NATION

PASSWORD

Are homosexuals really born that way?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is there a gay gene?

Yes
218
33%
No
231
35%
More study is needed to determine
209
32%
 
Total votes : 658

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Wed May 15, 2013 4:34 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Seperates wrote:This is what your question sounds like:

Why would black people want equality in the first place?

Because I want the right to buy chicken as much as white people.

How absurd.
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40542
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed May 15, 2013 4:34 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
No you are the majority, that does not make you correct. Lets see, we have 12 states right now who recognize same sex marriages. We are looking at adding a few more. We have SCOTUS looking into both state level bans and federal non recognition. This is no more a trend the allowing interracial marriage or women to vote.


Here we go again...I been down this road before, in these threads, mate. Women, blacks, jews, blah blah.
Don´t go that way, it ain´t the same thing.


How is it different?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Wed May 15, 2013 4:36 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
No you are the majority, that does not make you correct. Lets see, we have 12 states right now who recognize same sex marriages. We are looking at adding a few more. We have SCOTUS looking into both state level bans and federal non recognition. This is no more a trend the allowing interracial marriage or women to vote.


Here we go again...I been down this road before, in these threads, mate. Women, blacks, jews, blah blah.
Don´t go that way, it ain´t the same thing.

It isn't? :eyebrow:
Please explain how any type of minority wanting equal rights isn't the same for everybody?
Excluding on what they want, it IS the same.
by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
Lyassa and Nairoa
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Jun 29, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Lyassa and Nairoa » Wed May 15, 2013 4:36 pm

New Libertarian States wrote:
Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Why would people of a...er...different sexual persuasion want equality in the first place ?

Because its not that hard, nor a bad demand to be equal.
That's like asking "X race" why they would want to be equal.


You people should get a country of your own. Away from us. Where you could do...whatever God knows you do.

User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Wed May 15, 2013 4:36 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Here we go again...I been down this road before, in these threads, mate. Women, blacks, jews, blah blah.
Don´t go that way, it ain´t the same thing.


How is it different?

Because the yicky gays
*nods*
by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111685
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed May 15, 2013 4:36 pm

New Libertarian States wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:No, no, I draw the line at those Xers. X is always wanting to be equal to something, Y or a2 + b2. I say, enough!

Dammed Xers, dem taking mer jerbs!

Image
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Russadonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 377
Founded: Apr 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Russadonia » Wed May 15, 2013 4:36 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
No you are the majority, that does not make you correct. Lets see, we have 12 states right now who recognize same sex marriages. We are looking at adding a few more. We have SCOTUS looking into both state level bans and federal non recognition. This is no more a trend the allowing interracial marriage or women to vote.


Here we go again...I been down this road before, in these threads, mate. Women, blacks, jews, blah blah.
Don´t go that way, it ain´t the same thing.


Except that it is.

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Wed May 15, 2013 4:37 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Disserbia wrote:Does it really matter?


In some ways yes. unfortunately if people think of it as a choice, then they will probably simply say then there is no reason for equality, homosexuals can simply choose not to be attracted to those of the same gender. The fact that it shouldn't matter will not be brought up.

To which I would reply that if you love freedom so much don't be a hypocrite.
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111685
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed May 15, 2013 4:38 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
New Libertarian States wrote:Because its not that hard, nor a bad demand to be equal.
That's like asking "X race" why they would want to be equal.


You people should get a country of your own. Away from us. Where you could do...whatever God knows you do.

Tough. I'm a natural-born citizen of the United States of America. I'm entitled to just as many rights as you are. I deserve more for having to put up with people like you but we'll let that go.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Wed May 15, 2013 4:38 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
New Libertarian States wrote:Because its not that hard, nor a bad demand to be equal.
That's like asking "X race" why they would want to be equal.


You people should get a country of your own. Away from us. Where you could do...whatever God knows you do.

Then why don't you go back to your own country?
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Wed May 15, 2013 4:38 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
New Libertarian States wrote:Because its not that hard, nor a bad demand to be equal.
That's like asking "X race" why they would want to be equal.


You people should get a country of your own. Away from us. Where you could do...whatever God knows you do.

:eyebrow: I'm straight.....
That's like telling X people to get a country because ideals conflict.
IT'S DEMOCRACY. There's supposed to be conflicting ideals. If X ideas get popular, does it mean your wrong? No, but it may mean that there's something bad about it.
by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40542
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed May 15, 2013 4:38 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
New Libertarian States wrote:Because its not that hard, nor a bad demand to be equal.
That's like asking "X race" why they would want to be equal.


You people should get a country of your own. Away from us. Where you could do...whatever God knows you do.


Why? They are citizens of the united states and have (should have) all the rights and responsibilities that entails. We are no different from you, xcept we find different people attractive.
Last edited by Neutraligon on Wed May 15, 2013 4:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Wed May 15, 2013 4:39 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
New Libertarian States wrote:Dammed Xers, dem taking mer jerbs!

Image

Hide your jerbs, hide your hamsters, they stealing everybody up in here.
by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Wed May 15, 2013 4:39 pm

Dusk_Kittens wrote:Homosexuals are born that way.
Homosexual people may be born that way or may choose to be gay.
Note the difference. One is a noun, the other is an adjective. I realize this is very odd language (and someone is bound to toss unfounded allegations of prejudice at me, a bisexual woman, but using a noun "homosexual" and contrasting it with an adjective used in the phrase "homosexual people" should not be misinterpreted to suggest that I don't believe homosexuals are people; THEY ARE PEOPLE, TOO), but I use it because I hope it may help some understand.
In the case of the noun, those people are indeed innately gay (born that way, or genetic), whether they ever have a homosexual relationship or not.
In the case of the adjective, those people are in some cases innately gay (born that way, or genetic) and embrace being gay (this doesn't always happen easily, due to social bullshit), and in other cases have an experience that they use to define themselves as gay (environmental).

Is there "a gay gene"? As others have said, I doubt it's quite that simple. There is, however, most definitely a physical factor involved in some cases, which may suggest one gene or several, or a genetic predisposition.

Probably correct.
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Wed May 15, 2013 4:39 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
New Libertarian States wrote:Because its not that hard, nor a bad demand to be equal.
That's like asking "X race" why they would want to be equal.


You people should get a country of your own. Away from us. Where you could do...whatever God knows you do.


I have an idea.

As there have been homosexuals for far longer than there have been fundamentalist Christians and other social conservatives, why don't you get your own nation, and run it as you wish? After all, one's cultural, political, and religious beliefs are far more of a choice than one's sexual orientation, and I don't see why anyone else should be forced to deal with your offensive decisions.

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Wed May 15, 2013 4:42 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Disserbia wrote:Does it really matter?

...Of course.

Why?
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Lyassa and Nairoa
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Jun 29, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Lyassa and Nairoa » Wed May 15, 2013 4:43 pm

Russadonia wrote:
Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Here we go again...I been down this road before, in these threads, mate. Women, blacks, jews, blah blah.
Don´t go that way, it ain´t the same thing.


Except that it is.


I understand the women bit - and that´s why so many straight women, fag hags and the lot understand (male) homos...they know what it means to be penetrated.
Gay pride ? don´t make laugh. You´re gay prod.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Wed May 15, 2013 4:44 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Russadonia wrote:
Except that it is.


I understand the women bit - and that´s why so many straight women, fag hags and the lot understand (male) homos...they know what it means to be penetrated.
Gay pride ? don´t make laugh. You´re gay prod.


...was that meant to be a pun?

If so, then please stop. You're not very good at it.

User avatar
Phing Phong
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1748
Founded: Sep 04, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Phing Phong » Wed May 15, 2013 4:44 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:I have an idea.

As there have been homosexuals for far longer than there have been fundamentalist Christians and other social conservatives, why don't you get your own nation, and run it as you wish? After all, one's cultural, political, and religious beliefs are far more of a choice than one's sexual orientation, and I don't see why anyone else should be forced to deal with your offensive decisions.


They can have one square mile of San Francisco, in order to preserve their democratic right to an unfounded persecution complex.
Incompetent Buddhist, liberal centrist and militant queer

Embassy Program | NSwiki Pages | Factbook | Map | National Anthem | Constitution | Phing Phong Fine Rices | Culture Test
Member of the Stonewall Alliance, open to all LGBT-friendly nations!

User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Wed May 15, 2013 4:45 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Russadonia wrote:
Except that it is.


I understand the women bit - and that´s why so many straight women, fag hags and the lot understand (male) homos...they know what it means to be penetrated.
Gay pride ? don´t make laugh. You´re gay prod.

:eyebrow:
I have no clue what this means.
Are you trying to communicate?
Quickly, a translator!
by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Wed May 15, 2013 4:46 pm

Phing Phong wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:I have an idea.

As there have been homosexuals for far longer than there have been fundamentalist Christians and other social conservatives, why don't you get your own nation, and run it as you wish? After all, one's cultural, political, and religious beliefs are far more of a choice than one's sexual orientation, and I don't see why anyone else should be forced to deal with your offensive decisions.


They can have one square mile of San Francisco, in order to preserve their democratic right to an unfounded persecution complex.

Nope. Get them out of my San Fran.
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40542
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed May 15, 2013 4:46 pm

Lyassa and Nairo you still haven't explained how it is different.

Phing Phong wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:I have an idea.

As there have been homosexuals for far longer than there have been fundamentalist Christians and other social conservatives, why don't you get your own nation, and run it as you wish? After all, one's cultural, political, and religious beliefs are far more of a choice than one's sexual orientation, and I don't see why anyone else should be forced to deal with your offensive decisions.


They can have one square mile of San Francisco, in order to preserve their democratic right to an unfounded persecution complex.


Why would you want to ruin such a nice city?
Last edited by Neutraligon on Wed May 15, 2013 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Lyassa and Nairoa
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Jun 29, 2006
Father Knows Best State

Postby Lyassa and Nairoa » Wed May 15, 2013 4:47 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
You people should get a country of your own. Away from us. Where you could do...whatever God knows you do.


Why the are citizens of the united states and have (should have) all the rights and responsibilities that entails. We are no different from you, xcept we find different people attractive.


No, you find the WRONG people attractive...if you find people same sex people attractive, why don´t realise there´s something wrong with you ?
Why do you feel proud about it ? Is it a way to catharsis the shame ?

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Wed May 15, 2013 4:47 pm

Phing Phong wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:I have an idea.

As there have been homosexuals for far longer than there have been fundamentalist Christians and other social conservatives, why don't you get your own nation, and run it as you wish? After all, one's cultural, political, and religious beliefs are far more of a choice than one's sexual orientation, and I don't see why anyone else should be forced to deal with your offensive decisions.


They can have one square mile of San Francisco, in order to preserve their democratic right to an unfounded persecution complex.


That's a wonderful idea.

I would insist upon regular UN inspections to ensure that they're not developing nuclear weapons for use against their neighbors, but I somehow suspect that the scientific education necessary to reach that level wouldn't be a priority of the society.

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Wed May 15, 2013 4:48 pm

Lyassa and Nairoa wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Why the are citizens of the united states and have (should have) all the rights and responsibilities that entails. We are no different from you, xcept we find different people attractive.


No, you find the WRONG people attractive...if you find people same sex people attractive, why don´t realise there´s something wrong with you ?
Why do you feel proud about it ? Is it a way to catharsis the shame ?

What makes them the wrong people?
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Eahland, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Neu California, Phage, Philjia, PhilTech, Port Caverton, Ryemarch, Tarsonis, The Huskar Social Union, The Notorious Mad Jack

Advertisement

Remove ads