Because it was his job.
Advertisement

by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 8:26 pm

by Edlichbury » Thu May 09, 2013 8:27 pm
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:Page wrote:
Hardly, more than a dozen Americans died in the course of terrorist attacks on diplomatic missions over the course of Dubya's presidency and I don't recall that ever being the scandal of the week.
Watch the Daily Show did we?
Check out when they died. During the war in Iraq, and never in an attack on the scale of the one in Benghazi.

by Wikkiwallana » Thu May 09, 2013 8:27 pm
Ensiferum wrote:Farnhamia wrote:No, that's not true. You need 60 votes in the Senate to get past a filibuster. All bills brought to a vote pass with a majority, usually 51 votes (50 would be a tie, I misspoke before), regardless of whether it's a new law or an amendment to an existing one. Nowadays you do need 60 votes to get anything done but really, you only need 51.
A filibuster cannot legally prevent a bill from becoming law.
As the gun law got 54 votes it passed.
Any attempts to filibuster it is treason.
The bill passes, it passed. There is no stopping it.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by The Rulers of Mu » Thu May 09, 2013 8:27 pm
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:I demand that the Democratic legislators answer for the question of why every US consulate isn't equipped with a comically oversize bulldozer capable of squishing rioters! I further demand to know why the consulate wasn't made out of that stuff they make airplane black boxes out of, and why our ambassador had not been trained to deflect RPGs with his bare hands! Those responsible for this lack of elite ninja training for our diplomatic corps should be sent to Guantanamo!


by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 8:28 pm

by Cosara » Thu May 09, 2013 8:28 pm
Edlichbury wrote:Cosara wrote:How about actually sending help to the people during the assault? Why was the military told to stand down and allow four Americans to be slaughtered?
Defense Department officials have said they had no units that could have responded in time to counter the attack in Benghazi. Kind of pointless to send in the military to respond to an attack after it's happened.

by Edlichbury » Thu May 09, 2013 8:29 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu May 09, 2013 8:30 pm

by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 8:30 pm

by Edlichbury » Thu May 09, 2013 8:31 pm
Cosara wrote:Edlichbury wrote:Defense Department officials have said they had no units that could have responded in time to counter the attack in Benghazi. Kind of pointless to send in the military to respond to an attack after it's happened.
There was a period of 7 hours between the first attack and second attack. Also, wasn't there a team at the Benghazi airport that was told not to go?

by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 8:32 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Cosara wrote:How about actually sending help to the people during the assault? Why was the military told to stand down and allow four Americans to be slaughtered?
There were two attacks, one on the consulate at 9:40 PM local time and one on the CIA annex a mile away around midnight. Ambassador Stevens and Information Officer Sean Smith died from smoke inhalation when the main consulate building was set on fire. They were not "slaughtered." The forces at the annex defended themselves through the night, until reinforcements from Tripoli and some local Libyan forces arrived. The two men killed at the annex were victims of another attack there, as they attempted to reposition to cover the evacuation from that building. They were not "slaughtered," either.

by Farnhamia » Thu May 09, 2013 8:32 pm

by Wikkiwallana » Thu May 09, 2013 8:32 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Farnhamia » Thu May 09, 2013 8:32 pm
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:Farnhamia wrote:There were two attacks, one on the consulate at 9:40 PM local time and one on the CIA annex a mile away around midnight. Ambassador Stevens and Information Officer Sean Smith died from smoke inhalation when the main consulate building was set on fire. They were not "slaughtered." The forces at the annex defended themselves through the night, until reinforcements from Tripoli and some local Libyan forces arrived. The two men killed at the annex were victims of another attack there, as they attempted to reposition to cover the evacuation from that building. They were not "slaughtered," either.
Replace slaughtered with murdered. They were murdered.

by Lesbia » Thu May 09, 2013 8:33 pm

by Cosara » Thu May 09, 2013 8:33 pm
Edlichbury wrote:Cosara wrote:There was a period of 7 hours between the first attack and second attack. Also, wasn't there a team at the Benghazi airport that was told not to go?
From all the sources I've found, the only forces told to stand down were those outside of Benghazi that wouldn't have made it before the first attack finished. And frankly, there was no reason to suspect a second round of attacks.

by Farnhamia » Thu May 09, 2013 8:34 pm
Cosara wrote:Edlichbury wrote:From all the sources I've found, the only forces told to stand down were those outside of Benghazi that wouldn't have made it before the first attack finished. And frankly, there was no reason to suspect a second round of attacks.
What is the logic in keeping the remaining diplomats in a burning compound that had been broken into and set on fire by a well armed mob.

by Wikkiwallana » Thu May 09, 2013 8:35 pm
Cosara wrote:Edlichbury wrote:From all the sources I've found, the only forces told to stand down were those outside of Benghazi that wouldn't have made it before the first attack finished. And frankly, there was no reason to suspect a second round of attacks.
What is the logic in keeping the remaining diplomats in a burning compound that had been broken into and set on fire by a well armed mob.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Edlichbury » Thu May 09, 2013 8:35 pm
Cosara wrote:Edlichbury wrote:From all the sources I've found, the only forces told to stand down were those outside of Benghazi that wouldn't have made it before the first attack finished. And frankly, there was no reason to suspect a second round of attacks.
What is the logic in keeping the remaining diplomats in a burning compound that had been broken into and set on fire by a well armed mob.

by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 8:36 pm
Edlichbury wrote:Cosara wrote:There was a period of 7 hours between the first attack and second attack. Also, wasn't there a team at the Benghazi airport that was told not to go?
From all the sources I've found, the only forces told to stand down were those outside of Benghazi that wouldn't have made it before the first attack finished. And frankly, there was no reason to suspect a second round of attacks.

by Blackhelm Confederacy » Thu May 09, 2013 8:37 pm

by Wikkiwallana » Thu May 09, 2013 8:37 pm
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:Edlichbury wrote:From all the sources I've found, the only forces told to stand down were those outside of Benghazi that wouldn't have made it before the first attack finished. And frankly, there was no reason to suspect a second round of attacks.
Greg Hicks has said repeatedly that a fighter response, which could have been scrambled but was not, could have certainly averted the mortar attack that killed the two men at the CIA annex.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Farnhamia » Thu May 09, 2013 8:37 pm
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:Edlichbury wrote:From all the sources I've found, the only forces told to stand down were those outside of Benghazi that wouldn't have made it before the first attack finished. And frankly, there was no reason to suspect a second round of attacks.
Greg Hicks has said repeatedly that a fighter response, which could have been scrambled but was not, could have certainly averted the mortar attack that killed the two men at the CIA annex.

by Cosara » Thu May 09, 2013 8:37 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, EuroStralia, Fractalnavel, Grinning Dragon, Necroghastia, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Page, The Pirateariat, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement