Are some races inherently superior to others?

by **Mkuki** » Thu May 23, 2013 2:40 pm

Shaggai wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Considering those aren't races...

Well, I mean, the human race, you know...

But humans aren't a race. I'd suggest reading up on taxonomy and zoology. Not to mention biology.

by **Malkora** » Thu May 23, 2013 2:40 pm

I guess so. It's really an opinion question. 100 meter dash seems like more fun than a relay to me unless you like suspense.

by **Shaggai** » Thu May 23, 2013 2:54 pm

Mkuki wrote:
Shaggai wrote:Well, I mean, the human race, you know...

But humans aren't a race. I'd suggest reading up on taxonomy and zoology. Not to mention biology.

I was being sarcastic...

by **Greed and Death** » Thu May 23, 2013 2:57 pm

The race that is Superior to all others is the one I belong to, Mutt.

by **The Tectonic Plates** » Thu May 23, 2013 3:13 pm

"Races" aren't inherently superior to each other, Cultures, Nations and Individuals however, may be inherently superior to each other.

by **Chinese Regions** » Thu May 23, 2013 3:23 pm

The Tectonic Plates wrote:"Races" aren't inherently superior to each other, Cultures, Nations and Individuals however, may be inherently superior to each other.

What about continents?

by **The Tectonic Plates** » Thu May 23, 2013 3:26 pm

Chinese Regions wrote:
The Tectonic Plates wrote:"Races" aren't inherently superior to each other, Cultures, Nations and Individuals however, may be inherently superior to each other.

What about continents?

Nazca Plate > Everything else.

by **The Nihilistic view** » Thu May 23, 2013 3:27 pm

Yes of course. What a stupid question.

F1> NAFCAR.

by **Storica** » Thu May 23, 2013 3:32 pm

Thinking practicaly a tall Scandinavian would be better suited to most phyisical activitys than say an asian.But mostly dealing with stereotypes so i cant say for definate.

by **The Nihilistic view** » Thu May 23, 2013 3:36 pm

In all seriousness the OP should really be "are some ethnicities inherently superior to others?". what most people call racial are really ethnic differences. Yes some ethnicities are superior to others.

by **Meryuma** » Thu May 23, 2013 3:47 pm

greed and death wrote:The race that is Superior to all others is the one I belong to, Mutt.

My god, he might be right!

by **Arumdaum** » Thu May 23, 2013 3:51 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:In all seriousness the OP should really be "are some ethnicities inherently superior to others?". what most people call racial are really ethnic differences. Yes some ethnicities are superior to others.

Really? How so? Do you even know what ethnicity is?

by **Arumdaum** » Thu May 23, 2013 3:51 pm

Storica wrote:Thinking practicaly a tall Scandinavian would be better suited to most phyisical activitys than say an asian.But mostly dealing with stereotypes so i cant say for definate.

That's incredibly stupid.

by **The Nihilistic view** » Thu May 23, 2013 4:00 pm

Arumdaum wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:In all seriousness the OP should really be "are some ethnicities inherently superior to others?". what most people call racial are really ethnic differences. Yes some ethnicities are superior to others.

Really? How so? Do you even know what ethnicity is?

Its quite simple, Certain ethnic groups have better physical characteristics for example. Need i say more?

by **Arumdaum** » Thu May 23, 2013 4:35 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Arumdaum wrote:Really? How so? Do you even know what ethnicity is?

Its quite simple, Certain ethnic groups have better physical characteristics for example. Need i say more?

Yes, because you've only shown your lack of understanding of what ethnicity even is and admittance that you're a racist. Ethnicity is a socially defined category based upon common culture of nationality. You don't need to have black skin to Kenyan. You can have blue eyes and still be Chinese.

What certain ethnic groups have better physical characteristics? What are those characteristics? Does everyone in that group possess that?

by **Franklin Delano Bluth** » Thu May 23, 2013 5:13 pm

Yes. For example, the Indianapolis 500 is objectively better than the Daytona 500.

by **Disserbia** » Thu May 23, 2013 6:17 pm

Franklin Delano Bluth wrote:Yes. For example, the Indianapolis 500 is objectively better than the Daytona 500.

Only if you bring earplugs.

by **Czechanada** » Thu May 23, 2013 6:20 pm

There's only one superior race: the glorious PC gaming master race.

by **Anachronous Rex** » Thu May 23, 2013 6:21 pm

Czechanada wrote:There's only one superior race: the glorious PC gaming master race.

Consolers are untermenschen.

by **Ayreonia** » Fri May 24, 2013 1:58 pm

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Czechanada wrote:There's only one superior race: the glorious PC gaming master race.

Consolers are untermenschen.

THAT'S PLATFORMISM!

by **Piero Sraffa** » Mon May 27, 2013 5:55 am

NASCAR sucks. I prefer to watch the derby.

by **New Aerios** » Mon May 27, 2013 6:06 am

Black people run fast. White people swim fast. The polar ice caps are melting. Natural selection right there.

JK, I don't think any races are superior to others. However, I certainly think some cultures are superior.

by **Akashena Recordia** » Mon May 27, 2013 12:35 pm

As long as you know the thing called love we're all equal.

by **Evraim** » Mon May 27, 2013 12:54 pm

The Tectonic Plates wrote:"Races" aren't inherently superior to each other, Cultures, Nations and Individuals however, may be inherently superior to each other.

You do realize that culture is a sociological construct and that the nation is a socio-political construct, yes? Likewise, we would have to define the term "superior".

by **Pavlostani** » Mon May 27, 2013 1:07 pm

Yes. The Borg are perfection. Resistance is futile.
[/Nerd]

Are some races inherently superior to others?

Who is online