NATION

PASSWORD

Vaccines and whether or not there is a choice

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Sun May 26, 2013 2:31 am

Why the hell are people even anti-vaccine?

Do they want to die of some horrible - yet completely preventable - disease?
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55304
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun May 26, 2013 2:32 am

Tagmatium wrote:Why the hell are people even anti-vaccine?

Do they want to die of some horrible - yet completely preventable - disease?


Evidently yes. And they want their kids to die of it. And they want also it to spread.
.

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Sun May 26, 2013 2:33 am

Tagmatium wrote:Why the hell are people even anti-vaccine?

Do they want to die of some horrible - yet completely preventable - disease?

Religion makes people do stupid things.
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55304
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun May 26, 2013 2:34 am

Blazedtown wrote:No. Vaccination has saved more lives than any other human invention. Making them optional based on the nonsensical ramblings of some blonde bimbo with a nice rack...


blonde bimbo with a nice rack


blonde bimbo with a nice rack


Sorry, I got distracted.
.

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Sun May 26, 2013 2:35 am

Tagmatium wrote:Why the hell are people even anti-vaccine?

Do they want to die of some horrible - yet completely preventable - disease?

My aunt didn't want to get her daughter vaccinated for swine flu. She kept ranting on about pharmaceutical companies being corrupt and money-grabbing (which lead to some rather interesting conversations between her and my brother, who was vastly more intelligent than her and working as a process engineer for a large pharmaceutical company at the time).
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Sun May 26, 2013 2:36 am

Risottia wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:Why the hell are people even anti-vaccine?

Do they want to die of some horrible - yet completely preventable - disease?

Evidently yes. And they want their kids to die of it. And they want also it to spread.

It's like what we're having over in the UK.

People didn't get the MMR jab because of the false link to Autism.

Now people are coming down with measles. Completely fucking preventable, but here we are.

People who are anti-vaccine - especially on the spurious grounds of personal freedom - ought to be given a shot.

Of the vaccine.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55304
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun May 26, 2013 2:38 am

Tagmatium wrote:People who are anti-vaccine - especially on the spurious grounds of personal freedom - ought to be given a shot.
Of the vaccine.


I think the ECHR totally allows for forced vaccination.
Or forced confinement for health purposes.
.

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Sun May 26, 2013 2:43 am

Saiwania wrote:I won't get a vaccine if it costs me anything. If it is free and I have nothing to lose, then sure.


Do you mean government subisidised and paid out of taxes so free at point of delivery, or actually free?
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sun May 26, 2013 2:51 am

L Ron Cupboard wrote:
Saiwania wrote:I won't get a vaccine if it costs me anything. If it is free and I have nothing to lose, then sure.


Do you mean government subisidised and paid out of taxes so free at point of delivery, or actually free?


Probably the subsidized one, because I know it costs money to research and manufacture vaccines. Point is, if I have to pay for it myself; I will likely decide I can manage without. I have a great immune system and I don't exactly travel to very many places where there could be sick people. I can say without a doubt that sometimes I do value my bottom line more than my own life.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Sun May 26, 2013 2:52 am

Saiwania wrote:
L Ron Cupboard wrote:
Do you mean government subisidised and paid out of taxes so free at point of delivery, or actually free?


Probably the subsidized one, because I know it costs money to research and manufacture vaccines. Point is, if I have to pay for it myself; I will likely decide I can manage without. I have a great immune system and I don't exactly travel to very many places where there could be sick people. I can say without a doubt that sometimes I do value my bottom line more than my own life.

But you do have to pay for it yourself, or at least an amount of the costs proportionate to what you'd use. In your taxes.

In fact, you'd probably wind up paying more through taxes than paying by hand.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55304
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun May 26, 2013 2:59 am

Zottistan wrote:But you do have to pay for it yourself, or at least an amount of the costs proportionate to what you'd use. In your taxes.

In fact, you'd probably wind up paying more through taxes than paying by hand.


That's ok for me.

I'm not happy of paying my taxes, but I'm damn proud of it.
.

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Sun May 26, 2013 3:00 am

Risottia wrote:
Zottistan wrote:But you do have to pay for it yourself, or at least an amount of the costs proportionate to what you'd use. In your taxes.

In fact, you'd probably wind up paying more through taxes than paying by hand.


That's ok for me.

I'm not happy of paying my taxes, but I'm damn proud of it.

Whatever floats your boat. I'm just saying that "I don't want to spend money" is a shitty reason to support spending more money.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55304
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun May 26, 2013 3:01 am

Zottistan wrote:
Risottia wrote:
That's ok for me.

I'm not happy of paying my taxes, but I'm damn proud of it.

Whatever floats your boat. I'm just saying that "I don't want to spend money" is a shitty reason to support spending more money.

Fair enough.
.

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sun May 26, 2013 3:02 am

Zottistan wrote:But you do have to pay for it yourself, or at least an amount of the costs proportionate to what you'd use. In your taxes. In fact, you'd probably wind up paying more through taxes than paying by hand.


Taxes is what I don't have any choice about, so I generally don't mind paying tax because it is likely to be progressive. Granted, I'm not paying any taxes right now because I'm not employed. I have no income that can be collected from and I'm not using welfare or anything. Going to the doctor is something I'd definitely avoid, but a good dentist is what I'd be willing to spend money on instead.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Sun May 26, 2013 3:04 am

Saiwania wrote:
Zottistan wrote:But you do have to pay for it yourself, or at least an amount of the costs proportionate to what you'd use. In your taxes. In fact, you'd probably wind up paying more through taxes than paying by hand.


Taxes is what I don't have any choice about, so I generally don't mind paying tax because it is likely to be progressive. Granted, I'm not paying any taxes right now because I'm not employed. I have no income that can be collected from and I'm not using welfare or anything. Going to the doctor is something I'd definitely avoid, but a good dentist is what I'd be willing to spend money on instead.

