There 'ya go! Let's also use tampons just for funzys.
Advertisement

by Land of Tob » Thu May 16, 2013 12:29 pm

by Nailed to the Perch » Thu May 16, 2013 12:29 pm
Mirage wrote:Seperates wrote:Sure. It relates as a societal and psychological construst. Get rid of the biases and pre-suppusitions and we'd probably find that gender and race really don't affect anything in any meaningful statistical difference.
Biological too. And yes it does.
Take a man and a woman. Give them the same training, food etc. No steroids or anything. Tell me which one would be naturally stronger ?
Useless Eaters wrote:This is a clear attempt to flamenco.

by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 16, 2013 12:30 pm

by Neo Art » Thu May 16, 2013 12:30 pm

by Land of Tob » Thu May 16, 2013 12:30 pm
The Nihilistic view wrote:Neo Art wrote:
I am, as a matter of fact, fucking hilarious. I'm also far more clever than someone who thinks "I know you are but what am I?" is witty.
But not as clever as somebody that does not resort to piss taking it seems. I have come across used socks more entertaining than your puerile attempts at humor.

by United Paradisia » Thu May 16, 2013 12:30 pm
Individuality-ness wrote:Actor vs. Actress. Hero vs. Heroine. Steward vs. Stewardess. President vs. female President. Etc.
One of the nuances in the English language is this need to have different words to differentiate between genders doing what is essentially the same thing. For example, a male who acts is called an actor, a female who acts is an actress. A male who does heroic deeds is a hero, a female who does this is a heroine. And the list goes on and on.
My question is whether this is necessary at all. Do we need to have separate terms for male and females?
I personally do not think that we NEED separate words for males and females doing what is the same thing. To me, it's sexist, implying that a female cannot aspire to be an actor, a hero, etc, but instead must settle for a female version of it. Gender should not matter, and it doesn't matter. To me, suggesting that it makes a difference is part of patriarchy.
But what do you think?

by Land of Tob » Thu May 16, 2013 12:31 pm
Neo Art wrote:Land of Tob wrote:
Why don't we just wear it, too? Equality!
Jesus christ you are awful at this.
is this what the summer is going to be like? Really? Is this what we're in for for the next three months? 14 year old children screaming "BUT WHAT IF I WANT TO WEAR A BRA???"
Is this the kind of forum that the powers that be really want this to be? This is the kind of discource we're encouraging?
Jesus fucking christ, this is pathetic.


by Immoren » Thu May 16, 2013 12:31 pm

discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Land of Tob » Thu May 16, 2013 12:31 pm
United Paradisia wrote:Individuality-ness wrote:Actor vs. Actress. Hero vs. Heroine. Steward vs. Stewardess. President vs. female President. Etc.
One of the nuances in the English language is this need to have different words to differentiate between genders doing what is essentially the same thing. For example, a male who acts is called an actor, a female who acts is an actress. A male who does heroic deeds is a hero, a female who does this is a heroine. And the list goes on and on.
My question is whether this is necessary at all. Do we need to have separate terms for male and females?
I personally do not think that we NEED separate words for males and females doing what is the same thing. To me, it's sexist, implying that a female cannot aspire to be an actor, a hero, etc, but instead must settle for a female version of it. Gender should not matter, and it doesn't matter. To me, suggesting that it makes a difference is part of patriarchy.
But what do you think?
No it makes it easier for people for example :
Alex Smith-Actor
Is it a he or she?
Then I have to waste 2 minutes searching 'Alex Smith' on google.

by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 16, 2013 12:32 pm

by Mirage » Thu May 16, 2013 12:32 pm
Nailed to the Perch wrote:Mirage wrote:
Biological too. And yes it does.
Take a man and a woman. Give them the same training, food etc. No steroids or anything. Tell me which one would be naturally stronger ?
1. Depends on how you define "strength." Ability to lift heavy objects? Endurance? Ability to withstand pain?
2. More importantly, depends on the individual man and woman, obviously. A muscular, 250-pound woman can almost certainly lift more weight than a slight, 100-pound man.
3. Why in the shit does this MATTER for 99% of jobs?

by Esternial » Thu May 16, 2013 12:32 pm
Rocopurr wrote:
Not all women wear bras, and if a man wants to wear a bra let him.
So, you see, there is no 'right gender' for a bra.

by Seperates » Thu May 16, 2013 12:32 pm


by Immoren » Thu May 16, 2013 12:33 pm
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Central Slavia » Thu May 16, 2013 12:35 pm
Individuality-ness wrote:Actor vs. Actress. Hero vs. Heroine. Steward vs. Stewardess. President vs. female President. Etc.
One of the nuances in the English language is this need to have different words to differentiate between genders doing what is essentially the same thing. For example, a male who acts is called an actor, a female who acts is an actress. A male who does heroic deeds is a hero, a female who does this is a heroine. And the list goes on and on.
My question is whether this is necessary at all. Do we need to have separate terms for male and females?
I personally do not think that we NEED separate words for males and females doing what is the same thing. To me, it's sexist, implying that a female cannot aspire to be an actor, a hero, etc, but instead must settle for a female version of it. Gender should not matter, and it doesn't matter. To me, suggesting that it makes a difference is part of patriarchy.
But what do you think?
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]

by Land of Tob » Thu May 16, 2013 12:35 pm

by Mirage » Thu May 16, 2013 12:36 pm
Seperates wrote:Mirage wrote:
In this particular case, let us just say, "who can lift more weight".
While societal norms have me instintually saying that it would likely be the male individual, I, on second thought and from a more scientific point of view, must say that I personally do not know, given that it is difficult for me to imagine what the "average" constitution of a man or woman would be on the same diet and training program, since I have never seen such a thing.

by Individuality-ness » Thu May 16, 2013 12:37 pm
Neo Art wrote:
are you under this strange impression that all women wear bras? I'm not entirely sure your social circle has hit puberty yet.
Which, frankly, would explain a lot.

by Xanixi » Thu May 16, 2013 12:37 pm
Most Astounding FactDr. Carl Sagan wrote:“They say astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.”
#AupaAtleti #ContigoHastaElFinal
American and Spanish

by The Nihilistic view » Thu May 16, 2013 12:37 pm
Rocopurr wrote:
Not all women wear bras, and if a man wants to wear a bra let him.
So, you see, there is no 'right gender' for a bra.


by Mirage » Thu May 16, 2013 12:38 pm
Land of Tob wrote:We might have drifted off a little from language to fetishes.


Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bornada, Cannot think of a name, El Lazaro, Elwher, Fractalnavel, Inner Dahulia, Myrensis, Neo-American States, Risottia, Shidei, South Africa3, The Archregimancy, Wrekstaat, Xind
Advertisement