I don't think I will, but thanks.
Advertisement

by Farnhamia » Thu May 23, 2013 8:32 pm

by Spiritwolf » Thu May 23, 2013 8:32 pm

by Grenartia » Thu May 23, 2013 8:32 pm
Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:Desperate Measures wrote:Of course you found that interesting. It's Dobson.
"The Southern Poverty Law Center designated the FRC as a hate group in the Winter 2010 issue of its magazine, Intelligence Report"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Research_Council
so I have a conservative source? Cool. They used CDC studies and referenced them. I like the FRC.
Hittanryan wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Tell me. What exactly is so "wrong" about something that HARMS NOBODY?
I believe the argument boils down to "it's icky." Which is weird, because I think eating chips that fell in a puddle on the sidewalk is icky too, but for some reason I don't have a national political party basing its platform on preventing it.

by Desperate Measures » Thu May 23, 2013 8:32 pm
Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:Desperate Measures wrote:You are fired from the problem solving committee. Have your desk empty by the end of the day.
there wasn't a problem! The problem is that bsa is having to comprise their morals because people (many whom were not involved in the scouting program) were protesting. That's the problem.

by Franklin Delano Bluth » Thu May 23, 2013 8:34 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:
first off buddy boy, I don't bully. I stand up against what I believe to be wrong just as you are standing up for what you believe to be right. I will never insult a LGBT person for their beliefs but it is completely unnecessary to force a private organization to accept people contradictory to their values, while completely disregarding the negative mental and physical effects of engaging in homosexual activity. Scouts should be taught the dangers of all sexual activity with multiple partners. Especially the effects of having anal sex. Scouts should be taught to have sexual absence until over the age of consent and joined in wedlock.
Well, the BSA has changed its values to be more inclusive. Organizations change and evolve. I suppose you could advocate for repeal of this change inside the organization. That's your right.

by Christo et Ecclesiae » Thu May 23, 2013 8:34 pm
Franklin Delano Bluth wrote:Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:what are you conveying? That morally straight has a secret meaning?
Not secret at all. It's pretty clear: it means trying to be unerring in your adherence to moral principles.
Which includes unconditional acceptance of perfectly legitimate sexual preferences such as homosexuality, heterosexuality, bisexuality, pansexuality, and a lot of things in between.
If you don't accept those, you have erred in you adherence to moral principles, and therefore you are not morally straight.

by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 23, 2013 8:35 pm
Desperate Measures wrote:Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:there wasn't a problem! The problem is that bsa is having to comprise their morals because people (many whom were not involved in the scouting program) were protesting. That's the problem.
I understand how you see it that way. Try to make them go backwards, then. I think it would be a debate you will ultimately lose because it's a crappy side of the debate to be on.

by Desperate Measures » Thu May 23, 2013 8:35 pm
Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:Franklin Delano Bluth wrote:
Not secret at all. It's pretty clear: it means trying to be unerring in your adherence to moral principles.
Which includes unconditional acceptance of perfectly legitimate sexual preferences such as homosexuality, heterosexuality, bisexuality, pansexuality, and a lot of things in between.
If you don't accept those, you have erred in you adherence to moral principles, and therefore you are not morally straight.
is this really cleverly disguised sarcasm?

by Christo et Ecclesiae » Thu May 23, 2013 8:36 pm
Desperate Measures wrote:Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:there wasn't a problem! The problem is that bsa is having to comprise their morals because people (many whom were not involved in the scouting program) were protesting. That's the problem.
I understand how you see it that way. Try to make them go backwards, then. I think it would be a debate you will ultimately lose because it's a crappy side of the debate to be on.

by Christo et Ecclesiae » Thu May 23, 2013 8:37 pm

by Christo et Ecclesiae » Thu May 23, 2013 8:38 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu May 23, 2013 8:38 pm

by Hittanryan » Thu May 23, 2013 8:38 pm

by Desperate Measures » Thu May 23, 2013 8:39 pm

by Christo et Ecclesiae » Thu May 23, 2013 8:39 pm

by Grenartia » Thu May 23, 2013 8:41 pm
Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:Desperate Measures wrote:You are fired from the problem solving committee. Have your desk empty by the end of the day.
there wasn't a problem! The problem is that bsa is having to comprise their morals because people (many whom were not involved in the scouting program) were protesting. That's the problem.

by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 23, 2013 8:42 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu May 23, 2013 8:42 pm

by Franklin Delano Bluth » Thu May 23, 2013 8:42 pm

by The Keystone Federation » Thu May 23, 2013 8:43 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu May 23, 2013 8:43 pm

by Desperate Measures » Thu May 23, 2013 8:44 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu May 23, 2013 8:45 pm

by Desperate Measures » Thu May 23, 2013 8:48 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 23, 2013 8:49 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Fartsniffage, Floofybit, Gran Bretanha e Irlanda, Greater Miami Shores 3, Habsburg Mexico, Hauthamatra, Hirota, Islamic Holy Sites, Kenmoria, Kubra, La Xinga, Lativs, Newne Carriebean7, Of The Ursalian Federation, Pholza, Stellar Colonies, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Jamesian Republic, Trump Almighty, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army, Zurkerx
Advertisement