But still, you'd be paying more, just through a different medium. I don't understand what difference it makes, at all.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Torisakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16950
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Torisakia » Sun May 26, 2013 3:15 am

Vaccines have saved lives, but for my life, it's too late.

That last vaccines I got were when I had to get some before I started Kindergarten.
You ever woke up one morning and just decided it wasn't one of those days and you were gonna break some stuff?
President: Doug McDowell
Population: 227 million
Tech: MT-PMT
I don't use most NS stats
Ideology: Democracy Manifest
Pro: truth
Anti: bullshit


Latest Headlines
[TNN] A cargo ship belonging to Torisakia disappeared off the coast of Kostane late Wednesday evening. TBI suspects foul play. || Congress passes a T$10 billion aid package for the Democratic Populist rebels in Kostane. To include firearms, vehicles, and artillery.

User avatar
Dazchan
Senator
 
Posts: 3827
Founded: Mar 24, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Dazchan » Sun May 26, 2013 3:16 am

Zottistan wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
Probably the subsidized one, because I know it costs money to research and manufacture vaccines. Point is, if I have to pay for it myself; I will likely decide I can manage without. I have a great immune system and I don't exactly travel to very many places where there could be sick people. I can say without a doubt that sometimes I do value my bottom line more than my own life.

But you do have to pay for it yourself, or at least an amount of the costs proportionate to what you'd use. In your taxes.

In fact, you'd probably wind up paying more through taxes than paying by hand.


Medicare levy in Australia: 1.5% of income

Amount I paid last financial year: $1125

Clearly I'm paying more for my healthcare :roll:
If you can read this, thank your teachers.

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sun May 26, 2013 3:18 am

Zottistan wrote:But still, you'd be paying more, just through a different medium. I don't understand what difference it makes, at all.


If your income bracket is too low to cover the full cost of the new vaccine, you wouldn't be paying more. But if your income is high enough then yes, you might be better off just buying it directly.
Last edited by Saiwania on Sun May 26, 2013 3:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Densaner
Minister
 
Posts: 2760
Founded: Jul 19, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Densaner » Sun May 26, 2013 3:35 am

Vaccines should be optional. Forcing someone to undergo a medical procedure, however limited is a breach of the rights of that person.

User avatar
Herador
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8943
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Herador » Sun May 26, 2013 3:38 am

If I was five, I would say ban all shots forever because the lollipop and sticker I get afterwards totally aren't worth it. But you know, I'm not five, so inject away.
Last edited by Herador on Sun May 26, 2013 3:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Vaguely a pessimist, certainly an absurdist, unironically an antinatalist.

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Sun May 26, 2013 5:51 am

Dazchan wrote:
Zottistan wrote:But you do have to pay for it yourself, or at least an amount of the costs proportionate to what you'd use. In your taxes.

In fact, you'd probably wind up paying more through taxes than paying by hand.


Medicare levy in Australia: 1.5% of income

Amount I paid last financial year: $1125

Clearly I'm paying more for my healthcare :roll:

On the long run, yes, you probably are.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby SaintB » Sun May 26, 2013 5:59 am

Densaner wrote:Vaccines should be optional. Forcing someone to undergo a medical procedure, however limited is a breach of the rights of that person.


What about the breach of my rights when they catch rubella and cause an epidemic? Their right to get deathly ill suddenly supersedes my right to be healthy?
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Dezumanian Tribe
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 52
Founded: May 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Dezumanian Tribe » Sun May 26, 2013 6:02 am

Densaner wrote:Vaccines should be optional. Forcing someone to undergo a medical procedure, however limited is a breach of the rights of that person.


You aren't allowed to murder, so why would you be allowed to potentially spread a deadly disease? If it might hurt others it is NOT your bussiness, it's for the government...

Edit: You can't have unlimited personal freedom, because one man's freedom is another man's shackle.
Last edited by Dezumanian Tribe on Sun May 26, 2013 6:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
To clearly present my obvious interlectual superiority*, here's my signature:
*Note irony

"Any man's death diminishes me because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee. . . ."
-John Donne

I'll just leave this here:
"Given the opportunity, wealthier participants took twice as much candy from children as poorer participants. "

My Political Compass Test:
Economic Left/Right: -5.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.90

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Sun May 26, 2013 6:06 am

SaintB wrote:
Densaner wrote:Vaccines should be optional. Forcing someone to undergo a medical procedure, however limited is a breach of the rights of that person.


What about the breach of my rights when they catch rubella and cause an epidemic? Their right to get deathly ill suddenly supersedes my right to be healthy?

Apparently so, because science is evil and trying to destroy the omnicidal glory of God's spectacular diseases.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Nidaria
Senator
 
Posts: 3503
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Nidaria » Sun May 26, 2013 6:10 am

There should be a choice in receiving a vaccine. Forcing a person to take one would be authoritarian and draconian.
"He who denies the existence of God has some reason for wishing that God did not exist." --St. Augustine
"There is only one difference between genius and stupidity: genius has limits." --Albert Einstein
"When statesmen forsake their own private conscience for the sake of their public duties... they lead their country by a short route to chaos." --St. Thomas More
Anti-gay, Pro-life, Traditionalist, Libertarian, Non-interventionist, Loyal Roman Catholic
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic 25%
Secular/Fundamentalist 67%
Visionary/Reactionary 21%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian 6%
Communist/Capitalist 41%
Pacifist/Militaristic 7%
Ecological/Anthropocentric 52%

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Bear Stearns, El Lazaro, Godular, Kerwa, Lower Nubia, Narland, Nu Elysium, Plan Neonie, Souverain Revachol, Statesburg, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop

Advertisement

Remove ads