NATION

PASSWORD

Are homosexuals really born that way?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is there a gay gene?

Yes
218
33%
No
231
35%
More study is needed to determine
209
32%
 
Total votes : 658

User avatar
Mirage
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: May 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirage » Thu May 16, 2013 10:33 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Mirage wrote:

Source that claim.


The lack of source to contradict it is the only source you are going to get from me.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Thu May 16, 2013 10:34 am

Mirage wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Source that claim.


The lack of source to contradict it is the only source you are going to get from me.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetic ... osexuality

"The Epigenome at a Glance." Genetic Science Learning Center. The University of Utah, 2013. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. <http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/epigenetics/>
Richards, Sabrina. "The Scientist." The Scientist. N.p., 1 Jan. 2013. Web. 13 Apr. 2013.
"National Geographic Explains the Biology of Homosexuality." YouTube. YouTube, 04 Feb. 2009. Web. 13 Apr. 2013.
Ruthenburg, A., C. Allis, and J. Wysocka. "Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark." Molecular Cell 25.1 (2007): 15-30. Print.
Jablonka E and MJ Lamb (2010). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. In: M Pigliucci and GB Müller Evolution, the expanded synthesis
Friberg, Urban, Sergey Gavrilets, and William R. Rice. "Homosexuality as a Consequence of Epigenetically Canalized Sexual Development." The Quarterly Review of Biology 87.4 (2012): n. pag. Print.
"Gene Regulation May Explain How Homosexuality Flourishes." LiveScience.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2013.
"Gene Regulation May Explain How Homosexuality Flourishes." LiveScience.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2013.
Richards, Sabrina. "The Scientist." The Scientist. N.p., 1 Jan. 2013. Web.
Handunnetthi, Lahiru, Adam Handel, and Sreeram V. Ramagopalan. Contribution of Genetic, Epigenetic and Transcriptomic Differences to Twin Discordance in Multiple Sclerosis. Ebsco Host. Psyc Info, 2010. Web.
Friberg, Urban, Sergey Gavrilets, and William R. Rice. "Homosexuality as a Consequence of Epigenetically Canalized Sexual Development." The Quarterly Review of Biology 87.4 (2012): n. pag. Online.
Brook, Charles, Gerard S. Conway, and Melissa Hines. "Androgen and Psychosexual Development: Core Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, and Recalled Childhood Gender Role Behavior in Women and Men with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH)." Journal of Sex Research 41.1 (2004): 75-81. Online
Rice, William, and Urban Friberg. "Study Finds Epigenetics, Not Genetics, Underlies Homosexuality."
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Thu May 16, 2013 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Mirage
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: May 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirage » Thu May 16, 2013 10:35 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Mirage wrote:


So one person on the Internet's opinion now outweighs scientific research, because they agree with you and the research doesn't.

:roll:


No, because the scientific research also shows the same thing. Speculations and theories, not facts.

Mavorpen wrote:Still lying?

I get the feeling you're going to ignore this.[/quote]

I don't see anything other than your usual "omg lies"

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 16, 2013 10:35 am

Esternial wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Find one peer reviewed source that states choice is a factor.

We don't have enough evidence to say anything with enough certainty. It's all speculative, and choice may or may not be a factor in several cases.

Considering the claim isn't, "we have determined with absolute certainty that choice is not possibly a factor" this is both a straw man and gross misunderstanding of science.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Russadonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 377
Founded: Apr 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Russadonia » Thu May 16, 2013 10:35 am

Mirage wrote:
Russadonia wrote:
I have an idea. Go actually talk to some gays and ask them what they think. In fact, live among them for a bit. Participant-Observation is really the best tool in this matter since you ignore their other sources.

You'd definitely learn soon enough.


One of my best friends is one. We met about 5 years ago.


And you still think choice is a factor?

User avatar
Mirage
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: May 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirage » Thu May 16, 2013 10:36 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Mirage wrote:
The lack of source to contradict it is the only source you are going to get from me.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetic ... osexuality



My point still stands.

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Thu May 16, 2013 10:36 am

Mirage wrote:
Russadonia wrote:
I have an idea. Go actually talk to some gays and ask them what they think. In fact, live among them for a bit. Participant-Observation is really the best tool in this matter since you ignore their other sources.

You'd definitely learn soon enough.


One of my best friends is one. We met about 5 years ago.


So that would be when you were, I'm guessing....9?
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 16, 2013 10:37 am

Mirage wrote:
I don't see anything other than your usual "omg lies"

We know, you have trouble reading things. I'll post it again for you.

Mavorpen wrote:
Mirage wrote:
I don't have to. I only said it is what i "believe" it to be, not that that is what it is. You are the one making the claim here.

Mirage wrote:Yes, you are right. The exact cause is unclear and choice has not been taken out as a possibility or factor and hence i said that could be a factor or even the cause.

Still lying?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Thu May 16, 2013 10:37 am

Mirage wrote:


My point still stands.


No it fucking doesn't, because there are sources which contradict the nonsense you're spouting.

From the article:

"The Epigenome at a Glance." Genetic Science Learning Center. The University of Utah, 2013. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. <http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/epigenetics/>
Richards, Sabrina. "The Scientist." The Scientist. N.p., 1 Jan. 2013. Web. 13 Apr. 2013.
"National Geographic Explains the Biology of Homosexuality." YouTube. YouTube, 04 Feb. 2009. Web. 13 Apr. 2013.
Ruthenburg, A., C. Allis, and J. Wysocka. "Methylation of Lysine 4 on Histone H3: Intricacy of Writing and Reading a Single Epigenetic Mark." Molecular Cell 25.1 (2007): 15-30. Print.
Jablonka E and MJ Lamb (2010). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. In: M Pigliucci and GB Müller Evolution, the expanded synthesis
Friberg, Urban, Sergey Gavrilets, and William R. Rice. "Homosexuality as a Consequence of Epigenetically Canalized Sexual Development." The Quarterly Review of Biology 87.4 (2012): n. pag. Print.
"Gene Regulation May Explain How Homosexuality Flourishes." LiveScience.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2013.
"Gene Regulation May Explain How Homosexuality Flourishes." LiveScience.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2013.
Richards, Sabrina. "The Scientist." The Scientist. N.p., 1 Jan. 2013. Web.
Handunnetthi, Lahiru, Adam Handel, and Sreeram V. Ramagopalan. Contribution of Genetic, Epigenetic and Transcriptomic Differences to Twin Discordance in Multiple Sclerosis. Ebsco Host. Psyc Info, 2010. Web.
Friberg, Urban, Sergey Gavrilets, and William R. Rice. "Homosexuality as a Consequence of Epigenetically Canalized Sexual Development." The Quarterly Review of Biology 87.4 (2012): n. pag. Online.
Brook, Charles, Gerard S. Conway, and Melissa Hines. "Androgen and Psychosexual Development: Core Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, and Recalled Childhood Gender Role Behavior in Women and Men with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH)." Journal of Sex Research 41.1 (2004): 75-81. Online
Rice, William, and Urban Friberg. "Study Finds Epigenetics, Not Genetics, Underlies Homosexuality."
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Mirage
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: May 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirage » Thu May 16, 2013 10:37 am

Russadonia wrote:And you still think choice is a factor?


Yes.

Neo Art wrote:So that would be when you were, I'm guessing....9?


I will be 22 this year. Do the math.

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Thu May 16, 2013 10:38 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Mirage wrote:


So one person on the Internet's opinion now outweighs scientific research, because they agree with you and the research doesn't.

:roll:

I don't get that either.

I won't deny that (epi)genetics aren't the biggest factor involved. It's mentioned over and over that it's the primary influencing factor.

However, this doesn't rule out choice can't be a secondary factor that - while not exacting as much influence as the primary factor(s) - might be 'responsible' for a small percentage of homosexuals. Then again, if we want to bring up choice as a factor, we should also ask ourselves what 'choice' is. Your choice might as well be influenced by your brain structure and how it is programmed during your development within the womb.

Would this still constitute choice? Who knows? In essence, all the choices we make later in life are (partly) determined before we even leave the womb.

User avatar
Algonquin Ascendancy
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8417
Founded: Mar 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Algonquin Ascendancy » Thu May 16, 2013 10:38 am

Neo Art wrote:
Mirage wrote:
One of my best friends is one. We met about 5 years ago.


So that would be when you were, I'm guessing....9?

I'd have gone with 8...
• Call me Makki. •
Des: "Humanity: fucking awesome."
My name is Makkitotosimew, I am an Algonquin Separatist and also support the Quebec Separatist movement for purely pragmatic reasons. I am a member of the First Peoples National Party of Canada.
I worship Manitou, the Great Spirit. Mahinga is my spirit guide. All life is sacred and should be treated with respect. As such, I am opposed to sport hunting and factory farming.
I am a Democratic Syndicalist.
I am a 23 year old polyamorous, pansexual woman.
My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.05

User avatar
Mirage
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: May 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirage » Thu May 16, 2013 10:39 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:...


You honestly think i am going to bother reading all that. That wiki link doesn't contradict it. If you find something that does, link it and if it is a really long one a quote from it so that i can find out where. Otherwise it might be easier to just say :

Here is my proof :

www.google.com

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Thu May 16, 2013 10:40 am

Mirage wrote:I will be 22 this year. Do the math.


I mean, dreams are good and all, but come on, do you really expect me to believe that?
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Mirage
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: May 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirage » Thu May 16, 2013 10:40 am

Neo Art wrote:
Mirage wrote:I will be 22 this year. Do the math.


I mean, dreams are good and all, but come on, do you really expect me to believe that?


Then don't. Simple.

User avatar
Russadonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 377
Founded: Apr 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Russadonia » Thu May 16, 2013 10:40 am

I can't work under these conditions.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159121
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu May 16, 2013 10:41 am

Mirage wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:...


You honestly think i am going to bother reading all that. That wiki link doesn't contradict it. If you find something that does, link it and if it is a really long one a quote from it so that i can find out where. Otherwise it might be easier to just say :

Here is my proof :

http://www.google.com

Oh lawd, you got him here!

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Thu May 16, 2013 10:41 am

Mirage wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
I mean, dreams are good and all, but come on, do you really expect me to believe that?


Then don't. Simple.


....I wasn't gonna. Especially when you try to make an argument by linking to google.

Fucking pathetic.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 16, 2013 10:42 am

Mirage wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:...


You honestly think i am going to bother reading all that. That wiki link doesn't contradict it. If you find something that does, link it and if it is a really long one a quote from it so that i can find out where. Otherwise it might be easier to just say :

Here is my proof :

http://www.google.com

Allow me to translate this childish babble for the adults in the room.

"waaah! I actually have to read!?! Just spoonfeed me everything so I can pretend that I understand it and reject it immediately anyway!"
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Thu May 16, 2013 10:42 am

Mirage wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:...


You honestly think i am going to bother reading all that.


It's be nice to see some intellectual honesty.

That wiki link doesn't contradict it. If you find something that does, link it and if it is a really long one a quote from it so that i can find out where. Otherwise it might be easier to just say :


"The researchers found that stronger than average epi-marks, epigenomes that are wrapped tightly around the DNA sequence, convert sexual preference in individuals without altering genitalia or sexual identity"

"This research gives support to the hypothesis that homosexuality stems from the under expression of certain genes on the DNA sequence involved with sexual preferences."

It's in the introductory paragraph of the Wiki article.

Making claims about a source's content without having read the source is A Bad Idea.


Here is my proof :

http://www.google.com


So what you're saying is that you're unwilling to accept the word of scientists, you're unwilling to read short papers, you're unwilling to do anything but skim, and the fact that there's a long list of scientific sources at the bottom of the Wiki article means nothing to you, and all this is because you don't want your beliefs to be challenged with facts.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Herrebrugh
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15203
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Herrebrugh » Thu May 16, 2013 10:44 am

This thread gives me a headache :meh:
Uyt naem Zijner Majeſteyt Jozef III, bij de gratie Godts, Koningh der Herrebrugheylanden, Prins van Rheda, Heer van Jozefslandt, enz. enz. enz.
Im Namen Seiner Majeſtät Joſeph III., von Gottes Gnaden König der Herrenbrückinſeln, Prinz von Rheda, Herr von Josephsland etc. etc. etc.


The Factbook of the Kingdom of the Herrebrugh Islands
Where the Website-Style Factbook Originated!

User avatar
Anachronous Rex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Anachronous Rex » Thu May 16, 2013 10:44 am

Neo Art wrote:
Mirage wrote:I will be 22 this year. Do the math.


I mean, dreams are good and all, but come on, do you really expect me to believe that?

There's a terrible sort of irony to the, "I'm in my 20s" claims.

Presumably the people who make them think that it lends a sort of credibility to their person. When, in fact, it just makes them seem sort of especially sad.
My humor is like church wine: dry and tasteless.
If you are not sure if I am being serious, assume that I am not.

Summer is coming...

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 16, 2013 10:45 am

Anachronous Rex wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
I mean, dreams are good and all, but come on, do you really expect me to believe that?

There's a terrible sort of irony to the, "I'm in my 20s" claims.

Presumably the people who make them think that it lends a sort of credibility to their person. When, in fact, it just makes them seem sort of especially sad.

It's like watching Kent Hovind brag, "I have a PhD!" when he obtained it from a non accredited shack.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mirage
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 445
Founded: May 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirage » Thu May 16, 2013 10:47 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:"The researchers found that stronger than average epi-marks, epigenomes that are wrapped tightly around the DNA sequence, convert sexual preference in individuals without altering genitalia or sexual identity"

"This research gives support to the hypothesis that homosexuality stems from the under expression of certain genes on the DNA sequence involved with sexual preferences."


That doesn't mean that that alone causes it. Also i am interested in learning a bit more about the actual research. Can you direct me to a detailed version. (See, now things like this, i like to read in detail)

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Thu May 16, 2013 10:47 am

Herrebrugh wrote:This thread gives me a headache :meh:

I know how you feel.

I tried giving my two cents but schooling and ridiculing the infidel takes priority.
Last edited by Esternial on Thu May 16, 2013 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Eahland, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Neu California, Phage, Philjia, PhilTech, Port Caverton, Ryemarch, Tarsonis, The Huskar Social Union, The Notorious Mad Jack

Advertisement

Remove ads