Beldonia wrote:Peter the Great. He was great!
He's a terrific cricket player anyway.
Advertisement
by Yellow Zone 20-A » Fri May 03, 2013 2:30 am
by CTALNH » Fri May 03, 2013 2:32 am
by Toiracsi Saduj » Fri May 03, 2013 2:32 am
by Romberg » Fri May 03, 2013 2:35 am
by New Freedomstan » Fri May 03, 2013 2:37 am
Romberg wrote:... the dog?
by Mike the Progressive » Fri May 03, 2013 2:39 am
by Shofercia » Fri May 03, 2013 2:42 am
by Yorkopolis » Fri May 03, 2013 2:47 am
Vetalia wrote:Nikita Khrushchev, for his efforts to remedy the purges, gulags and tyranny of the Stalin era, tentative reforms in the arts and culture, and for presiding over one of the longest-lasting and most genuine periods of prosperity in modern Russian history. While he certainly had plenty of faults and misguided policies, the 1950's in the USSR were a genuinely prosperous time that massively increased the standard of living for the bulk of the population, advanced Soviet science to heights rivaling or even surpassing those of the west and which created substantial optimism for the future.
by The Democratic Republic of Davida » Fri May 03, 2013 2:51 am
by Pope Joan » Fri May 03, 2013 2:53 am
The Democratic Republic of Davida wrote:Catherine the Great? Don't know all that much about her really. Seems like she did pretty well.
by Risottia » Fri May 03, 2013 6:11 am
Shofercia wrote:Risottia wrote:Dunno... not getting owned by a rebellion is the mark of a great politician, though.
Yup but Russia needed peace immediately. Brest-Litovsk was the better one could get realistically in a reasonably short time.
Also a healthy dose of realism is needed. As usual, the problem is striking a working balance.
True, but War Communism should've ended months earlier. It was a temporary shock-therapy solution. Lenin overextended it.
In terms of peace, I would've just withdrawn my armies a bit back, and created a new trench system. WWI was trench warfare, where the offensives and counteroffensives were brutal. Setting up defensive positions and constantly retreating, even in 1917, would've cost Germany a lot of lives, and they still had France and GB to deal with.
While, I agree about the dose of realism, we both know that there was more to it than that. Lenin didn't want any countries to have borders, that's part of why he agreed to Brest-Litovsk, thinking that USSR will get all of it back, so I wouldn't say that Lenin's vision was realistic.
by The Nuclear Fist » Fri May 03, 2013 6:12 am
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
by Khodoristan » Fri May 03, 2013 6:14 am
by West Macedonia » Fri May 03, 2013 6:14 am
by Tovarishchestvo » Fri May 03, 2013 6:24 am
by Petrovsegratsk » Fri May 03, 2013 6:46 am
GraySoap wrote:Petrovsegratsk wrote:Anyone who spells 'Viktor' as the Western version, 'Victor', doesn't deserve to speak on a Russian-related thread.
Begone, tovarisch!
Speak English or die.
Yandere Schoolgirls wrote:Capitalism is the most moral and effective system for bringing wealth to countries that man has ever devised or known
Hippostania wrote:I live in the second largest metropolitan area in the country (with a grand population of 300,000 :p) and as a lifelong city dweller, I have no skills to survive in the wild whatsoever. To put it mildly, I'd be royally fucked.
The Ben Boys wrote:They are so cute. It's like a toddler trying to wrestle a bear, except the toddler is retarded, doesn't have any teeth, and poops way too much.
by Romberg » Fri May 03, 2013 7:11 am
Khodoristan wrote:Eduard Khil.
by Libertarian California » Fri May 03, 2013 7:14 am
by Libertarian California » Fri May 03, 2013 7:17 am
The Marxist State wrote:My assessment of the EROB video is as follows.
1. Lenin (speaks 100% true in the battle)
2. Putin
3. Stalin/Rasputin tie
4. Gorbachev (he loses points for entering on a terrible pun)
by Shofercia » Fri May 03, 2013 12:29 pm
Libertarian California wrote:The Marxist State wrote:My assessment of the EROB video is as follows.
1. Lenin (speaks 100% true in the battle)
2. Putin
3. Stalin/Rasputin tie
4. Gorbachev (he loses points for entering on a terrible pun)
Nah. Gorby kicked their asses with his sick beat, and being the only one who at least somewhat favored democracy.
Risottia wrote:Shofercia wrote:
True, but War Communism should've ended months earlier. It was a temporary shock-therapy solution. Lenin overextended it.
In terms of peace, I would've just withdrawn my armies a bit back, and created a new trench system. WWI was trench warfare, where the offensives and counteroffensives were brutal. Setting up defensive positions and constantly retreating, even in 1917, would've cost Germany a lot of lives, and they still had France and GB to deal with.
While, I agree about the dose of realism, we both know that there was more to it than that. Lenin didn't want any countries to have borders, that's part of why he agreed to Brest-Litovsk, thinking that USSR will get all of it back, so I wouldn't say that Lenin's vision was realistic.
Well, 30 years later...
by Heavenly Peace » Fri May 03, 2013 12:51 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Eahland, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Ineva, Keltionialang, New Rubberduckia, Pale Dawn, Plan Neonie, Prion-Cirus Imperium, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic
Advertisement