Hear talk, no evidence to back your claims up. If you want to continue this, just made a new topic: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=242054
Advertisement

by New Rogernomics » Sun May 19, 2013 2:55 pm
Hear talk, no evidence to back your claims up. If you want to continue this, just made a new topic: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=242054

by Pope Joan » Sun May 19, 2013 2:57 pm

by New Rogernomics » Sun May 19, 2013 2:58 pm
Well it doesn't discount race, so long as the study is done by geographical region i.e. Africa, Asia, Europe, South America, North America.Yankee Empire wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:Exactly, "race" has more to do with cultural elements. Genetically humans exist in a continuum with no clean cut racial divisions.
Right no "Clean cut" divisions, which is why the concept of racial "purity" is nonsense.
But this doesn't discount Race.
Afte all don't genetics play a role in how a culture is formed as well as enviroment and thought?

by New Rogernomics » Sun May 19, 2013 3:03 pm
I don't think it is too important, it is more the geographical area; than 'race' or arbitrary distinctions like 'ethnicity' that counts in a study. If I was to study people on several pacific islands, you wouldn't be able to determine anything by setting aside those that use language x vs language y; though you could determine something if it was by geographical area i.e. pacific islands vs Africa.Pope Joan wrote:If you still think race is even an important observable reality you might find a statistical quirk here and there. By and large, taking the ever present exceptions into account, white really can't jump. By the same token it seems to be challenging for black folks to swim competitively. OF course it happens, but it is not the norm.
Do I care? If I am drowning, I would be delighted to see a black lifeguard.
So in real life the statistical differences don't mean much.

by Mavorpen » Sun May 19, 2013 3:20 pm

by Disserbia » Sun May 19, 2013 3:25 pm
Solmakia wrote:Then we have Scandinavians who tend to be stronger and firmer than other Europeans,

by Mavorpen » Sun May 19, 2013 3:25 pm
Choronzon wrote:Thats an incredibly long winded way of saying you think black people are inferior.
Choronzon wrote:Thats an incredibly long winded way of saying you think black people are inferior.

by Mavorpen » Sun May 19, 2013 3:31 pm

by Zweite Alaje » Sun May 19, 2013 3:34 pm

by Mavorpen » Sun May 19, 2013 3:36 pm

by Mavorpen » Sun May 19, 2013 3:39 pm

by Mavorpen » Sun May 19, 2013 3:41 pm

by Zweite Alaje » Sun May 19, 2013 3:42 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:
That's nice. I don't care what you think is cute or not, my views don't revolve around you.
No shit. I live in reality.
You live in Narnia, or some other magical place where liberal means the opposite of what it actually means. When you want to have an actual discussion between mature adults, expand your vocabulary.

by Napkiraly » Sun May 19, 2013 3:43 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Mavorpen wrote:No shit. I live in reality.
You live in Narnia, or some other magical place where liberal means the opposite of what it actually means. When you want to have an actual discussion between mature adults, expand your vocabulary.
My use of "liberal" is in accordance and constistent with everything liberals do and promote. Funny you should mention vocabulary, considering I'm a linguist, my vocabulary is most likely many times that of yours.

by Mavorpen » Sun May 19, 2013 3:44 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Mavorpen wrote:No shit. I live in reality.
You live in Narnia, or some other magical place where liberal means the opposite of what it actually means. When you want to have an actual discussion between mature adults, expand your vocabulary.
My use of "liberal" is in accordance and constistent with everything liberals do and promote. Funny you should mention vocabulary, considering I'm a linguist, my vocabulary is most likely many times that of yours.

by Xsyne » Sun May 19, 2013 3:46 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Mavorpen wrote:No shit. I live in reality.
You live in Narnia, or some other magical place where liberal means the opposite of what it actually means. When you want to have an actual discussion between mature adults, expand your vocabulary.
My use of "liberal" is in accordance and constistent with everything liberals do and promote. Funny you should mention vocabulary, considering I'm a linguist, my vocabulary is most likely many times that of yours.
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?

by Xirxixcroxior » Sun May 19, 2013 3:48 pm

by Zweite Alaje » Sun May 19, 2013 3:49 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:
My use of "liberal" is in accordance and constistent with everything liberals do and promote. Funny you should mention vocabulary, considering I'm a linguist, my vocabulary is most likely many times that of yours.
So...you're a linguist? That just makes your failure to use terms correctly that much more pathetic.
Napkiraly wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:
My use of "liberal" is in accordance and constistent with everything liberals do and promote. Funny you should mention vocabulary, considering I'm a linguist, my vocabulary is most likely many times that of yours.
Science isn't liberal nor conservative. It is science, and if it breaks your little world to bad. Until you can prove them wrong, you are wrong and ignoring scientific evidence.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Corporate Collective Salvation, Czechostan, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, Kenmoria, Oceasia, Phage, Port Caverton, Rhodevus, Swimington, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement