What the fuck makes you think he can't take it? He can, he just doesn't see why he should have to. He's right. No one should have to.
Advertisement

by Ovisterra » Sun May 26, 2013 1:32 pm

by Greenvul » Sun May 26, 2013 1:32 pm
Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia wrote:Yankee Empire wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/25/marine-letter-faggots-boot-camp_n_3322214.html
Now i understand the broad mentality of this website and already get what side most people are going to be on.
But I wanted to bring it up first.
But the thing you may not understand or Realize is that in Bootcamp it isn't personal and the Drill Sergeants job is to try and get under your skin an piss you off in order to see if you can Handle duress.
All this polical correct nonsense being shoved into our miltary and restricitions of how they can train the recruits just makes them soft.
Now some Sergeants probably going to lose his Job or be severely repimanded for saying something to a recruit that before would of been perfectly fine (as it's use as an insult works effectively well against Heterosexuals).
So what do you think NSG, you think the Marines are being too mean and that this recruit shouldn't be picked on by the big mean drill sergeants and deal with the stress every other recruit has to simply because he's gay?
Obviously this homosexual has an inability to cope with the reality of living in a nation that cherishes the freedom of speech over his demand for special consideration due to what he prefers to do with his genitalia. Quite frankly, he ought to give suicide more intense consideration.

by Greed and Death » Sun May 26, 2013 1:34 pm

by Agritum » Sun May 26, 2013 1:35 pm
Estovakiva wrote:Orcoa wrote:Ah so we should treat our men and women just like the nations we are going over to so they can be "Stronger" for it?
....No you're point has fallen over and catches on fire
No, to PREPARE them for just that, said person couldn`t even handle being called a "Fag"
Their fighting a war agains`t people who even targets 15 year olds (referance to Pakistani blogger girl)
But yeah it seems people like you would rather send people of to war without being propperly prepared to what they will or shall meet?
I`d love to see you get a better counter-argument.Agritum wrote: help remind the recruits that homosexuals are fundamentally treated better in the USA than in those other countries, and that they are fighting to protect a country who atleast permits them to be openly gay without major repercussions?
That would be great, but they should be also teached about how said cultures treats their gays and they will be looked down upon even if their to help them, even by their local allies same with woman soldiers.
Sadly not every country as the same rights for people of the diffrent gender, nor sexuality.

by Copenhagen Metropolis » Sun May 26, 2013 1:36 pm
Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia wrote:Obviously this homosexual has an inability to cope with the reality of living in a nation that cherishes the freedom of speech over his demand for special consideration due to what he prefers to do with his genitalia.

by Helicthon » Sun May 26, 2013 1:39 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Helicthon wrote:Language exists in context; part of the global context in American (and therefore USMC) society is that whiteness, maleness and heterosexuality are socio-cultural advantages. It is called privilege. You should learn about it.
I do need to learn about it, because never once have I had an advantage because I'm white, male, or heterosexual. In fact, getting sun burned very easily is quite the disadvantage.
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Also, not having full mental capacity and liking the same sex is different.

by Helicthon » Sun May 26, 2013 1:42 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Helicthon wrote:Language exists in context; part of the global context in American (and therefore USMC) society is that whiteness, maleness and heterosexuality are socio-cultural advantages. It is called privilege. You should learn about it.
I do need to learn about it, because never once have I had an advantage because I'm white, male, or heterosexual. In fact, getting sun burned very easily is quite the disadvantage.

by Greenvul » Sun May 26, 2013 1:46 pm
St George wrote:Yankee Empire wrote:so long as it's just words.
So long as it's just words... You know what the thing about words it?
Words have power. Intention has much more. When you say faggot, or nigga or slut, or any other slur considering to be of similar offence, with the intent of insulting someone, you are making your judgement of another person known.
When you make such a word taboo, you give it far more power. People do have a right to discuss these words, because to do otherwise is to permit these words to carry the same power they have and had have. In almost all cases, doing this leads to nothing good. The words are powerful enough on their own without people saying 'oh you can't discuss this'.
The way to remove a words power is to make sure you are condemning it's use when it's used in the way you see faggot and nigga and slut and similar words are used, in a derogatory, very insulting fashion. People are the most effective weapon against bigotry, not misguided attempts to stifle discussion of a words use and meaning.

by Democratic Koyro » Sun May 26, 2013 1:46 pm
Greenvul wrote:St George wrote:So long as it's just words... You know what the thing about words it?
Words have power. Intention has much more. When you say faggot, or nigga or slut, or any other slur considering to be of similar offence, with the intent of insulting someone, you are making your judgement of another person known.
When you make such a word taboo, you give it far more power. People do have a right to discuss these words, because to do otherwise is to permit these words to carry the same power they have and had have. In almost all cases, doing this leads to nothing good. The words are powerful enough on their own without people saying 'oh you can't discuss this'.
The way to remove a words power is to make sure you are condemning it's use when it's used in the way you see faggot and nigga and slut and similar words are used, in a derogatory, very insulting fashion. People are the most effective weapon against bigotry, not misguided attempts to stifle discussion of a words use and meaning.
I reckon you've never heard of "sticks and stones may break my bones".

by Ifreann » Sun May 26, 2013 1:48 pm
[Marine Corps spokesman Captain Richard] Ulsh also said that the letter accuses drill instructors of using language and acting in a manner that is not tolerated in boot camp.
"I mean, we're all human. ... There are people who might do that," Ulsh told HuffPost. "But the way [the recruit] talks about it is like it happens every day all the time. There are strict measures enforced that prevent those sorts of things from happening."
Drill Instructors are not even allowed to "drop f-bombs," according to Ulsh, and if they were throwing around offensive slurs, "there would certainly be repercussions."

by Ovisterra » Sun May 26, 2013 1:55 pm
Greenvul wrote:I reckon you've never heard of "sticks and stones may break my bones".

by Greenvul » Sun May 26, 2013 2:08 pm

by Blekksprutia » Sun May 26, 2013 2:09 pm

by Ovisterra » Sun May 26, 2013 2:10 pm
Greenvul wrote:
Why is "pussy" offensive to women? It's a small, furry creature, i.e. a squirrel or cat. Cats and squirrels are usually portrayed as cowardly, since they run away from strangers. So, calling someone a pussy is short for a scaredy pussy cat.

by Blekksprutia » Sun May 26, 2013 2:11 pm

by Blekksprutia » Sun May 26, 2013 2:12 pm
Oceania-Eurasia-Eastasia wrote:Yankee Empire wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/25/marine-letter-faggots-boot-camp_n_3322214.html
Now i understand the broad mentality of this website and already get what side most people are going to be on.
But I wanted to bring it up first.
But the thing you may not understand or Realize is that in Bootcamp it isn't personal and the Drill Sergeants job is to try and get under your skin an piss you off in order to see if you can Handle duress.
All this polical correct nonsense being shoved into our miltary and restricitions of how they can train the recruits just makes them soft.
Now some Sergeants probably going to lose his Job or be severely repimanded for saying something to a recruit that before would of been perfectly fine (as it's use as an insult works effectively well against Heterosexuals).
So what do you think NSG, you think the Marines are being too mean and that this recruit shouldn't be picked on by the big mean drill sergeants and deal with the stress every other recruit has to simply because he's gay?
Obviously this homosexual has an inability to cope with the reality of living in a nation that cherishes the freedom of speech over his demand for special consideration due to what he prefers to do with his genitalia. Quite frankly, he ought to give suicide more intense consideration.

by Helicthon » Sun May 26, 2013 2:14 pm
Greenvul wrote:Why is "pussy" offensive to women? It's a small, furry creature, i.e. a squirrel or cat. Cats and squirrels are usually portrayed as cowardly, since they run away from strangers. So, calling someone a pussy is short for a scaredy pussy cat.

by Blekksprutia » Sun May 26, 2013 2:15 pm

by Neoconstantius » Sun May 26, 2013 2:17 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arvenia, Democratic Poopland, Greater Miami Shores 3, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Necroghastia, Umeria, Yomet
Advertisement