Pedophilia

[Tahar Joblis]

FWIW, there are a few 20 year olds who look 12 and vice versa.

Juliet was 12-14, Romeo was 14-15. It's not pedophilia if it's 2 young teenagers.

However when it's a 12 year old and a 20 year old, something's wrong there. That's not love.

Let's clarify that. It's not pedophilia when the young person is a teenager. It's often inappropriate, and especially so when an adult engages in a sexual relationship with a teenager over which they have some power.

[Bunyippie]

See the problem with this is Children cannot give consent but i think that there should be no statutoryu rape from 12 up because 12 is when you begin to reach sexual maturity so why not have other maturity as well ?

Thats not socially acceptable so it will never happen.

Having your ankles showing used to not be socially acceptable and same for women wearing pants but look where we are now and there could be a liomit of like 10 years area around you

In those times it was socially acceptable to marry off your 12 year-old daughter to a 42 year old man. We don't regress, we progress.

in ancient greece, loving underage boys was consider normal and in fact, it was consider an honor if an older male engaged in pederasty with you.

[Threlizdun]

I have a very odd, and quite radical opinion on this subject. I have stated on previous topics that "Love is love". I also have stated that I think that should apply with any consensual indeviduals. I still believe that, although I forgot to add any consensual individuals that are educated about the topic and know what they are doing. I actually think that after a child has gotten a certain number of years of sexual education class, then they should be responsible for their own choices. I still don't know what that number would be, but it would probably be enough to make sure that really young children that might be harmed, would not be allowed to do as such. No I am not a pedophile (I couldn't be as I am currently thirteen years old. And no, I am not saying this because I would like to at this age.), but I think that if it is a relationship in which everyone desires it and knows what they are doing, then they should be allowed to.

[Blouman Empire]

See the problem with this is Children cannot give consent but i think that there should be no statutoryu rape from 12 up because 12 is when you begin to reach sexual maturity so why not have other maturity as well ?

Thats not socially acceptable so it will never happen.

Having your ankles showing used to not be socially acceptable and same for women wearing pants but look where we are now and there could be a liomit of like 10 years area around you

In those times it was socially acceptable to marry off your 12 year-old daughter to a 42 year old man. We don't regress, we progress.

in ancient greece, loving underage boys was consider normal and in fact, it was consider an honor if an older male engaged in pederasty with you.

It was also acceptable to have slaves.

[Jibberi]

The reason people go "aaawww" when they see a five year old and a six year old calling eachother boyfriend and girlfriend is because they know that the children have no idea what they are actually talking about.

Children do not understand relationships. Hell, I'm way past childhood and even I don't think I'm ready for a relationship with anyone, soulmate or no. Especially a sexual one!

I wouldn't mind a non-sexual relationship between a teen and an adult. I would be disturbed by a sexual relationship between a teen and an adult (Unless they were in their late teens or something) but adult and children? No, that's creepy.

Technically Pedophilia is when you are sexually attracted towards children, not when you are in a relationship with one for other reasons.

[Bunyippie]

okay, let me break it down, pedophillia, like beastility (do not start that shit storm please) falls into two groups
A. self called Pedosexuals, they are attracted EMOTIONALLY to kids and are capable of having nonsexual boyfriend/girlfriend etc, with them.
B. Pedophiles, people who enjoy SEX with kids for the sake of sex with kids.

And there is anecdotal evidence that the former group generally causes less harm and SOMETIMES is beneneficial to the child (IE first gay relationship and all that.)

[Blouman Empire]

okay, let me break it down, pedophillia, like beastility (do not start that shit storm please) falls into two groups
A. self called Pedosexuals, they are attracted EMOTIONALLY to kids and are capable of having nonsexual boyfriend/girlfriend etc, with them.
B. Pedophiles, people who enjoy SEX with kids for the sake of sex with kids.

One does not have to have sex or any sexual contact with children to be a pedophile.

And there is anecdotal evidence that the former group generally causes less harm and SOMETIMES is beneneficial to the child (IE first gay relationship and all that.)

Ancedotal? Yes that really is good evidence.

[Bunyippie]

okay, let me break it down, pedophillia, like beastility (do not start that shit storm please) falls into two groups
A. self called Pedosexuals, they are attracted EMOTIONALLY to kids and are capable of having nonsexual boyfriend/girlfriend etc, with them.
B. Pedophiles, people who enjoy SEX with kids for the sake of sex with kids.

One does not have to have sex or any sexual contact with children to be a pedophile.

And there is anecdotal evidence that the former group generally causes less harm and SOMETIMES is beneneficial to the child (IE first gay relationship and all that.)

Ancedotal? Yes that really is good evidence.

that is the third category of pedophiles, opportunitistic, they rape kids if given a chance and a chance not to get caught, usally one time events
and that is why I underlined it

[Blouman Empire]

okay, let me break it down, pedophillia, like beastility (do not start that shit storm please) falls into two groups
A. self called Pedosexuals, they are attracted EMOTIONALLY to kids and are capable of having nonsexual boyfriend/girlfriend etc, with them.
B. Pedophiles, people who enjoy SEX with kids for the sake of sex with kids.

One does not have to have sex or any sexual contact with children to be a pedophile.

And there is anecdotal evidence that the former group generally causes less harm and SOMETIMES is beneneficial to the child (IE first gay relationship and all that.)

Ancedotal? Yes that really is good evidence.

that is the third category of pedophiles, opportunitistic, they rape kids if given a chance and a chance not to get caught, usally one time events
and that is why I underlined it

And how is being raped beneficial?

[Bunyippie]

okay, let me break it down, pedophillia, like beastility (do not start that shit storm please) falls into two groups
A. self called Pedosexuals, they are attracted EMOTIONALLY to kids and are capable of having nonsexual boyfriend/girlfriend etc, with them.
B. Pedophiles, people who enjoy SEX with kids for the sake of sex with kids.

One does not have to have sex or any sexual contact with children to be a pedophile.

And there is anecdotal evidence that the former group generally causes less harm and SOMETIMES is beneneficial to the child (IE first gay relationship and all that.)

Ancedotal? Yes that really is good evidence.

that is the third category of pedophiles, opportunitistic, they rape kids if given a chance and a chance not to get caught, usally one time events
and that is why I underlined it

And how is being raped beneficial?

as I said the first group, the emotional group, is the helpful kind when it is helpful, and pedophilia covers the span to under the legal age (including 13 and up) when sexual maturity takes place.

[Redslavia]

Anyone wanting to rape a child deserves physical castration at the least.

[Blouman Empire]

as I said the first group, the emotional group, is the helpful kind when it is helpful, and pedophilia covers the span to under the legal age (including 13 and up) when sexual maturity takes place.

Yeah see that didn't really explain how being raped is beneficial.

[Cubic kms]

Anyone wanting to rape a child deserves physical castration at the least.

What if the child is the male and the rapist is a woman?

[Scalietti]

Anyone wanting to rape a child deserves physical castration at the least.

What if the child is the male and the rapist is a woman?

Then the woman must be damn good at what she does

[Blouman Empire]

Anyone wanting to rape a child deserves physical castration at the least.

What if the child is the male and the rapist is a woman?

The same really should apply unfortunately judges are sexist dicks who think that a 13 year old took advantage of a girl 10 years his senior.

[SaintB]

People cannot help whom they are attracted to. However those who act upon those urges regardless of 'consent' are predators feeding in the naivety of children and should be punished. I can't agree with many people's ideas of punishment though; as the entire point of punishment should be to make the person regret their wrongs because of the people they hurt and not to make a person regret their punishment because of the people who hurt them.

[Redslavia]

Anyone wanting to rape a child deserves physical castration at the least.

What if the child is the male and the rapist is a woman?

Female circumcision, it has the same effect as male castration.