Indeed.
Advertisement

by Dyakovo » Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:58 pm

by Kobrania » Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:59 pm

by Zykorinov » Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:59 pm

by Dyakovo » Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:59 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:
Quiet you.
Actually originally it wasn't the tree was used by pagans in Germany mainly in Saxony, when St Boniface, destroyed the cut down the tree that was an important symbol in the Germanic pagan faith and changed the meaning of the tree and it spread throughout Germany. It was then brought into the UK by Prince Albert consort to Queen Victoria and was then taken over to the US and spread around the world.
It is wrong to say that the tree is a purely Christian symbol but is also wrong to say that it isn't at all.


by Dyakovo » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:00 pm

by Gerechtigkeit fur Mann » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:01 pm

by Dyakovo » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:02 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:
It depends on if they have Gods, some pagan faiths do have god(s) however others don't those that don't are atheists.
And some atheists do have a belief, a belief that thereisare no gods.

by Blouman Empire » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:02 pm

by Zykorinov » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:03 pm

by Blouman Empire » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:03 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:
Quiet you.
Actually originally it wasn't the tree was used by pagans in Germany mainly in Saxony, when St Boniface, destroyed the cut down the tree that was an important symbol in the Germanic pagan faith and changed the meaning of the tree and it spread throughout Germany. It was then brought into the UK by Prince Albert consort to Queen Victoria and was then taken over to the US and spread around the world.
It is wrong to say that the tree is a purely Christian symbol but is also wrong to say that it isn't at all.


by Dyakovo » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:03 pm

by Kobrania » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:04 pm

by Joesavi » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:05 pm
Idaho Conservatives wrote:Adolf Hitler.
He's still livin' on that South American island, bitches! Along with Elvis Presley, Amelia Earhart, and Mace Windu.
Idaho Conservatives wrote:Once again Joesavi, you have proven yourself as NS's master firearm pimp.
Slakonian wrote:And do not tell i am not wrong because i am absolutly right
Non-Exploding Cupcake wrote:Twelve-tone death polka! Thrash baroque reggae! Neoclassical stoner trance jazz!
Wilconson wrote:The creator of a communist version of ThunderCats.
Mushrenia wrote:The creator of Spetznaz Felines

by New Kereptica » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:05 pm
Dyakovo wrote:
As do I (well actually I use both depending upon whether I feel like typing out "christmas" or not).
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

by Blouman Empire » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:05 pm
Kobrania wrote:He never said that, he just said he commits violent acts on Christmas, he probably lure children into his van with chocolate Easter eggs too.

by Dyakovo » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:06 pm

by Zykorinov » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:07 pm


by Dyakovo » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:08 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:
Quiet you.
Actually originally it wasn't the tree was used by pagans in Germany mainly in Saxony, when St Boniface, destroyed the cut down the tree that was an important symbol in the Germanic pagan faith and changed the meaning of the tree and it spread throughout Germany. It was then brought into the UK by Prince Albert consort to Queen Victoria and was then taken over to the US and spread around the world.
It is wrong to say that the tree is a purely Christian symbol but is also wrong to say that it isn't at all.
That's the second time in two months you have clapped one of my posts, Dyakovo.
What's going on?


by Blouman Empire » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:09 pm
Dyakovo wrote:It depends on if they have Gods, some pagan faiths do have god(s) however others don't those that don't are atheists.
And some atheists do have a belief, a belief that thereisare no gods.
Fixed to make the statement more accurate...
Not there was anything inherently wrong with the original...


by Blouman Empire » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:10 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Just because we usually disagree doesn't me we always do...
Either that or its a sign of the apocalypse, your choice...

by Dyakovo » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:12 pm

by Zykorinov » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:12 pm

by Dyakovo » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:13 pm
Zykorinov wrote:Atheists deserve just as much respect as the other religions do. They might still be eyed with suspicion, but that's only because it's relatively new (as a mainstream religion). We'll grow into it, and it'll become more accepted.
Think: What if Christianity hadn't been heard of AT ALL, until yesterday. What would you think of it? I'd think it was made up by a bunch of lunatics. And, if you look closely at it, that's exactly the impression you'll get. It's just that it's been around so long, and we've grown to accept it. That's all.

by Rhodmhire » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:14 pm

by Katganistan » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:15 pm
Penafrancia wrote:i kinda wonder. <if this is not the proper forum, just transfer it somewhere>
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Dimetrodon Empire, Dreria, Eternal Algerstonia, Floofybit, Haganham, Kehlstein, Mithridatium, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Jamesian Republic, The Nationalistic Republics of N Belarus, The United Penguin Commonwealth, The Vision, Valrifall, Westport and Holland, Zurkerx
Advertisement