Actually it is all the Top liberals are communist who worship Aleister Crowley who inspired L Ron Hubbard to create the satanic left wing new age scientology cult
Advertisement

by Wesley Custer Douglas » Thu May 09, 2013 9:10 pm

by Gauthier » Thu May 09, 2013 9:10 pm
Edlichbury wrote:Neo Art wrote:Yes the wonder of right wing cognitive dissonance. The left is simultaniously capable of elaborate conspiracies and utterly incapable of doing anything right at all.
We are all brilliant morons.
In our defense, some of us don't believe that the government is both incapable and a shadowy conspiracy. Generally, we don't get covered, but rational Republicans do exist.

by Edlichbury » Thu May 09, 2013 9:10 pm
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:Edlichbury wrote:Considering he begins with a claim that "The Obama national security team, including CIA, DNI and the Pentagon, apparently watched and listened to the assault on the U.S. consulate and cries for help but did nothing," which already was proven categorically false, I highly doubt the legitimacy of his other arguments. He continues on with other falsehoods, such as claiming we had an overhead drone where we didn't. He even claims that despite, by his own admission, the CIA repeatedly making statements saying that they made no "stand down" order, someone in the CIA did and the entire agency is covering it up.
These do not sound like the claims by a fully objective, rational person. Why should we consider his other statements to be so?
Yes or no, you retract both previous claims that the
A) entire government besides Greg Hicks stands behind the theory that Benghazi could not have been helped
and
B) the admiral "admitted no response would have saved Ambassador Stevens "

by Edlichbury » Thu May 09, 2013 9:12 pm

by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 9:12 pm
Edlichbury wrote:Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:
Yes or no, you retract both previous claims that the
A) entire government besides Greg Hicks stands behind the theory that Benghazi could not have been helped
and
B) the admiral "admitted no response would have saved Ambassador Stevens "
Why exactly? Every rational response, including that of Lyons, admits that no forces within the area could have saved Ambassador Stevens. Why does Greg Hicks opinion matter?

by Farnhamia » Thu May 09, 2013 9:13 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu May 09, 2013 9:14 pm
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:Edlichbury wrote:Why exactly? Every rational response, including that of Lyons, admits that no forces within the area could have saved Ambassador Stevens. Why does Greg Hicks opinion matter?
Allow me to reiterate my previously mentioned quote by Adm. Lyons.
""I know those Special Forces personnel were ready to leap at the opportunity. There is no doubt in my mind they would have wiped out the terrorists attackers. Also I have no doubt that Admiral William McRaven, Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, would have had his local commander at Sigonella ready to launch; however, apparently he was countermanded—by whom? We need to know.""

by Gauthier » Thu May 09, 2013 9:15 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Edlichbury wrote:Please don't remind me that Teabaggers still control my party. I've tried so hard to not pay attention to them.
You have to pay attention to them, because you have to drive them out. Let them go found their own party. The Republican Party used to be honorable, but since the rise of the Tea Party, I cannot use that word for them.

by Edlichbury » Thu May 09, 2013 9:15 pm
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:Edlichbury wrote:Why exactly? Every rational response, including that of Lyons, admits that no forces within the area could have saved Ambassador Stevens. Why does Greg Hicks opinion matter?
Allow me to reiterate my previously mentioned quote by Adm. Lyons.
""I know those Special Forces personnel were ready to leap at the opportunity. There is no doubt in my mind they would have wiped out the terrorists attackers. Also I have no doubt that Admiral William McRaven, Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, would have had his local commander at Sigonella ready to launch; however, apparently he was countermanded—by whom? We need to know.""

by Ixzara » Thu May 09, 2013 9:15 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Edlichbury wrote:Please don't remind me that Teabaggers still control my party. I've tried so hard to not pay attention to them.
You have to pay attention to them, because you have to drive them out. Let them go found their own party. The Republican Party used to be honorable, but since the rise of the Tea Party, I cannot use that word for them.

by Edlichbury » Thu May 09, 2013 9:16 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Edlichbury wrote:Please don't remind me that Teabaggers still control my party. I've tried so hard to not pay attention to them.
You have to pay attention to them, because you have to drive them out. Let them go found their own party. The Republican Party used to be honorable, but since the rise of the Tea Party, I cannot use that word for them.

by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 9:18 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:
Allow me to reiterate my previously mentioned quote by Adm. Lyons.
""I know those Special Forces personnel were ready to leap at the opportunity. There is no doubt in my mind they would have wiped out the terrorists attackers. Also I have no doubt that Admiral William McRaven, Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, would have had his local commander at Sigonella ready to launch; however, apparently he was countermanded—by whom? We need to know.""
Admiral Lyons has been retired since 1987. I doubt he's been included in very many briefings lately.

by Gauthier » Thu May 09, 2013 9:18 pm
Edlichbury wrote:Farnhamia wrote:You have to pay attention to them, because you have to drive them out. Let them go found their own party. The Republican Party used to be honorable, but since the rise of the Tea Party, I cannot use that word for them.
I wish we could just bring Eisenhower back and get him to take command of the Republicans.

by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 9:18 pm
Edlichbury wrote:Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:
Allow me to reiterate my previously mentioned quote by Adm. Lyons.
""I know those Special Forces personnel were ready to leap at the opportunity. There is no doubt in my mind they would have wiped out the terrorists attackers. Also I have no doubt that Admiral William McRaven, Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, would have had his local commander at Sigonella ready to launch; however, apparently he was countermanded—by whom? We need to know.""
And from literally the exact same article, he admitted he had no idea (or at the very least could not be certain) if help would have saved the Ambassador.

by Gauthier » Thu May 09, 2013 9:19 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu May 09, 2013 9:21 pm

by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 9:22 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:
I believe he maintains a position as a US military advisor to the United Nations.
He's the founder and CEO of LION Associates, LLC, "an international consulting firm with unique global experience dealing with commercial and goverment policies and programs. Its efforts are primarily directed towards anti-terrorism, security services, defense procurement, foreign policy and security affairs, international marketing and trade/project development."

by Wikkiwallana » Thu May 09, 2013 9:22 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 9:23 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:
I believe he maintains a position as a US military advisor to the United Nations.
He's the founder and CEO of LION Associates, LLC, "an international consulting firm with unique global experience dealing with commercial and goverment policies and programs. Its efforts are primarily directed towards anti-terrorism, security services, defense procurement, foreign policy and security affairs, international marketing and trade/project development."

by Edlichbury » Thu May 09, 2013 9:28 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu May 09, 2013 9:28 pm
I know those Special Forces personnel were ready to leap at the opportunity. There is no doubt in my mind they would have wiped out the terrorists attackers. Also I have no doubt that Admiral William McRaven, Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, would have had his local commander at Sigonella ready to launch; however, apparently he was countermanded—by whom? We need to know.
I also understand we had a C-130 gunship available, which would have quickly disposed of the terrorist attackers. This attack went on for seven hours. Our fighter jets could have been at our Benghazi mission within an hour. Our Special Forces out of Sigonella could have been there within a few hours. There is not any doubt that action on our part could have saved the lives of our two former Navy SEALs and possibly the ambassador.

by Wikkiwallana » Thu May 09, 2013 9:28 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Belarusball, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ethel mermania, Habsburg Mexico, Lurinsk, Samrif, Sarolandia, Stellar Colonies, Valrifall, Valyxias, Vivida Vis Animi
Advertisement