NATION

PASSWORD

So, Abortion.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What should the legal conditions for abortion be?

Always legal.
142
27%
Legal until the date of expected birth.
24
4%
Legal until the start of the third trimester.
62
12%
Legal until the start of the second trimester.
48
9%
Legal until the fetus can feel pain.
37
7%
Legal until the fetus has brain activity.
51
10%
Legal until the fetus has a heartbeat.
35
7%
Completely illegal, but allow the morning-after pill.
58
11%
Completely illegal and do not allow the morning-after pill.
78
15%
 
Total votes : 535

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:08 pm

Asuiop wrote:I don't believe that consent to sex is consent to pregnancy. The reason why they get different treatment is because consent to sex is consent to risk of pregnancy.

So according to you, wanting sex automatically means the woman is consenting to the risk of pregnancy, but not the pregnancy itself. Therefore, you wouldn't have problem accepting that a woman should have access to abortion in case a pregnancy results from sex, no?
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Fri May 31, 2013 9:09 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Auralia wrote:Roe v. Wade was contingent on the assumption that a fetus is not a person. Do you believe that some human beings are not human persons?

Yes. What a stupid question.

No, it really isn't. You're going to have to clarify that distinction.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Fri May 31, 2013 9:10 pm

Vazdania wrote:Again, the many of you know my views on abortion.

I don't think that abortion should be legal accept for in cases of rape and if it will kill the mother if she gives birth to it.

A fetus is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and its developing into an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to develop into an individual. I'm not anti-women, but I can't help but viewing abortion as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.

....a fetus is a human, unless its mother was raped.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 31, 2013 9:10 pm

Auralia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Yes. What a stupid question.

No, it really isn't. You're going to have to clarify that distinction.

It is when you consider that I've stated that at least six times.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Asuiop
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1568
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Asuiop » Fri May 31, 2013 9:10 pm

Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:
Asuiop wrote:I don't believe that consent to sex is consent to pregnancy. The reason why they get different treatment is because consent to sex is consent to risk of pregnancy.

So according to you, wanting sex automatically means the woman is consenting to the risk of pregnancy, but not the pregnancy itself. Therefore, you wouldn't have problem accepting that a woman should have access to abortion in case a pregnancy results from sex, no?

Yes, I would have a problem...
"Unless hes ready to put some serious boot to ass, Hungry is fucked. Blobhemia, Austria, Switzerland, Britanny and whoever else gets cascaded. Thats a hell of an alliance to go against, especially because you know France will worm their way in too. They always do."
- Some random EU3 player


Join the UU(Unitarian Union) today! We are completely open region with our own centralized currency, the Unitaria! The only requirement is that you change your currency to the Unitaria.

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:10 pm

Vazdania wrote:A fetus is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and its developing into an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to develop into an individual. I'm not anti-women, but I can't help but viewing abortion as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.

A "corpse" is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and it "can be revived to be" an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to "revive to be" an individual. I'm not anti-"casket", but I can't help but viewing "burial" as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.
Last edited by Grad Duchy of Luxembourg on Fri May 31, 2013 9:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Fri May 31, 2013 9:12 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Auralia wrote:No, it really isn't. You're going to have to clarify that distinction.

It is when you consider that I've stated that at least six times.

Humour me. Please explain why some human beings are not human persons.
Last edited by Auralia on Fri May 31, 2013 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:12 pm

Asuiop wrote:
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:So according to you, wanting sex automatically means the woman is consenting to the risk of pregnancy, but not the pregnancy itself. Therefore, you wouldn't have problem accepting that a woman should have access to abortion in case a pregnancy results from sex, no?

Yes, I would have a problem...

Let me quote Dakani again.
Dakini wrote:So how is abortion not an acceptable way to deal with this outcome? Consent to sex is also consent to the risk of getting an STI, but that doesn't mean we keep people from getting some penicillin when they get the clap because they chose to take that risk.

If it's because life is important and every fetus has the right to become a baby, then the rape victim should also be forced to carry to term.

If it's about taking responsibility for your actions, then I ask how is an abortion not taking responsibility? It's not like it's something women do for fun.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Fri May 31, 2013 9:12 pm

Vazdania wrote:Again, the many of you know my views on abortion.

I don't think that abortion should be legal accept for in cases of rape and if it will kill the mother if she gives birth to it.

