According to that i guess God was abusive to the Israelite, but he warned them so many times. can't deny that
Advertisement

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:47 am

by Individuality-ness » Tue May 21, 2013 12:49 am

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:51 am
'Individuality-ness wrote:Need a name wrote:According to that i guess God was abusive to the Israelite, but he warned them so many times.
The entire Bible is a story of an abusive asshole. The New Testament would be the "honeymoon" and "calm" phases of the cycle.
But back to evolution vs. creationism. Please give us a peer-reviewed scientific study that refutes evolution.

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:52 am
Individuality-ness wrote:Need a name wrote:According to that i guess God was abusive to the Israelite, but he warned them so many times.
The entire Bible is a story of an abusive asshole. The New Testament would be the "honeymoon" and "calm" phases of the cycle.
But back to evolution vs. creationism. Please give us a peer-reviewed scientific study that refutes evolution.

by Individuality-ness » Tue May 21, 2013 12:52 am
Need a name wrote:'Individuality-ness wrote:The entire Bible is a story of an abusive asshole. The New Testament would be the "honeymoon" and "calm" phases of the cycle.
But back to evolution vs. creationism. Please give us a peer-reviewed scientific study that refutes evolution.
The Cambrian explosion, animals that couldn't survive if they had to evolve to get curtain parts, and my favorite unstable nothingness

by Caecuser » Tue May 21, 2013 12:52 am
Need a name wrote:'Individuality-ness wrote:The entire Bible is a story of an abusive asshole. The New Testament would be the "honeymoon" and "calm" phases of the cycle.
But back to evolution vs. creationism. Please give us a peer-reviewed scientific study that refutes evolution.
The Cambrian explosion, animals that couldn't survive if they had to evolve to get curtain parts, and my favorite unstable nothingness
by Hodori » Tue May 21, 2013 12:53 am
Need a name wrote:'Individuality-ness wrote:The entire Bible is a story of an abusive asshole. The New Testament would be the "honeymoon" and "calm" phases of the cycle.
But back to evolution vs. creationism. Please give us a peer-reviewed scientific study that refutes evolution.
The Cambrian explosion, animals that couldn't survive if they had to evolve to get curtain parts, and my favorite unstable nothingness
Individuality-ness wrote:Please give us a peer-reviewed scientific study that refutes evolution.
Lauren Ashburton wrote:Damn it, why is socialising so hard? What do I do? Aaargh!

by Oceasia » Tue May 21, 2013 12:53 am
Need a name wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:The entire Bible is a story of an abusive asshole. The New Testament would be the "honeymoon" and "calm" phases of the cycle.
But back to evolution vs. creationism. Please give us a peer-reviewed scientific study that refutes evolution.
God is not an asshole!
Jurassic World has announced a new attraction coming this June. No other details were given.

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:53 am

by Individuality-ness » Tue May 21, 2013 12:54 am

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:54 am

by Lemanrussland » Tue May 21, 2013 12:55 am
Need a name wrote:here is one give me time http://x-evolutionist.com/

by Individuality-ness » Tue May 21, 2013 12:55 am
Need a name wrote:here is one give me time http://x-evolutionist.com/

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:56 am

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:56 am

by Individuality-ness » Tue May 21, 2013 12:56 am
Need a name wrote:http://www.sciforums.com/Scientific-Reasons-for-God-t-44465.html another

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:57 am
Individuality-ness wrote:Need a name wrote:here is one give me time http://x-evolutionist.com/
1. Bias, the first page says even says "how I came to believe in God".
2. This is NOT a peer-reviewed scientific study. Invalid.

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:57 am

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:58 am

by Individuality-ness » Tue May 21, 2013 12:58 am
Need a name wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:He doesn't know what the Cambrian Explosion is. He thinks it's day five in the story of Genesis.
what the hell are you talking about it is 6 days and the is creations the cambrian explosion is when people found more complex things than the expected on the Cambrian level

by Caecuser » Tue May 21, 2013 12:59 am
Need a name wrote:http://www.conservapedia.com/Arguments_for_a_recent_creation

by Individuality-ness » Tue May 21, 2013 12:59 am

by Need a Name » Tue May 21, 2013 12:59 am

by Individuality-ness » Tue May 21, 2013 1:00 am
Need a name wrote:http://www.conservapedia.com/Arguments_for_a_recent_creation
Conservapedia is NOT a source.Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bahrimontagn, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, Komarovo, New haven america, Phage, Poportus New, Port Caverton, Rary, The Two Jerseys, Umeria
Advertisement