I wasn't saying there is or is not a difference, just saying what they are.
Advertisement

by Herador » Mon May 27, 2013 1:43 am

by Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 1:44 am
Hathradic States wrote:Valentir wrote:No. For one I cannot serve in the US military as I'm British. And two I never signed up in the British military because I went out and became an accountant instead.
No offense, my friend, then you don't know dick about the military. I served, bootcamp sucked a bit (mostly because I was discharged seven weeks in. Fucking knee), but, then again, I didn't get much shit from the DI.
I called them officers) break down recruits, and use swearing a lot. And that is how far I've gotten. So could you answer a question for me? Is joining the military worth the time and experience?
by Hathradic States » Mon May 27, 2013 1:45 am
Valentir wrote:Hathradic States wrote:No offense, my friend, then you don't know dick about the military. I served, bootcamp sucked a bit (mostly because I was discharged seven weeks in. Fucking knee), but, then again, I didn't get much shit from the DI.
Yeah. Pretty much. Consider me the typical city town person. The military, well, I know don't much of it. From what I have heard is that the drill sergeants (I called the officers) break down recruits, and use swearing a lot. And that is how far I've gotten. So could you answer a question for me? Is joining the military worth the time and experience?

by Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 1:45 am
Immoren wrote:Valentir wrote:The difference between that manager and the officer is that the officer's job is to get under the skin of this recruit. To make them from boys into men. There is strong and then there's army strong *nods*
I don't think officers are responsible for recruit training in US and Commonwealth forces...
Whoops, not officers, drill sergeants. God I need to read a military book here and there and put down the math and economic books.
by Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 1:46 am
Hathradic States wrote:Valentir wrote:Yeah. Pretty much. Consider me the typical city town person. The military, well, I know don't much of it. From what I have heard is that the drill sergeants (I called the officers) break down recruits, and use swearing a lot. And that is how far I've gotten. So could you answer a question for me? Is joining the military worth the time and experience?
Fuck yes.

by Stolen Droplets » Mon May 27, 2013 1:47 am

by Immoren » Mon May 27, 2013 1:47 am
Valentir wrote:Hathradic States wrote:No offense, my friend, then you don't know dick about the military. I served, bootcamp sucked a bit (mostly because I was discharged seven weeks in. Fucking knee), but, then again, I didn't get much shit from the DI.
Yeah. Pretty much. Consider me the typical city town person. The military, well, I know don't much of it. From what I have heard is that the drill sergeants (I called the officers) break down recruits, and use swearing a lot. And that is how far I've gotten. So could you answer a question for me? Is joining the military worth the time and experience?
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Helicthon » Mon May 27, 2013 1:48 am
Valentir wrote:Well don't they, in boot camp, breakdown new recruits? And don't they discipline them and make them from kids into men? .
Valentir wrote:And what qualifies you to know the same might I ask? And have you served?
Valentir wrote:If not then I don't what kind of military the United States is running.

by Karelo-Finnish SSR » Mon May 27, 2013 1:51 am

by Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 1:52 am
Helicthon wrote:Valentir wrote:Well don't they, in boot camp, breakdown new recruits? And don't they discipline them and make them from kids into men? .
I don't know, because I haven't served.Valentir wrote:And what qualifies you to know the same might I ask? And have you served?
As I said, I haven't served. Nothing qualifies me to know the same. Neither of these things are a problem because I've never claimed to know jack shit about the military.Valentir wrote:If not then I don't what kind of military the United States is running.
This is the fundamental issue. You have some idea of the military that includes this over-romanticized macho bullshit (which the practice of calling recruits "faggot" forms a part of). Not only is that an irresponsible assumption, it's also fucking degrading to the men and women actually risking their lives in the service. Value them for who and what they are, don't use them as an excuse to prop up your shitty ideas.

by Hathradic States » Mon May 27, 2013 2:01 am
Karelo-Finnish SSR wrote:HahaOhWow.jpg
If he can't handle an insult then what the hell is he doing in the Marine Corps then?


by The Occident » Mon May 27, 2013 2:03 am

by Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 2:05 am

by Helicthon » Mon May 27, 2013 2:11 am
Valentir wrote:Helicthon wrote:
Except you did. If you're okay with DIs using the word "faggot", you're okay with gay soldiers being discriminated against.
Excuse me? So if I think that DI's can call new recruits, of all sexualities, faggots, then all of a sudden I'm homophobic? No, I'm not homophobic. If the DI's call straight people faggots then it is unfair for one group to just be called faggots. And faggot is also an insult to women for being weak, and an insult to men for also being weak and being a coward. Every Time the word faggot comes out it does not have to be a homophobic slur. People made it a homophobic slur, corrupting what once meant a bundle of sticks.

by Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 2:16 am
Helicthon wrote:Valentir wrote:Excuse me? So if I think that DI's can call new recruits, of all sexualities, faggots, then all of a sudden I'm homophobic? No, I'm not homophobic. If the DI's call straight people faggots then it is unfair for one group to just be called faggots. And faggot is also an insult to women for being weak, and an insult to men for also being weak and being a coward. Every Time the word faggot comes out it does not have to be a homophobic slur. People made it a homophobic slur, corrupting what once meant a bundle of sticks.
Calling a straight recruit "faggot" isn't the same as calling a gay recruit "faggot". I've explained this in detail already.
Furthermore:
P1. In this context, "faggot" means "homosexual".
P2. If you think "faggot" is an insult to everyone, you think "faggot" is a bad thing to be.
P3. You think "faggot" is an insult to everyone.
P4. If you think "homosexual" is a bad thing to be, you're a homophobe.
C1. From P2 and P3, you think "homosexual" is a bad thing to be.
C2. From C1 and P4, you're a homophobe.

by The Lone Alliance » Mon May 27, 2013 2:16 am
By the very definition:

by Democratic Koyro » Mon May 27, 2013 2:17 am
Helicthon wrote:Valentir wrote:Excuse me? So if I think that DI's can call new recruits, of all sexualities, faggots, then all of a sudden I'm homophobic? No, I'm not homophobic. If the DI's call straight people faggots then it is unfair for one group to just be called faggots. And faggot is also an insult to women for being weak, and an insult to men for also being weak and being a coward. Every Time the word faggot comes out it does not have to be a homophobic slur. People made it a homophobic slur, corrupting what once meant a bundle of sticks.
Calling a straight recruit "faggot" isn't the same as calling a gay recruit "faggot". I've explained this in detail already.
Furthermore:
P1. In this context, "faggot" means "homosexual".
P2. If you think "faggot" is an insult to everyone, you think "faggot" is a bad thing to be.
P3. You think "faggot" is an insult to everyone.
P4. If you think "homosexual" is a bad thing to be, you're a homophobe.
C1. From P2 and P3, you think "homosexual" is a bad thing to be.
C2. From C1 and P4, you're a homophobe.

by Vitaphone Racing » Mon May 27, 2013 2:17 am
Valentir wrote:Helicthon wrote:
Except you did. If you're okay with DIs using the word "faggot", you're okay with gay soldiers being discriminated against.
Excuse me? So if I think that DI's can call new recruits, of all sexualities, faggots, then all of a sudden I'm homophobic? No, I'm not homophobic. If the DI's call straight people faggots then it is unfair for one group to just be called faggots. And faggot is also an insult to women for being weak, and an insult to men for also being weak and being a coward. Every Time the word faggot comes out it does not have to be a homophobic slur. People made it a homophobic slur, corrupting what once meant a bundle of sticks.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

by Helicthon » Mon May 27, 2013 2:18 am
Valentir wrote:*denial*

by Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 2:20 am
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Valentir wrote:Excuse me? So if I think that DI's can call new recruits, of all sexualities, faggots, then all of a sudden I'm homophobic? No, I'm not homophobic. If the DI's call straight people faggots then it is unfair for one group to just be called faggots. And faggot is also an insult to women for being weak, and an insult to men for also being weak and being a coward. Every Time the word faggot comes out it does not have to be a homophobic slur. People made it a homophobic slur, corrupting what once meant a bundle of sticks.
You're not homophobic, you're deluded. Deluded for thinking that faggot loses all offensiveness to gay people if you use it to insult a straight person. Faggot, like the word nigger, is something that nobody should say and just because some gay/black people use it to refer to themselves doesn't make that right either.
Some people need a lesson in discrimination about what and when something is appropriate.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alternate Garza, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Dayganistan, Eahland, Fahran, Grinning Dragon, Kenmoria, Leba non, Myrensis, The North Polish Union, Timemovee
Advertisement