:This is a nonsensical question. Becoming a person doesn't preclude gaining rights, gaining rights precludes becoming a person. Being a person depends upon having rights.

OK, then, let's examine another question: do you believe that human beings have a right to life? If so, doesn't abortion violate this right?

Again. fetus have never been given legal personhood. Ever.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:29 pm

Asuiop wrote:It is a human being, and killing a living human being is wrong, assuming they aren't coming at you with a knife.

fetus is not a human being no matter how much you wish they would be.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Fri May 31, 2013 9:29 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Auralia wrote:OK, then, let's examine another question: do you believe that human beings have a right to life? If so, doesn't abortion violate this right?

No. What the fuck is with this 20 Questions shit?

I'm asking questions because I'm trying to understand how you can reconcile abortion with the fact that fetuses are human beings.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:30 pm

Auralia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No. What the fuck is with this 20 Questions shit?

I'm asking questions because I'm trying to understand how you can reconcile abortion with the fact that fetuses are human beings.

We reconcile it by knowing that fetus is not a human being.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 31, 2013 9:30 pm

Auralia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No. What the fuck is with this 20 Questions shit?

I'm asking questions because I'm trying to understand how you can reconcile abortion with the fact that fetuses are human beings.

Why? Why do this when you can simply read what I've posted in this thread previously?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Asuiop
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1568
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Asuiop » Fri May 31, 2013 9:31 pm

Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:
Asuiop wrote:It is a human being, and killing a living human being is wrong, assuming they aren't coming at you with a knife.

fetus is not a human being no matter how much you wish they would be.

Yes, it is. Lets just drop all this legal crap and get right down to it. The fetus is simply an underdeveloped human which is currently developing.
"Unless hes ready to put some serious boot to ass, Hungry is fucked. Blobhemia, Austria, Switzerland, Britanny and whoever else gets cascaded. Thats a hell of an alliance to go against, especially because you know France will worm their way in too. They always do."
- Some random EU3 player


Join the UU(Unitarian Union) today! We are completely open region with our own centralized currency, the Unitaria! The only requirement is that you change your currency to the Unitaria.

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Fri May 31, 2013 9:31 pm

Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:
Auralia wrote:I'm asking questions because I'm trying to understand how you can reconcile abortion with the fact that fetuses are human beings.

We reconcile it by knowing that fetus is not a human being.

Mavorpen has stated that fetuses are human beings. We both agree on that point, so I'm making use of it in this debate.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Fri May 31, 2013 9:32 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Auralia wrote:I'm asking questions because I'm trying to understand how you can reconcile abortion with the fact that fetuses are human beings.

Why? Why do this when you can simply read what I've posted in this thread previously?

Because I don't have the time nor the will to trawl through a 70+ page thread looking for your comments. Why not quote some of what you've already said, to make it easier on me?
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 31, 2013 9:33 pm

Auralia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Why? Why do this when you can simply read what I've posted in this thread previously?

Because I don't have the time nor the will to trawl through a 70+ page thread looking for your comments. Why not quote some of what you've already said, to make it easier on me?

Are you kidding? There's a search bar right there at the top of the page.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Fri May 31, 2013 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:35 pm

Asuiop wrote:
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:fetus is not a human being no matter how much you wish they would be.

Yes, it is. Lets just drop all this legal crap and get right down to it. The fetus is simply an underdeveloped human which is currently developing.

How is your desire to just outright claim that fetus is a human any more special than my desire to stick to the law of the land and not imbue it with human rights?
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:36 pm

Auralia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Why? Why do this when you can simply read what I've posted in this thread previously?

Because I don't have the time nor the will to trawl through a 70+ page thread looking for your comments. Why not quote some of what you've already said, to make it easier on me?

Your laziness is not my problem.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Fri May 31, 2013 9:36 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Auralia wrote:Because I don't have the time nor the will to trawl through a 70+ page thread looking for your comments. Why not quote some of what you've already said, to make it easier on me?

Are you kidding? There's a search bar right there at the top of the page.

Look, it's not my job to hunt down your arguments in the 200+ search results I get when I search for your nation's name (which, by the way, dd not necessarily include your original posts, only posts in which your name is mentioned).
Last edited by Auralia on Fri May 31, 2013 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Fri May 31, 2013 9:37 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Dakini wrote:So? Consenting people are aware that a pregnancy may result from sex and that they may have to seek an abortion as much as this is an uncomfortable procedure with unpleasant effects (but still significantly better than carrying a pregnancy to term).

why would you seek an abortion in the first place?

Me personally? If I got pregnant right now there would definitely be some issues. I'm trying to take up a job on a fixed contract while my partner finishes his PhD (I'm finishing mine soon) in a country where I don't speak the language and would not be able to yell "get that fucking scalpel away from me" so I don't think I'd want to give birth there. Also, the contract would not allow for maternity leave so if I carried to term and took any time off at all, I'd have to repay any money I'd earned up to that point and uh... not have a job after that. So my partner, our hypothetical offspring and I would have to eke out an existence on his stipend as a lab assistant (which isn't much) in a country where we have no family or support network (and indeed, family and support network would be on the other side of the planet). Oh, that is if they let me stay in the country. I could apply for a spousal visa, but you know. I'd probably have to leave and come back and they could of course deny my application. It's not really a good time for babies here (which is, of course, why we're vigilant about contraception, but then so are most of the women who go in to get abortions in the first place).

If you meant in general, women have abortions for lots of reasons. People take surveys, but they usually boil it down to few word answers.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:37 pm

Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:
Asuiop wrote:Yes, it is. Lets just drop all this legal crap and get right down to it. The fetus is simply an underdeveloped human which is currently developing.

How is your desire to just outright claim that fetus is a human any more special than my desire to stick to the law of the land and not imbue it with human rights?

Fetuses are in fact human though. :unsure:
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:37 pm

Dakini wrote:
Vazdania wrote:why would you seek an abortion in the first place?

Me personally? If I got pregnant right now there would definitely be some issues. I'm trying to take up a job on a fixed contract while my partner finishes his PhD (I'm finishing mine soon) in a country where I don't speak the language and would not be able to yell "get that fucking scalpel away from me" so I don't think I'd want to give birth there. Also, the contract would not allow for maternity leave so if I carried to term and took any time off at all, I'd have to repay any money I'd earned up to that point and uh... not have a job after that. So my partner, our hypothetical offspring and I would have to eke out an existence on his stipend as a lab assistant (which isn't much) in a country where we have no family or support network (and indeed, family and support network would be on the other side of the planet). Oh, that is if they let me stay in the country. I could apply for a spousal visa, but you know. I'd probably have to leave and come back and they could of course deny my application. It's not really a good time for babies here (which is, of course, why we're vigilant about contraception, but then so are most of the women who go in to get abortions in the first place).

If you meant in general, women have abortions for lots of reasons. People take surveys, but they usually boil it down to few word answers.

so don't have sex in the first place.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Imota
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1828
Founded: Dec 19, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Imota » Fri May 31, 2013 9:38 pm

Always legal, always available, always safe, always regulated, and always rare.

User avatar
Asuiop
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1568
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Asuiop » Fri May 31, 2013 9:38 pm

Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:
Asuiop wrote:Yes, it is. Lets just drop all this legal crap and get right down to it. The fetus is simply an underdeveloped human which is currently developing.

How is your desire to just outright claim that fetus is a human any more special than my desire to stick to the law of the land and not imbue it with human rights?

You are all obsessed with legality and court cases and dictionary definitions that you completely ignore the most important part! The Ethics!
Last edited by Asuiop on Fri May 31, 2013 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Unless hes ready to put some serious boot to ass, Hungry is fucked. Blobhemia, Austria, Switzerland, Britanny and whoever else gets cascaded. Thats a hell of an alliance to go against, especially because you know France will worm their way in too. They always do."
- Some random EU3 player


Join the UU(Unitarian Union) today! We are completely open region with our own centralized currency, the Unitaria! The only requirement is that you change your currency to the Unitaria.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Fri May 31, 2013 9:38 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:How is your desire to just outright claim that fetus is a human any more special than my desire to stick to the law of the land and not imbue it with human rights?

Fetuses are in fact human though. :unsure:

Why does any human get to use another human's body without the second human's consent?

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Fri May 31, 2013 9:38 pm

Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:
Auralia wrote:Because I don't have the time nor the will to trawl through a 70+ page thread looking for your comments. Why not quote some of what you've already said, to make it easier on me?

Your laziness is not my problem.

I'm not talking to you. I have zero interest in debating with you, given your quasi-personal attack. Please stop talking to me.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 31, 2013 9:38 pm

Auralia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Are you kidding? There's a search bar right there at the top of the page.

Look, it's not my job to hunt down your arguments in the 200+ search results I get when I search for your nation's name (which, by the way, dd not necessarily include your original posts, only posts in which your name is mentioned).

And it's not my job to explain everything I've already explained.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:38 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:How is your desire to just outright claim that fetus is a human any more special than my desire to stick to the law of the land and not imbue it with human rights?

Fetuses are in fact human though. :unsure:

No legally they are not a person.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Fri May 31, 2013 9:39 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Dakini wrote:Me personally? If I got pregnant right now there would definitely be some issues. I'm trying to take up a job on a fixed contract while my partner finishes his PhD (I'm finishing mine soon) in a country where I don't speak the language and would not be able to yell "get that fucking scalpel away from me" so I don't think I'd want to give birth there. Also, the contract would not allow for maternity leave so if I carried to term and took any time off at all, I'd have to repay any money I'd earned up to that point and uh... not have a job after that. So my partner, our hypothetical offspring and I would have to eke out an existence on his stipend as a lab assistant (which isn't much) in a country where we have no family or support network (and indeed, family and support network would be on the other side of the planet). Oh, that is if they let me stay in the country. I could apply for a spousal visa, but you know. I'd probably have to leave and come back and they could of course deny my application. It's not really a good time for babies here (which is, of course, why we're vigilant about contraception, but then so are most of the women who go in to get abortions in the first place).

If you meant in general, women have abortions for lots of reasons. People take surveys, but they usually boil it down to few word answers.

so don't have sex in the first place.

No.

User avatar
Asuiop
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1568
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Asuiop » Fri May 31, 2013 9:39 pm

Dakini wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Fetuses are in fact human though. :unsure:

Why does any human get to use another human's body without the second human's consent?

Because the first human effectively forced the second human to develop within and completely dependant to the first human.
"Unless hes ready to put some serious boot to ass, Hungry is fucked. Blobhemia, Austria, Switzerland, Britanny and whoever else gets cascaded. Thats a hell of an alliance to go against, especially because you know France will worm their way in too. They always do."
- Some random EU3 player


Join the UU(Unitarian Union) today! We are completely open region with our own centralized currency, the Unitaria! The only requirement is that you change your currency to the Unitaria.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cannot think of a name, Gallade, Hurdergaryp, Majestic-12 [Bot], Stellar Colonies, Z-Zone 3

Advertisement

Remove ads