It wasn't an 'oath' it was based upon the Jewish wedding ritual.
Advertisement

by Menassa » Fri May 24, 2013 8:55 pm

by Sociobiology » Fri May 24, 2013 9:10 pm
Menassa wrote:Sociobiology wrote:except its not, in the original language she is only referred to as a young woman, it only became virgin through mistranslation.
I'm going to assume
(although please try and be coherent in your next post)
That you're talking about Isaiah 7:14.... Isaiah 7:14... is not talking about Mary at all... you see how the word is: 'The' a definite article... meaning that the Woman is known to both the prophet Isaiah and who he was speaking too.
Sociobiology wrote:
And you differentiate how?
because if the answer is evidence, then it all becomes horse shit again.
A Jew believes in the Miracles attributed to Moses.
A Christian believes in the Miracles attributed to Moses and Jesus.
A Muslim believes in the Miracles attributed to Moses and Jesus and Muhammad.
Do you see the connection?

by Menassa » Fri May 24, 2013 9:12 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Menassa wrote:I'm going to assume
(although please try and be coherent in your next post)
That you're talking about Isaiah 7:14.... Isaiah 7:14... is not talking about Mary at all... you see how the word is: 'The' a definite article... meaning that the Woman is known to both the prophet Isaiah and who he was speaking too.
actually it translates as A young woman. from the original Hebrew.
A Jew believes in the Miracles attributed to Moses.
A Christian believes in the Miracles attributed to Moses and Jesus.
A Muslim believes in the Miracles attributed to Moses and Jesus and Muhammad.
Do you see the connection?
Oldest to youngest sects of the same religion?
Still want to know how you think you tell the difference between accurate and false "miracles"

by Sociobiology » Fri May 24, 2013 9:43 pm
Menassa wrote:Sociobiology wrote:
if only the devil can rebel then demons must be doing gods bidding.
You've clearly missed the subtlety in that post... I'll make note of that.
Sociobiology wrote:When Elyon divided the nations, when he separated the sons of Adam,
he established the borders of the nations according to the number of the sons of the gods.
Yahweh’s portion was his people, [Israel] his allotted inheritance. (Deut. 32:8–9)
בְּהַנְחֵל עֶלְיוֹן גּוֹיִם, בְּהַפְרִידוֹ בְּנֵי אָדָם; יַצֵּב גְּבֻלֹת עַמִּים, לְמִסְפַּר בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל. When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the children of men, He set the borders of the peoples according to the number of the children of Israel.
כִּי חֵלֶק יְהוָה, עַמּוֹ: יַעֲקֹב, חֶבֶל נַחֲלָתוֹ. For the portion of the LORD is His people, Jacob the lot of His inheritance.
Learn2masoretictext.
Sociobiology wrote:Then [Elohim] said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness” (Genesis 1:26).
Were you aware that Christians believe that his verse refers to the Trinity?
Sociobiology wrote:[Elohim] stands in the assembly of El; in the midst of the gods he renders judgment (Ps. 82:1).
. A song of Asaph. God stands in the congregation of God; in the midst of the judges He will judge. א. מִזְמוֹר לְאָסָף אֱלֹהִים נִצָּב בַּעֲדַת אֵל בְּקֶרֶב אֱלֹהִים יִשְׁפֹּט:
I'm seriously doubting your Biblical Hebrew skills.
Sociobiology wrote:All the gods bow down before [Jehovah] (Ps. 97:7).
The Talmud teaches us dear friend, when a heretic brings a verse before you the answer is usually around that verse.
Psalm 97:7 All worshippers of graven images will be ashamed,
Sociobiology wrote:But you must not turn away from all the commandments I am giving you today, to either the right or left, nor pursue other gods and worship them (Deut. 28:14–15).
and the classic
“You shall have no other gods before me” (Ex. 20:3).
and “I, Jehovah, your God, am a jealous God”
referring to the tribes, meaning other tribes have other gods.
You as an Atheist do not believe God exists....
According to your logic (in saying that those verses prove paganism) that God does indeed exist... you just don't believe that he exists.

