18 Year Old Girl Facing Felony for Dating 15 Year Old Girl

[Frisivisia]

A sliding scale system, however, would be much better.

Indeed, however the law is the law. It was broken whether or not the current code is fair or not and so the sentence must be served.

Is there much support for this sliding scale system.

An unjust law isn't a law to be bound by.

[Ovisterra]

She had sex with someone below the age of consent and is getting in trouble for it. Remind me what the problem is?

The problem is that a good sliding-scale system wasn't in place so two teenagers in high school together couldn't have a sexual relationship.

What's a sliding scale system?

Justice was erved

You forgot the apostrophe.

[OMGeverynameistaken]

I wonder if her parents gave her any warning, or if they just called the cops on their daughter the moment they found out she was TEH EBUL GAYZ?

Disgusting. Betraying your child like that should qualify as abuse. I hope the kid's lawyer demands that she be provided a different house to be under house arrest in.

[Abatael]

I wonder if her parents gave her any warning, or if they just called the cops on their daughter the moment they found out she was TEH EBUL GAYZ?

Disgusting. Betraying your child like that should qualify as abuse. I hope the kid's lawyer demands that she be provided a different house to be under house arrest in.

No. It's not disgusting. In fact, they are obligated as humans and as citizens to report crimes.

[Frisivisia]

The problem is that a good sliding-scale system wasn't in place so two teenagers in high school together couldn't have a sexual relationship.

What's a sliding scale system?

It means that a 60-year-old couldn't fuck a 15-year-old, but a 19-year-old could, due to the fact that their ages are closer and circumstances may be much different.

[Communists for the people]

She had sex with someone below the age of consent and is getting in trouble for it. Remind me what the problem is?

Because they were lesbians, we have to feel sorry for them.

I swear, replace this with a heterosexual couple and people would be screaming for the man to be sent to the gallows

Probably.

[The Tectonic Plates]

Indeed, however the law is the law. It was broken whether or not the current code is fair or not and so the sentence must be served.

Is there much support for this sliding scale system.

An unjust law isn't a law to be bound by.

Change it through the ballot box, don't just ignore it and break it.

[Zweite Alaje]

no victim, no crime.

Age of consent laws are in place to protect minors. You know, so pedos can't fuck little girls and get away with it.

[Mike the Progressive]

Indeed, however the law is the law. It was broken whether or not the current code is fair or not and so the sentence must be served.

Is there much support for this sliding scale system.

An unjust law isn't a law to be bound by.

Of course it is.

[Frisivisia]

An unjust law isn't a law to be bound by.

Change it through the ballot box, don't just ignore it and break it.

lrn2civilrightsmovement br0

[Resora]

I wonder if her parents gave her any warning, or if they just called the cops on their daughter the moment they found out she was TEH EBUL GAYZ?

Disgusting. Betraying your child like that should qualify as abuse. I hope the kid's lawyer demands that she be provided a different house to be under house arrest in.

You have the parents mixed up. Hunt's parents are being very supportive and are campaigning to protect their daughter. The other girl's parents are the ones reporting Hunt because they believe Hunt "made" their daughter gay.

[Chetssaland]

I wonder if her parents gave her any warning, or if they just called the cops on their daughter the moment they found out she was TEH EBUL GAYZ?

Disgusting. Betraying your child like that should qualify as abuse. I hope the kid's lawyer demands that she be provided a different house to be under house arrest in.

No. It's not disgusting. In fact, they are obligated as humans and as citizens to report crimes.

Maybe as citizens, but as humans most people won't report every trivial 'crime' they see.

[Abatael]

Change it through the ballot box, don't just ignore it and break it.

lrn2civilrightsmovement br0

That doesn't justify breaking the law.

[The Spiral Future]

Indeed, however the law is the law. It was broken whether or not the current code is fair or not and so the sentence must be served.

Is there much support for this sliding scale system.

An unjust law isn't a law to be bound by.

Laws exist to provide society with order. You can't just pick and choose what laws to follow. If you wish to change the system then by all means go ahead. Protest, petition, run for government and whatever other means you can find.

However you are bound for those laws, you do not get a choice on this matter. You may view it as unjust, but a mad man who thinks the world is out to get him and desires vengence would see laws against murder as unjust. There are no exceptions.

[Frisivisia]

An unjust law isn't a law to be bound by.

Of course it is.

Sit-ins were terrible. Respect the law, crazy colored folk.

[The Sector Union]

What's a sliding scale system?

It means that a 60-year-old couldn't fuck a 15-year-old, but a 19-year-old could, due to the fact that their ages are closer and circumstances may be much different.

It does make sense sort of, but this scale would extend. Okay, the Law is 18 but 19 is okay because it leans closer. Next thing you know, it's now 20, then 21, then 22 and so on.

There shouldn't be exceptions.

[Mike the Progressive]

lrn2civilrightsmovement br0

That doesn't justify breaking the law.

Nor is it the same.

[Ordolibertarian metropolis]

no victim, no crime.

Age of consent laws are in place to protect minors. You know, so pedos can't fuck little girls and get away with it.

i know but that would have a victim. I meant in this case it would apply.

[Abatael]

No. It's not disgusting. In fact, they are obligated as humans and as citizens to report crimes.

Maybe as citizens, but as humans most people won't report every trivial 'crime' they see.

I don't see rape as trivial. It's nice to know you do.

[The Tectonic Plates]

Change it through the ballot box, don't just ignore it and break it.

lrn2civilrightsmovement br0

I don't think Civil Rights apply in this case.

[Frisivisia]

An unjust law isn't a law to be bound by.

Laws exist to provide society with order. You can't just pick and choose what laws to follow. If you wish to change the system then by all means go ahead. Protest, petition, run for government and whatever other means you can find.

However you are bound for those laws, you do not get a choice on this matter. You may view it as unjust, but a mad man who thinks the world is out to get him and desires vengence would see laws against murder as unjust. There are no exceptions.

Non-violence, of course, is always necessary.

[Frisivisia]

lrn2civilrightsmovement br0

I don't think Civil Rights apply in this case.

What I'm saying is that the Civil Rights Movement used civil disobedience to further their cause.

[Communists for the people]

lrn2civilrightsmovement br0

I don't think Civil Rights apply in this case.

Not much if any.

[Mike the Progressive]

Of course it is.

Sit-ins were terrible. Respect the law, crazy colored folk.

There's a bit of a difference between massive protests demanding racial equality and committing statutory rape.

[LANDOF]

Why do I get the feeling the parents would have been fine if it was a son instead of a daughter?