Individuality-ness wrote:Agymnum wrote:I get what he's saying (I love Oswalt, by the way, almost as much as Carlin), but my main opposition to religion is in the modern era.
I mean, if religion was completely useless forever and ever, then it would've never been invented. It's like a square wheel - why invent something that doesn't improve your quality of life?
My point is that religion in the modern era is like a chariot racing around on a highway alongside Chevy's and Toyota's and Benz's. It's just not right, not today when we have sufficiently evolved both scientifically and culturally to be able to rise above it.
Just because we ourselves don't need religion doesn't mean that no one else does. Even if we're all driving flying cars and living on Mars, people are still going to wonder what is their purpose in the world. Some of us are going to conclude "we have no defined purpose", others "I need to define my own", and still others will look towards divine reasons. As long as a religion doesn't inhibit scientific progress or deny others civil rights, there's no problems with having one.
Well said.