by Menassa » Fri May 24, 2013 9:49 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Menassa wrote:You've clearly missed the subtlety in that post... I'll make note of that.
בְּהַנְחֵל עֶלְיוֹן גּוֹיִם, בְּהַפְרִידוֹ בְּנֵי אָדָם; יַצֵּב גְּבֻלֹת עַמִּים, לְמִסְפַּר בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל. When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the children of men, He set the borders of the peoples according to the number of the children of Israel.
כִּי חֵלֶק יְהוָה, עַמּוֹ: יַעֲקֹב, חֶבֶל נַחֲלָתוֹ. For the portion of the LORD is His people, Jacob the lot of His inheritance.
Learn2masoretictext.
I am referring to the oldest versions of the text.
Sociobiology wrote:Were you aware that Christians believe that his verse refers to the Trinity?
which means they believe ins skitzo god.
Also why would would the Christian interpretation matter?
Sociobiology wrote:. A song of Asaph. God stands in the congregation of God; in the midst of the judges He will judge. א. מִזְמוֹר לְאָסָף אֱלֹהִים נִצָּב בַּעֲדַת אֵל בְּקֶרֶב אֱלֹהִים יִשְׁפֹּט:
I'm seriously doubting your Biblical Hebrew skills.
I have to doubt yours
singular stands in plural of singular, in the midst of plural, singular judges.
that is a sentence describing the leader of a group of something.
El both the word for the father of gods and the generic word for god, for example, Saturn and Hadad are referred to as El in old Semitic manuscripts.
Sociobiology wrote:The Talmud teaches us dear friend, when a heretic brings a verse before you the answer is usually around that verse.
Psalm 97:7 All worshippers of graven images will be ashamed,
exactly a graven image means a carving made to represent a god, he is punishing them for worshiping other god, just like the Greek gods did.Source that the Greek gods did this.
Secondly... it's like I said below:
"I am so awesome that unicorns are jealous of me."
knowing full well unicorns don't exist.

by Sociobiology » Fri May 24, 2013 10:19 pm
Sociobiology wrote:which means they believe ins skitzo god.
Also why would would the Christian interpretation matter?
Because... you believe that this talking about multiple Gods.
Some Christians believe it's talking about the Trinity.
[/quote]Sociobiology wrote:I have to doubt yours
singular stands in plural of singular, in the midst of plural, singular judges.
that is a sentence describing the leader of a group of something.
El both the word for the father of gods and the generic word for god, for example, Saturn and Hadad are referred to as El in old Semitic manuscripts.
What?
The verse says God sits in God's court and in the midst of Judges he will Judge.
The two words used for God here are: El, and Elohim.
Sociobiology wrote: exactly a graven image means a carving made to represent a god, he is punishing them for worshiping other god, just like the Greek gods did.

by Menassa » Fri May 24, 2013 10:24 pm
Sociobiology wrote:which means they believe ins skitzo god.
Also why would would the Christian interpretation matter?
Because... you believe that this talking about multiple Gods.
Some Christians believe it's talking about the Trinity.
Sociobiology wrote:You are arguing that the Greeks were monotheistic be cause they refer to Hephaestus as the god of the forge.
And that the president os the only person in the army because he calls it his army.
congregation means multiple
the Iliad.
of did you not read the cause of the first Trojan war in the text.

by Sociobiology » Fri May 24, 2013 10:25 pm

by Menassa » Fri May 24, 2013 10:26 pm

by Sociobiology » Fri May 24, 2013 10:43 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Because... you believe that this talking about multiple Gods.
Some Christians believe it's talking about the Trinity.
some also believe Lucifer is the devil
Sociobiology wrote:What?
The verse says God sits in God's court and in the midst of Judges he will Judge.
Yes, God does sit in God's Court, and in the midst of Judges he will Judge.So they're the Same... El, and Elohim...
yes in the sense they often do not refer to Yahweh
and one can be the plural of the other.I am saying that because it says not to worship other God's... it does not mean other Gods exist... in fact many times it calls them false gods.
he would wouldn't he, he also says he is jealousAs well as you who are an Atheist.
You will say: "I don't believe in God."
Which means God exists... you just don't believe in him... it's the same thing.

by Sociobiology » Fri May 24, 2013 10:44 pm
Sociobiology wrote:some also believe Lucifer is the devil
Some do believe that,
we believe that neither of those characters Exists.
Yes, God does sit in God's Court, and in the midst of Judges he will Judge.
So they're the Same... El, and Elohim...
I am saying that because it says not to worship other God's... it does not mean other Gods exist... in fact many times it calls them false gods.
[/quote]As well as you who are an Atheist.
You will say: "I don't believe in God."
Which means God exists... you just don't believe in him... it's the same thing.

by Menassa » Fri May 24, 2013 10:47 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Because... you believe that this talking about multiple Gods.
Some Christians believe it's talking about the Trinity.
some also believe Lucifer is the devil
Sociobiology wrote:What?
The verse says God sits in God's court and in the midst of Judges he will Judge.
Yes, God does sit in God's Court, and in the midst of Judges he will Judge.So they're the Same... El, and Elohim...
yes in the sense they often do not refer to Yahweh
and one can be the plural of the other.I am saying that because it says not to worship other God's... it does not mean other Gods exist... in fact many times it calls them false gods.
he would wouldn't he, he also says he is jealousAs well as you who are an Atheist.
You will say: "I don't believe in God."
Which means God exists... you just don't believe in him... it's the same thing.

by Sociobiology » Fri May 24, 2013 10:48 pm

by Menassa » Fri May 24, 2013 10:51 pm

by Sociobiology » Fri May 24, 2013 10:53 pm
Menassa wrote:Sociobiology wrote:there are no prophets/ there are prophets but you can them them from the fakes because they will not do this thing that both the fakes and the "real" ones do.
The Bible says there are prophets who will instruct you in the ways of God.
Kill those prophets who don't instruct you in the ways of God.
How is that unclear?

by Menassa » Fri May 24, 2013 10:55 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Menassa wrote:The Bible says there are prophets who will instruct you in the ways of God.
Kill those prophets who don't instruct you in the ways of God.
How is that unclear?
without giving you any way to tell if the instructions are the ways of god.
at least not instructions that would not force you to see Moses as a false prophet.

by Sociobiology » Fri May 24, 2013 10:55 pm
which you determine by guessing
Irrelevant, stick to the subject.
Yes, God does sit in God's Court, and in the midst of Judges he will Judge.
So they're the Same... El, and Elohim...
Also I notice still no answer to
“You shall have no other gods before me” (Ex. 20:3).
when "You shall have no other gods" would have worked, unless they are allowed to worship other gods but only to a lesser and reserved extent, because of the jealousy thing.
Yes it would have.... don't eat unicorn!

by Menassa » Fri May 24, 2013 11:00 pm
Sociobiology wrote:Irrelevant, stick to the subject.
highly relevant because you are arguing for one interpretation as correct without any reason to prefer that interpretation.
Sociobiology wrote:Yes, God does sit in God's Court, and in the midst of Judges he will Judge.
actually the translation is assembly or congregation which is a group

by Ordya » Sat May 25, 2013 5:46 am
Menassa wrote:Sociobiology wrote: the Septuagint and the Tanakh at Qumran
The Septuagint... may be less then reliable and I've presented you with what it says from the earliest Hebrew Texts.Sociobiology wrote:Because... you believe that this talking about multiple Gods.
Some Christians believe it's talking about the Trinity.
some also believe Lucifer is the devil
Sociobiology wrote:You are arguing that the Greeks were monotheistic be cause they refer to Hephaestus as the god of the forge.
And that the president os the only person in the army because he calls it his army.
congregation means multiple
the Iliad.
of did you not read the cause of the first Trojan war in the text.

by Menassa » Sat May 25, 2013 10:24 am
Ordya wrote:No, it's not. God may exist, but you have no proof to support this, therefore the null hypothesis is that he doesn't exist (or at least shouldn't be believed in).

by Mizrad » Sat May 25, 2013 10:28 am

by Menassa » Sat May 25, 2013 10:31 am
Mizrad wrote:Just because this thread is full of religious people who might know the answer to this question, does anybody know when and where the Bible was written and by who or atleast the answer to one of those three? I'm just asking a question, don't start getting angry at me.

by Conscentia » Sat May 25, 2013 10:39 am
Mizrad wrote:Just because this thread is full of religious people who might know the answer to this question, does anybody know when and where the Bible was written and by who or atleast the answer to one of those three? I'm just asking a question, don't start getting angry at me.
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Mizrad » Sat May 25, 2013 10:39 am
Menassa wrote:Mizrad wrote:Just because this thread is full of religious people who might know the answer to this question, does anybody know when and where the Bible was written and by who or atleast the answer to one of those three? I'm just asking a question, don't start getting angry at me.
I believe the first stage of the Bible was Canonized in Babylon... the second and third were canonized in Judea soon after the Babylonian exile.
I do NOT believe it was a canonized at the hypothetical council of Jamina.... which there is no evidence for and the only possible reason for such a claim would be to prove that the Jews.... the Pharisees... believed in Jesus but rejected him anyway.... and only John 8:44 can do that.

by Menassa » Sat May 25, 2013 10:40 am
Conscentia wrote:Mizrad wrote:Just because this thread is full of religious people who might know the answer to this question, does anybody know when and where the Bible was written and by who or atleast the answer to one of those three? I'm just asking a question, don't start getting angry at me.
The Bible is a collection of books that have been written, rewritten, and expanded upon for centuries.
See the relevant link in my signature.
Alternatively, the url can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlnnWbkMlbg
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Azmeny, Des-Bal, Duvniask, Eternal Algerstonia, Fartsniffage, Forsher, Greater Marine, Greater Miami Shores 3, Gun Manufacturers, Incelastan, Myrensis, Nilokeras, North American Imperial State, Northern Komanose, Shrillland, South Africa3, Umeria, Utquiagvik, Varisland, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement