The Marxist State wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
Presuming unconstitutional actions are a high crime, and the president is committing such crimes frequently, then what would SCOTUS have anything to do with whether the president should be charged (impeached) and convicted (removed), except the CJ's ceremonial role during such cases in the senate?
What Nadkor was saying is that SCOTUS can rule executive orders or legislation signed by the President unconstitutional without removing him from office.
Close enough.



