Where is this all coming from? 1984, CCTV, Police State? O_O

[Dyakovo]

most people would like to believe I'm a knife welding hoody.

I find that hard to believe.

Why.

Because here on NS you sound just like every other socialist sissy I've ever met.

Not a one of them had the stones to stand up for their beliefs. They'd only ever stand up for something if there was a faceless mob around that shared their opinion, and only then after somebody told them what to do or what opinion to hold.

[Dyakovo]

You're in a public space. Are you claiming then that a police officer wouldn't be allowed to look at you in the street for fear of breaching this 'right' you've decided you have? Would I be allowed to look at you?

Yes. Though you don't record my every move though do you?
Or do you? O_O

No, I'm concentrating on MHiJ for now...

[Skeptikosia]

Well Britain I just have one thing so say to you guys and your police state.

America is right behind you.

I hope its a God fearing Police state. That would be the bees knees.

Yeah, theocracy is such an awesome idea. I wonder why no one has tried it?

[Skeptikosia]

most people would like to believe I'm a knife welding hoody.

I find that hard to believe.

Why.

Because here on NS you sound just like every other socialist sissy I've ever met.

Not a one of them had the stones to stand up for their beliefs. They'd only ever stand up for something if there was a faceless mob around that shared their opinion, and only then after somebody told them what to do or what opinion to hold.

*cough cough* tea party *cough*

Those are new, I'm waiting to see how people settle out. If they keep the sheeple mentality, I'll call them out on it as well.

The sissies have been doing this since the 60's and their still the same old sissies.

Social unrest movements are, by their very nature, communal.

True enough, but one mindset appears to be run by a bunch of people who want their lives run for them, and the other is, at least ostensibly, about wanting to be left alone.

[Grave_n_idle]

True enough, but one mindset appears to be run by a bunch of people who want their lives run for them, and the other is, at least ostensibly, about wanting to be left alone.

If you're going to misrepresent both perspectives to avoid reality, why would I bother addressing it?

The people you're referring to as 'socialists' don't want other people thinking for them any more than anyone else does - they want a community that offers support.

The people you're referring to as 'the other' don't want to be left alone, they don't want to support their community.

Personally - I'll take socialists over unpatriotic parasites any day.

[Skeptikosia]

True enough, but one mindset appears to be run by a bunch of people who want their lives run for them, and the other is, at least ostensibly, about wanting to be left alone.

If you're going to misrepresent both perspectives to avoid reality, why would I bother addressing it?

The people you're referring to as 'socialists' don't want other people thinking for them any more than anyone else does - they want a community that offers support.

The people you're referring to as 'the other' don't want to be left alone, they don't want to support their community.

Personally - I'll take socialists over unpatriotic parasites any day.

You and I appear to have diametrically opposing views regarding the nature of the primary positions in the discussion at hand.

I'm not misrepresenting either side in my opinion.

Socialists don't want a community that offers support, they want to force people to support the community in governmentally approved ways, which is opposed to fundamental property and personal rights.

[Grave_n_idle]

I'm not misrepresenting either side in my opinion.

Socialists don't want a community that offers support, they want to force people to support the community in governmentally approved ways, which is opposed to fundamental property and personal rights.

You realise that your first claim and your second claim are mutually exclusive, yes?

[Skeptikosia]

I'm not misrepresenting either side in my opinion.

Socialists don't want a community that offers support, they want to force people to support the community in governmentally approved ways, which is opposed to fundamental property and personal rights.

You realise that your first claim and your second claim are mutually exclusive, yes?

How so?

[Grave_n_idle]

I'm not misrepresenting either side in my opinion.

Socialists don't want a community that offers support, they want to force people to support the community in governmentally approved ways, which is opposed to fundamental property and personal rights.

You realise that your first claim and your second claim are mutually exclusive, yes?

How so?

You claimed you didn't misrepresent either side, and then went straight on to misrepresent one side?

[Skeptikosia]

I'm not misrepresenting either side in my opinion.

Socialists don't want a community that offers support, they want to force people to support the community in governmentally approved ways, which is opposed to fundamental property and personal rights.

You realise that your first claim and your second claim are mutually exclusive, yes?

How so?

You claimed you didn't misrepresent either side, and then went straight on to misrepresent one side?

Ah...

I disagree.

[Grave_n_idle]

I'm not misrepresenting either side in my opinion.

Socialists don't want a community that offers support, they want to force people to support the community in governmentally approved ways, which is opposed to fundamental property and personal rights.

You realise that your first claim and your second claim are mutually exclusive, yes?

How so?

You claimed you didn't misrepresent either side, and then went straight on to misrepresent one side?

Ah...

I disagree.

And you're a socialist, so your opinion matters?

[Skeptikosia]

I'm not misrepresenting either side in my opinion.

Socialists don't want a community that offers support, they want to force people to support the community in governmentally approved ways, which is opposed to fundamental property and personal rights.

You realise that your first claim and your second claim are mutually exclusive, yes?

How so?

You claimed you didn't misrepresent either side, and then went straight on to misrepresent one side?

Ah...

I disagree.

And you're a socialist, so your opinion matters?

I'm not a socialist.

[Grave_n_idle]

I'm not misrepresenting either side in my opinion.

Socialists don't want a community that offers support, they want to force people to support the community in governmentally approved ways, which is opposed to fundamental property and personal rights.

You realise that your first claim and your second claim are mutually exclusive, yes?

How so?

You claimed you didn't misrepresent either side, and then went straight on to misrepresent one side?

Ah...

I disagree.

And you're a socialist, so your opinion matters?

I'm not a socialist.

So, you're just making up your 'representation' of socialists, then?

I'm shocked. You were so convincing. I really thought you knew what you were talking about.

[Skeptikosia]

I'm not misrepresenting either side in my opinion.

Socialists don't want a community that offers support, they want to force people to support the community in governmentally approved ways, which is opposed to fundamental property and personal rights.

You realise that your first claim and your second claim are mutually exclusive, yes?

How so?

You claimed you didn't misrepresent either side, and then went straight on to misrepresent one side?

Ah...

I disagree.

And you're a socialist, so your opinion matters?

I'm not a socialist.

So, you're just making up your 'representation' of socialists, then?

I'm shocked. You were so convincing. I really thought you knew what you were talking about.

Your sarcasm is duly noted.