NATION

PASSWORD

18 Year Old Girl Facing Felony for Dating 15 Year Old Girl

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Chetssaland
Senator
 
Posts: 4669
Founded: May 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Chetssaland » Sun May 19, 2013 3:21 pm

Abatael wrote:
Chetssaland wrote:
Again, common sense is a better way to judge things rather than the law.

All those involved in the underground railroad were breaking the law. I don't know about you, but I don't condemn their actions.

And no, I'm not comparing this to slavery.


It was "common sense" that the earth was flat and the center of the universe. Common sense can be wrong. To say it's right because it's common sense is a fallacy as well.
Also, it has yet to be proven that this is common sense. I disagree.

Edit: Also, if you're not comparing this to slavery, then don't bring it up.


Things that can be proven/disproven by science aren't common sense. Nice try though.

And I brought it up because it was an example of how the law can be wrong. And you know that. Or at least I hope so... :roll:

User avatar
LANDOF
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 193
Founded: Nov 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby LANDOF » Sun May 19, 2013 3:21 pm

Communists for the people wrote:
LANDOF wrote:
I am going to predict a suicide attempt in the future.


What does suicide have to do with his/her post?


Part of the consequences of her action. She is 18 and the world is crashing around her. Just sayin.

User avatar
Cosara
Senator
 
Posts: 4339
Founded: Nov 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cosara » Sun May 19, 2013 3:21 pm

Sedikal wrote:
Cosara wrote:It's not "rape" technically, but those below the age of consent cannot give consent, so it is also rape technically.

Are you sure? When I had sexual relations with an 18 year old women as a 16 year old I'm damn sure I was consending to it.

There is an age of consent. People cannot legally give consent to jack shit below that age.
"Do not lose hope; St. Joseph also had moments of doubt. but he never lost faith and was able to overcome them in the certainty that God never abandons us." -Pope Francis

"We are never defeated unless we give up on god." -Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Yankee Empire
Senator
 
Posts: 4186
Founded: Aug 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yankee Empire » Sun May 19, 2013 3:22 pm

Communists for the people wrote:
LANDOF wrote:
I am going to predict a suicide attempt in the future.


What does suicide have to do with his/her post?




Two SP vids in on thread im no a roll, though the video quality for this one is quite bad.
Economic Left/Right: -6.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05


Pro: U.S.,Diplomatic Militarism, Imperialism, Patriotism/Civic Nationalism, Cosmopolitanism, Stoicism, Authoritarianism, Classical Liberalism, Unionism, Centralization (usually), Federalism, Corporatism.
Anti:Tribalism, Seccessionism(usually),Decentralization,Pure Capitalism/State controlled economics, Misanthropy,Cruelty, Cowardice, Pacifism,Hedonism, Corporitocracy.
Vice-Chairman of the National-Imperialist-FreedomParty
"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right."-Carl Schurz

User avatar
Caecuser
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6896
Founded: Jul 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Caecuser » Sun May 19, 2013 3:22 pm

Abatael wrote:
Chetssaland wrote:
Again, common sense is a better way to judge things rather than the law.

All those involved in the underground railroad were breaking the law. I don't know about you, but I don't condemn their actions.

And no, I'm not comparing this to slavery.


It was "common sense" that the earth was flat and the center of the universe. Common sense can be wrong. To say it's right because it's common sense is a fallacy as well.
Also, it has yet to be proven that this is common sense. I disagree.

Edit: Also, if you're not comparing this to slavery, then don't bring it up.


The Earth is technically the centre of the Observable Universe and almost nobody has thought the Earth is flat for thousands of years.

Why are you so vehemently depending the law in this case? Do you just like the law out is it your opinion that it should be kept this way.

User avatar
Chetssaland
Senator
 
Posts: 4669
Founded: May 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Chetssaland » Sun May 19, 2013 3:22 pm

Abatael wrote:
Chetssaland wrote:
LOLOLOLOL.

Look, I'm trying to have a real discussion here. If you're gonna play this game, then we're done.


If you laugh at rape and call it a "game," we most definitely are done.


You're not going to get me upset. Not that it will stop you from continuing to try.

User avatar
The Spiral Future
Diplomat
 
Posts: 903
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Spiral Future » Sun May 19, 2013 3:23 pm

Sedikal wrote:
Cosara wrote:It's not "rape" technically, but those below the age of consent cannot give consent, so it is also rape technically.

Are you sure? When I had sexual relations with an 18 year old women as a 16 year old I'm damn sure I was consending to it.


Still legally rape. Doesn't matter how much you wanted it.

EDIT : To clarify, I believe the law should be updated.
Last edited by The Spiral Future on Sun May 19, 2013 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SaintB wrote:I like to believe that civil rights are a revolution. That revolution will never stop until everyone in the world is legally equal.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Sun May 19, 2013 3:23 pm

Sedikal wrote:Are you sure? When I had sexual relations with an 18 year old women as a 16 year old I'm damn sure I was consending to it.


That depends on where you live, in Connecticut you had a perfectly healthy sexual encounter, in Delaware you were raped.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sun May 19, 2013 3:24 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Sedikal wrote:Are you sure? When I had sexual relations with an 18 year old women as a 16 year old I'm damn sure I was consending to it.


That depends on where you live, in Connecticut you had a perfectly healthy sexual encounter, in Delaware you were raped.


And SVU needs to investigate!

User avatar
Sedikal
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9176
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sedikal » Sun May 19, 2013 3:24 pm

Cosara wrote:
Sedikal wrote:Are you sure? When I had sexual relations with an 18 year old women as a 16 year old I'm damn sure I was consending to it.

There is an age of consent. People cannot legally give consent to jack shit below that age.

Which is fucking stupid. Most kids can think for themselves as indapendint people by 16. That is Why I support lowering the age of consent. But I did consent to that act. And boy did it turn out good for me.
Nice Little Quotes
“Kindness is the golden chain by which society is bound together.”
-Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

Yet human intelligence has another force, too: the sense of urgency that gives human smarts their drive. Perhaps our intelligence is not just ended by our mortality; to a great degree, it is our mortality.
-Adam Gopnik

Fighting for peace, is like fucking for chastity
-Stephen King


Proud Member of the New Democrats in the NSG Senate
Political Compass of Sedikal
KANSAS CITY CHIEFS!

Turchynov/Yatsenyuk
Russia Out Of Crimea

User avatar
Abatael
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6608
Founded: Mar 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abatael » Sun May 19, 2013 3:25 pm

Chetssaland wrote:
Abatael wrote:
It was "common sense" that the earth was flat and the center of the universe. Common sense can be wrong. To say it's right because it's common sense is a fallacy as well.
Also, it has yet to be proven that this is common sense. I disagree.

Edit: Also, if you're not comparing this to slavery, then don't bring it up.


Things that can be proven/disproven by science aren't common sense. Nice try though.

And I brought it up because it was an example of how the law can be wrong. And you know that. Or at least I hope so... :roll:


Then what is common sense? After you define it, prove to us that it is common sense this form of rape should be allowed.

The law is not wrong; the law is the law. People are wrong.
IMPERIVM·NOVVM·VENOLIÆ.
PAX·PER·BELLVM.
ROMVLVS·AVRELIVS·SECVNDVS.
DEVS·VENOLIAM·BENEDICAT.

Second Best Factbook (UNDERGOING MAJOR REVISIONS)| Factbook Rankings | Embassy Program

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sun May 19, 2013 3:25 pm

The Spiral Future wrote:
Sedikal wrote:Are you sure? When I had sexual relations with an 18 year old women as a 16 year old I'm damn sure I was consending to it.


Still legally rape. Doesn't matter how much you wanted it.

EDIT : To clarify, I believe the law should be updated.


One could even argue, Sedikal was...asking for it?

User avatar
Dusk_Kittens
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1216
Founded: May 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dusk_Kittens » Sun May 19, 2013 3:25 pm

The Spiral Future wrote:There may be an element of homophobia there alright.

She was underage however, we do not make exceptions to laws.


Why is that?

To borrow and paraphrase a little comment from some religious text or other, "Humans were not made for the law; the law was made for humans."

and something about the spirit of the law vs the letter of the law

but anyway.

It's perfectly legal in some states in the US for a girl as young as 14 to get married with her parents' consent, and that little piece of paper (the marriage license) makes an exception to the laws on age of consent. Elsewhere, the age for this is 16, but it still results in an exception to the law.
Her Divine Grace,
the Sovereign Principessa Luna,
Ulata-Druidessâ Teutâs di Genovâs,
Ardua-Druidessâ of Dusk Kittens

The Tribal Confederacy of Dusk_Kittens
(a Factbook in progress)
~ Stairsneach ~

My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
(Left Libertarian)

My C4SS Ratings
58% Economic Leftist
63% Anarchist
79% Anti-Militarist
67% Socio-Cultural Liberal
80% Civil Libertarian

"... perché lo universale degli uomini
si pascono così di quel che pare come di quello che è:
anzi, molte volte si muovono
più per le cose che paiono che per quelle che sono."
-- Niccolò Machiavelli,
Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio,
Libro Primo, Capitolo 25.

User avatar
The Spiral Future
Diplomat
 
Posts: 903
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Spiral Future » Sun May 19, 2013 3:25 pm

Mike the Progressive wrote:
The Spiral Future wrote:
Still legally rape. Doesn't matter how much you wanted it.

EDIT : To clarify, I believe the law should be updated.


One could even argue, Sedikal was...asking for it?


You're terrible :lol:
SaintB wrote:I like to believe that civil rights are a revolution. That revolution will never stop until everyone in the world is legally equal.

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Sun May 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Abatael wrote:
Chetssaland wrote:
Again, common sense is a better way to judge things rather than the law.

All those involved in the underground railroad were breaking the law. I don't know about you, but I don't condemn their actions.

And no, I'm not comparing this to slavery.


It was "common sense" that the earth was flat and the center of the universe. Common sense can be wrong. To say it's right because it's common sense is a fallacy as well.
Also, it has yet to be proven that this is common sense. I disagree.

Edit: Also, if you're not comparing this to slavery, then don't bring it up.

Here's the problem: strict liability laws are prone to abuse, especially when they involve arbitrary limits. When this girl was still 17, her relationship with that fifteen year old was not illegal. But the moment she turned 18, in spite of their prior relationship, and relative age proximity, it became illegal. Cases like this are brought up only because of vindictive parents, and represent a waste of legal resources. Additionally, in a few months the younger girl will turn 16, in which case it would not longer be illegal for anyone younger than 24 to have sex with her due to Florida's variable age of consent law.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
TaQud
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15959
Founded: Apr 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby TaQud » Sun May 19, 2013 3:26 pm

there's a website called lgbtnation? hmm you learned something knew everyday :meh:
CENTRIST Economic Left/Right: 0.62 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.46
List Your Sexuality, nickname(s), NSG Family and Friends, your NS Boyfriend or Girlfriend, gender, favorite quotes and anything else that shows your ego here.
(Because I couldn't live without knowing who was part of NSG Family or what your nickname was. I was panicking for days! I couldn't eat, I couldn't sleep I was so worried that I'd would never know and have to live without knowing this! /sarcasm)
2013 Best signature Award

User avatar
Aethrys
Minister
 
Posts: 2714
Founded: Apr 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Aethrys » Sun May 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Al-Quarra wrote:Welcome in the US i would say... over here they can't even arrest that girl for such thing... she hasn't commited any crime in my eyes, otherwise they should forbid every relation between an "adult" and a "child" (of a normal age difference) wich is just stupid


Sexual relationships between adults and children are forbidden. That's why this girl is going to jail. I don't know what you're trying to say here.
"Concentration of power in a political machine is bad; and an Established Church is only a political machine; it was invented for that; it is nursed, cradled, preserved for that; it is an enemy to human liberty, and does no good which it could not better do in a split-up and scattered condition." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Sedikal
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9176
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sedikal » Sun May 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Sedikal wrote:Are you sure? When I had sexual relations with an 18 year old women as a 16 year old I'm damn sure I was consending to it.


That depends on where you live, in Connecticut you had a perfectly healthy sexual encounter, in Delaware you were raped.

It took place in kansas. Not to familer with Kansas statutory rape laws but I do think they consiter that tape. Which is weird considering I didn't feel raped.
Nice Little Quotes
“Kindness is the golden chain by which society is bound together.”
-Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

Yet human intelligence has another force, too: the sense of urgency that gives human smarts their drive. Perhaps our intelligence is not just ended by our mortality; to a great degree, it is our mortality.
-Adam Gopnik

Fighting for peace, is like fucking for chastity
-Stephen King


Proud Member of the New Democrats in the NSG Senate
Political Compass of Sedikal
KANSAS CITY CHIEFS!

Turchynov/Yatsenyuk
Russia Out Of Crimea

User avatar
Central Slavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8451
Founded: Nov 05, 2009
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Central Slavia » Sun May 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Central Slavia wrote:Absurdly high age of consent,
It should be set to 15 years or so ,to fucking reflect reality.

Hell no. We don't need 20 yr olds fucking 15 yr olds legally.

I'd prefer to leave that to the participants to decide. In fact, cases like this show why it'd be a good idea.
At 15 you are old enough to get work, get your ID , get criminal responsibility, and indeed where I'm from, it's the age of consent. Don't think we have any greater occurence of paedophillia than elsewhere, but it does prevent lawsuits where everyone loses out.
Kosovo is Serbia!
Embassy Anthem Store Facts

Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.

Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions

Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]

User avatar
Abatael
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6608
Founded: Mar 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Abatael » Sun May 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Caecuser wrote:
Abatael wrote:
It was "common sense" that the earth was flat and the center of the universe. Common sense can be wrong. To say it's right because it's common sense is a fallacy as well.
Also, it has yet to be proven that this is common sense. I disagree.

Edit: Also, if you're not comparing this to slavery, then don't bring it up.


The Earth is technically the centre of the Observable Universe and almost nobody has thought the Earth is flat for thousands of years.

Why are you so vehemently depending the law in this case? Do you just like the law out is it your opinion that it should be kept this way.


The earth is not the center of the universe. That is what was said. Nothing else. And I said "was."

I don't understand your question.
IMPERIVM·NOVVM·VENOLIÆ.
PAX·PER·BELLVM.
ROMVLVS·AVRELIVS·SECVNDVS.
DEVS·VENOLIAM·BENEDICAT.

Second Best Factbook (UNDERGOING MAJOR REVISIONS)| Factbook Rankings | Embassy Program

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Sun May 19, 2013 3:26 pm

The Spiral Future wrote:
Yankee Empire wrote:
Because 15 year olds shouldn't be having sex at all.


It's entirely natural for an animal to have sex when the urges arrive, humanity is not the exception to this rule. I would however put forward the motion of showering the youth with lemon fresh condoms and sex education.


Nature doesn't mean anything when it comes to order.

Regardless of opinion, the girls knew what they were doing was illegal and should be punished, that is how society must function.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sun May 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Cosara wrote:
Shofercia wrote:
I've heard of rather idiotic zero tolerance cases in the US, not just in Florida. The ones that involved an 18 year old banging a 15 year old, with clear cut consent. And they were hetero.

That was statutory rape.


Ok, let me present a really obvious case. Say you have a 17 year old, dating a 15 year old. And because the 15 year old is slightly smarter, they're taking the same classes for half of the day. And they've been going strong for years before this. They're going to get married, once they're done with high school. Both of their parents approve of their relationship. It's 100% consensual. If she says stops, he stops, and goes to make her tea. And doesn't bug her for the night. Two years pass. He's 19, she's 17. They're still banging. They're three months away from marriage. And then, before having sex, they forgot to close the blinds on their second story window. A peeping tom records them having sex, and posts videos online. For three days in a row. Authorities get hold of said videos, and recognize them! Two months before they marry, they take him away for statutory rape. To spend two years in jail.

Do you understand now, why zero tolerance laws, suck?
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Sun May 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Abatael wrote:
Then what is common sense? After you define it, prove to us that it is common sense this form of rape should be allowed.

The law is not wrong; the law is the law. People are wrong.


The law is right because the law is the law, I never understood why MLK couldn't get that through his head.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
LANDOF
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 193
Founded: Nov 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby LANDOF » Sun May 19, 2013 3:27 pm

Trotskylvania wrote:Here's the problem: strict liability laws are prone to abuse, especially when they involve arbitrary limits. When this girl was still 17, her relationship with that fifteen year old was not illegal. But the moment she turned 18, in spite of their prior relationship, and relative age proximity, it became illegal. Cases like this are brought up only because of vindictive parents, and represent a waste of legal resources. Additionally, in a few months the younger girl will turn 16, in which case it would not longer be illegal for anyone younger than 24 to have sex with her due to Florida's variable age of consent law.


This sucks.

User avatar
The Sector Union
Minister
 
Posts: 2192
Founded: Mar 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sector Union » Sun May 19, 2013 3:27 pm

The Spiral Future wrote:
Yankee Empire wrote:
Because 15 year olds shouldn't be having sex at all.


It's entirely natural for an animal to have sex when the urges arrive, humanity is not the exception to this rule. I would however put forward the motion of showering the youth with lemon fresh condoms and sex education.


But in today, children are in an education stage.We're not wild beasts anymore. So there is no need for people under 18 to reproduce.
Purge the Xeno! For the Homo Sapien, For the Imperium of Terra!!!!

"In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy's country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good." -Sun Tzu

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Big Eyed Animation, Bovad, Eahland, Kostane, Moreistan, Ohnoh, Saiwana, Sarduri, Stratonesia, Strye Treossow, The Black Forrest, The V O I D, Tiami, Uiiop, Vologda State, Washington-Columbia

Advertisement

Remove ads