NATION

PASSWORD

Are homosexuals really born that way?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is there a gay gene?

Yes
218
33%
No
231
35%
More study is needed to determine
209
32%
 
Total votes : 658

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Thu May 16, 2013 11:19 am

Esternial wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:In some ways, yes. This does seem to be how fetishism in males develops (typically, whatever a boy is into at 13 will be his obsession forever.)

But this is not what most homosexuals report as their experience. I know it's a tired cliché, but the "I always knew I wasn't like the other girls" motif exists for a reason.

My answer is in the cliché. "Like the other girls".

You're expected to like the other sex. The mind is incredibly powerful, and it's possible that you inhibit the expression of your own inherent sexual preference by telling yourself you like the other sex. Since sexual preference is regulated from your own mind, the mind itself can probably inhibit it.

Well virtually all homosexuals up until very recently have, at one point or another, tried to "inhibit the expression of their own inherent sexual preference" to no effect.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 16, 2013 11:19 am

Euroslavia wrote:
Mirage wrote:
Wrong in both cases.

You still missed the point as i was saying he should just give google as his source if he is going to give so many as i am not patient enough to read all of them.

And i did acknowledge it. Not my fault if you missed it.


I'm glad that we've gotten to the "No, you!" point in the debate. Your intellectual prowess is just too overwhelming for me. :roll:

What are you talking about? We've been at that point since he made his first post in this thread.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Euroslavia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 7781
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Euroslavia » Thu May 16, 2013 11:20 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Euroslavia wrote:
I'm glad that we've gotten to the "No, you!" point in the debate. Your intellectual prowess is just too overwhelming for me. :roll:

What are you talking about? We've been at that point since he made his first post in this thread.

I'm talking about us specifically.
BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

User avatar
Nadkor
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12114
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Nadkor » Thu May 16, 2013 11:20 am

Nailed to the Perch wrote:
Esternial wrote:Actually, if you think about it, what seems most plausible is that we're born asexual. During our first years we show no distinct interest in the other sex, but as soon as puberty kicks in we start developing our taste.

There might be a hormone (or several of them) in that pubescent cocktail that triggers the activation of the genes that determine your sexual orientation, which might also rely on environmental or other factors.

Seems plausible, no?


Ehhh...somewhat, but not entirely.

Here's the thing: when I was in preschool, I had a crush on a little boy in my class and wanted him to be my "boyfriend." I tried to get him to "marry" me. I wanted to hold his hand every time the class had to hold hands with each other. I'm a straight woman.

One of my gay male friends has described the exact same experience.

Now, I'm not saying that this proves sexuality is set in stone when one is three. I think sexuality is in many ways as much a process as a state, and that it can evolve over time (up to a point, anyway) - but I think there is a LOT of evidence that small children have sexual orientations, just not sexual orientations that tend to involve desire for intercourse so much as for hand-holding and mock wedding ceremonies.


Yeah, I definitely had people I 'fancied' way back in the day, in what you Americans would call pre-school.
economic left/right: -7.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: -7.59
thekidswhopoptodaywillrocktomorrow

I think we need more post-coital and less post-rock
Feels like the build-up takes forever but you never get me off

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Thu May 16, 2013 11:21 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Esternial wrote:Actually, if you think about it, what seems most plausible is that we're born asexual. During our first years we show no distinct interest in the other sex, but as soon as puberty kicks in we start developing our taste.


Speak for yourself, I was having a "girlfriend" when I was 5.

You were "having" her?

That's a bit young, don't you think?
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 16, 2013 11:22 am

Euroslavia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:What are you talking about? We've been at that point since he made his first post in this thread.

I'm talking about us specifically.

I know. I'm just saying it was inevitable. :p
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 16, 2013 11:22 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
Speak for yourself, I was having a "girlfriend" when I was 5.

You were "having" her?

That's a bit young, don't you think?

You're never too young to chop up people you like and barbecue them. *nods*
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Euroslavia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 7781
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Euroslavia » Thu May 16, 2013 11:23 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Euroslavia wrote:I'm talking about us specifically.

I know. I'm just saying it was inevitable. :p

Fair point, I should've expected it. :p Three responses was way too much time given in hopes of at least one legitimate source. I'll go to my corner now. :unsure:
BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Thu May 16, 2013 11:24 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Esternial wrote:My answer is in the cliché. "Like the other girls".

