NATION

PASSWORD

Gay recruit complains about being called a fag in USMC

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Mon May 27, 2013 1:17 am

St George wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Fags are horrible, though! They cause lung cancer!
Jesus fucking Christ you know exactly what meaning of the word fag was being used there

Opportunity was too good to pass up. Sue me for having a fucked up sense of humor.
No, I think it is acceptable for the Marine Corps to use on recruits, there is a difference.

And therein lies the problem. That word is not an acceptable insult to use against anyone. By thinking it is acceptable to be used you are part of the problem that millions of people face everyday

Maybe you are, too? You know...I don't know about, but when people scream at me "YOU CAN SAY THAT WORD ITS BAD!"...all I want to fucking to do it say it more, say it louder, and say it to their face. Maybe if folks stopped making a fucking issue over it, people wouldn't feel the desire to say it.

Especially making a fucking issue over this case. it's the fucking military, they can fucking say what they fucking want to their recruits, because it is time those fucking pansies manned the fuck up and got used to slurs and insults, because I am damn fucking sure our enemies won't care about their fucking feelings. FUCK.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Mon May 27, 2013 1:19 am

Hathradic States wrote:Fucking man up and deal with it. You want to be a Marine, you better grow some fucking thick skin.
There is no need for drill sergeants to use slurs when trying to get under a recruit's skin. It is equating something perfectly acceptable with a negative quality. Call them fat, lazy, stupid, or other genuinely negative qualities, but all using slurs does is make these individuals feel unwelcome. The purpose of training is not just to toughen you up, but to build a unified squad. Degrading someone for their sexual orientation does not promote unity. Just like referring to recruits as niggers, kykes, spiks, or wetbacks should be expected to only breed animosity, so too should homophobic slurs. The practice isn't just bigoted, it's dangerous.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Valentir
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12865
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 1:19 am

Democratic Koyro wrote:This thread has killed my faith in humanity. Well, maybe not, my faith that this generation won't grow up to be snizzling, pampered little cowards scared of WORDS has been utterly shattered though.

What do expect? Humans get more cowardly and scared every generation. On so many aren't. Oh well though.

User avatar
Helicthon
Attaché
 
Posts: 95
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Helicthon » Mon May 27, 2013 1:20 am

Democratic Koyro wrote:snizzling


I fear no word that actually exists. (There's linguistic innovation, and then there's being a bit of a tosspot.)

Hathradic States wrote:*cartman rant*


I am normally all in favor of coloring my language with a healthy dose of profanity, but I think you mad bro. And I think that's because you know your position here is untenable. (See my remarks on rationalization.)

User avatar
Valentir
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12865
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 1:20 am

Hathradic States wrote:
St George wrote:Jesus fucking Christ you know exactly what meaning of the word fag was being used there

Opportunity was too good to pass up. Sue me for having a fucked up sense of humor.
And therein lies the problem. That word is not an acceptable insult to use against anyone. By thinking it is acceptable to be used you are part of the problem that millions of people face everyday

Maybe you are, too? You know...I don't know about, but when people scream at me "YOU CAN SAY THAT WORD ITS BAD!"...all I want to fucking to do it say it more, say it louder, and say it to their face. Maybe if folks stopped making a fucking issue over it, people wouldn't feel the desire to say it.

Especially making a fucking issue over this case. it's the fucking military, they can fucking say what they fucking want to their recruits, because it is time those fucking pansies manned the fuck up and got used to slurs and insults, because I am damn fucking sure our enemies won't care about their fucking feelings. FUCK.

:o :clap:

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Mon May 27, 2013 1:22 am

Helicthon wrote:I am normally all in favor of coloring my language with a healthy dose of profanity, but I think you mad bro. And I think that's because you know your position here is untenable. (See my remarks on rationalization.)

Dude, I always colour my language with enough profanity to make Red Fox blush. ;)

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
St George
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 491
Founded: Mar 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby St George » Mon May 27, 2013 1:22 am

Hathradic States wrote:
St George wrote:Jesus fucking Christ you know exactly what meaning of the word fag was being used there

Opportunity was too good to pass up. Sue me for having a fucked up sense of humor.
I'm not American, I don't sue for every little thing.
And therein lies the problem. That word is not an acceptable insult to use against anyone. By thinking it is acceptable to be used you are part of the problem that millions of people face everyday

Maybe you are, too? You know...I don't know about, but when people scream at me "YOU CAN SAY THAT WORD ITS BAD!"...all I want to fucking to do it say it more, say it louder, and say it to their face. Maybe if folks stopped making a fucking issue over it, people wouldn't feel the desire to say it.
I haven't said 'you can't use that word', I've said 'using that word in that context is wrong'. I agree with you, making a word taboo will just make people want to use it. So instead of making it taboo, what you do is condemn and oppose those you use it in that context. There is a difference.
Bombadil wrote:To be quite honest, on any subject, around 25% of any population are batshit insane.

User avatar
Herador
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8038
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Herador » Mon May 27, 2013 1:24 am

St George wrote:I'm not American, I don't sue for every little thing.

As an American I find this incredibly offensive, expect a call from my lawyers soon.
Last edited by Herador on Mon May 27, 2013 1:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
My politics are real simple: I just want to be able to afford to go to the doctor.

User avatar
Valentir
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12865
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 1:25 am

Herador wrote:
St George wrote:I'm not American, I don't sue for every little thing.

As an American I find this incredibly offensive, expect a call from my lawyers soon.

:lol2:

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Mon May 27, 2013 1:25 am

St George wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Opportunity was too good to pass up. Sue me for having a fucked up sense of humor.
I'm not American, I don't sue for every little thing.

Slamming a whole country, are you?

Maybe you are, too? You know...I don't know about, but when people scream at me "YOU CAN SAY THAT WORD ITS BAD!"...all I want to fucking to do it say it more, say it louder, and say it to their face. Maybe if folks stopped making a fucking issue over it, people wouldn't feel the desire to say it.
I haven't said 'you can't use that word', I've said 'using that word in that context is wrong'. I agree with you, making a word taboo will just make people want to use it. So instead of making it taboo, what you do is condemn and oppose those you use it in that context. There is a difference.

Then how could one use the word if not in an insulting context? And condemning someone for using something is the same thing as a taboo, really. Or, rather, they go hand in hand.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 16570
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Mon May 27, 2013 1:26 am

The number of people who think this is OK is frankly disheartening. Such behaviour within the armed forces is rather umprofessional- would a manager get away with shouting slurs and insults at a subordinate in an office? No, of course not. So why is it OK when military officers do it? Surely, if anything, they should be held to a higher standard?
Anglican monarchist, paternalistic conservative and Christian existentialist.
"It is spiritless to think that you cannot attain to that which you have seen and heard the masters attain. The masters are men. You are also a man. If you think that you will be inferior in doing something, you will be on that road very soon."
- Yamamoto Tsunetomo
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
Valentir
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12865
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 1:32 am

Old Tyrannia wrote:The number of people who think this is OK is frankly disheartening. Such behaviour within the armed forces is rather umprofessional- would a manager get away with shouting slurs and insults at a subordinate in an office? No, of course not. So why is it OK when military officers do it? Surely, if anything, they should be held to a higher standard?

The difference between that manager and the officer is that the officer's job is to get under the skin of this recruit. To make them from boys into men. There is strong and then there's army strong *nods*

User avatar
Helicthon
Attaché
 
Posts: 95
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Helicthon » Mon May 27, 2013 1:33 am

Valentir wrote:The difference between that manager and the officer is that the officer's job is to get under the skin of this recruit. To make them from boys into men. There is strong and then there's army strong *nods*


Have you ever served?

User avatar
Valentir
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12865
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 1:35 am

Helicthon wrote:
Valentir wrote:The difference between that manager and the officer is that the officer's job is to get under the skin of this recruit. To make them from boys into men. There is strong and then there's army strong *nods*


Have you ever served?

No. For one I cannot serve in the US military as I'm British. And two I never signed up in the British military because I went out and became an accountant instead.

User avatar
Helicthon
Attaché
 
Posts: 95
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Helicthon » Mon May 27, 2013 1:36 am

Valentir wrote:No. For one I cannot serve in the US military as I'm British. And two I never signed up in the British military because I went out and became an accountant instead.


So then what, exactly, qualifies you to tell the rest of us what an officer's job is?

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Mon May 27, 2013 1:37 am

Valentir wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:The number of people who think this is OK is frankly disheartening. Such behaviour within the armed forces is rather umprofessional- would a manager get away with shouting slurs and insults at a subordinate in an office? No, of course not. So why is it OK when military officers do it? Surely, if anything, they should be held to a higher standard?

The difference between that manager and the officer is that the officer's job is to get under the skin of this recruit. To make them from boys into men. There is strong and then there's army strong *nods*
It's the officer's job to get under their skin and promote unity. This succeeds at the first task but completely undermines the latter one.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Mon May 27, 2013 1:37 am

Valentir wrote:
Helicthon wrote:
Have you ever served?

No. For one I cannot serve in the US military as I'm British. And two I never signed up in the British military because I went out and became an accountant instead.

No offense, my friend, then you don't know dick about the military. I served, bootcamp sucked a bit (mostly because I was discharged seven weeks in. Fucking knee), but, then again, I didn't get much shit from the DI.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Mon May 27, 2013 1:38 am

Threlizdun wrote:
Valentir wrote:The difference between that manager and the officer is that the officer's job is to get under the skin of this recruit. To make them from boys into men. There is strong and then there's army strong *nods*
It's the officer's job to get under their skin and promote unity. This succeeds at the first task but completely undermines the latter one.

Well, if they call them all faggots, and degrades them so they all feel equally worthless, it might work for the latter.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Mon May 27, 2013 1:38 am

Old Tyrannia wrote:The number of people who think this is OK is frankly disheartening. Such behaviour within the armed forces is rather umprofessional- would a manager get away with shouting slurs and insults at a subordinate in an office? No, of course not. So why is it OK when military officers do it? Surely, if anything, they should be held to a higher standard?
Because it's only the drill Sargent saying it. You know the guys who are stereotypically supposed to make you feel like shit?

Something else I've realized, there have been gays in the military for years, somehow all of the previous homosexuals survived being called faggots in Bootcamp.

What makes this person anyone special? No one should give a fuck about your sexual orientation in the military.
Last edited by The Lone Alliance on Mon May 27, 2013 1:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65251
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Mon May 27, 2013 1:38 am

Valentir wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:The number of people who think this is OK is frankly disheartening. Such behaviour within the armed forces is rather umprofessional- would a manager get away with shouting slurs and insults at a subordinate in an office? No, of course not. So why is it OK when military officers do it? Surely, if anything, they should be held to a higher standard?

The difference between that manager and the officer is that the officer's job is to get under the skin of this recruit. To make them from boys into men. There is strong and then there's army strong *nods*


I don't think officers are responsible for recruit training in US and Commonwealth forces...
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Herador
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8038
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Herador » Mon May 27, 2013 1:40 am

Immoren wrote:
Valentir wrote:The difference between that manager and the officer is that the officer's job is to get under the skin of this recruit. To make them from boys into men. There is strong and then there's army strong *nods*


I don't think officers are responsible for recruit training in US and Commonwealth forces...

They're non-commissioned officers, at least in the US.
My politics are real simple: I just want to be able to afford to go to the doctor.

User avatar
Valentir
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12865
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 1:41 am

Helicthon wrote:
Valentir wrote:No. For one I cannot serve in the US military as I'm British. And two I never signed up in the British military because I went out and became an accountant instead.


So then what, exactly, qualifies you to tell the rest of us what an officer's job is?

Well don't they, in boot camp, breakdown new recruits? And don't they discipline them and make them from kids into men? If not then I don't what kind of military the United States is running. And what qualifies you to know the same might I ask? And have you served?

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65251
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Mon May 27, 2013 1:42 am

Herador wrote:
Immoren wrote:
I don't think officers are responsible for recruit training in US and Commonwealth forces...

They're non-commissioned officers, at least in the US.

Still. Enlisted men and not officers. ;)
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Democratic Koyro
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5111
Founded: Feb 13, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Democratic Koyro » Mon May 27, 2013 1:42 am

Herador wrote:
Immoren wrote:
I don't think officers are responsible for recruit training in US and Commonwealth forces...

They're non-commissioned officers, at least in the US.


True, but there is a very, very big difference between NCO's and Commissioned Officers.
THERMOBARIC THERMITE

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Mon May 27, 2013 1:43 am

Hathradic States wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:It's the officer's job to get under their skin and promote unity. This succeeds at the first task but completely undermines the latter one.

Well, if they call them all faggots, and degrades them so they all feel equally worthless, it might work for the latter.

No, that makes the gay recruits feel like shit because their sexual orientation is being given a negative connotation. By your logic, there would be no consequences of calling all recruits niggers. This ignores the reality that black recruits and honestly anyone with the slightest sense of racial equality will be completely repulsed by this statement.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arvenia, Democratic Poopland, Greater Miami Shores 3, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Necroghastia, Umeria, Yomet

Advertisement

Remove ads