A fetus is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and its developing into an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to develop into an individual. I'm not anti-women, but I can't help but viewing abortion as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.

If you believe it is human, then why (without some hocus-pocus Christian explanation) would it be fine to abort a fetus resulting from a rape, but not from consensual sex?
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:12 pm

Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:
Vazdania wrote:A fetus is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and its developing into an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to develop into an individual. I'm not anti-women, but I can't help but viewing abortion as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.

A "corpse" is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and it "can be revived to be" an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to "revive to be" an individual. I'm not anti-"casket", but I can't help but viewing "burial" as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.

The dead person is not really developing anymore now are they???
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Asuiop
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1568
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Asuiop » Fri May 31, 2013 9:13 pm

Dakini wrote:
Asuiop wrote:I don't believe that consent to sex is consent to pregnancy. The reason why they get different treatment is because consent to sex is consent to risk of pregnancy.

So how is abortion not an acceptable way to deal with this outcome? Consent to sex is also consent to the risk of getting an STI, but that doesn't mean we keep people from getting some penicillin when they get the clap because they chose to take that risk.

If it's because life is important and every fetus has the right to become a baby, then the rape victim should also be forced to carry to term.

If it's about taking responsibility for your actions, then I ask how is an abortion not taking responsibility? It's not like it's something women do for fun.

And this is why I was wary of answering the rape question... Okay, the rape victim must be forced to carry the term. Since that kind of legislation will never, and I mean never, get passed, I support the allowing of rape abortions purely to get an anti-abortion bill passed. Better to stop most abortions rather than none..
"Unless hes ready to put some serious boot to ass, Hungry is fucked. Blobhemia, Austria, Switzerland, Britanny and whoever else gets cascaded. Thats a hell of an alliance to go against, especially because you know France will worm their way in too. They always do."
- Some random EU3 player


Join the UU(Unitarian Union) today! We are completely open region with our own centralized currency, the Unitaria! The only requirement is that you change your currency to the Unitaria.

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:14 pm

Asuiop wrote:
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:So according to you, wanting sex automatically means the woman is consenting to the risk of pregnancy, but not the pregnancy itself. Therefore, you wouldn't have problem accepting that a woman should have access to abortion in case a pregnancy results from sex, no?

Yes, I would have a problem...

So even though you are fine with delineating consent to sex as consenting to risk of pregnancy but not pregnancy itself, if a pregnancy results from said sex, you are just absolutely certain that there must be no abortion. Why draw a fine distinction between consenting to risk of pregnancy but not pregnancy itself then in the first place?
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:14 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:A "corpse" is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and it "can be revived to be" an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to "revive to be" an individual. I'm not anti-"casket", but I can't help but viewing "burial" as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.

The dead person is not really developing anymore now are they???

They can be revived. Or are you just against reviving all people who have no heart beats?
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Fri May 31, 2013 9:15 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:A "corpse" is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and it "can be revived to be" an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to "revive to be" an individual. I'm not anti-"casket", but I can't help but viewing "burial" as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.

The dead person is not really developing anymore now are they???

Unless they're developing a taste for brains!

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:16 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Again, the many of you know my views on abortion.

I don't think that abortion should be legal accept for in cases of rape and if it will kill the mother if she gives birth to it.

A fetus is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and its developing into an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to develop into an individual. I'm not anti-women, but I can't help but viewing abortion as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.

If you believe it is human, then why (without some hocus-pocus Christian explanation) would it be fine to abort a fetus resulting from a rape, but not from consensual sex?

consenting people are aware of what may result from sex and have the ability to say No.

A person who's raped has no such option.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Fri May 31, 2013 9:16 pm

Asuiop wrote:
Dakini wrote:So how is abortion not an acceptable way to deal with this outcome? Consent to sex is also consent to the risk of getting an STI, but that doesn't mean we keep people from getting some penicillin when they get the clap because they chose to take that risk.

If it's because life is important and every fetus has the right to become a baby, then the rape victim should also be forced to carry to term.

If it's about taking responsibility for your actions, then I ask how is an abortion not taking responsibility? It's not like it's something women do for fun.

And this is why I was wary of answering the rape question... Okay, the rape victim must be forced to carry the term. Since that kind of legislation will never, and I mean never, get passed, I support the allowing of rape abortions purely to get an anti-abortion bill passed. Better to stop most abortions rather than none..

I agree, in the long run stopping the rape abortion could be legislated after the first anti-abortion bill is passed.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:16 pm

Dakini wrote:
Vazdania wrote:The dead person is not really developing anymore now are they???

Unless they're developing a taste for brains!

ZOMBIES D: COVER ALL CASKETS WITH CEMENT!!!
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 31, 2013 9:17 pm

Auralia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:It is when you consider that I've stated that at least six times.

Humour me. Please explain why some human beings are not human persons.

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=243936&p=14761423#p14761423
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Fri May 31, 2013 9:18 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:If you believe it is human, then why (without some hocus-pocus Christian explanation) would it be fine to abort a fetus resulting from a rape, but not from consensual sex?

consenting people are aware of what may result from sex and have the ability to say No.

A person who's raped has no such option.

A human is a human, the manner in which it was created is irrelevant.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Fri May 31, 2013 9:18 pm

Asuiop wrote:
Dakini wrote:So how is abortion not an acceptable way to deal with this outcome? Consent to sex is also consent to the risk of getting an STI, but that doesn't mean we keep people from getting some penicillin when they get the clap because they chose to take that risk.

If it's because life is important and every fetus has the right to become a baby, then the rape victim should also be forced to carry to term.

If it's about taking responsibility for your actions, then I ask how is an abortion not taking responsibility? It's not like it's something women do for fun.

And this is why I was wary of answering the rape question... Okay, the rape victim must be forced to carry the term. Since that kind of legislation will never, and I mean never, get passed, I support the allowing of rape abortions purely to get an anti-abortion bill passed. Better to stop most abortions rather than none..

Then suddenly the rate of reported rapes skyrockets as all women who want an abortion claim they were raped and make up some shady stranger who jumped them on their way home. They just didn't report it immediately because ...uh.... it was an inconvenience...?

No seriously why do you think women should be forced to be incubators when they do not choose to be?

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:18 pm

Vazdania wrote:consenting people are aware of what may result from sex and have the ability to say No.

A person who's raped has no such option.

By that reason, people who have become accidentally pregnant due to failure of contraceptives should have access to abortion because they haven't had a chance to not consent to pregnancy.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
The New Earth Coalition
Envoy
 
Posts: 277
Founded: Aug 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Earth Coalition » Fri May 31, 2013 9:18 pm

Grad Duchy of Luxembourg wrote:
Vazdania wrote:A fetus is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and its developing into an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to develop into an individual. I'm not anti-women, but I can't help but viewing abortion as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.

A "corpse" is human, it may not be alive, but it's human and it "can be revived to be" an individual. I think and believe that we should allow that human the opportunity to "revive to be" an individual. I'm not anti-"casket", but I can't help but viewing "burial" as negative if they so willfully committed an act which has large consequences to it.


Oh my god...

Image
Economic Left/Right: -2.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 4.41

Founder of the The Third Dominion and member of the Progressive-Conservative Party

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Fri May 31, 2013 9:19 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:If you believe it is human, then why (without some hocus-pocus Christian explanation) would it be fine to abort a fetus resulting from a rape, but not from consensual sex?

consenting people are aware of what may result from sex and have the ability to say No.

A person who's raped has no such option.

But how does their consent to sex make it wrong to abort an embryo or fetus?
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.
I am a market socialist, atheist, more to come maybe at some point
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
Grad Duchy of Luxembourg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1925
Founded: Nov 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grad Duchy of Luxembourg » Fri May 31, 2013 9:19 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Dakini wrote:Unless they're developing a taste for brains!

ZOMBIES D: COVER ALL CASKETS WITH CEMENT!!!

No seriously. I hope you are not a doctor. Just because there is potential does not mean we should all act in only one way to preserve that potential.
Economic Left/Right: -3.00
Member of Caninope Contingent

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.64

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri May 31, 2013 9:20 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Vazdania wrote:consenting people are aware of what may result from sex and have the ability to say No.

A person who's raped has no such option.

A human is a human, the manner in which it was created is irrelevant.

and? This is upon the women's shoulders, this is a burden they must bear. If men had children i'd have the same opinion.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Democratic Poopland, Destructive Government Economic System, EuroStralia, Necroghastia, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads