NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion is Murder

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Was it murder?

Yes, killing a fetus is murder
101
31%
No, it wasn't a person
177
55%
Whoa, slow down there, maestro. There's a *New* Mexico?
46
14%
 
Total votes : 324

User avatar
Kuomintang
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kuomintang » Thu May 16, 2013 11:28 am

Neo Art wrote:Why wouldn't it be murder?

Why would it be? It wasn't a person.

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Biased poll is biased.

You're entitled to your opinion, but it's a shame the truth makes you uncomfortable.

User avatar
Stelarus
Envoy
 
Posts: 287
Founded: Oct 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Stelarus » Thu May 16, 2013 11:28 am

Ashmoria wrote:there was no fetus. 6 weeks pregnant is an embryo.

it needs to be a crime but first degree murder is unwarranted.


this.
98% of all Internet users would cry if Facebook broke down. If you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your sig
Apparently I should still have a line here about being a constitutional monarchy,
Alignment swings between Chaotic Neutral and Chaotic Good.
Please consider: http://www.nationstates.net/region=the_luxan_empire

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Thu May 16, 2013 11:28 am

The Whispers wrote:
Potted Plants United wrote:In most places, I would image yes. However, trying to get him for "first degree murder" is 1) more likely to make him plead guilty for a lesser charge and 2) makes for better headlines.

3) To push public perception of the termination of pregnancies ever-closer to "abortion is murder", and to try to create an anti-Roe vs. Wade.

yes

because if it is murder for HIM to give her an abortion drug at 6 weeks why is it then ok for HER to willingly take the same drug in order to end the pregnancy?

isn't murder an offense only against the person who dies? in both scenarios the same "person" dies.
whatever

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu May 16, 2013 11:28 am

Nadkor wrote:
Britannia I wrote:Argue if you want but I made abortion legal in my nation on this basis.


Oh, well that's that then.


Well, shit. I've got nothing.

Kuomintang wrote:
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Biased poll is biased.

You're entitled to your opinion, but it's a shame the truth makes you uncomfortable.


Oh god, you're one of those people.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
The Whispers
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Whispers » Thu May 16, 2013 11:29 am

Ovisterra wrote:
The Whispers wrote:3) To push public perception of the termination of pregnancies ever-closer to "abortion is murder", and to try to create an anti-Roe vs. Wade.


SaintB wrote:The court isn't calling abortion murder, it is calling the unwanted forced termination of a pregnancy murder.

Right but if there's a thing on the statute books that is already "the unwanted termination of a pregnancy" as a crime, why not use that rather than murder, given that it actually fits the definition?

User avatar
Krakosov
Diplomat
 
Posts: 694
Founded: Oct 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Krakosov » Thu May 16, 2013 11:29 am

SaintB wrote:
Krakosov wrote:its a brainless piece of skin, its just as much murder as removing a tumor.

The court isn't calling abortion murder, it is calling the unwanted forced termination of a pregnancy murder.

the point is still relevant, he should be charged with something else.
feelings are dumb and should be hated!!!
favorite song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkPzOJbA ... re=related

User avatar
The Emerald Legion
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10698
Founded: Mar 18, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Emerald Legion » Thu May 16, 2013 11:29 am

"Don't you care?!"
"Care? No, why should I care?"
"Because they're people and they're going to die!"
"I do not understand you, there are people dying all over your world yet you do not care about them."


Bonus Points to anyone who gets the reference.
"23.The unwise man is awake all night, and ponders everything over; when morning comes he is weary in mind, and all is a burden as ever." - Havamal

User avatar
Kuomintang
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Kuomintang » Thu May 16, 2013 11:29 am

Cosara wrote:Abortion is murder. That is my stance.

You have no right dictate control over my or any woman's body. That is my stance.

User avatar
ALMF
Minister
 
Posts: 2937
Founded: Jun 04, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby ALMF » Thu May 16, 2013 11:29 am

Neo Art wrote:
Krakosov wrote:its a brainless piece of skin, its just as much murder as removing a tumor.

Ok. And? What's that have to do with the federal murder statute?

It makes the EXISTENCE thereof a Crime Against Sentience.
a left social libertarian (all on a scale 0-10 with a direction: 0 centrist 10 extreme)
Left over right: 5.99
Libertarian over authoritarian: 4.2,
non-interventionist over neo-con: 5.14
Cultural liberal over cultural conservative: 7.6

You are a cosmopolitan Social Democrat. 16 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 5 percent are more extremist than you.

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Thu May 16, 2013 11:29 am

Kuomintang wrote:
Neo Art wrote:Why wouldn't it be murder?

Why would it be? It wasn't a person.


For what purposes? It seems for the purposes of the federal murder statute, it most certainly was a person.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu May 16, 2013 11:30 am

The Whispers wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:

Right but if there's a thing on the statute books that is already "the unwanted termination of a pregnancy" as a crime, why not use that rather than murder, given that it actually fits the definition?


I wasn't aware of such an offence.

Care to source it?
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Cosara
Senator
 
Posts: 4339
Founded: Nov 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cosara » Thu May 16, 2013 11:30 am

Kuomintang wrote:
Cosara wrote:Abortion is murder. That is my stance.

You have no right dictate control over my or any woman's body. That is my stance.

A woman has no right to dictate over weather or not someone gets a chance to live.
"Do not lose hope; St. Joseph also had moments of doubt. but he never lost faith and was able to overcome them in the certainty that God never abandons us." -Pope Francis

"We are never defeated unless we give up on god." -Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Thu May 16, 2013 11:30 am

Cosara wrote:Abortion is murder. That is my stance.


Well, I mean, given that "murder" is a legal term with an actual definition and that abortion falls outside that definition I'm going to go ahead and say that your stance is wrong.

You might not like abortion. You might want it to be murder.

But abortion is not murder.

(Obviously this isn't the case everywhere, but I'm talking about Cosara's location)
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Meinkraft
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1836
Founded: Dec 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Meinkraft » Thu May 16, 2013 11:30 am

Cosara wrote:Abortion is murder. That is my stance.

*Looks at flag* Gee, I wonder what our first clue was!

The fact that he did it is wrong and hurtful (He should be charged with fraud) but fetuses are not human until eight months after conception.
Last edited by Kirby Delauter on Wed, Jan 7, 2015 2:00 am, edited Delauter times in total.


ANTIFA!

Soldier wrote:And then he used his fight money to buy two of every animal on earth. And then he hearded them onto a boat, and then he beat the crap out of every single one!
Alert Level:
5- At Peace
4- Raid Watch
3- At War
2- Nuclear War
1- Taking of the Capital
I'm Pan. Deal with it.
Economic Left/Right: -7.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.69

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu May 16, 2013 11:30 am

Cosara wrote:
Kuomintang wrote:You have no right dictate control over my or any woman's body. That is my stance.

A woman has no right to dictate over weather or not someone gets a chance to live.


If that someone is attached to her body she is entitled to remove them.
Last edited by Ovisterra on Thu May 16, 2013 11:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Land of Tob
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 359
Founded: Apr 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Land of Tob » Thu May 16, 2013 11:31 am

Kuomintang wrote:
Cosara wrote:Abortion is murder. That is my stance.

You have no right dictate control over my or any woman's body. That is my stance.


So I'd have no right to control your finger if you want to press on the trigger? Because basically - it's the same thing.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu May 16, 2013 11:31 am

Land of Tob wrote:
Kuomintang wrote:You have no right dictate control over my or any woman's body. That is my stance.


So I'd have no right to control your finger if you want to press on the trigger? Because basically - it's the same thing.


Erm, no, it's not.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Stelarus
Envoy
 
Posts: 287
Founded: Oct 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Stelarus » Thu May 16, 2013 11:31 am

Ashmoria wrote:
The Whispers wrote:3) To push public perception of the termination of pregnancies ever-closer to "abortion is murder", and to try to create an anti-Roe vs. Wade.

yes

because if it is murder for HIM to give her an abortion drug at 6 weeks why is it then ok for HER to willingly take the same drug in order to end the pregnancy?

isn't murder an offense only against the person who dies? in both scenarios the same "person" dies.


OK, I don't agree with the "Abortion is murder" thing, I don't think it is,
But preventing a woman from having a child by making her miscarry when she wants to should count as a crime, but against the woman, not the thing that could have become a person.
98% of all Internet users would cry if Facebook broke down. If you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your sig
Apparently I should still have a line here about being a constitutional monarchy,
Alignment swings between Chaotic Neutral and Chaotic Good.
Please consider: http://www.nationstates.net/region=the_luxan_empire

User avatar
Cosara
Senator
 
Posts: 4339
Founded: Nov 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cosara » Thu May 16, 2013 11:31 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Cosara wrote:A woman has no right to dictate over weather or not someone gets a chance to live.


If that someone is attached to her body she is entitled to remove them.

If it's a human life, it is murder if she does so.
"Do not lose hope; St. Joseph also had moments of doubt. but he never lost faith and was able to overcome them in the certainty that God never abandons us." -Pope Francis

"We are never defeated unless we give up on god." -Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Thu May 16, 2013 11:31 am

Land of Tob wrote:
Kuomintang wrote:You have no right dictate control over my or any woman's body. That is my stance.


So I'd have no right to control your finger if you want to press on the trigger? Because basically - it's the same thing.


Analogy fail.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Thu May 16, 2013 11:31 am

Kuomintang wrote:
Neo Art wrote:Why wouldn't it be murder?

Why would it be? It wasn't a person.

The Steel Magnolia wrote:Biased poll is biased.

You're entitled to your opinion, but it's a shame the truth makes you uncomfortable.

so how long do you think the guy should go away with this?

as a pro-choice person you must be really pissed about this woman having her choice forcefully taken away
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Thu May 16, 2013 11:31 am

Nadkor wrote:
Cosara wrote:Abortion is murder. That is my stance.


Well, I mean, given that "murder" is a legal term with an actual definition and that abortion falls outside that definition I'm going to go ahead and say that your stance is wrong.

You might not like abortion. You might want it to be murder.

But abortion is not murder.

(Obviously this isn't the case everywhere, but I'm talking about Cosara's location)


Well, abortion most certainly CAN be murder. What the defendant did cause is unambiguously an abortion. And it would seem, causing an abortion in an unwilling woman constitutes murder under the federal statute.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu May 16, 2013 11:32 am

Cosara wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
If that someone is attached to her body she is entitled to remove them.

If it's a human life, it is murder if she does so.


Only if it's illegal.

Which it's not, so you're objectively wrong.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
The Whispers
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Whispers » Thu May 16, 2013 11:32 am

Ovisterra wrote:
The Whispers wrote:Right but if there's a thing on the statute books that is already "the unwanted termination of a pregnancy" as a crime, why not use that rather than murder, given that it actually fits the definition?


I wasn't aware of such an offence.

Care to source it?

No, I was just going by what I was told in the thread (which is that it was a thing in the US). If it doesn't exist, it absolutely should.

User avatar
Vistulange
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5472
Founded: May 13, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Vistulange » Thu May 16, 2013 11:32 am

Oh dear God this thread again.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Aphrilia, Ashotu Kun, Cavirfi, Ethel mermania, Godular, Hidrandia, Hurdergaryp, Infected Mushroom, Jerzylvania, Krasny-Volny, Love Peace and Friendship, New New Israel, Port Carverton, Saiwana, Sarolandia, Statesburg, The Apollonian Systems, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads