NATION

PASSWORD

Gay recruit complains about being called a fag in USMC

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grand Britannia » Sun May 26, 2013 5:46 pm

Pharthan wrote:
Vistulange wrote:
And that makes using a homophobic slur alright? It's the same deal as calling a black person "nigger" and getting off because hey, it's "TEH MARINEZ AND I AM SARGEANT". There are hundreds of insults he could've used which wouldn't be homophobic. If that sarge can't use a few cells in his brain to avoid using a homophobic slur, perhaps he shouldn't be a sargeant.

It's not the same as using the N-word at all, because I hear the N-word everyday in the military - and never from whites.
I actually find it offensive that anyone would suggest that any slur ever be compared to the N-word, because it's racist that I can't use it, but black people can without reprocussion.

I find it extremely offensive that I could lose my job if I say it, yet there are guys rapping on the mess-decks regularly using the word, and only because of my skin-color.

My problem with issues like this is that people don't actually understand the full situation about what they are arguing. People are all-too-ready to offer their opinions on how to run the military, and none-too-ready to actually do the job.
My point: None of you, unless you've actually served, has any clue what you're talking about. I don't care if your parents were military. I don't care if you're married to military. If you haven't served, your opinion should mean very little.
Why should your opinion mean so little in the realm of the military? Well, in an ideal world, it should mean just as much as anywhere else, but any realist can tell you that the world is far from ideal, and thusly two main reasons come about when dealing with the military:
1) If you haven't served, your concept of how things run in the military is purely word-of-mouth and usually quite corrupted by Hollywood and crappy websites like Huffington Post or news agencies like MSNBC who make money off of murdering context. Normally, this wouldn't be a huge issue, except for the next point:
2) People die in the military. While it's true there are more dangerous ways to go about life than Army/Marine Infantry (i.e. living in Washington D.C., Detroit, or Chicago), it's the point that you're letting your own personal opinions get in the way of an organization that is relatively isolated by simple nature, and you're trying to run it.

It's worse than asking politicians to run it.
People are assuming that because they pay taxes, that they should get a say in how the military runs things. Like I'm going to feel comfortable giving my life to someone else's hands who's knowledge of the military extends further than Rambo? I barely feel comfortable going to sleep on the ship as it is, knowing who's standing watch at times, let alone putting a civie in the driver's seat. It's nothing against the civilian populace, it's just a matter of lack of knowledge. You simply don't have all the information, nor will you ever, even if we posted everything on the internet in a nice bold-easy-to-read font.

We military folk don't walk around telling people running oil-rigs or schools how to do their jobs.
Don't tell us how to do ours. We've just got, oh, like 200 years worth of experience we're trying to turn over to new generations every year to try to keep us all alive, yah know.
Not like our lives depend on not having that all jacked up because someone wants to stick their nose where it doesn't belong just because they've found some new word offensive.
"But how can telling Drill Sergeant's not to say 'faggot' really mess all of that up?"
Good question. Here's the process. It goes something like this (coming from experience, not just speculation.)

A) Civilian X makes complaint about Political Correctness.
B) Congressman Y or News Agency Z want to look more popular/get higher ratings/get reelected, so they get on the bandwagon and make a big deal of it all.
C) Word gets out, usually lacking any and all proper context (or sometimes blatant lies) in such a manner as to rile up public opinion against the military on issue A.
D) Military Branch hears complaint. There is some genuine concern - the military does care about it's own people, after all everyone in a high position used to be someone in a low position, and we do have some degree of camaraderie - however this is completely and totally overshadowed by the fact that the military doesn't wish to be painted poorly. Tends to lower recruitment ratings and everything, which means the ability to maintain anything becomes horribly threatened.
E) Branch implements overzealous training program. After all, there really isn't any other way to do it. You have to have documentation saying you properly told everyone not to sexually-molest/say mean things, or else the news agencies and Anti-Military politicians make an even bigger stink which forces certain other politicians to put a halt to all operations.
F) Time and money and various operations are wasted due to said training. You are wasting millions of dollars every time this happens.
G) Millions of dollars that could otherwise go to body-armor, new equipment, et cetera, are now going to tell hundreds of thousands of military members the exact same message: "Don't be a bad person." Why? Because there are bad apples, and you have to tell them not to be bad people, but you can't always tell who those bad people are, so you have to tell everyone.
H) People die because they don't have aforementioned equipment. A simple complaint is more effective than an IED. Some soldier doesn't get in that shipment of night-vision goggles or new body armor, shipments get delayed, parts don't get fixed, et cetera. People. Die.

Happens like every frakking month.
You want the military to stop wasting money? Shut the hell up and grow a pair every once and a while. Some of us actually know what we're doing, and you can't stop every bad apple. We deal with them well enough, despite what the news agencies make it look like. Despite what people may think, the military is a fair representation of the country it's made of. Kind of happens when most people only serve 4 years and you replace them.

So thanks for being so frakking sensitive that you have to butt in where you're not only unwanted, but the job is already getting done, just because you have to make yourself known. It's getting taken care of, believe it or not.

Yeah, society sucks. Fix it where it's not getting killed. Everyone is to blame.
Not just the military.
Try teaching your kids to be good people. Blame the parents.
By the time it's gotten to the 18-to-50 year-olds in the military, the damage has been done. It's like watching someone eat your hamburger and not waiting until they are done to tell them, 'Oh wait, I actually did want that.'

TL;DR
You don't walk up to someone mopping the floor and tell them the floor is dirty. They've got it.
All anyone is doing is making a global stink of the issue and forcing the military to waste millions of dollars just so they can actually keep up recruiting numbers.
And costing lives because of it.
Thanks. I sure do love knowing I could die just because someone can't grow a pair or think for a second.


Image

Truer Truths have never been ushered.
Member of laissez-fair right-wing worker-mistreatment brigade
Why Britannians are always late
Please help a family in need, every penny counts.
Mainland Map | "Weebs must secure the existence of anime and a future for cute aryan waifus"| IIwiki
I Identify as a Graf Zeppelin class aircraft carrier, please refer to me as she.
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.72

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Sun May 26, 2013 6:02 pm

I've been on the internet too much to consider Faggot insulting anymore.
That and the -fag suffix cheapens it even more.

None the less I see this as nothing important. I see it as pointless whining.
They're supposed to hate everyone equally.
Last edited by The Lone Alliance on Sun May 26, 2013 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Helicthon
Attaché
 
Posts: 95
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Helicthon » Sun May 26, 2013 6:19 pm

The Lone Alliance wrote:None the less I see this as nothing important. I see it as pointless whining.They're supposed to hate everyone equally.


Did you not read even a little of the thread? A principal question here is "does 'hating everyone equally' (which I'm not even sure is the idea, but whatever) necessarily mean saying 'faggot'?" I haven't yet seen it demonstrated that it does, and I think I've done a decent job of demonstrating that rather the reverse is true, if anything.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sun May 26, 2013 6:28 pm

Shofercia wrote:
Yankee Empire wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/25/marine-letter-faggots-boot-camp_n_3322214.html



Now i understand the broad mentality of this website and already get what side most people are going to be on.
But I wanted to bring it up first.

But the thing you may not understand or Realize is that in Bootcamp it isn't personal and the Drill Sergeants job is to try and get under your skin an piss you off in order to see if you can Handle duress.
All this polical correct nonsense being shoved into our miltary and restricitions of how they can train the recruits just makes them soft.

Now some Sergeants probably going to lose his Job or be severely repimanded for saying something to a recruit that before would of been perfectly fine (as it's use as an insult works effectively well against Heterosexuals).

So what do you think NSG, you think the Marines are being too mean and that this recruit shouldn't be picked on by the big mean drill sergeants and deal with the stress every other recruit has to simply because he's gay?


They're supposed to be mean during training. If you want nice training, find a job outside the military. Now, if this was, say, a job where school teachers are being trained, than the fucker should be fired on the spot. But he's preparing the recruit to get shot at. To have bullets fly towards him. You cannot do that by being nice.

Read the article, chief. The Corps doesn't allow the kind of behaviour alleged.


Farnhamia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Rather the opposite, someone said earlier.

Indeed, the most accepting part of the military is the Girl Scouts.

I didn't think we were going public with their real training yet...


Heavenly Peace wrote:Offence is taken, not given.

Offence is taken. Insults are offered.


Greenvul wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
How can you say with certainty that when it's used in an insulting manner, it refers to cats? You're going to need to source that.

Because cats are cowardly, so when called a pussy, you are indirectly being called a coward. I have never seen pussy used in a negative context, unless someone was being cowardly.

EXAMPLE 1:"OH MY GOD, IT'S A HUGE ASS SPIDER"

"dude, it's a cricket, stop being a pussy."

EXAMPLE 2:"I don't know man, I don't think I can lift that weight."

"Stop being such a pussy, my little brother could lift this weight."

ITT: Mansplaining.


Steel Confessors wrote:
Helicthon wrote:
Without commenting on the history (because I don't know for sure; I'm not an expert on that either, though it's my understanding that the Brits in any case kicked a lot more ass than you're giving them credit for), how likely is it that there's literally no better way to mold a person into an effective fighting force than calling them mean names?


Its designed to break the lad simply put.

DI's are tasked with calling them a name that really affects them in a negative manner over and over again to mentally break them. After that the actual process of molding a soldier from the quivering mass of civilian goo begins. Its like the initial weeks are mostly physical drills, obstacle courses and such, merely because with a compounded exertion and mental distress a person breaks easier. Again, once you break someone you can strengthen them past that.

You are not associated with the United States Marine Corps. Do not try to tell us how their training regimens are designed.


Brocwika wrote:

Fucking hell, does no one get that the world has moved on since Ermey was a DI? Shit, he was only a DI for one fucking year. The character he played in Full Metal Jacket is not the be all and end all of training marines. Shit, Gunny Hartman was so shit a drill sergeant that, lolspoilers, Gomer Pyle fucking killed him. You guys want that for the Corps? You want your DIs and DSs getting murdered by the recruits they've been abusing?


Democratic Koyro wrote:
Brocwika wrote:Call a straight recruit a "faggot" and nobody bats an eye


(Image)

Call a gay recruit a faggot and everyone loses their minds!

Honestly I think that people, nomatter who they are, need to be less sensitive and offended to being called words.

Words are only offensive because people give them power.

Am I offended by being called a "pollack"? No, I am not.


It's only because the marine decided he was going to cry about it. If he had bucked up the article would never have been written and this silly discussion would never have happened.

Bitch please, this thread has more people crying that there might be limits on drill sergeants than there could possibly be in this one letter. Don't pretend that yours is the side of the dry eyes.


Greenvul wrote:
Helicthon wrote:
That's not because you've "forfeited your freedoms". That's because you've entered into an arrangement with an employer, and it requires you to function in a certain way; your profession is also an extraordinarily dangerous one, hence the much stricter enforcement and much harsher punishment for transgression. Occam's Razor: none of this requires any fundamental forfeiture of freedoms to be explained.

You're still forfeiting your personal freedoms. I don't see how it's otherwise. You have to obey orders, you have grooming standards, you have to ask for permission to speak freely, etc.

You are forfeiting your rights only up to a point. The US military does not have carte blanche to do what it likes to its troops.


Kazarogkai wrote:That thin skinned Pansie should be flogged or given a good beating for being such weakness, he is a humiliation on the armed forces. Such a thin skinned weakling like that should never be even near the military. In the military he is a maggot a simple piece of dirt to be crushed and broken down under the boot of his superiors, they are superior and better than him and he needs to know that from the start and needs to learn that quickly or else. He has no right to have an opinion or to even back talk to his superiors for he is dirt and nothing else, when in the military that is how things run and work. They have a hierarchy for a reason, this idiot better learn quick who his betters are.

Sorry COD star, the Marines don't work like your sex fantasies. The behaviour alleged by the recruit is not allowed by the Corps, according to a Marine Corps Captain.

User avatar
Helicthon
Attaché
 
Posts: 95
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Helicthon » Sun May 26, 2013 6:35 pm

Ifreann wrote:ITT: Mansplaining.

Ifreann wrote:Shit, Gunny Hartman was so shit a drill sergeant that, lolspoilers, Gomer Pyle fucking killed him.

Ifreann wrote:Bitch please, this thread has more people crying that there might be limits on drill sergeants than there could possibly be in this one letter. Don't pretend that yours is the side of the dry eyes.

Ifreann wrote:Sorry COD star, the Marines don't work like your sex fantasies.


I like you. You can come over my house and fuck my sister.

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Sun May 26, 2013 6:40 pm

Helicthon wrote:
The Lone Alliance wrote:None the less I see this as nothing important. I see it as pointless whining.They're supposed to hate everyone equally.


Did you not read even a little of the thread? A principal question here is "does 'hating everyone equally' (which I'm not even sure is the idea, but whatever) necessarily mean saying 'faggot'?" I haven't yet seen it demonstrated that it does, and I think I've done a decent job of demonstrating that rather the reverse is true, if anything.

If the goal is to "Make you feel bad about yourself" then Faggot is the most effective use for the word. Faggot provides a universal put down that crosses all racial, economical, and sociological boundaries as a universal insult.

It insults people, it insults white people, it insults black people, it insults straight people, it insults homosexual people, it insults males, and it insults females, it's the prefect insult outside of maybe "you M*****f***ers" which would still only apply to people with mothers.

PS:I got called a faggot so many times in my life I have became de-sensitized to it.

PSS: Which is what I'm hoping will eventually happen society wise, that the word "Faggot" will lose all emotional appeal and eventually find itself in the trashbin of history.
Last edited by The Lone Alliance on Sun May 26, 2013 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Helicthon
Attaché
 
Posts: 95
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Helicthon » Sun May 26, 2013 6:41 pm

The Lone Alliance wrote:Faggot provides a universal put down that crosses all racial, economical, and sociological boundaries as a universal insult.


This is only true on the Internet.

The Lone Alliance wrote:It insults people, it insults white people, it insults black people, it insults straight people, it insults homosexual people, it insults males, and it insults females, it's the prefect insult outside of maybe "you M*****f***ers" which would still only apply to people with mothers.


And the point that has been made repeatedly is that it insults homosexuals more than the rest of that list.

The Lone Alliance wrote:PS:I got called a faggot so many times in my life I have became de-sensitized to it.


Doesn't make it right.

User avatar
Insane Kidney Mentality
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1282
Founded: Nov 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Insane Kidney Mentality » Sun May 26, 2013 6:42 pm

The Lone Alliance wrote:
Helicthon wrote:
Did you not read even a little of the thread? A principal question here is "does 'hating everyone equally' (which I'm not even sure is the idea, but whatever) necessarily mean saying 'faggot'?" I haven't yet seen it demonstrated that it does, and I think I've done a decent job of demonstrating that rather the reverse is true, if anything.

If the goal is to "Make you feel bad about yourself" then Faggot is the most effective use for the word. Faggot provides a universal put down that crosses all racial, economical, and sociological boundaries as a universal insult.

It insults people, it insults white people, it insults black people, it insults straight people, it insults homosexual people, it insults males, and it insults females, it's the prefect insult outside of maybe "you M*****f***ers" which would still only apply to people with mothers.

PS:I got called a faggot so many times in my life I have became de-sensitized to it.


You need to get off the internet, more.
I frequently use dark humor and sarcasm. Don't take anything I say seriously. Unless it is.

Actually a puppet of an older player that's been here too long for her own good.

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Sun May 26, 2013 7:05 pm

Helicthon wrote:This is only true on the Internet.
Really?
The stereotypical image of a "faggot" is of the weak, high pitched, wimpy sounding person who is homosexual correct?
Lets see, this is supposed to be the marines right?
Marines are supposed to be "Rough and tough" right?
Well if you're a 'faggot' then that implies you're some 'weakling' ''pansy" who "can't handle the marines".
It doesn't matter what gender or race you are, if you're trying to join the marines and they're implying "You are too much of a weakling" it hurts self-esteem.

Helicthon wrote:
The Lone Alliance wrote:It insults people, it insults white people, it insults black people, it insults straight people, it insults homosexual people, it insults males, and it insults females, it's the prefect insult outside of maybe "you M*****f***ers" which would still only apply to people with mothers.


And the point that has been made repeatedly is that it insults homosexuals more than the rest of that list.
Not all of them, some have embraced the word and turned it on itself. Words only have enough power that you grant them.

The Lone Alliance wrote:PS:I got called a faggot so many times in my life I have became de-sensitized to it.

Doesn't make it right.[/quote]
Insane Kidney Mentality wrote:You need to get off the internet, more.
I am talking about real life. Being called a Faggot got old fast.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sun May 26, 2013 7:08 pm

Pharthan wrote:
Vistulange wrote:
And that makes using a homophobic slur alright? It's the same deal as calling a black person "nigger" and getting off because hey, it's "TEH MARINEZ AND I AM SARGEANT". There are hundreds of insults he could've used which wouldn't be homophobic. If that sarge can't use a few cells in his brain to avoid using a homophobic slur, perhaps he shouldn't be a sargeant.

It's not the same as using the N-word at all, because I hear the N-word everyday in the military - and never from whites.
I actually find it offensive that anyone would suggest that any slur ever be compared to the N-word, because it's racist that I can't use it, but black people can without reprocussion.

So, I'm Irish. I'm whiter than milk. Nigger, nigger, nigger. Come at me, repercussions.

I find it extremely offensive that I could lose my job if I say it, yet there are guys rapping on the mess-decks regularly using the word, and only because of my skin-color.

So make a complaint. Fight for equality, bro. Or do you not have the courage of your convictions?

My problem with issues like this is that people don't actually understand the full situation about what they are arguing. People are all-too-ready to offer their opinions on how to run the military, and none-too-ready to actually do the job.
My point: None of you, unless you've actually served, has any clue what you're talking about. I don't care if your parents were military. I don't care if you're married to military. If you haven't served, your opinion should mean very little.

And tell me, what is your opinion worth compared to that of a Marine Corps captain? There's one quoted in the article from the OP, explaining how the behaviour alleged is unacceptable.
Why should your opinion mean so little in the realm of the military? Well, in an ideal world, it should mean just as much as anywhere else, but any realist can tell you that the world is far from ideal, and thusly two main reasons come about when dealing with the military:
1) If you haven't served, your concept of how things run in the military is purely word-of-mouth and usually quite corrupted by Hollywood and crappy websites like Huffington Post

That quote a USMC captain. Go ahead, tell him his opinion is worthless.
or news agencies like MSNBC who make money off of murdering context. Normally, this wouldn't be a huge issue, except for the next point:
2) People die in the military. While it's true there are more dangerous ways to go about life than Army/Marine Infantry (i.e. living in Washington D.C., Detroit, or Chicago), it's the point that you're letting your own personal opinions get in the way of an organization that is relatively isolated by simple nature, and you're trying to run it.

It's worse than asking politicians to run it.

You mean like how the Founding Fathers of the United States of America asked that politicians should run the military?

People are assuming that because they pay taxes, that they should get a say in how the military runs things. Like I'm going to feel comfortable giving my life to someone else's hands who's knowledge of the military extends further than Rambo? I barely feel comfortable going to sleep on the ship as it is, knowing who's standing watch at times, let alone putting a civie in the driver's seat.

Barack Obama, your Commander in Chief, is as civilian as anyone posting here. I guess you never should have joined the military. If you even did.
Last edited by Ifreann on Sun May 26, 2013 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sun May 26, 2013 7:11 pm

The Lone Alliance wrote:
Helicthon wrote:
Did you not read even a little of the thread? A principal question here is "does 'hating everyone equally' (which I'm not even sure is the idea, but whatever) necessarily mean saying 'faggot'?" I haven't yet seen it demonstrated that it does, and I think I've done a decent job of demonstrating that rather the reverse is true, if anything.

If the goal is to "Make you feel bad about yourself" then Faggot is the most effective use for the word. Faggot provides a universal put down that crosses all racial, economical, and sociological boundaries as a universal insult.

It insults people, it insults white people, it insults black people, it insults straight people, it insults homosexual people, it insults males, and it insults females, it's the prefect insult outside of maybe "you M*****f***ers" which would still only apply to people with mothers.

PS:I got called a faggot so many times in my life I have became de-sensitized to it.

PSS: Which is what I'm hoping will eventually happen society wise, that the word "Faggot" will lose all emotional appeal and eventually find itself in the trashbin of history.

Holy cock gobbling Christ do you even hear yourself?! You're saying that being compared to a gay person is universally insulting and you don't get why people might object to that? YOU ARE WHY!
Last edited by Ifreann on Sun May 26, 2013 7:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Helicthon
Attaché
 
Posts: 95
Founded: May 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Helicthon » Sun May 26, 2013 7:15 pm

EDIT yeah you know what fuck even debating this. This is rapidly becoming insane. Got focused on the trees and didn't notice the batshit forest of claiming one minority's epithet is a universal insult.
Last edited by Helicthon on Sun May 26, 2013 7:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun May 26, 2013 7:15 pm

Ifreann wrote:
The Lone Alliance wrote:If the goal is to "Make you feel bad about yourself" then Faggot is the most effective use for the word. Faggot provides a universal put down that crosses all racial, economical, and sociological boundaries as a universal insult.

It insults people, it insults white people, it insults black people, it insults straight people, it insults homosexual people, it insults males, and it insults females, it's the prefect insult outside of maybe "you M*****f***ers" which would still only apply to people with mothers.

PS:I got called a faggot so many times in my life I have became de-sensitized to it.

PSS: Which is what I'm hoping will eventually happen society wise, that the word "Faggot" will lose all emotional appeal and eventually find itself in the trashbin of history.

Holy cock gobbling Christ do you even hear yourself?! You're saying that being compared to a gay person is universally insulting and you don't get why people might object to that? YOU ARE WHY!

Don't blow a piston ring.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sun May 26, 2013 7:19 pm

Galloism wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Holy cock gobbling Christ do you even hear yourself?! You're saying that being compared to a gay person is universally insulting and you don't get why people might object to that? YOU ARE WHY!

Don't blow a piston ring.

It's too late, the piston rings are blown.



What's a piston ring?

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun May 26, 2013 7:21 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Galloism wrote:Don't blow a piston ring.

It's too late, the piston rings are blown.



What's a piston ring?

A ring that goes around the piston.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sun May 26, 2013 7:31 pm

Galloism wrote:
Ifreann wrote:It's too late, the piston rings are blown.



What's a piston ring?

A ring that goes around the piston.

Shit, I shouldn't have blown that...

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sun May 26, 2013 9:31 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Shofercia wrote:


They're supposed to be mean during training. If you want nice training, find a job outside the military. Now, if this was, say, a job where school teachers are being trained, than the fucker should be fired on the spot. But he's preparing the recruit to get shot at. To have bullets fly towards him. You cannot do that by being nice.

Read the article, chief. The Corps doesn't allow the kind of behaviour alleged.


From the article:

However, Marine Corps spokesman Captain Richard Ulsh said the text of the supposed Marine recruit's letter didn't seem credible, for a variety of reasons.

He pointed out that Gawker's story said the recruit had emailed the letter to friends -- which threw up a red flag, as Marine recruits do not have access to email. Military experts have also raised this question, but Gawker told HuffPost this week that the letter had been first handwritten by the recruit and later was transcribed and forwarded as an email.

Ulsh also said that the letter accuses drill instructors of using language and acting in a manner that is not tolerated in boot camp.

"I mean, we're all human. ... There are people who might do that," Ulsh told HuffPost. "But the way [the recruit] talks about it is like it happens every day all the time. There are strict measures enforced that prevent those sorts of things from happening."

Drill Instructors are not even allowed to "drop f-bombs," according to Ulsh, and if they were throwing around offensive slurs, "there would certainly be repercussions."
'

Sorry Ifreann, but I'm not going to read, with a straight face, a spokesman talking about how Marine Instructors aren't allowed to drop f-bombs. I just don't see NSG posters being more oppressive than drill instructors. I don't fucking see it :P


Northern Dominus wrote:
Shofercia wrote:
See, now that's the kind of argument that might sway me, if there was data to back it up.
Data. Right. LIke the DOD is ever forthcoming on anything which might shine a bad light on how they do things. I mean how long did it take for them to admit there is a problem with sexual assault cases being overturned by commanding officers again?

Plus I still contend that any drill instructor that resorts to using intentionally divisive slurs as "motivation" is unable to think laterally and therefore lacking in the intelligence necessary to be an effective drill instructor in the first place, and by extension should not be put in charge of training the next generation of Marines.


Or they could be preparing them for a potential capture scenario in Iraq, or Afghanistan. Do you think that Taliban is going be squeamish if someone reacts to the word "fag" by cringing?
Last edited by Shofercia on Sun May 26, 2013 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Sun May 26, 2013 9:56 pm

So are any junior generals here going to explain how being harassed by your platoon and bullied by your superior, the guy you're supposed to go to when you report code of conduct breaches, toughens people up sufficiently that they're able to resist an entirely different kind of mental pressure, without having the trust of the unit undermined?

Because this really makes no fucking sense. Literally, none.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
Herador
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8038
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Herador » Sun May 26, 2013 11:32 pm

Vitaphone Racing wrote:So are any junior generals here going to explain how being harassed by your platoon and bullied by your superior, the guy you're supposed to go to when you report code of conduct breaches, toughens people up sufficiently that they're able to resist an entirely different kind of mental pressure, without having the trust of the unit undermined?

Because this really makes no fucking sense. Literally, none.

Clearly the faggot should quit acting like a faggot and act more like a Marine! [/sarcasm]
My politics are real simple: I just want to be able to afford to go to the doctor.

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Sun May 26, 2013 11:45 pm

Fucking man up and deal with it. You want to be a Marine, you better grow some fucking thick skin.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Mon May 27, 2013 12:31 am

We should standardize the language used in the Full Metal Jacket as mandatory to all drill sergants. That way no one will really be happy and we can all shake eachother hands at a modern compromise.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
Valentir
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12865
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Valentir » Mon May 27, 2013 12:38 am

Pharthan wrote:
Vistulange wrote:
And that makes using a homophobic slur alright? It's the same deal as calling a black person "nigger" and getting off because hey, it's "TEH MARINEZ AND I AM SARGEANT". There are hundreds of insults he could've used which wouldn't be homophobic. If that sarge can't use a few cells in his brain to avoid using a homophobic slur, perhaps he shouldn't be a sargeant.

It's not the same as using the N-word at all, because I hear the N-word everyday in the military - and never from whites.
I actually find it offensive that anyone would suggest that any slur ever be compared to the N-word, because it's racist that I can't use it, but black people can without reprocussion.

I find it extremely offensive that I could lose my job if I say it, yet there are guys rapping on the mess-decks regularly using the word, and only because of my skin-color.

My problem with issues like this is that people don't actually understand the full situation about what they are arguing. People are all-too-ready to offer their opinions on how to run the military, and none-too-ready to actually do the job.
My point: None of you, unless you've actually served, has any clue what you're talking about. I don't care if your parents were military. I don't care if you're married to military. If you haven't served, your opinion should mean very little.
Why should your opinion mean so little in the realm of the military? Well, in an ideal world, it should mean just as much as anywhere else, but any realist can tell you that the world is far from ideal, and thusly two main reasons come about when dealing with the military:
1) If you haven't served, your concept of how things run in the military is purely word-of-mouth and usually quite corrupted by Hollywood and crappy websites like Huffington Post or news agencies like MSNBC who make money off of murdering context. Normally, this wouldn't be a huge issue, except for the next point:
2) People die in the military. While it's true there are more dangerous ways to go about life than Army/Marine Infantry (i.e. living in Washington D.C., Detroit, or Chicago), it's the point that you're letting your own personal opinions get in the way of an organization that is relatively isolated by simple nature, and you're trying to run it.

It's worse than asking politicians to run it.
People are assuming that because they pay taxes, that they should get a say in how the military runs things. Like I'm going to feel comfortable giving my life to someone else's hands who's knowledge of the military extends further than Rambo? I barely feel comfortable going to sleep on the ship as it is, knowing who's standing watch at times, let alone putting a civie in the driver's seat. It's nothing against the civilian populace, it's just a matter of lack of knowledge. You simply don't have all the information, nor will you ever, even if we posted everything on the internet in a nice bold-easy-to-read font.

We military folk don't walk around telling people running oil-rigs or schools how to do their jobs.
Don't tell us how to do ours. We've just got, oh, like 200 years worth of experience we're trying to turn over to new generations every year to try to keep us all alive, yah know.
Not like our lives depend on not having that all jacked up because someone wants to stick their nose where it doesn't belong just because they've found some new word offensive.
"But how can telling Drill Sergeant's not to say 'faggot' really mess all of that up?"
Good question. Here's the process. It goes something like this (coming from experience, not just speculation.)

A) Civilian X makes complaint about Political Correctness.
B) Congressman Y or News Agency Z want to look more popular/get higher ratings/get reelected, so they get on the bandwagon and make a big deal of it all.
C) Word gets out, usually lacking any and all proper context (or sometimes blatant lies) in such a manner as to rile up public opinion against the military on issue A.
D) Military Branch hears complaint. There is some genuine concern - the military does care about it's own people, after all everyone in a high position used to be someone in a low position, and we do have some degree of camaraderie - however this is completely and totally overshadowed by the fact that the military doesn't wish to be painted poorly. Tends to lower recruitment ratings and everything, which means the ability to maintain anything becomes horribly threatened.
E) Branch implements overzealous training program. After all, there really isn't any other way to do it. You have to have documentation saying you properly told everyone not to sexually-molest/say mean things, or else the news agencies and Anti-Military politicians make an even bigger stink which forces certain other politicians to put a halt to all operations.
F) Time and money and various operations are wasted due to said training. You are wasting millions of dollars every time this happens.
G) Millions of dollars that could otherwise go to body-armor, new equipment, et cetera, are now going to tell hundreds of thousands of military members the exact same message: "Don't be a bad person." Why? Because there are bad apples, and you have to tell them not to be bad people, but you can't always tell who those bad people are, so you have to tell everyone.
H) People die because they don't have aforementioned equipment. A simple complaint is more effective than an IED. Some soldier doesn't get in that shipment of night-vision goggles or new body armor, shipments get delayed, parts don't get fixed, et cetera. People. Die.

Happens like every frakking month.
You want the military to stop wasting money? Shut the hell up and grow a pair every once and a while. Some of us actually know what we're doing, and you can't stop every bad apple. We deal with them well enough, despite what the news agencies make it look like. Despite what people may think, the military is a fair representation of the country it's made of. Kind of happens when most people only serve 4 years and you replace them.

So thanks for being so frakking sensitive that you have to butt in where you're not only unwanted, but the job is already getting done, just because you have to make yourself known. It's getting taken care of, believe it or not.

Yeah, society sucks. Fix it where it's not getting killed. Everyone is to blame.
Not just the military.
Try teaching your kids to be good people. Blame the parents.
By the time it's gotten to the 18-to-50 year-olds in the military, the damage has been done. It's like watching someone eat your hamburger and not waiting until they are done to tell them, 'Oh wait, I actually did want that.'

TL;DR
You don't walk up to someone mopping the floor and tell them the floor is dirty. They've got it.
All anyone is doing is making a global stink of the issue and forcing the military to waste millions of dollars just so they can actually keep up recruiting numbers.
And costing lives because of it.
Thanks. I sure do love knowing I could die just because someone can't grow a pair or think for a second.

I salute you sir. That is the truth. Thank you for pointing it out. -prepares handshake-

User avatar
St George
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 491
Founded: Mar 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby St George » Mon May 27, 2013 12:47 am

Hathradic States wrote:Fucking man up and deal with it. You want to be a Marine, you better grow some fucking thick skin.

You are part of the reason why people think using the word faggot is ok. You're also part of the reason some people think it's ok to abduct, torture and murder homosexuals.
Bombadil wrote:To be quite honest, on any subject, around 25% of any population are batshit insane.

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Mon May 27, 2013 12:51 am

Vitaphone Racing wrote:So are any junior generals here going to explain how being harassed by your platoon and bullied by your superior, the guy you're supposed to go to when you report code of conduct breaches, toughens people up sufficiently that they're able to resist an entirely different kind of mental pressure, without having the trust of the unit undermined?
Because this really makes no fucking sense. Literally, none.
You don't know much about Boot camp do you?

A terrorist could defeat the guy complaining with a megaphone and a book of curse words.

St George wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Fucking man up and deal with it. You want to be a Marine, you better grow some fucking thick skin.

You are part of the reason why people think using the word faggot is ok. You're also part of the reason some people think it's ok to abduct, torture and murder homosexuals.
Actually it sounds rather thin skinned of someone to be so enraged by the existence of a homosexual to do all of those things.
Last edited by The Lone Alliance on Mon May 27, 2013 12:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Democratic Koyro
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5111
Founded: Feb 13, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Democratic Koyro » Mon May 27, 2013 12:52 am

St George wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Fucking man up and deal with it. You want to be a Marine, you better grow some fucking thick skin.

You are part of the reason why people think using the word faggot is ok. You're also part of the reason some people think it's ok to abduct, torture and murder homosexuals.


Lol. That's quite a jump you got there, from using an insult on a recruit in boot camp to murder?
THERMOBARIC THERMITE

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arvenia, Democratic Poopland, Greater Miami Shores 3, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Necroghastia, Umeria, Yomet

Advertisement

Remove ads