You're expected to like the other sex. The mind is incredibly powerful, and it's possible that you inhibit the expression of your own inherent sexual preference by telling yourself you like the other sex. Since sexual preference is regulated from your own mind, the mind itself can probably inhibit it.

Well virtually all homosexuals up until very recently have, at one point or another, tried to "inhibit the expression of their own inherent sexual preference" to no effect.

Hmm, right.

Well obviously it isn't as simple as I make it out to be. Lots of things are likely involved.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62660
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Thu May 16, 2013 11:25 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
Speak for yourself, I was having a "girlfriend" when I was 5.

You were "having" her?

That's a bit young, don't you think?


Male sheep are sexually mature at 4 to 6 months.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 16, 2013 11:26 am

Euroslavia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:I know. I'm just saying it was inevitable. :p

Fair point, I should've expected it. :p Three responses was way too much time given in hopes of at least one legitimate source. I'll go to my corner now. :unsure:

Yes, you can spend your time doing something productive. Like playing Pokemon in the corner. *nods*
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Thu May 16, 2013 11:27 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:You were "having" her?

That's a bit young, don't you think?


Male sheep are sexually mature at 4 to 6 months.

Touché.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Thu May 16, 2013 11:30 am

Esternial wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Well virtually all homosexuals up until very recently have, at one point or another, tried to "inhibit the expression of their own inherent sexual preference" to no effect.

Hmm, right.

Well obviously it isn't as simple as I make it out to be. Lots of things are likely involved.

Well let me personalize it then. I can remember having sexual thoughts as early as 5. I wouldn't call them, strictly, heterosexual, but they were definitely leaning in that direction.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Thu May 16, 2013 11:36 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Esternial wrote:Hmm, right.

Well obviously it isn't as simple as I make it out to be. Lots of things are likely involved.

Well let me personalize it then. I can remember having sexual thoughts as early as 5. I wouldn't call them, strictly, heterosexual, but they were definitely leaning in that direction.

What I'm interesting in is what causes those thoughts. Would it be predetermined that one has these thoughts at 5? Or is it possible that our society has sped up the process? Maybe there's an early onset of puberty that is far less noticeable...some kind of pre-puberty where the structure of your mind is shaped. After all that's where it all starts. Hormones are released there first.

Also, thank you for sharing that...and pardon my speculations.

User avatar
Euroslavia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 7781
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Euroslavia » Thu May 16, 2013 11:40 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Euroslavia wrote:Fair point, I should've expected it. :p Three responses was way too much time given in hopes of at least one legitimate source. I'll go to my corner now. :unsure:

Yes, you can spend your time doing something productive. Like playing Pokemon in the corner. *nods*

The ironic part is that I'm literally playing Pokemon Black 2 right now. :blink:
BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Thu May 16, 2013 11:48 am

Esternial wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Well let me personalize it then. I can remember having sexual thoughts as early as 5. I wouldn't call them, strictly, heterosexual, but they were definitely leaning in that direction.

What I'm interesting in is what causes those thoughts.

In my case Linka and Gi from Captain Planet.

Would it be predetermined that one has these thoughts at 5? Or is it possible that our society has sped up the process? Maybe there's an early onset of puberty that is far less noticeable...some kind of pre-puberty where the structure of your mind is shaped. After all that's where it all starts. Hormones are released there first.

Also, thank you for sharing that...and pardon my speculations.

It's a mistake to view children as asexual. They are merely not fully sexual (and, of course, incapable of meaningful consent; don't want you to get the wrong idea about me.) I can't imagine that society had much influence on this. I know five year olds are not immune from societal influences, but still.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
This Might Be A Nation
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Jan 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

There is no gay gene.

Postby This Might Be A Nation » Thu May 16, 2013 11:49 am

The only way I know how to look at this issue is by a Christian point-of-view. The Bible and Book of Mormon (both of which I know are true) both state homosexuality is an intolerable abomination in the eyes of our Lord God. Since we have all been given agency (the ability to choose between right or wrong), I honestly do not think God would make it so an individual had no choice but to sin and love someone of their own sex just because of their genes. Homosexually learn/choose to be the way they are. If one were to claim that they "cannot help it," I would say their spirit is possessed by the Devil, altering their state of mind. In other words, it's probably a mental illness.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 16, 2013 11:50 am

Euroslavia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Yes, you can spend your time doing something productive. Like playing Pokemon in the corner. *nods*

The ironic part is that I'm literally playing Pokemon Black 2 right now. :blink:

This is totally a coincidence and does not mean I am currently observing you from a discreet place.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62660
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Thu May 16, 2013 11:52 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Euroslavia wrote:The ironic part is that I'm literally playing Pokemon Black 2 right now. :blink:

This is totally a coincidence and does not mean I am currently observing you from a discreet place.


Ah, so you took my spot.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Thu May 16, 2013 11:55 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:This is totally a coincidence and does not mean I am currently observing you from a discreet place.


Ah, so you took my spot.


Oh wow! That's you? I can see you from the tree, across the street, that I'm currently sitting in.
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Thu May 16, 2013 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Thu May 16, 2013 12:05 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
Ah, so you took my spot.


Oh wow! That's you? I can see you from the tree, across the street, that I'm currently sitting in.
... get out of my goddamn tree before I get the shotgun.
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Euroslavia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 7781
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Euroslavia » Thu May 16, 2013 12:08 pm

This Might Be A Nation wrote:The only way I know how to look at this issue is by a Christian point-of-view. The Bible and Book of Mormon (both of which I know are true) both state homosexuality is an intolerable abomination in the eyes of our Lord God. Since we have all been given agency (the ability to choose between right or wrong), I honestly do not think God would make it so an individual had no choice but to sin and love someone of their own sex just because of their genes. Homosexually learn/choose to be the way they are. If one were to claim that they "cannot help it," I would say their spirit is possessed by the Devil, altering their state of mind. In other words, it's probably a mental illness.

Except that it's not a mental illness.

http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/h ... ealth.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/10 ... 32118.html
http://www.aglp.org/gap/1_history/
BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

User avatar
Euroslavia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 7781
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Euroslavia » Thu May 16, 2013 12:09 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Euroslavia wrote:The ironic part is that I'm literally playing Pokemon Black 2 right now. :blink:

This is totally a coincidence and does not mean I am currently observing you from a discreet place.

Well this is awkward. I figured it was paparazzi taking pictures of my daily life for an article on 'Successful Gays" in the Detroit Free Press.
BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Thu May 16, 2013 12:10 pm

Euroslavia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:This is totally a coincidence and does not mean I am currently observing you from a discreet place.

Well this is awkward. I figured it was paparazzi taking pictures of my daily life for an article on 'Successful Gays" in the Detroit Free Press.

I should inform you: that wasn't a camera lens.

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Thu May 16, 2013 12:13 pm

Euroslavia wrote:
This Might Be A Nation wrote:The only way I know how to look at this issue is by a Christian point-of-view. The Bible and Book of Mormon (both of which I know are true) both state homosexuality is an intolerable abomination in the eyes of our Lord God. Since we have all been given agency (the ability to choose between right or wrong), I honestly do not think God would make it so an individual had no choice but to sin and love someone of their own sex just because of their genes. Homosexually learn/choose to be the way they are. If one were to claim that they "cannot help it," I would say their spirit is possessed by the Devil, altering their state of mind. In other words, it's probably a mental illness.

Except that it's not a mental illness.

http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/h ... ealth.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/10 ... 32118.html
http://www.aglp.org/gap/1_history/


I can clear this up quickly.

"I am God.

Gays are ok. Stop persecuting them or I will smite you in cruel and ironic ways."

There we go, simple enough. Anyone claiming a "christian" basis seems just as easily duped the same flimsy evidence anyway.
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Arianhroda, Arikea, Bornada, BRITISH EMPIRE OF MALAYA, Des-Bal, Divided Free Land, Duvniask, El Lazaro, Fractalnavel, Hidrandia, Hurdergaryp, Juansonia, Nantoraka, Necroghastia, Nilokeras, Ostroeuropa, Rio Cana, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, The Emerald Legion, The Grand Fifth Imperium, Uiiop, Umeria, Upper Magica

Advertisement

Remove ads