NSG often is this forum's rough and rowdy kindergarten, so your statement makes all kinds of sense.
Advertisement

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:29 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Norstal » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:30 am
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Normandium » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:30 am

by Choronzon » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:30 am
Cosara wrote:The Ignore List is really making this forum a more peaceful place.

by Agymnum » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:31 am
Greater Pokarnia wrote:Agymnum wrote:
You too? My class had idiots who thought we literally evolved from gorillas and pestered me as to why gorillas don't transform into humans right before our eyes.
Like this is fucking Beauty and the Beast or some shit. Unbelievable.
I actually managed to convince somebody in my class that didn't believe the theory of evolution that it was true. Felt pretty good.

by Middleton St George » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:31 am

by Normandium » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:31 am
Choronzon wrote:Cosara wrote:The Ignore List is really making this forum a more peaceful place.
So, is this why you hold such stupid positions born of total ignorance? Because every time someone explains to you that a scientific theory is different from a layman's theory or how Creationism has no evidence while Evolution has a ton you go "LALALALALALALA CANT HERE YOU"?

by Agymnum » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:32 am

by Samuraikoku » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:33 am
Nidaria wrote:In Mexico, a vicious anti-Catholic persecution took place. Since then the country has been plagued with crime and disorder.
Nidaria wrote:Bolivia, Paraguay, and Argentina (just to list a few Latin American countries) underwent a Liberal revolution, then suffered from oppressive governments, bandits, and economic decline. After Garcia Moreno was assassinated in Ecuador, disorder and economic decline plagued the country and it never became a major power again.

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:34 am
Normandium wrote:Choronzon wrote:So, is this why you hold such stupid positions born of total ignorance? Because every time someone explains to you that a scientific theory is different from a layman's theory or how Creationism has no evidence while Evolution has a ton you go "LALALALALALALA CANT HERE YOU"?
He must've been great fun in science class.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Norstal » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:34 am
Samuraikoku wrote:Nidaria wrote:In Mexico, a vicious anti-Catholic persecution took place. Since then the country has been plagued with crime and disorder.
So you're telling me that Plutarco Elías Calles, a president in the mid 1920s, is still responsible for Mexico's situation today?Nidaria wrote:Bolivia, Paraguay, and Argentina (just to list a few Latin American countries) underwent a Liberal revolution, then suffered from oppressive governments, bandits, and economic decline. After Garcia Moreno was assassinated in Ecuador, disorder and economic decline plagued the country and it never became a major power again.
Source on Argentina, please. I'm not seeing the Liberal revolution, and I'm not seeing any Christianity-related woes.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Antic Master Fegelein » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:36 am
Norstal wrote:Samuraikoku wrote:
So you're telling me that Plutarco Elías Calles, a president in the mid 1920s, is still responsible for Mexico's situation today?
Source on Argentina, please. I'm not seeing the Liberal revolution, and I'm not seeing any Christianity-related woes.
Nidaria is a conservative American. Which mean that anything not reactionary or regressive, is liberal.
Hell, if your country is not an absolute monarchy whose powers are derived from God, your country is a liberal hellhole.
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Yes, you're to blame. For everything.

by Greater Pokarnia » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:36 am
Agymnum wrote:Greater Pokarnia wrote:
I actually managed to convince somebody in my class that didn't believe the theory of evolution that it was true. Felt pretty good.
I convinced quite a few people in both biology class (evolutionary theory) and English class (atheism). Never got a following in democratic socialism, though my teacher was a maniac leftist (to the point where he almost got fired for talking shit about the US during AP US history class).

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:36 am
Norstal wrote:Nidaria is a conservative American. Which mean that anything not reactionary or regressive, is liberal.
Hell, if your country is not an absolute monarchy whose powers are derived from God, your country is a liberal hellhole.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Nihilistic Cosmopolitan-Fascist States » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:36 am
Screensaver wrote:Conservatism does more evil than good in society and government. Conservatism is ultimately the main reason that the United States is perhaps one the least developed and most socially backward first countries. Conservatism is the reason the U.S. economy is in a recession and dragged so many other economies down with it and it is the reason that the U.S. is lags behind so many other countries in regards to women's rights, secular rights, and lgbt rights. Conservatism is also the reason that the U.S. is the only first world country without universal healthcare. True patriotism is wanting what is best for your country and the fact is that conservatism is the main reason that the United States is a failure compared to most other first world countries. After World War 2 Germany passed laws that were aimed at destroying National Socialism to prevent it from rising again. Should this be done against Conservatism in the United States? If the Republican Party was banned then the United States would see a lot of economic and social progress so it would be for the greater good in my opinion.

by Romneyerica » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:37 am
Screensaver wrote:Conservatism does more evil than good in society and government. Conservatism is ultimately the main reason that the United States is perhaps one the least developed and most socially backward first countries. Conservatism is the reason the U.S. economy is in a recession and dragged so many other economies down with it and it is the reason that the U.S. is lags behind so many other countries in regards to women's rights, secular rights, and lgbt rights. Conservatism is also the reason that the U.S. is the only first world country without universal healthcare. True patriotism is wanting what is best for your country and the fact is that conservatism is the main reason that the United States is a failure compared to most other first world countries. After World War 2 Germany passed laws that were aimed at destroying National Socialism to prevent it from rising again. Should this be done against Conservatism in the United States? If the Republican Party was banned then the United States would see a lot of economic and social progress so it would be for the greater good in my opinion.

by Agymnum » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:37 am
Antic Master Fegelein wrote:Norstal wrote:Nidaria is a conservative American. Which mean that anything not reactionary or regressive, is liberal.
Hell, if your country is not an absolute monarchy whose powers are derived from God, your country is a liberal hellhole.
so.....everywhere except the middle east?
like saudi arabia and bahrain?

by Samuraikoku » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:38 am
Norstal wrote:Nidaria is a conservative American. Which mean that anything not reactionary or regressive, is liberal.
Hell, if your country is not an absolute monarchy whose powers are derived from God, your country is a liberal hellhole.

by Norstal » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:38 am
Antic Master Fegelein wrote:Norstal wrote:Nidaria is a conservative American. Which mean that anything not reactionary or regressive, is liberal.
Hell, if your country is not an absolute monarchy whose powers are derived from God, your country is a liberal hellhole.
so.....everywhere except the middle east?
like saudi arabia and bahrain?
Hurdegaryp wrote:Is that how it works? But what if your liberal hellhole also is a monarchy, as is the case with many European countries?

Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:39 am
Antic Master Fegelein wrote:Norstal wrote:Nidaria is a conservative American. Which mean that anything not reactionary or regressive, is liberal.
Hell, if your country is not an absolute monarchy whose powers are derived from God, your country is a liberal hellhole.
so.....everywhere except the middle east?
like saudi arabia and bahrain?

by Hurdegaryp » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:39 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Antic Master Fegelein » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:40 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Yes, you're to blame. For everything.

by Freiheit Reich » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:41 am
Mavorpen wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:
Definition 1, 2B, and possibly 2A.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialismDefinition of SOCIALISM
1
: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2
a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property
b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3
: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
So basically it isn't socialist.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Empire of Donner land, Gun Manufacturers, I always choose the longest answer
Advertisement