Numen wrote:New Libertarian States wrote:That's true
Source: http://www.gospelherald.com/article/soc ... ursday.htm
It's true and I am a member of one of the troops. I'm all for the ban.Way to go ban!
Looks like Cosara's back.
Advertisement

by Esparmuran » Thu May 23, 2013 7:55 pm
Numen wrote:New Libertarian States wrote:That's true
Source: http://www.gospelherald.com/article/soc ... ursday.htm
It's true and I am a member of one of the troops. I'm all for the ban.Way to go ban!

by Desperate Measures » Thu May 23, 2013 7:55 pm
Spiritwolf wrote:Grenartia........... there will always be people who have completely opposing beliefs and lifestyles, people who are completely intolerant of each other and their philosophies. Don't take it personally, it is simply a fact of life.

by Disserbia » Thu May 23, 2013 7:55 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 23, 2013 7:55 pm
Yankee Empire wrote:Yankee Empire wrote:You leftists are scum, telling me to be rational while saying that pedophila can be ok.Threlizdun wrote:My views don't represent those of most leftists. While I don't care for the word scum being used to describe me, this isn't simply an issue of leftism.
No it is, this is what it inevitably leads too.
This is a major reason I abadoned it.HOW!? How is it ever ok?if all involved gave consentWhat benfit to society would it bring?Consenting individuals can legally do as they pleaseWhat progress does it make?Consent would be respected
"Muh consent"
"Muh consent"
"Muh consent"
To hell with your consent I have standards.
None of these have any value in themselves and in fact in this case they are detrimental and degenerate.And they say the slippery slope argument is a fallacy![]()
Maybe it is but tht doesn't make it wrong, this garbage is proof of that.I support allowing consenting individuals to do as they please. By saying this, I am being ideologically consistent. I don't go beyond that.
True you are ideological consistent with leftism/liberalism. Prime example of why I hate it with a passion.I don't support extending it to those that can't give consent.
And where do you draw that line?
What dertermines that a 5 year old can't give consent as well as an 11 year old?
Not that either of these are acceptable.
It's fucking disgusting and benefits absolutely fucking nothing.Throughout all this, you still failed to provide an argument. I have been answering your questions for a while. Can you explain to me now why consent doesn't matter here?
Because children don't know any better, because parents (sane parents) don't want people fucking their kids, Because there is no fucking reason to allow it at all!
So what are you reasons?
Consent!?
Who fucking cares? Consent for the benefit of who? For perverts that want to fuck children?
For such a deep seated intrinsic taboo I don't even need a compelling argument, you on the other hand need to convince billions of people that allowing pedophiles to fuck kids will someone be a benefit to society.
So where's your argument besides "muh consent"? I'm waiting...
Just what i was thinking.
by Tsmida Eri » Thu May 23, 2013 7:55 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu May 23, 2013 7:55 pm

by New Libertarian States » Thu May 23, 2013 7:56 pm

by Christo et Ecclesiae » Thu May 23, 2013 7:56 pm
Threlizdun wrote:Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:umm.. You've had the talk right?
Being homosexual does not mean you are having sex all the time. Allowing homosexuals to join does not mean that they will begin having sex anymore than allowing heterosexual students in coed schools leads to people screwing each other in the middle of class. There is this magical thing called "restraint", that almost everyone on Earth possesses.

by The Keystone Federation » Thu May 23, 2013 7:56 pm
ONLY STEERS AND QUEERS COME FROM TEXAS!

by New Libertarian States » Thu May 23, 2013 7:57 pm

by Hittanryan » Thu May 23, 2013 7:57 pm

by Nomelan » Thu May 23, 2013 7:57 pm
Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:Threlizdun wrote:Being homosexual does not mean you are having sex all the time. Allowing homosexuals to join does not mean that they will begin having sex anymore than allowing heterosexual students in coed schools leads to people screwing each other in the middle of class. There is this magical thing called "restraint", that almost everyone on Earth possesses.
found this interesting. http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=Is01B1

by Franklin Delano Bluth » Thu May 23, 2013 7:58 pm
The Keystone Federation wrote:Threlizdun wrote:We understand why people are upset over this, because they reject science in favor of homophobic nonsense. By stating that you see some sense in that, you are accepting that their argument has even the slightest legitimacy, which it does not.
Then you are wrong. Homosexual scout leaders will not increase molestation incidents.
Are you aware of the term, "opinion"?

by New Libertarian States » Thu May 23, 2013 7:58 pm
Hittanryan wrote:Works for me, religious crybabies can continue crying.

by Eucadian Federation » Thu May 23, 2013 7:58 pm


by Russadonia » Thu May 23, 2013 7:59 pm

by Christo et Ecclesiae » Thu May 23, 2013 7:59 pm
Nomelan wrote:Christo et Ecclesiae wrote:found this interesting. http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=Is01B1
An unbiased source, please?

by Nomelan » Thu May 23, 2013 7:59 pm
Spiritwolf wrote:Grenartia........... there will always be people who have completely opposing beliefs and lifestyles, people who are completely intolerant of each other and their philosophies. Don't take it personally, it is simply a fact of life.

by The Keystone Federation » Thu May 23, 2013 7:59 pm

by Esparmuran » Thu May 23, 2013 8:00 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Brezzia, Ellese, Great Britain eke Northern Ireland, Imperiul romanum, Neu California, Vassenor
Advertisement