Yeah, I chose the wrong one. Of course, that wouldn't have happened if European royalty could come up with unique names.
Advertisement

by Mkuki » Thu May 02, 2013 1:31 pm
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Insane Kidney Mentality » Thu May 02, 2013 1:31 pm
Mandicoria wrote:Putin is best leader for obvious reasons.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infoc ... TXUL0R.jpg
http://landofthefreeish.com/wp-content/ ... sharks.jpg

by The Godly Nations » Thu May 02, 2013 1:31 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:I have a great deal of sympathy for Tsar Nicholas II, even if he wasn't Russia's greatest ruler. I'd have to say he's my favourite.

by Insane Kidney Mentality » Thu May 02, 2013 1:32 pm
Haydenish People wrote:Asking me my favorite Russian leader is like asking me my favorite Chinese leader. They were better before they had those silly socialist revolutions.

by Kachilla » Thu May 02, 2013 1:35 pm



by Socialist States of Russia » Thu May 02, 2013 1:35 pm

by Insane Kidney Mentality » Thu May 02, 2013 1:39 pm
Kachilla wrote:No real favorite - there's never really been a truly democratic Russian leader (Putin included), and that alone makes it hard for me to choose. But Lenin has cool facial hair! And an epic rap in ERBOH! And this police photo of him from 1895 just seals it:
(Image)
DAT HAIR. HE LOOKS LIKE A FLIPPING MAD SCIENTIST. I'm not too-too sure about his policies (he was better than Stalin at the very least) but DAT HAIR.![]()

by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu May 02, 2013 1:46 pm
by Shofercia » Thu May 02, 2013 1:47 pm

by Kachilla » Thu May 02, 2013 1:47 pm
Mandicoria wrote:Putin is best leader for obvious reasons.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infoc ... TXUL0R.jpg
but THERE'S A PUPPY! 
by Mkuki » Thu May 02, 2013 1:50 pm
Kachilla wrote:Mandicoria wrote:Putin is best leader for obvious reasons.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infoc ... TXUL0R.jpg
AAAHHH!! PUPPY!![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh, and Vladimir Putin as well - normally I'd be all
![]()
but THERE'S A PUPPY!
![]()
![]()
Puppies make even pseudo-dictators look tame!

John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu May 02, 2013 1:50 pm
Kachilla wrote:Mandicoria wrote:Putin is best leader for obvious reasons.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infoc ... TXUL0R.jpg
AAAHHH!! PUPPY!![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh, and Vladimir Putin as well - normally I'd be all
![]()
but THERE'S A PUPPY!
![]()
![]()
Puppies make even pseudo-dictators look tame!

by Constaniana » Thu May 02, 2013 1:51 pm
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.

by Greenvul » Thu May 02, 2013 2:10 pm

by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu May 02, 2013 2:26 pm

by Central Slavia » Thu May 02, 2013 4:20 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]

by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu May 02, 2013 4:42 pm

by Vetalia » Thu May 02, 2013 4:48 pm

by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu May 02, 2013 4:56 pm
Vetalia wrote:Nikita Khrushchev, for his efforts to remedy the purges, gulags and tyranny of the Stalin era, tentative reforms in the arts and culture, and for presiding over one of the longest-lasting and most genuine periods of prosperity in modern Russian history. While he certainly had plenty of faults and misguided policies, the 1950's in the USSR were a genuinely prosperous time that massively increased the standard of living for the bulk of the population, advanced Soviet science to heights rivaling or even surpassing those of the west and which created substantial optimism for the future.

by Vetalia » Thu May 02, 2013 5:07 pm
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:He could be a bit of a dope on certain matters, though.
Like his brilliant plans for agriculture in central Asia.
"Cotton and wheat won't grow in arid steppe? Then we will drain the Aral Sea!"
The Soviet Union: Punching Mother Nature in the Face Since 1922

by TaQud » Thu May 02, 2013 5:09 pm

by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu May 02, 2013 5:12 pm
by Ainin » Thu May 02, 2013 5:27 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bift Valam, El Lazaro, Elwher, Fahran, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, Josip Boobtitten, Lemurians, Necroghastia, Norse Inuit Union, Ostroeuropa, Pangurstan, Pizza Friday Forever91, Saiwana, Shidei, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, Uiiop, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement