NATION

PASSWORD

Obama Impeachment

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should Obama be impeached?

Poll ended at Sun Jun 02, 2013 4:04 pm

Yes
218
28%
No
501
64%
Undecided
59
8%
 
Total votes : 778

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Tue May 14, 2013 11:36 am

Neo Art wrote:
Sabara wrote:
I love how liberals are so hypocritcal that they claim conservatives are bigoted.

It makes me laugh so hard.


Does it?

Does it really???

Tell me, tell me how it makes you laugh. Describe it for me. Is it a chuckle? A snort? A great big gaffaw? Elaborate, describe, detail.

LET ME FEEL YOUR LAUGHTER.


A derisive and supremely superior snort I'd wager.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Tue May 14, 2013 11:36 am

Khadgar wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Well Glenn Beck is a patriot who loves his country.


He loves it so much he wants to build his own little paradise enclave within it when the rules of the land don't actually apply. He's such a patriot.


Not only that, but he has little plans for it that is pretty much centralized social and economic planning, something he derides as socialism when done by the government, yeah I know.

User avatar
Sabara
Senator
 
Posts: 3501
Founded: Jan 14, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sabara » Tue May 14, 2013 11:36 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Sabara wrote:
It's quite obvious that he's implying it.

No, he isn't.

Unless you want to argue that Glenn Beck represents all conservatives.

In which case, you're pretty much proving that all conservatives are bigoted.


How is Glenn Beck bigoted? (Gets ready for a whole buttload of death threats)
A unique MT rp: Tiandi

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Tue May 14, 2013 11:37 am

Sabara wrote:Posting this on NSG?

Get ready for the bloodthirsty liberals to jump down your throat. :P

Firstly, we much prefer soy-mocha-lattes to blood. Secondly, why shouldn't we attack a stupid post for being stupid, regardless of our party affiliation?
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Sabara
Senator
 
Posts: 3501
Founded: Jan 14, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sabara » Tue May 14, 2013 11:37 am

Khadgar wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
Does it?

Does it really???

Tell me, tell me how it makes you laugh. Describe it for me. Is it a chuckle? A snort? A great big gaffaw? Elaborate, describe, detail.

LET ME FEEL YOUR LAUGHTER.


A derisive and supremely superior snort I'd wager.


That's the snort you guys snort.
A unique MT rp: Tiandi

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue May 14, 2013 11:37 am

Sabara wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No, he isn't.

Unless you want to argue that Glenn Beck represents all conservatives.

In which case, you're pretty much proving that all conservatives are bigoted.


How is Glenn Beck bigoted? (Gets ready for a whole buttload of death threats)

Funny that you bring up death threats.

"I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore, and I'm wondering if I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it." –Glenn Beck, May 2005
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Sabara
Senator
 
Posts: 3501
Founded: Jan 14, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sabara » Tue May 14, 2013 11:37 am

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Sabara wrote:Posting this on NSG?

Get ready for the bloodthirsty liberals to jump down your throat. :P

Firstly, we much prefer soy-mocha-lattes to blood. Secondly, why shouldn't we attack a stupid post for being stupid, regardless of our party affiliation?


Stupid in your opinion.
A unique MT rp: Tiandi

User avatar
Xsyne
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6537
Founded: Apr 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Xsyne » Tue May 14, 2013 11:38 am

Sabara wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:No, he isn't.

Unless you want to argue that Glenn Beck represents all conservatives.

In which case, you're pretty much proving that all conservatives are bigoted.


How is Glenn Beck bigoted? (Gets ready for a whole buttload of death threats)

Death threats? How adorable.
If global warming is real, why are there still monkeys? - Msigroeg
Pro: Stuff
Anti: Things
Chernoslavia wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.


Source?

User avatar
Xsyne
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6537
Founded: Apr 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Xsyne » Tue May 14, 2013 11:38 am

Sabara wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Firstly, we much prefer soy-mocha-lattes to blood. Secondly, why shouldn't we attack a stupid post for being stupid, regardless of our party affiliation?


Stupid in your opinion.

Who the fuck else's opinion would it be?
If global warming is real, why are there still monkeys? - Msigroeg
Pro: Stuff
Anti: Things
Chernoslavia wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.


Source?

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue May 14, 2013 11:39 am

Xsyne wrote:
Sabara wrote:
How is Glenn Beck bigoted? (Gets ready for a whole buttload of death threats)

Death threats? How adorable.

The persecution complex some of these people have is just plain disturbing.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Tue May 14, 2013 11:40 am

Xsyne wrote:No declared enemy? I recall a certain Authorization for Use of Military Force that says otherwise.

Legislation never disproves Sibirsky unless it addresses him by name…
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Tue May 14, 2013 11:40 am

Sabara wrote:
Khadgar wrote:
A derisive and supremely superior snort I'd wager.


That's the snort you guys snort.


Oh please, the only thing we liberal snort is ground up babies.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Tue May 14, 2013 11:41 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Xsyne wrote:Death threats? How adorable.

The persecution complex some of these people have is just plain disturbing.


Said in a thread where the main reasons listed for opposition to Obama is race and political party.

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Tue May 14, 2013 11:42 am

Sabara wrote:
Wikkiwallana wrote:Firstly, we much prefer soy-mocha-lattes to blood. Secondly, why shouldn't we attack a stupid post for being stupid, regardless of our party affiliation?


Stupid in your opinion.

No, it was pretty demonstrably stupid. Non-stupid posts are readable, for a start.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Tue May 14, 2013 11:43 am

Sibirsky wrote:Does this war spread to the territory of the United States? Been outside lately? I do not know where you live, or even if you live in the US. I assume you do. And in that case, I am fairly confident that there is no combat action over there.


I am unaware that the united states federal government has ever, at any time during the current administration, attempted the assassination of US citizens on US soil. You're paranoid

We are not at war. There is no declared enemy.


Now that's just absolutely incorrect. The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists and the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq quite clearly lay out both the theater of operations, and the targets, and authorizes the president (then Bush, now Obama) to, in any way the President deems necessary and appropriate, use the Armed forces:

1) against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons

and

2) to defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq

To argue, as you absurdly and nonsensically do here that there is "no declared enemy" is an absolute falsehood, and demonstrates either a profound ignorance of current international relations, or extreme dishonesty. So you either don't have the slightest fucking clue what you're talking about, or you're lying.

You can choose for yourself which you prefer to be thought of as.

And, the administration is claiming legal powers, for assassination of US citizens, even on US territory.


Oh. Liar it is then.
Last edited by Neo Art on Tue May 14, 2013 11:46 am, edited 3 times in total.
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
The Little Village Up The Coast
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Apr 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Little Village Up The Coast » Tue May 14, 2013 11:43 am

We should impeach Obama for not doing what he promised us during his campaign!

Nah, if that was enough to impeach a president, we could impeach them all. There's no good reason to impeach the guy.

User avatar
Amareux
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Apr 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Amareux » Tue May 14, 2013 11:43 am

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Mistelemr wrote:Did anybody else notice that the OP linked Glenn Beck, or was that just me? Any potential for conversation ends when Glenn Beck enters the room.

Me: Why would you impe-
Beck: YOU GOD DAMN MARXIST COMMUNIST FASCO NAZI. YOUR KIND IS TAKING ALL OUR JOBS AND RAPING OUR WOMEN INTO TAKING BIRTH CONTROL. GOD SAVE US ALL


Well Glenn Beck is a patriot who loves his country.


So was Hitler.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Tue May 14, 2013 11:43 am

Sibirsky wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Uh huh. See, you have this braggadocios claim in your bumper that shows you're a Silver Medal debater. That's not a personal attack to point it out. Nice try though.

And, which AMCITs has he murdered, exactly?

You are not merely pointing it out. I don't your need your bullshit.

Have you been living under a rock?

Abdulrahman Anwar Al-Awlaki?

They claim it is a mistake. And sure, lets give them the benefit of the doubt. it is a mistake.

Killing his father was not. And being an American citizen, he is entitled to the due process of law. Like any other American citizen.

Or, it should be, any other human being, having to go through the American justice system.

Well, I'm glad you don't need my bullshit, since I'm not giving you any. I might feel bad if you did need it though.

Yes, he was a person who stated his goals were to use murder as a tool of persuasion during a time of war, and in a location that had been recognized, by congress, as a battlefield.

You know what killing that person means? Not a damn thing. So he's American? Whoop dee doo. It's legal. If it wasn't, I'm almost entirely positive that the House would have impeached him for authorizing the strike by now.

So, try again, Mr. Silver Medal.

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Tue May 14, 2013 11:44 am

Amareux wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Well Glenn Beck is a patriot who loves his country.


So was Hitler.


Hitler Ate Sugar.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Tue May 14, 2013 11:45 am

Amareux wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Well Glenn Beck is a patriot who loves his country.


So was Hitler.


Hitler was an anti-smoking vegetarian.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue May 14, 2013 11:45 am

Amareux wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Well Glenn Beck is a patriot who loves his country.


So was Hitler.

Mavorpen wrote:Hitler also breathed air.

Do you breathe air?

Congratulations, you're on the way to becoming Hitler.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue May 14, 2013 11:46 am

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Amareux wrote:
So was Hitler.


Hitler was an anti-smoking vegetarian.

He wasn't a vegetarian.

Did he support animal rights? Yes. But he wasn't a vegetarian.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Godly Nations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5503
Founded: Jul 20, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Godly Nations » Tue May 14, 2013 11:47 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Amareux wrote:
So was Hitler.

Mavorpen wrote:Hitler also breathed air.

Do you breathe air?

Congratulations, you're on the way to becoming Hitler.


Hitler had only one ball, that's the crucial part.

User avatar
The Little Village Up The Coast
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Apr 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Little Village Up The Coast » Tue May 14, 2013 11:47 am

Khadgar wrote:
Amareux wrote:
So was Hitler.


Hitler Ate Sugar.


Heil honey, I'm home!

User avatar
The Little Village Up The Coast
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Apr 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Little Village Up The Coast » Tue May 14, 2013 11:49 am

The Godly Nations wrote:Hitler had only one ball, that's the crucial part.


I thought that was Mao Zedong?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Dimetrodon Empire, EuroStralia, Fractalnavel, Grinning Dragon, Majestic-12 [Bot], Northern Socialist Council Republics, Page, Washington-Columbia

Advertisement

Remove ads