It has always been summer around here.
Advertisement

by The Nuclear Fist » Thu May 16, 2013 9:46 pm
The Godly Nations wrote:We're working on the Mainland first, then we simply assume that those portion would naturally flock to us because of our national pristage.
As for the stupidity of restoring Republican control, we need to first start by establishing a base amongst mainlanders, then using them, and our own forces, to overthrow the Commies.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by The Nuclear Fist » Thu May 16, 2013 9:46 pm
The Godly Nations wrote:They are all dirty Commies, and why America must take away their seat from the UN and give it back to the legitimate government of China.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Ganos Lao » Thu May 16, 2013 9:47 pm
The Godly Nations wrote:Ganos Lao wrote:
It's gonna take more than that to convince me.
You have to provide details about these differences. Every proposition must have collaborating evidence to back it up.
http://www.axl.cefan.ulaval.ca/europe/franco-normand.htm
Notice how the French, Jerrais, and Guernesiais hardly differ.

by Solmakia » Thu May 16, 2013 9:48 pm

by Ganos Lao » Thu May 16, 2013 9:48 pm

by The Godly Nations » Thu May 16, 2013 9:49 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:The Godly Nations wrote:We're working on the Mainland first, then we simply assume that those portion would naturally flock to us because of our national pristage.
That's an awful lot of assumptions. Poor assumptions, at that. Let's assume they don't. Let's assume they prefer the way things are, rather than joining up with a war ravaged China (and it would be ravaged). How does a hypothetical KMT-led China respond?As for the stupidity of restoring Republican control, we need to first start by establishing a base amongst mainlanders, then using them, and our own forces, to overthrow the Commies.
Ah, so you've got no legs to stand on.

by The Godly Nations » Thu May 16, 2013 9:49 pm

by The Godly Nations » Thu May 16, 2013 9:50 pm
Ganos Lao wrote:The Nuclear Fist wrote:That is, quite literally, impossible.
TGN's been claiming that the world ought to return - in terms of boundaries - to what it was like in 1763 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.
So the ROC wouldn't even be the legitimate government of China, because by that logic, it'd be some old dynasty that would be.

by Gigaverse » Thu May 16, 2013 9:50 pm
Art-person(?). Japan liker. tired-ish.
Student inlinguistics???. On-and-off writer.
MAKE CAKE NOT stupidshiticanmakefunof.born in, raised in and emigrated from vietbongistan lolol
Operating this polity based on preferences and narrative purposes
clowning incident | clowning incident | bottom text
can produce noises in (in order of grasp) vietbongistani, oldspeak
and bonjourois (learning weebspeak and hitlerian at uni)

by Ganos Lao » Thu May 16, 2013 9:50 pm
Solmakia wrote:I personally don't really give a fuck about the land disputes, but I'm siding with China on this one because the forced prostitution of women from Korea and China was not at all necessary, and was just cruel and abusive. I can't stand those Japs trying to make excuses. Accept that you guys fucked up, and move on. Don't keep trying to make yourselves seem like the angels, because you weren't; you were monsters.
Yes, I know that Japan did officially apologize, but I'm not believing that it was sincere. I personally believe them to be monsters, but I also realize that not all Japanese people are like that, and in fact, most Japanese people are decent human beings. The deniers, on the other hand, are just like Holocaust deniers.
by Arumdaum » Thu May 16, 2013 9:51 pm
Ganos Lao wrote:The Nuclear Fist wrote:That is, quite literally, impossible.
TGN's been claiming that the world ought to return - in terms of boundaries - to what it was like in 1763 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.
So the ROC wouldn't even be the legitimate government of China, because by that logic, it'd be some old dynasty that would be.

by Samozaryadnyastan » Thu May 16, 2013 9:51 pm
Nationalist Eminral Republic wrote:Jerusalemian wrote:That's China for you,they claim asia in the name of the Chinese civilization!
Well, they were the first to see the moon so its inherently a Chinese territory belonging to the Chinese people *nods*
This bullying and aggressive actions of China will bounce back to them, I am sure of that.
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by The Nuclear Fist » Thu May 16, 2013 9:51 pm
The Godly Nations wrote:We'll cross that bridge when we get there, for now, we must concern ourselves with immediate issues- like the economy, and how to conquer the Mainland, all that.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Ganos Lao » Thu May 16, 2013 9:51 pm
The Godly Nations wrote:Ganos Lao wrote:
TGN's been claiming that the world ought to return - in terms of boundaries - to what it was like in 1763 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.
So the ROC wouldn't even be the legitimate government of China, because by that logic, it'd be some old dynasty that would be.
Qing,

by The Nuclear Fist » Thu May 16, 2013 9:52 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by The Godly Nations » Thu May 16, 2013 9:52 pm
Gigaverse wrote:The Godly Nations wrote:
They are all dirty Commies, and why America must take away their seat from the UN and give it back to the legitimate government of China.
I see no difference between the Mainland Commies and the Island Nazis. Both are not legitimate representatives of China and the Chinese people, judging many aspects. Until a proper Revolution or Preemptive Strike against either or both takes place, I refuse to recognize both the "People's Nation" and "People's Republic".
That aside, Nazi America isn't the owner of the UN - they couldn't afford take away the UN seat from their biggest debtor and give it to a tiny regime of "just-that-bad's"; that'd make a Cold War.

by Ganos Lao » Thu May 16, 2013 9:52 pm
Arumdaum wrote:Ganos Lao wrote:
TGN's been claiming that the world ought to return - in terms of boundaries - to what it was like in 1763 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.
So the ROC wouldn't even be the legitimate government of China, because by that logic, it'd be some old dynasty that would be.
It's funny because in 1763 China wasn't even ruled by Chinese people.

by The Nuclear Fist » Thu May 16, 2013 9:52 pm
Ganos Lao wrote:TGN's been claiming that the world ought to return - in terms of boundaries - to what it was like in 1763 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.
So the ROC wouldn't even be the legitimate government of China, because by that logic, it'd be some old dynasty that would be.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Gigaverse » Thu May 16, 2013 9:53 pm
Solmakia wrote:I personally don't really give a fuck about the land disputes, but I'm siding with China on this one because the forced prostitution of women from Korea and China was not at all necessary, and was just cruel and abusive. I can't stand those Japs trying to make excuses. Accept that you guys fucked up, and move on. Don't keep trying to make yourselves seem like the angels, because you weren't; you were monsters.
Yes, I know that Japan did officially apologize, but I'm not believing that it was sincere. I personally believe them to be monsters, but I also realize that not all Japanese people are like that, and in fact, most Japanese people are decent human beings. The deniers, on the other hand, are just like Holocaust deniers.
Art-person(?). Japan liker. tired-ish.
Student inlinguistics???. On-and-off writer.
MAKE CAKE NOT stupidshiticanmakefunof.born in, raised in and emigrated from vietbongistan lolol
Operating this polity based on preferences and narrative purposes
clowning incident | clowning incident | bottom text
can produce noises in (in order of grasp) vietbongistani, oldspeak
and bonjourois (learning weebspeak and hitlerian at uni)

by The Godly Nations » Thu May 16, 2013 9:53 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:The Godly Nations wrote:We'll cross that bridge when we get there, for now, we must concern ourselves with immediate issues- like the economy, and how to conquer the Mainland, all that.
Stop dodging the question. If the Taiwanese conquer mainland China, but the ROC clains in other nations (and Tibet) don't want any part of China, what does the KMT government do?
How does it respond?
Personally, I'm beginning to suspect you'd just support invading them.

by Nationalist Eminral Republic » Thu May 16, 2013 9:53 pm
Solmakia wrote:I personally don't really give a fuck about the land disputes, but I'm siding with China on this one because the forced prostitution of women from Korea and China was not at all necessary, and was just cruel and abusive. I can't stand those Japs trying to make excuses. Accept that you guys fucked up, and move on. Don't keep trying to make yourselves seem like the angels, because you weren't; you were monsters.
Yes, I know that Japan did officially apologize, but I'm not believing that it was sincere. I personally believe them to be monsters, but I also realize that not all Japanese people are like that, and in fact, most Japanese people are decent human beings. The deniers, on the other hand, are just like Holocaust deniers.
Federation of Eminral Republic|Pederasyon ng Republika ng Eminral
エミンラル共和連邦 | Federación de la República Eminral

by The Godly Nations » Thu May 16, 2013 9:54 pm

by Ganos Lao » Thu May 16, 2013 9:54 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Ganos Lao wrote:TGN's been claiming that the world ought to return - in terms of boundaries - to what it was like in 1763 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.
So the ROC wouldn't even be the legitimate government of China, because by that logic, it'd be some old dynasty that would be.
What would that possibly achieve?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Enormous Gentiles, Eurocom, Giovanniland, Gustatopolis, Kubra, Namkada, Necroghastia, Page, Saiwana, The Holy Therns, The Xenopolis Confederation, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement