Doo-doo, doo-doo-doo
(Mah-nah, mah-nah)
Doo doo-doo, doo
(Mah-nah, mah-nah)
Doo-doo, doo-doo-doo, doo-doo-doo, doo-doo-doo, doo-doo-doo-doo-doo doo-doo doo-doo doo
Advertisement

by Franklin Delano Bluth » Thu May 23, 2013 8:54 pm

by Desperate Measures » Thu May 23, 2013 8:58 pm

by Hittanryan » Thu May 23, 2013 9:00 pm

by Franklin Delano Bluth » Thu May 23, 2013 9:01 pm

by Hittanryan » Thu May 23, 2013 9:03 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu May 23, 2013 9:05 pm

by ALMF » Thu May 23, 2013 9:43 pm
the blue is unmitigated (see also monstrous) homophobia so the stricken is false.The Keystone Federation wrote:Threlizdun wrote:And we have scout leaders and boy scouts. There is no issue aside from your absurd belief that homosexuals all want to have sex with children.
What the fuck? I didn't say that. If you would allow me to actually explain instead of being so ignorant maybe you would be able to understand that this is the point in why they have had it banned for so long. People think that when you place homosexual males into a group of homosexual kids, those homosexual males (even straight scout leaders have molested their kids in the past) will be more likely to molest the children than straight males. It's not a very hard concept to grasp that this is the reason why people are against this.It isn't homophobia, they want to protect their children,and I agree with them 100%- and may I remind you that I am in fact in full support of gay rights.

by ALMF » Thu May 23, 2013 9:46 pm
The Keystone Federation wrote:New Libertarian States wrote:They had it banned because they believed it was immoral, not because they worried about homosexual pedophiles.
You think the rest of society thinks the same? Especially conservatives? I can create a list of the people I know who would say the complete opposite.

by Zokoria » Thu May 23, 2013 9:48 pm
Senator Markus Zokos
Constituency 84 (Weisen)
Proud Member of the New Democrats
Ambassador to the Progressive Monarchist PartyNation does not reflect real life views.
Please note that Zokoria is undergoing a major revamp in roleplaying.
Moderate leftist and MLP/anime fanboy FTWThe Republic of Zokoria
Esquarium'shomophobic, bigoted, right-wingfreedom-loving nation with a big heart

by ALMF » Thu May 23, 2013 9:50 pm
Yankee Empire wrote:New Libertarian States wrote:Obivously, all gays are pedophiles.
Don't you leftists use a similair case against the death penalty?
That passed purely on probability innocent people will inevitably be executed?
If you have openly Gay Scout leaders and Teenage Boy (or worse even younger)scouts isn't it inevitable tyhat something will happen?
Then whats your argument?
Oh it's be fine "cuz consent"?

by Eucadian Federation » Thu May 23, 2013 10:12 pm
Yankee Empire wrote:New Libertarian States wrote:Obivously, all gays are pedophiles.
Don't you leftists use a similair case against the death penalty?
That passed purely on probability innocent people will inevitably be executed?
If you have openly Gay Scout leaders and Teenage Boy (or worse even younger)scouts isn't it inevitable tyhat something will happen?
Then whats your argument?
Oh it's be fine "cuz consent"?

by ALMF » Thu May 23, 2013 10:12 pm

by ALMF » Thu May 23, 2013 10:25 pm
Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:Threlizdun wrote:Being homosexual does not mean you are having sex all the time. Allowing homosexuals to join does not mean that they will begin having sex anymore than allowing heterosexual students in coed schools leads to people screwing each other in the middle of class. There is this magical thing called "restraint", that almost everyone on Earth possesses.
found this interesting. http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=Is01B1
Why not quot the Gastopo on the risks of the presence of Jews?
by ALMF » Thu May 23, 2013 10:33 pm
Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:Hittanryan wrote:Your article isn't. Give us links to their CDC sources, so we can see how much liberty they took with the studies.
http://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/about.htm
I'm pretty sure this has plenty to support my argument. Not to even mention bullying and exclusion.

by Hathradic States » Thu May 23, 2013 10:36 pm

by ALMF » Thu May 23, 2013 10:51 pm
Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:Nomelan wrote:"Differences in sexual behavior account for some of these disparities, but others are associated with social and structural inequities, such as the stigma and discrimination that LGBT populations experience"
In other words, it's your fault and people like you's fault that this is the case.
first off buddy boy, I don't bully. I stand up against what I believe to be wrong just as you are standing up for what you believe to be right. I will never insult a LGBT person for their beliefs but it is completely unnecessary to force a private organization to accept people contradictory to their values, while completely disregarding the negative mental and physical effects of engaging in homosexual activity. Scouts should be taught the dangers of all sexual activity with multiple partners. Especially the effects of having anal sex. Scouts should be taught to have sexual absence until over the age of consent and joined in wedlock.

by The Black Forrest » Thu May 23, 2013 10:54 pm
Yankee Empire wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:I am surprised. I expected a "paper tiger" but will wait for it to be final.
If the Christians want to bail out, let them. Scouting isn't supposed to be about hate. They can teach hatred in their churches all they want......
Allow Gays, ban Christians *nods*

by The Black Forrest » Thu May 23, 2013 10:57 pm
Yankee Empire wrote:The Corparation wrote:Yes there is such thing. Except that this isn't that thing. You're saying there are no restrictions on boys joining. We have pointed out that there are in fact restrictions against atheists and there were restrictions up until now against gays.You maintained that there aren't any restrictions. I fail to see how encouraging you to understand the definition of what a restriction actually is is anything resembling a strawman attack.
I said there were no restrictions on boys joining, which is true.
If they want to openly declare themselves Atheists or Homosexuals then thats a differant matter from them being boys.
They may be boys, but thats not why their being restricted.

by The Black Forrest » Thu May 23, 2013 11:01 pm

by The Black Forrest » Thu May 23, 2013 11:05 pm
Dakran wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:I am surprised. I expected a "paper tiger" but will wait for it to be final.
If the Christians want to bail out, let them. Scouting isn't supposed to be about hate. They can teach hatred in their churches all they want......
If I remember correctly, Scouts were supposed to promote tolerance.
The Black Forrest wrote:
Sort out one problem at a time.
There were a couple openly Atheists in my old troop.

by The Black Forrest » Thu May 23, 2013 11:09 pm
That passed purely on probability innocent people will inevitably be executed?
If you have openly Gay Scout leaders and Teenage Boy (or worse even younger)scouts isn't it inevitable tyhat something will happen?
Then whats your argument?
Oh it's be fine "cuz consent"?

by Eucadian Federation » Thu May 23, 2013 11:28 pm

by The Black Forrest » Thu May 23, 2013 11:46 pm

by Eucadian Federation » Thu May 23, 2013 11:53 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Fartsniffage, Floofybit, Gran Bretanha e Irlanda, Greater Miami Shores 3, Habsburg Mexico, Hauthamatra, Hirota, Islamic Holy Sites, Kenmoria, Kubra, La Xinga, Lativs, Newne Carriebean7, Of The Ursalian Federation, Pholza, Saiwana, Stellar Colonies, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Jamesian Republic, Trump Almighty, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army, Zurkerx
Advertisement