Yep.
But I'm bored, it's a Friday evening and this is a religious thread; may as well see what he comes up with.
Advertisement

by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Fri May 10, 2013 10:40 am

by Distruzio » Fri May 10, 2013 10:40 am
Mirage wrote:The Moors of Fire wrote:If you think about it, can't physics be considered a god, although not a sapient one? Physical laws in a way created the universe, and they control how the world works.
But aren't there certain situations where some laws don't apply ? like cause and effect. It would be an endless loop and nothing would have come into existence if the law was true for all cases.

by Koumakan Underground » Fri May 10, 2013 10:41 am

by Kaizakhstan » Fri May 10, 2013 10:41 am
This is kind of the point I was trying to make.The Moors of Fire wrote:Liriena wrote:
Disregarding the fact that your question is a, to put it bluntly, useless one...as far as we know, the laws of physics have always existed. If you, however, are willing to claim, despite no proof and with no actual rational basis, that any gap in scientific theory can only be explained through the faith in an illusive supreme entity...then you have quite the problem in your hands.
Also...if god were physics, then the Bible, and all related religious text, would be the greatest lie ever told. After all, physical laws, applied in our Universe, are quite hostile towards human life. Physical laws gave us a Universe where the odds are stacked against as, and where a plethora of phenomena are constantly trying to destroy our species (just like 99% of all the species that came before us).
If you think about it, can't physics be considered a god, although not a sapient one? Physical laws in a way created the universe, and they control how the world works.
Woah there, son, that's Devil talk

by Distruzio » Fri May 10, 2013 10:41 am

by The Rich Port » Fri May 10, 2013 10:42 am

by Koevoet » Fri May 10, 2013 10:43 am
Kaizakhstan wrote:This is kind of the point I was trying to make.The Moors of Fire wrote:If you think about it, can't physics be considered a god, although not a sapient one? Physical laws in a way created the universe, and they control how the world works.Woah there, son, that's Devil talkKoevoet wrote:First of all, I'm not your bro.
And honestly, if God would exist, I wouldn't give a damn about him. I just love my right hand too much for that

by Councordia » Fri May 10, 2013 10:43 am
Liriena wrote:Councordia wrote:
Erm, the link. And also, high school world history. Maybe not American high school world history.
(EDIT) Also, in retrospect, 'blah blah blah' does not a response constitute. And I nowhere said that atheists cause all the suffering in the world. So either respond to my evidence (the numbers) with evidence, or getouttahere...
Fascism and nationalsocialism were not atheistic. All the contrary: both fascist regimes and Nazi Germany were strongly theistic.
Proof? Please? One can cloak one's ideology in religious rhetoric, but that does not makes one's ideology a religious ideology.
Also...eugenics, and the fascist and nationalsocialist (mis)interpretation of Darwinian evolutionary theory, are not in any way correlated to atheism. Darwinian evolutionism is not a "book" of the athiest "bible". Atheism lacks a central dogma, unlike religion. There are no atheist commandments. There is no central, absolutist atheist myth of the creation of the universe. There are no atheist prophecies, or rituals.
I know that there is no 'atheist scripture' although apparently, now, you do in fact have churches and priests (funny, that). And it is exactly that lack of a central dogma that totally makes all your 'no true scotsman' claims below absolutely, well, ridiculous. /b]
Fascism is not secular, and if you knew anything of 20th century European and Latin American history (or at least, anything factual about it) you'd know full well that practically all fascist regimes were Catholic, either de jure or de facto. From Mussolini and Franco, to Pinochet and Videla.
[b] Perhaps 'fascist' is too broad a term, because, as you pointed out, it does encompass a broad range of ideologies and historical manifestations. Let's go with Nazism as our poster child for radical nationalism for now, 'mkay?
Nazi Germany was not primarily catholic. In fact, Hitler's ideas of genetic purity were entirely unrelated to religion. Furthermore, Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
Stalinism (and its Asian and Latin American variants), on the other hand, always involved a cult of personality surrounding the leader of the regime, and never was any of the crimes you accuse Stalinism of committed in the name of atheism. They were committed in the name of an ideology, one that is not inherently theistic or atheistic.
I don't really give two shits if it was done in the name of any particular thing. The pragmatic, actual outworking of Stalinism, which had atheistic materialism as its guiding ideological star, was mass murder.
"The Soviet Union was the first state to have, as an ideological objective, the elimination of religion[1] and its replacement with universal atheism.[2][3] The communist regime confiscated religious property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in schools.[4] The confiscation of religious assets was often based on accusations of illegal accumulation of wealth." From none other than Wiki : [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_Soviet_Union
[/url]
Stalinism and fascism are not secularistic ideologies. All the contrary: they imposed state religions, based on political leaders rather than unseen deities.
Which is secularism (Rousseau's, not Locke's) taken to its logical conclusion. Stop lying. Thanks
Also, please do yourself a favor and get rid of this bullshit claim:So if any ideology is 'dangerous', it is atheism. Not because atheists are dangerous people, but because they believe in no one (but themselves and the Goddess Reason) hold to no creed (except to anathematize other creeds) and have no real basis for conducting themselves in a 'moral' fashion. And here's the proof of it.*
It's a claim so blatantly false and disgustingly inane that it barely deserves a proper response.
Well, it didn't get one, so I guess everything's Ok, then.
Since most crimes in the world are committed by theists rather than atheists, and since most nations with a large percentage of atheist citizens are not anarchic, impoverished, polluted bloodbaths...yeah, feel free to take that bullshit elsewhere, along with every single tired old talking point you've spewed.
Fucking disgraceful.
Cute.

by The Moors of Fire » Fri May 10, 2013 10:43 am
Distruzio wrote:Mirage wrote:
But aren't there certain situations where some laws don't apply ? like cause and effect. It would be an endless loop and nothing would have come into existence if the law was true for all cases.
Not to mention the fact that scientists continue to discover whole planets, stars, and solar systems where our laws of physics don't apply. Then there are the materialshere on earththat disregard physics altogether.

by Jerusalemian » Fri May 10, 2013 10:44 am
Kaizakhstan wrote:This is kind of the point I was trying to make.The Moors of Fire wrote:If you think about it, can't physics be considered a god, although not a sapient one? Physical laws in a way created the universe, and they control how the world works.Woah there, son, that's Devil talkKoevoet wrote:First of all, I'm not your bro.
And honestly, if God would exist, I wouldn't give a damn about him. I just love my right hand too much for that

by Jefferstown » Fri May 10, 2013 10:44 am
1) How can you believe such a thing in a Universe that has been designed with the odds stacked against you?
2) I've heard that tale...and all it does is prove how Christianity is basically sugar-coated misanthropy. Also...the Biblical god is self-contradicting. He makes claims that his own book then refutes, or even worse, that the natural world he himself allegedly created refutes.
3) Argumentum ad numerum? Yeah...

by Cosara » Fri May 10, 2013 10:45 am

by Distruzio » Fri May 10, 2013 10:46 am
The Moors of Fire wrote:
I din't know that. Could you give me some names of those materials, I can't get on youtube where I am right now (School)

by Liriena » Fri May 10, 2013 10:46 am
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Shokan » Fri May 10, 2013 10:47 am

by Koumakan Underground » Fri May 10, 2013 10:47 am
Distruzio wrote:Mirage wrote:
But aren't there certain situations where some laws don't apply ? like cause and effect. It would be an endless loop and nothing would have come into existence if the law was true for all cases.
Not to mention the fact that scientists continue to discover whole planets, stars, and solar systems where our laws of physics don't apply. Then there are the materialshere on earththat disregard physics altogether.

by The Rich Port » Fri May 10, 2013 10:48 am
Cosara wrote:Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
You'll have proof for this, then, of course.
I have evidence against the Atheist World View (IE, a world in which no god exists). The Foundation of the Atheist World View is the Big Bang. Well, I have to ask: What created the big bang? What created the cause of the cause. What created the cause of the cause of the cause. This is an infinite regression which makes it impossible for the Big Bang to have happened. At some point down the line, you'd have to have an uncaused cause to cause the causes of all of the causes that caused the Big Bang. It's simple logic: From nothing, nothing comes. Now, your rebuttle is "Where did god come from." well, God, existing outside of time and space and not having to comply with the Laws of Nature, is the uncaused cause. The Big Bang must comply with the laws of nature, making it impossible under the reason I stated above, however God does not comply with the laws of nature, and is therefor free from needing a cause or a creator.

by Esparmuran » Fri May 10, 2013 10:49 am


by Koevoet » Fri May 10, 2013 10:50 am
Esparmuran wrote:Let's first all remember what "God" is gentlemen and gentlewoman.
God is, what most Christians from most dominions say, a Jewish zombie in the sky that watches over all of us, all the time. All 7 billion of us. Everyday, 24/7, nonstop. He supposedly protects us from dangers by sending his "angels" down to protect us. Although they seem to be invisible... which is a shame, because if I need help from him, I don't know when his angels arrive. His angels don't seem to do a good job protecting people either, considering almost 300,000 people on this planet die everyday. Maybe he just doesn't like us.

by The Rich Port » Fri May 10, 2013 10:51 am
Esparmuran wrote:Let's first all remember what "God" is gentlemen and gentlewoman.
God is, what most Christians from most dominions say, a Jewish zombie in the sky that watches over all of us, all the time. All 7 billion of us. Everyday, 24/7, nonstop. He supposedly protects us from dangers by sending his "angels" down to protect us. Although they seem to be invisible... which is a shame, because if I need help from him, I don't know when his angels arrive. His angels don't seem to do a good job protecting people either, considering almost 300,000 people on this planet die everyday. Maybe he just doesn't like us.

by Esparmuran » Fri May 10, 2013 10:51 am
Koevoet wrote:Esparmuran wrote:Let's first all remember what "God" is gentlemen and gentlewoman.
God is, what most Christians from most dominions say, a Jewish zombie in the sky that watches over all of us, all the time. All 7 billion of us. Everyday, 24/7, nonstop. He supposedly protects us from dangers by sending his "angels" down to protect us. Although they seem to be invisible... which is a shame, because if I need help from him, I don't know when his angels arrive. His angels don't seem to do a good job protecting people either, considering almost 300,000 people on this planet die everyday. Maybe he just doesn't like us.
"he's a silent protector, a guardian that never sleeps, it's
NANANANANNANANANANNA
BATMAAAN

by Transhuman Proteus » Fri May 10, 2013 10:51 am
Cosara wrote:Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
You'll have proof for this, then, of course.
I have evidence against the Atheist World View (IE, a world in which no god exists). The Foundation of the Atheist World View is the Big Bang. Well, I have to ask: What created the big bang? What created the cause of the cause. What created the cause of the cause of the cause. This is an infinite regression which makes it impossible for the Big Bang to have happened. At some point down the line, you'd have to have an uncaused cause to cause the causes of all of the causes that caused the Big Bang. It's simple logic: From nothing, nothing comes. Now, your rebuttle is "Where did god come from." well, God, existing outside of time and space and not having to comply with the Laws of Nature, is the uncaused cause. The Big Bang must comply with the laws of nature, making it impossible under the reason I stated above, however God does not comply with the laws of nature, and is therefor free from needing a cause or a creator.

by Mirage » Fri May 10, 2013 10:52 am
Koumakan Underground wrote:
Sulfur hexafluoride is some cool-ass shit. I wanna get some just so I can float things on it and pretend that I'm magical.


by Distruzio » Fri May 10, 2013 10:53 am
Esparmuran wrote:Let's first all remember what "God" is gentlemen and gentlewoman.
God is, what most Christians from most dominions say, a Jewish zombie in the sky that watches over all of us, all the time. All 7 billion of us. Everyday, 24/7, nonstop.
He supposedly protects us from dangers by sending his "angels" down to protect us. Although they seem to be invisible... which is a shame, because if I need help from him, I don't know when his angels arrive. His angels don't seem to do a good job protecting people either, considering almost 300,000 people on this planet die everyday. Maybe he just doesn't like us.

by Transhuman Proteus » Fri May 10, 2013 10:54 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Des-Bal, Duvniask, Eternal Algerstonia, Fartsniffage, Forsher, Google [Bot], Greater Marine, Gun Manufacturers, Myrensis, Nilokeras, North American Imperial State, Northern Komanose, San Lumen, Shrillland, South Africa3, Umeria, Utquiagvik, Varisland, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement